Don’t miss Chesler’s review of the HBO documentary Love Crimes of Kabul, in which many women end up in a prison there. Oppressed by Sharia law and men who pardon themselves of every crime imaginable by blaming on the woman.
Forced, arranged marriage is a heartbreaking and soul-crushing Islamic reality. Yes, I know: tribal concepts of family honor and Arab desert customs take pride in the fact that they are able to break each individual’s will in the service of the larger good of the family, the clan, the most brutal patriarch, the historical past, and ultimately Allah himself.
Nevertheless, marrying a ten-year-old to her thirty-year-old, illiterate first cousin or to a man old enough to be her grandfather and who already has two wives and grown sons is barbaric and inhuman. Forcing a girl or a boy to marry someone against their will and preventing them from marrying the person of their choice is a crime against the heart. Often, such arranged marriages (and almost all marriages are arranged) include normalized wife-and daughter-in-law beating. The few shelters and jails for battered women and for the intended victims of honor killings in the Muslim world are filled with such stories.
….These women say that in their family “people speak with knives.” Alia is clear that if she is ever released from prison, her family will “quietly drown” her.
That some Religion of Women’s rights you have there….
Another woman took things into her own hands when she became tired of her husband’s behaviuor.
Courtesy of Amnesty International and Frontline/PBS, everyone now knows about the “dancing boys” of Afghanistan and about the Taliban and Kandahari penchant for young boys, who are often orphans, always poor boys, who are taught to dress and dance like women and with whom the older, dominant man has both anal and oral sex. There is no question that sodomy is a “happening” thing in Afghanistan.
Back to the Badum Bagh prison: One woman on camera admits that she finally killed her husband. Naseema is 45 years old and has no regrets. “Men like my husband should all be murdered. He had sex with boys and other women and with a seven year old girl. I did the world some good. But it’s considered a crime. I have no pain or remorse. I’m glad.”
What you mean he was Gay? Yup she’s saying exactly that.
Thanks to The Jawa Report at: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/
Thanks to The People’s Cube at: http://thepeoplescube.com/
Thanks to Theo Spark at: http://www.theospark.net/
Where is the outrage from the worldwide Christian community? I could fill hundreds of pages with stories of muslims burning down churches and killing Christians. Here is a very small sample of recent incidents of Christian persecution taking place on a regular basis in countries with majority muslim populations.
Muslims on Saturday (July 30) burned down a church building on Zanzibar island off the coast of Tanzania, church leaders said, just three days after another congregation’s facility on the island was reduced to ashes.
Live Leak – Another Zanzibar church burning – another pre-Ramadan gesture of Interfaith Dialogue™ to the tiny Christian population of this Tanzanian island outpost. In Fuoni on the south coast of Zanzibar (known locally as Unguja), Islamic extremists torched the building of the Evangelical Assemblies of God-Tanzania (EAGT) at around 2 p.m., said Pastor Leonard Massasa, who oversees Zanzibar’s EAGT churches. The assailants were shouting, “Away with the church – we do not want infidels to spoil our community, especially our children,” Pastor Massasa said.
On neighboring Pemba island, suspected Muslim extremists in Konde on June 17 razed a Seventh-day Adventist Church building, a witness said.
“We don’t want churches on our street. Today we are going to burn the church, and if you continue we are going to burn your house also,” Note posted to the donor of a plot for a church building in Zanzibar. As if a 97% Muslim majority was not enough, the local population and government (taking a cue from how they do it in other Muslim countries) is, through this latest Zanzibar church burning incident, seeing to it that Islam is the only way on Tanzania’s Pemba and Unguja Islands.
The latest Zanzibar church burning isn’t an isolated initiative. Other places of Christian worship have been torched recently and only days ago, Muslims started work on building a hotel directly on a Anglican cemetery they had siezed.
The real ethnic cleansing in Kosovo is being carried out by muslims who are trying to drive out/kill all the Serbian Christians who remain there and burn down and destroy their churches.
In order to terrorise the remaining Christian Serbs to leave their homeland of Kosovo, Albanian muslims burned down more then 40 monasteries and churches some over 1000 years old. This was done in the front of NATO and all the charities of the world who came to Kosovo to create a multiethnic society.
In Pakistan, muslims regularly target churches and Christians.
Asia News – On March 25, a mob of Islamic extremists attacked a Pentecostal church in Hyderabad, killing two Christians and burning some copies of the Bible. Eyewitnesses said that the fundamentalists stormed the place of worship looking to set it on fire, but a group of believers defended the church.
Security forces have fled the scene, leaving those present at the mercy of the crowd. The attackers hurled anti-Christian slogans and a feeling of anger toward the religious minority has spread. in the city The pastor of the church reports that “despite the condemnation of the burning of the Koran” the community “has come under attack because they think that we are linked to the Americans.” “What fault did those two innocent people have – he ends – who were not Americans, but only Pakistani Christians?”.
In a second incident, the Full Gospel Assembly Church, in the Badami Bagh area of Lahore, was attacked. Again fundamentalists burned the church, threw copies of the Bible into the street and accused the Christians of blasphemy, claiming they found pieces of the Koran, not far from the church.
Muslims burn down 60 churches in Ethiopia.
Persecution – Beginning on March 2nd in an Islamic area of Ethiopia, Muslims went on a rampage beginning with an assault on the church in Asendabo.
ICC and others alerted the world and called on the Ethiopian government to intervene. Sadly, they could not or would not stop the Muslim attacks. After a week, when the smoke cleared, the damage was evident. The Muslims had burned down the homes of 30 Christian leaders, they had killed one Christian, wounded several others, and burned down 69 churches, a Bible school, and a Christian orphanage.
The violence has displaced more than 10,000 Ethiopian Christians – leaving the churches in the area scrambling to provide basic necessities for the persecuted.
The ‘NEW’ Egypt: Muslims burn down church, then kill protesters.
News Real – Why were the Christians protesting? Recently, in the village of Sole, just outside of Cairo, local Muslims decided they now had the freedom to burn down the town’s Coptic church. Without a strong Mubarak police force, they had nothing and no one stopping them. After torching the sacred place, the Muslims promised to build a mosque on that very spot.
Thousands of Coptic Christians protested in front of the state-ran television building in Cairo. They carried large wooden crosses and hoped to get the media’s attention of the burning down of their church (the Church of the Two Martyrs). Sadly, soon after, many of the protesters became martyrs. We were staging a peaceful demonstration for the church, but they attacked us with firearms, stones and Molotov cocktails. -Samia, a Christian protester.
The tanks made way for the thugs to come in. There was shooting until two o’clock in the morning. After that they burnt the houses and stole from them. They broke whatever they could not carry away. No fire engines or ambulances came. We had to take the injured to hospital in garbage trucks.
Muslim Mobs burn down 288 churches, kill hundreds in Nigeria.
Persecution – On April 18, Kenneth Ngeumpa was eating his breakfast and getting ready to go to work in the metropolitan city of Kaduna when violence broke out. He watched in terror as a Muslim mob led by his neighbor approached his home shooting and calling for murder of his family. Ngeumpa and 12 members of his family narrowly escaped from the attackers by fleeing through the back door of their home before the mob set the house on fire, burning their entire property to the ground.
Ngeumpa was lucky to escape with his life. Many other Christians were not so lucky. Muslim attackers have killed hundreds in the attacks that began on April 18. ICC source travelled to the towns of Zonkwa and Kafanchan in Kaduna, where more than 300 people, mostly Christians, were massacred. It is impossible to know the exact number of victims because the Nigerian officials quickly conducted a mass burial of the victims in order to prevent any revenge attacks and cool down the crisis. The Muslim attackers also burned down 288 churches and several Christian homes.”
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/
A federal judge refused to let a Muslim file a third amended complaint that claims a Christian church in Florida violated the First Amendment with its ultimately successful, highly publicized attempts to burn the quran last year.
Courthouse News Though Terry Jones’ Dove World Outreach Center did not burn the Muslim holy book on the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as it planned , the church ultimately set fire to the book in April 2011 after finding it guilty of having caused “murder, rape and terrorism” in a mock trial.
Syed Mohammed Iqtidar Haider, a Muslim, filed for an injunction against the Rev. Terry D. Jones, who publicized a Quran book burning on Sept. 11, 2010, at his church, the Dove Church Outreach Center. The motion was denied the day it was filed because Haider neither served the motion on Jones nor filed an affidavit as required. After attracting international criticism for his demonstration, Jones ultimately canceled the event .
By March, however, Jones announced plans to judge the Quran in a mock March 2011 trial. Signs outside of the Dove Church read: “Burn it. Drown it. Shred it. Shoot it.”
Haider filed a second amended complaint, which was again dismissed because it not state a cause for relief. It also exceeded the maximum page limit and was not filed on the standard complaint form.
Jones announced that his church found the Quran guilty of murder, rape and terrorism, and that his church subsequently burned it.
In April 2011, Haider moved to file a third amended complaint, claiming Jones violated his First Amendment rights by all the aforementioned actions and others, including posting a sign at Dove Church in July 2009 that read “Islam is of the Devil.” Haider also challenged the church’s July 2010 protest at the Islamic Center of Gainesville in which Dove congregants wore shirts saying “Islam is of the Devil” and carried signs that related Islam to terrorism. Haider said Jones’ propaganda caused the deaths of two people and injured four others during Afghanistan protests.
Haider sought to have the city manager, sheriff, police chief and fire chief of Gainesville release any records they have on the Dove Church. He also sought a hearing at which he could “explain the First Amendment in the light of the verses of Qur’an”.
Haider went on to say that if the court accepted his explanation of the First Amendment, he wanted to submit additional claims for relief. U.S. District Judge Gary Jones in Gainesville rejected the motion on July 15.
“Plaintiff’s complaint falls squarely within the definition of frivolous,” Jones wrote. “Plaintiff appears to allege not that his own First Amendment rights were violated, but that Jones, in the course of exercising his First Amendment rights, expressed himself in ways that plaintiff contends are outside the scope of First Amendment protection. The First Amendment grants rights and cannot be invoked by a private citizen to curtail speech he finds disagreeable.”
“Because the flaws in plaintiff’s complaints are so numerous and so fundamental, the court concludes that granting plaintiff a further opportunity to amend would be futile and would simply be a further waste of scarce and valuable judicial resources,” Jones concluded.
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/
10 Ugly Comments By 10 Uglier Women
1. Janeane Garofalo
“Our country is founded on a sham: our forefathers were slave-owning rich white guys who wanted it their way. So when I see the American flag, I go, ‘Oh my God, you’re insulting me.’ That you can have a gay parade on Christopher Street in New York, with naked men and women on a float cheering, ‘We’re here, we’re queer!’ — that’s what makes my heart swell. Not the flag, but a gay naked man or woman burning the flag. I get choked up with pride.”
2. Rosie O’Donnell
“Wait just one second. Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.”
3. Barbara Streisand
“Bush’s actions remind me of Herman Goering’s quote during the Nuremberg Trials, where he stated: ‘…it’s always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it’s a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.’”
4. Helen Thomas
“Remember these people are occupied and it’s their land,” Thomas says in the video. “It’s not German and it’s not Polish.”
Asked what Jews in Israel should do, Thomas says “go home.” Asked where that home is, she replies: “Poland. Germany. And America and everywhere else.”
5. Hillary Clinton
“I have to confess that it’s crossed my mind that you could not be a Republican and a Christian.”
Source: Richmond Times-Dispatch, 1997
6. Whoopi Goldberg
“I know it wasn’t rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.” — Whoopi Goldberg on Roman Polanski’s rape of a 13 year-old girl
7. Sandra Bernhard
…if Palin ever visited New York, she would be “gang-raped by my big black brothers.”
8. Wanda Sykes
“(Rush Limbaugh) just wants the country to fail. To me that’s treason. He’s not saying anything different than what Osama Bin Laden is saying. You might want to look into this, sir, because I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight. … Rush Limbaugh, I hope the country fails, I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?”
Source: Washington Monthly
9. Cindy Sheehan
“You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine and you’ll stop the terrorism.”
10. Roseanne Barr
“Many of the Palestinian people are jewish and became christian after Israel stole their land and homes. They were dark skinned, and so driven out of their homes by a cheney-ized Judeo Christian Bushite America. the jewish american socialists are sending a flotilla from america to break the blockade of the anti-semitic zionists in Gaza! Zionists are German. weird hybrid. In order to defeat euro socialism, Hitler leveraged the rich jewish industrialists against the working class jews. The Russian accounts say that the last trains to Auschwitz were first class, as that is all the leverage left to the jewish oligarchs within the ‘reich’, (other than the jews like Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler at the top). The scientists of the Reich successfully created a mutant human–a hybrid of Jewish mentality and German Resolve, the Zionist– He who broke the back of the labor movements and socialism,— which is the goal of National Socialism—(different word for the American Southern Confederacy-the one Anne Coulter loves).”
Thanks to I Hate The Media at:
via Moonbattery at: http://moonbattery.com/
By George Neumayr on 8.4.11 @ 6:08AM
In 2009, the Obama administration dropped the phrase “the war on terror,” revealing a reluctance on its part to call terrorists “terrorists.” The liberal establishment shows no such reluctance when describing Tea Partiers. “[T]hese Tea Party guys are, like, strapped with dynamite,” said former Obama administration official Steven Rattner. New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman calls them the “Hezbollah faction” of the GOP.
Others described them as muggers, carjackers, jihadists, suicide bombers, and hostage takers. The only pause in this stream of invective came when these critics of the Tea Party welcomed Gabby Giffords back to the House of Representatives. The inimitable Joe Biden, who had agreed with these descriptions of the Tea Party earlier in the day, reminded Giffords of his “two craniotomies” and declared them “both members of the cracked head club.” Perhaps Biden offered other thoughtful words of comfort to Giffords but those weren’t recorded.
No sooner had the pleasantries with Giffords ended than liberals resumed their attacks on the Tea Party. The ferocity of the criticism, were it directed toward any other group, would probably lead liberals to call for a new hate crime category. Just last week, the Eugene Robinsons of the press were blaming the Norway shootings in part on what they see as the intemperate rhetoric of the right about militant Islam.
They saw no irony in savaging the Tea Party, amidst misty-eyed tributes to Giffords, because civility for them is not a moral concept but an ideological one. “Civility” is synonymous with the advancement of liberalism, so nothing they could possibly say about Tea Partiers, no matter how nasty, conflicts with it. On the other hand, Tea Partiers, according to this logic, are inherently uncivil for refusing to argue within the narrow parameters of debate set up by the establishment.
To Read the rest of this article go to The American Spectator at:
The American Animal Farm
George Orwell wrote his famous Animal Farm allegory about the corrupting potential of socialism in 1943. The novel was not published for two years because the liberal Bloomsbury establishment did not want to offend the new Labour Party majority in London or Stalinist allies in Moscow. After WWII, Orwell defended his fable, saying that his intention was to illustrate how easily otherwise intelligent people could be “misled by propaganda in a democracy.”
Political ideology in America has devolved to forms that would make Orwell cringe today: socialists (née Marxists) and democratic socialists (née Keynesians). The former views government as an all-purpose solution and the latter views government as a “stimulator,” a kind of economic and social Wizard of Oz. The two are more alike than they are different. The fatal flaw of both is the chronic inability of voters and their elected representatives to distinguish between wants and needs. Elections are now confused with democracy, and the majority seldom votes for the common good — or their own best interests.
Neither debt nor deficits are national security crises. Both are just two symptoms of civic decline, a bloodless coup in slow motion. The end may come slowly or catastrophically, but collapse seems inevitable. And the solution isn’t Democrats or Republicans; both parties are now “democratic” in name only. Neither major party represents the will nor the best interests of the people.
Before the turn of the 21st century, Francis Fukuyama wrote a provocative essay for National Interest where he argued that the fall of the Soviet Union represented the “end of (authoritarian) history” as we knew it and a triumph of “liberal democracy.” Fukuyama didn’t have much to say about the advent of totalitarian Islamism or the spread of virulent socialism in the West. Indeed, Frank might have been more candid had he called the 20th century a triumph of “social,” not liberal, democracy. Fascists and old-school Communists may be gone, but socialism has metastasized in every Western democracy under the tutelage of “progressives.”
Socialism, with the able assistance of Islamism, is now poised to do to Europe, the British Commonwealth, and America what Nazis, Fascists, and Communists could not. The threat from social democrats may be more subtle than the naked aggression of Islamists, but the endgame might be the same. The illusions of socialism and the worst instincts of democracy are now joined in a death spiral.
The fatal flaws of social democracy include but are not limited to promises that cannot possibly be kept; outlays that might always exceed income; the necessity for Orwellian mendacity; the absence of all moral hazards; and ultimately, a terminal erosion of the electoral process and democracy itself.
Social democracy is a kind of piñata politics, a system where special interests seek like-minded politicians who will cater to a host of creative dependencies. Few distinctions are made between real needs and simple cupidity. Once established, most federal programs quickly outlive their usefulness. Results become immaterial.
Once funded, the legislature might be lobbied by bureaucrats from within and beneficiaries from without. Social democracy is a perpetual motion machine where the prime function of government is spare parts — spare parts for itself. Mission statements for most social agencies are adorned with adjectival admonitions like “better” or “improved,” yet few if any measures of effectiveness are ever established or enforced. The “wars” on poverty, illiteracy, drugs, and terrorism and their associated federal departments are all examples of dismal, yet expensive failures. The only function that most federal agencies do well is write checks — checks against funds which must be borrowed from folks that may not have our best interests at heart.
The liberal or progressive proposal for solving the deficit/debt dilemma is “more of the same”: tax and spend. The strategy is aptly defined as “leading from behind.” Four in ten spending dollars must be borrowed today to keep America afloat. Paul Krugman tells us we must spend now, cut later. Later, unfortunately, never comes.
For the first time in history, the specter of sovereign default stalks the wealthiest nation on Earth. The wealthiest was also, heretofore, the most successful democracy. Democratic capitalism, once thought to be the engine of post-agrarian American success, has been undone by a socialist revolution without guns.
Debt and deficit, or double-”D” economics, assumes that growth and proportionate tax receipts will always compensate for imprudent spending. Like Fitzgerald’s green light, this elusive future is always visible but never near. Spending your way out of debt is an oxymoron, a kind of logic that thrives only among civic knaves, politicians, and public employees. No prudent banker will raise the credit limit for an insolvent cardholder. Assumptions about ever-growing revenues are similar to public employee expectations about pay and raises. Apparatchiks and dependents see the public trough as a bottomless pit.
In a rare bit of candor, journalists have christened European insolvents as “PIIGS” (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain). The acronym does not yet include America, but well it might. Some pigs are more equal than others. The Yankee boar, like Orwell’s Napoleon, has the power to wreck the international barnyard.
The proper Orwellian state requires a language of euphemisms. Discretionary and non-discretionary spending are two of the best. The latter term is designed to protect sacred cows — as if any spending is ever “mandatory.” Taxes are never taxes; words like “investments,” investments that never pay, mask the pain. Keynesian deficit spending masquerades as “stimulus.” If a stimulus package doesn’t work, clearly it wasn’t big enough. A corruption of language is necessary for any successful fraud. Mendacity is a standard kit for grifters and social democrats.
The most egregious deception turns rhetoric and logic on their heads. Those who argue that spending should not exceed income are libeled as immature, radical, insensitive, and dangerous. Those who would end the spending bender are labeled as right-wing “nuts.” Somehow a balanced budget threatens the future, full faith, and credit of America. In the bizarre world of social democracy, all facts and logic are subverted by compulsive spending and fiscal deficit disorders. Blaming the thrifty for impending default is a little like blaming fire on the alarm.
There are no moral hazards in the world of social democrats. Indeed, government is not required to produce goods, nor does it necessarily deliver services. In spite of decades of Keynesian stimulus, government at all levels has become a net consumer, not a creator of wealth. And most programs and departments are vampires, they cannot be killed. Failure always looms, yet there are no penalties for poor performance. No-fault politics is a value that crosses party lines. Of 15 cabinet departments, six have been in default for decades. All are immune to reform or the axe.
Consider just three: Defense, Welfare, and Education. America has waged a host of wars since WWII. Few have been unambiguous successes. Indeed, among four ongoing wars in the Muslim world, the word “victory” is the most notable casualty. At home, two cabinet departments now service the welfare state. Even progressives argue that misguided federal largess has created a host of pathologies and dependencies that never existed before the advent of the “nanny” state. And American education is a domestic and international joke. The technology sector, that is supposed to be America’s economic salvation, must go abroad to India and China to find qualified employees.
In the 18th century, the founding fathers restricted the voting franchise to the landed gentry. The idea was to restrict governance to the successful and accomplished citizens. If nothing else, successful and enterprising men were thought to serve as role models. No one anticipated a 20th-century oligarchy of venal lawyer/politicians without term limits.
Like the wise men of 5th-century Athens, early American political philosophers were aware that even a representative republic could be hijacked — where cupidity and self-interest could thrive at the expense of the common good. It’s no accident that the word “democracy” does not appear in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution.
The original vision of an entrepreneurial, capitalist republic has devolved now to a social democratic nightmare where government programs actually suffocate initiative and enterprise. Literal, and figurative, industry is now vilified from the Oval Office. At the local level, especially in urban areas, social democrats thrive in dysfunctional, one-party towns. These urban blights cannot afford incompetence, even; it must be subsidized.
Fifty percent of the population pays no income taxes, but they do have the vote. This constituency has no skin in the game except, maybe, to collect a government check. There’s no incentive for fiscal prudence when deadbeats can be bought with other people’s money.
The American crisis was not created by reformers or conservatives. It was created by a bovine electorate and a porcine federal government — a horrible model that actually cultivates social pathologies for political purposes. More than four out of ten dollars spent by Washington must be borrowed to finance what now amounts to an American “Animal Farm.” Indeed, George! The pigs have taken over again. Napoleon and Squealer are back.
We The Stupid
I stand here in abject stupefaction. The so-called “right” or “Tea Party” in this republic is being so thoroughly rolled and defeated that I am struggling to come up with an adequate violent submission metaphor that does not involve prison rape . . . and they honesty think that they’re “winning.” Really? You call this winning?
- - Obama gets over $2 Trillion to spend before the 2012 election
- - There are no real spending cuts
- - There is a massive tax increase effective January 1, 2013
Obama is going to be handed something in excess of $2 Trillion — and he has made it perfectly clear that he will spend every penny of it before the November 2012 election. That’s why he kept saying, ” . . . so we don’t have to do this again”, meaning raise the debt ceiling again. The debt ceiling would only need to be raised if all of the money had been spent. Therefore, he has stated very clearly that he will spend every penny of any debt ceiling increase. He is going to burn through $2 Trillion-plus in the next sixteen months. This was the Obama regime’s plan from day one. Geithner appeared before Congress in early May and told them this in no uncertain terms. This outcome has been a known quantity all along.
There are no spending cuts in this plan. It is all accounting fraud. Saying that you are not going to spend money in Afghanistan ten years from now is not spending cuts. Even if you accept the $1 Trillion in cuts over ten years propaganda, that is only $100 Billion per year, which is essentially meaningless relative to the size of the problem. Furthermore, even a miniscule uptick in interest rates, which given the massive debasement of our currency is now a mathematical certainty, will completely consume that $100 Billion per year. It’s all a joke.
Back to the $2 Trillion that Obama is being handed. I honestly think that most people in this country have no understanding of simple counting numbers. Do you not understand how much a trillion is? Where do you think this money is going to come from — who has two trillion dollars to loan us? China? Nope. Not even close. China’s entire GDP is only $6 Trillion. Do you honestly think that China is going to loan us one third of their total annual economic production? China was a huge creditor to us back when $100 Billion was considered a staggeringly large amount of money – which was four years ago. Now $100 Billion is literally a rounding error. Do you realize that there are only a handful of nations of this planet that even have a GDP in excess of $2 Trillion? If these countries loaned us every penny of their GDP, it wouldn’t even be $2 Trillion:
Canada ($1.57 T)
India ($1.54 T)
Russia ($1.46 T)
Are you starting to understand the scope of what we are talking about now? Obama is going to embezzle considerably more than the entire economic output of Canada, India or Russia to his cronies before the 2012 election — and that is just counting this round of spending. This doesn’t include the other $5 Trillion he has already burned through since 2009.
China is not going to lend us this money because they simply don’t have anything close to that much money to lend. This $2 Trillion is going to come from the Federal Reserve. Where is the Federal Reserve going to get $2 Trillion? They are going to print it out of thin air. We are in the midst of the largest currency debasement ever seen in human history. There is only one result that can come of currency debasement: hyperinflation and total economic and societal collapse.
Have you also forgotten the so-called “Bush tax cuts”? Yeah. Those rates are going to expire on January 1, 2013. Obama will presumably still be occupying the Oval Office at that time assuming that he is not forcibly removed or that the Republic is still intact at that time. Taxes will increase significantly at that point, and the Congressional Budget Office has scored everything put before them given the fact of the massive tax increases on 1/1/2013. Do you understand that? When these Republicans and even these so-called “Tea Party Freshmen” tell you that there are no tax hikes in their “plan,” they are consciously, willfully, knowingly lying to you through their teeth.
Finally, I do not understand how it can possibly be that conservative writers are still addressing Obama as if he is actually trying to help the economy, but his well-intentioned policies are failing.
Obama is the enemy. Obama is a Marxist-Communist usurper and puppet front for a cabal of Marxist-Communists who are actively trying to destroy the United States of America. Everything they have done, are doing, and will do has the single goal of collapsing and destroying the U.S. economy, military, constitutional government and culture. What part of “Marxist Revolution” do you not understand?
The Obama regime is not a failure. The Obama regime is not incompetent. The Obama regime has achieved more in two and a half years than anyone could have possibly foreseen. It has debased the currency by 50% of the GDP and guaranteed that our economy will collapse. It has looted the Treasury for more than the size of a top-ten economy and embezzled that wealth into the hands of their fellow Marxists in preparation for the final collapse of the United States. It has ground the economy of the United States to a screeching halt. It has destabilized the entire Muslim world and ensured that there will be a nuclear war centered around Israel within the decade.
The Obama regime has no interest whatsoever in “stimulus” or “getting folks back to work.” How can you not understand this? How can we possibly win this war if we refuse to come to terms with the fact that we are in fact fighting a war.
God save the United States of America, because the people are far too stupid to do it themselves.
Ann Barnhardt is a livestock and grain commodity broker and marketing consultant, American patriot, traditional Catholic, and unwitting counter-revolutionary blogger. She can be reached through her business at www.barnhardt.biz.
GET YOUR LAZY ASS OFF THE COUCH AND PAY ATTENTION TO SOMETHING OTHER THAN YOURSELF.
A Nation Of Sheep Breeds A Government Of Wolves’ ~ By: David Ben Moshe
A NATION OF SHEEP BREEDS A GOVERNMENT OF WOLVES
By David Ben Moshe, formerly of the T.V. Show, QPTV (JTF.ORG) NYC
The government at all levels, but especially the federal government has been stepping on our toes for decades and the populace did nothing about it. By the 1930s the government of the people, by the people and for the people, was no more. Those in power were becoming ravenous wolves after realizing that the masses are so dumb, and so unconcerned with their government, that the government could stealthily ignore the confines of the Constitution and grow exponentially while usurping the power and rights of the states and the people.
So, they gave us Social Security and we did nothing. They gave us a department of housing and we did nothing. They gave us a department of labor and we did nothing. They gave us a department of commerce and we did nothing. They confiscated gold and we did nothing. They gave us a department of education and we did nothing. They gave us the EPA and OSHA and we did nothing. They removed a small daily prayer from the schools and we did nothing. They opened the borders to all of the savages and dumbbells of the third world and we did nothing. They let third world savages from Mexico flood in here, bypassing immigration and we did nothing. Those illegal Mexicans killed over 40,000 Americans and we did nothing. We began to lose our language and culture and we did nothing. They gave us Medicare and Medicaid causing medical bills to rise way passed the inflation rate and we did nothing. (Oh, it caused us to buy insurance to pay for the medical rate increases). They gave a new medical insurance plan, which will raise our costs so we can give medical care to illegals and we did nothing. They let industry move to Asia and we did nothing. They let companies merge and merge again, killing millions of American jobs and we did nothing. The government raises their own salaries at will, and have their own superior medical and retirement plans and we did nothing. They pay out far more than they take in and borrow monies from nations that aren’t too crazy about us and we did nothing.
Well, if you women are finished shopping and watching Oprah and you men are through watching football, eating pizza and spilling beer on your T-shirts and stop to look around, you just might notice that while you were only concerned with your own self indulgence, your nation has become an empty shell of what it once was. Not only do we make nothing here (and a nation that manufactures nothing IS nothing) but we owe trillions that we can’t ever hope to pay off and the government continues to pile up that debt knowing that we will do nothing. State governments such as Idaho are already selling land and mansions to China. The unconstitutional Federal Reserve continues to print money, thereby stealing from your savings, but do you care?
They have no fear that after all of their treasonous actions we wont be coming to off them. Hell, we wont even be coming to just throw them out. Most Americans are so oblivious to what has happened to them and their nation that they think that they will fix things in the next election. ITS TOO LATE FOR THE BALLOT BOX!!!! It will take a different kind of box that contains things that costs about 75 cents each and fly through the air very fast.
Oh forget it!! Go back to sleep. At least when you wake up and find that we are part of China, you will always have a place to have your clothes ironed.
Thanks to The Mad Jewess at: http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/
(I was going to comment on Joe Biden and his “terrorist” remarks but then I saw this from The Mad Jewess and I knew this was the “The perfect country and western song, so I felt obliged to put it on this album” (David Allen Coe) ZTW
Where is the PROOF of this allegation, you damned, OLD windbag sonofabitch? I am SICK of these people. The Tea Party is NOT a ‘terrorist’, which is why I refuse to join. Because… I DO want to beat the sh*t out of these FREAKS.
……… Its time for war. It is time to put these old, dirty, Romans with togas out to pasture. PAST TIME. I believe we need to sue Joe Biden. We need to sue that dirty, rotten, bastard and take everything he has. GO TO HELL Biden, you flake. IF I ever get a hold of you, Biden, I won’t even send you to hell, straightaway. I will send you to the psych-ward where you belong. We will give you E.S.T., and watch your tongue fall out of your mouth.
Thanks to The Mad Jewess at: http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/page/2/
Hatred, smears and the liberals hell-bent on bullying millions of us into silence
The baleful effects of the recent attacks in Norway, where Anders Breivik bombed Oslo’s government district and then gunned down teenagers at a Labour party camp, murdering at least 77 people, have not been limited to that horrific carnage.
For the atrocity has produced a reaction among people on the political Left in Britain, Europe and the U.S. that is in itself shocking and terrifying.
Former Norwegian prime minister and current chairman of the Nobel Peace Prize committee Thorbjorn Jagland has said that, in response to the violent attacks, David Cameron and other European leaders should use a more ‘cautious’ approach when talking about multiculturalism.
Cameron has said multiculturalism (the doctrine that gives the values of minorities equal status to those of the majority) has failed, and has also talked about ‘Islamist extremism’ as a cause of terrorism.
Jagland, however, said leaders would be ‘playing with fire’ if they continued to use rhetoric that could be exploited by extremists such as Breivik.
This is because Breivik’s so-called manifesto shows that he is violently against mass immigration, multiculturalism and Islamisation — and that he wants the forced repatriation of Muslims from Europe and the murder of all who have promoted multiculturalism.
But to connect such abhorrent ravings with Cameron’s comments is simply grotesque.
First and foremost, this is treating Breivik as if his words deserve to be taken seriously and at face value.
As of now, however, we don’t know whether Breivik is psychotic, a psychopath or under the influence of all the drugs he claims to have taken.
We also don’t know what part, if any, his political views actually played in this atrocity.
After all, since his target was his country’s Labour party one might just as well surmise that he was motivated by hatred of his father, who was a Labour party supporter and who was divorced from Breivik’s mother when the killer was a baby.
In any event, someone who travels to a teenagers’ summer camp and invites them all to gather round so that he can kill them all cannot be considered rational.
Yet the former Norwegian premier is treating Breivik as if he is a political terrorist whose words have the authority of a sane and coherent creed.
Even if he was motivated by hostility to multiculturalism and Islam, it is perverse to suggest that no one should write about these things because some deranged person raving about such ideas has run amok.
It’s a bit like saying no one should express concern about late abortions or animal cruelty because it leads straight to the firebombing of abortion clinics or animal-testing laboratories.
Multiculturalism and Islamic extremism raise entirely legitimate and very serious concerns about defending a culture from attack both from within and from without.
To Read the remainder of this article go to: The Daily Mail at -
Why It’s Time to Speak about God Again
By Jay Haug
America is living under an illusion: the idea that we can expunge God (broadly understood) from our national and public belief system and still operate a moral and accountable government.
C.S. Lewis summed up the problem in The Abolition of Man. ”We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful.” John Adams asserted, “Our Constitution was made for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Our founding fathers laid down a system that demanded conscientious, self-restrained implementation — a government dependent on the character of the people. Ben Franklin, perhaps the most deistic of the founding fathers, famously assured one curious bystander that the Constitutional Conventions had engendered “a Republic, if you can keep it.” How many people today truly understand that America’s health depends on the moral character of its citizens, of their personal “keeping” of our nation?
Many people in power have discovered that what Ivan Karamazov said is true: “If God is dead, all is permitted.” They recognize only too well that God has been removed from public life — and with Him, the attendant moral order. In their minds, there is no responsibility because there is no God. Morality, though not always agreed upon, has become a matter of opinion, easily dismissed.
How quaint the phrases of JFK appear to modern ears in his inaugural address: ”the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.” Unlike most of American history, religious utterances today are considered sectarian, even offensive. For the publicly disgraced, however, take a few years in jail or probation and a good lawyer, and they are home free. Americans forgive, and well they should, but who is left to pick up the pieces and contemplate the risk/reward of bad behavior?
When was the last time an American president prayed aloud in public? It was FDR at the moment of the D-Day invasion. According to preacher Andy Stanley, Americans stopped in traffic and got out of their cars, and major companies sent home their employees to pray for the invasion. Children stopped in school, all to pray. The truth is that for most of our history, Americans have believed that our nation is accountable to God for our behavior and prayed publicly for His guidance and forgiveness. Even when Abraham Lincoln asserted in his Second Inaugural that “[t]he Almighty has His own purposes,” intimating that they are not easily discerned, very few Americans doubted, as Lincoln asserted, that they are “true and righteous altogether.”
Only since prayer was banished from public schools in 1962 and a vocal minority began to consider it their right never to be present in a public place within earshot of a prayer was it that America decided to hang up on the voice of God in the public sphere. But this has not protected us from what Julia Ward Howe called “His terrible swift sword” — i.e., the consequences for our behavior. We are reaping the whirlwind even as we speak.
Many believe that religion should be confined to the private sphere. They want religion, in Francis Schaeffers’s words, “privately important, but publicly irrelevant.” But the truth is that public people living out public lives have always been subject to public oaths and understandings that invoke the name and sanction of God. According to historian David McCullough, George Washington added “so help me God” to the presidential oath, and it has stuck ever since. In the face of communism in the 1950s, Congress added “under God” to the pledge of allegiance and made “One Nation Under God” our national motto. Those who preceded us knew the wisdom of inculcating an understanding of God and the roots of conscience in all Americans — even in public schools. The “lowest common denominator” result of the 1962 school prayer decision was not only foolish constitutionally, but self-destructive nationally. Our public schools have never been the same since.
American history shows that two “Great Awakenings” presaged the two greatest crises in American history. John and Charles Wesley and George Whitfield preached through the entire thirteen colonies in the 1740s, preparing the next generation for the challenges and inculcating the self-control needed for revolutionary times. Charles Phinney, Lyman Beecher, and others led the 2nd Great Awakening that formed the backdrop for the Civil War, empowering in the aftermath a greater healing and reconciliation of the nation than might normally have occurred. When the Civil Rights movement reached its critical stage, Martin Luther King, Jr., a clergyman, appeared on government property and invoked both the Bible (the book of Amos) and our founding documents to declare racial prejudice wrong, telling Americans that racism fell short of both God’s laws and America’s founding vision. He knew where freedom came from, proclaiming, “Thank God Almighty, I’m free at last” as he strode from the Lincoln Memorial. Must God be turned to publicly only when America is shaken to the core, or when our values are seriously compromised? Are we not in that position right now?
America is in crisis. Unfortunately, since the 1960s, we have expunged the one Presence from our public life who can truly help us as He has in the past. In his book Who Are We?, Samuel Huntington tells us that America is different from every other nation in the following regard: throughout the world, the more impoverished a nation is, the more time its people spend in religious observance and activities. The only exception — the only one — is America. We are wealthy and we also spend much time in religious observance.
Huntington warns us that we have about fifteen years to preserve what he calls “our Protestant heritage.” Let’s expand that here to include the public presence of God, which can help to enliven the private consciences of all Americans.
What we must face is a simple fact. A morality unhinged from God is not only inadequate for the times, but it will also doom us to a permanent slide into oblivion. Many believe that America will turn publicly to God…eventually. But will it be too late when the time finally comes?
Jay Haug is a freelance writer living in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida. You may e-mail him at email@example.com.
By: Daniel Greenfield
Herman Cain is being lynched for taking a stand. And the people doing it are Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives. Commentators who complain about the “race card” are eagerly laying down the “bigot card” because Cain did what few candidates are ready to do. He clearly spelled out the problem with Islamic involvement in American public life.
If as some insist, Cain’s campaign was brought down by his statements about Islam– then Republicans have accepted the Dhimmi Principle that the viability of a candidate depends on taking a moderate position on Islam. A moderate position being skeptical, but not particularly confrontational. A position that easily leads back to that old “Handful of Extremists” saw.
All this comes down to is an Islamic vetting of presidential candidates. And everyone attacking Cain over it has given CAIR their victory.
All the little condescending pieces on how Cain was a good candidate until he went a little too far off the reservation deserve a head pat from a black gloved hand. What better victory for the Islamists than to have conservative pundits falsely attribute Cain’s campaign problems to his opposition to Islam?
What did Cain say that was so wrong? He questioned how Muslims could reconcile a theocracy with participation in American public life. And he came out on the side of communities fighting back against mosque projects. And that’s bigotry. Don’t ask why it’s bigotry. It is. And if you don’t believe me, go ask CNN or the Washington Post.
Playing the bigot card is cheap and easy. It’s free. And value free.
The real question we should be asking, is it permissible to question the bona fides of members of an ideology that has murdered millions around the world and thousands in America? Can we actually ask whether a theology that calls for the subjugation of the world disqualifies you from taking an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States?
There are two obligations here and they are incompatible with one another. We cannot look into the soul of another person, but the contradiction between the two must be asked and answered. And if we cannot do that, then we have already given up freedom of speech and thought, and exchanged it for the conformity of political correctness. So we say that after a Muslim kills he may be criticized, but not before the fact. And close our eyes to the origin of the act.
Is there a “Good Islam” and a “Bad Islam”. The Islam of decent people and of evil terrorists. But where do we find this “Good Islam”?
Not in Pakistan, Iran or Saudi Arabia. What about Indonesia, with its genocides, Malaysia with its church burnings or Egypt with its persecution of the Copts? Forget Muslim countries then, what about countries with Muslim minorities. Nigeria, Thailand and the Philippines. How many heads would you like to see.
Why must we ask is the Muslim world less pluralistic, less free and more intolerant than the countries where they are demanding the right to impose their theocratic legal system on others. And what exactly will happen when they gain that power?
Can you imagine that America will retain its freedoms under a president who believes that the Koran is the writ of heaven, that non-Muslims are inferior, that women are subhuman and that only laws based on the Koran are just?
Can you imagine that police chiefs who believe that women cause their own rapes will protect rape victims? Why even bother asking, when cabbies who believe that seeing eye dogs drive away angels refuse to carry the blind.
When cartoonists go into hiding and Muslim soldiers open fire on their fellow troops, there is no serious debate to be had over what happens when the Koran and the laws of the United States intersect with one another. And the results are bloody.
If religious and ethnic minorities are persecuted in the Muslim world, and if even religious and ethnic majorities are set on by Muslim minorities in the non-Muslim world, then how hard is to figure out what comes next for America? Do we really need a map or a diagram. Should we go once again to the Ground Zero Mosque to understand how much contempt and how much deception is woven into the campaign to subjugate us. To wipe away our laws and freedoms and replace them with the ravings of a 7th century bandit who murdered and raped his way across the desert, turning a multicultural society into a fanatical wasteland.
It is easier not to deal with these uncomfortable questions. To assent to CNN and the WaPo and all the other outlets of the manufactured consensus. To nod your head and say, “Cain went too far. There may be some bad eggs out of Mecca, but we shouldn’t be bigots.”
So let’s talk about bigotry. Talk to the Copts of Egypt, the Christians of Pakistan and Malaysia, or the Jews of Iran. Learn about bigotry from them and what happens when political power is vested in the hands of members of a cult that preaches the absolute political dominance of their theocracy.
Do you want bigotry? The cemeteries of the world are filled with the victims of the Koran. And their number grows year by year. Go the graves of the murdered and the dead, and mumble to them about bigotry. Tell them that singling out Muslims isn’t nice. It’s not proper. It’s not the American Way– or that flavor of the American Way cooked up by liberals around 1965.
When Orwell wrote 1984, few Americans imagined being too afraid to speak their minds. Now it’s 2011 and we are learning to be afraid. And when someone stands up to speak what we know is the truth, then we shiver and bring out the rope. We lynch him as a sacrifice. The way that Europeans denounce Israel, and prosecute Koran burning. An offering for the Dhimmi altar.
This isn’t about Cain, who has backtracked his earlier comments. This is about cowardice. Not physical cowardice, but the cowardice of the mind. The timidity of stepping beyond a reasonably safe opinion and following it to its logical conclusion. Of even raising the subject. And the glee of destroying the man who steps slightly to the right of you. Who dares to say what you do not.
Should we be banning Muslims from public office or keeping mosques out of communities? Certainly we should be able to have that question, without cries of “bigot” coming from people who should know better.
If nothing else, the butcher’s bill we have paid in the last decade gives us the right to ask those questions. The dead on our side and the killers on theirs means that we have paid for the right to ask those questions in blood. And we go on paying for it with unrecognized sacrifices and unspoken terror. A conspiracy unmasked there, a bomb plot exposed here. An assault there, a rape here.
But will we ask those questions? The Constitution won for us Freedom of Speech, but what worth is it if isn’t used. It won for us Freedom of Religion, but what use is it if we allow that freedom to be taken away from us by a theocracy that does not recognize the existence of such a thing. There is no need to take a red pencil and X out any parts of the Bill of Rights. By allowing them to fall into disuse, by destroying the reputations of anyone who makes use of them, we will have accomplished the same thing.
It is startling to me sometimes to see how much bolder the Europeans are than us. What would the condemners of Cain make of Geert Wilders and Oriana Fallaci, or Brits like Pat Condell. Europe may be under siege, but it still has men and women who rise up and speak the truth. And we who have Freedom of Speech enshrined in the Constitution are prisoners of politically correct timidity.
Maybe your back has to be up against the wall to be able to speak out that way. And maybe we must wait for our own No Go Zones, and our own Islamic Councils. To see firsthand that we are losing the country. Maybe when that day comes it will be the shushers of Cain who will be shushed and the ridiculers of a man who dared to speak the truth who will be humbled . When speaking out in the face of terror is no longer a crime and when challenging theocracy is no longer out of sorts.
I would hope and pray that it doesn’t take that. That we need not be schooled to desperation before we are allowed to ask whether we can retain our freedom under the rule of a creed that calls every man a slave.
From The Mad Jewess
HARVARD left wing terrorist supporters demand dismissal of Indian professor who condemned Islamic terrorism
Posted: July 28, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam |
A group of Harvard students have started a petition calling on the University to sever ties with Subramanian Swamy, a Harvard Summer School economics instructor who wrote an op-ed against Islamic terrorism that many have called inflammatory and offensive to muslims.
The Crimson -In an article published July 16 in the Indian newspaper Daily News and Analysis, Swamy recommended demolishing hundreds of mosques, disenfranchising non-Hindus who do not acknowledge their alleged Hindu ancestry, and banning conversion from Hinduism. The op-ed came in response to a series of bombings in Mumbai that killed 23 on July 13.(An Islamic act of terrorism that was all but ignored by the American media, but not at BNI: breaking-news-another-muslim-terrorist-attack-in-mumbai-india; latest-on-the-mumbai-islamic-terrorist-attacks )
“The first lesson to be learnt from the recent history of Islamic terrorism against India and for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus,” Swamy wrote.
His op-ed spurred over 200 people to sign a petition condemning Swamy and calling on Harvard to end its relationship with him. “These are statements you’d expect a demagogue on the extreme right to say,” Umang Kumar, a student at Harvard Divinity School, said, “but a professor who comes here, who got his Ph.D. from Harvard?”
Kumar and Sanjay J. Pinto, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology and social policy, organized the petition with a small group of peers and then emailed it out to an initial group of 80 students. “Both of us decided we really needed to take action,” Pinto said. “His comments are wrong on many levels. They put forth a vision of Indian society in which not all religious groups are welcome, which is very different from the India that both of us know.”(It’s about time)
In an interview with The Crimson, Swamy said that he is a religiously tolerant person. “I can’t condemn all Muslims. I’m not against them,” Swamy said. “I never said Muslims as a whole are terrorists.” However, the petition accuses Swamy of using the July 13 bombings to write a piece that is inflammatory towards Muslims.
“Swamy has exploited this event not only to promote a vision of Indian society based on Hindu supremacy, but to disparage and cast suspicion on the entire Muslim community in India,” the petition states. (And that’s a BAD thing because why?) At the Summer School, Swamy teaches Economics S-110: “Quantitative Methods in Economics and Business” and Economics S-1316: “Economic Development in India and East Asia.”
In a statement sent by a spokesperson, Donald H. Pfister, the dean of Harvard Summer School, said that the school will examine the issue. “At this point we have only a basic awareness of the situation and have not been contacted by the organizations involved,” Pfister said. “Professor Swamy is a long-time member of the Harvard Summer School faculty who previously was a member of the Department of Economics here. We will give this matter our serious attention.”
Pinto and Kumar plan to deliver their petition to the Harvard administration early next week.
“Swamy draws a lot of prestige and legitimacy from his position at Harvard,” Pinto said. “If the Hindu right were to come into power in India, he could very well be someone who takes up a position in government, so I think it’s important for members of this community to play a part in discrediting him and saying, ‘No, he does not represent us.’” (Who cares? He represents hundreds of millions of Hindus)
In India, Swamy leads the Janata party, a political party that held the majority of India’s Parliament decades ago but has since fragmented. At Harvard, he earned his Ph.D. in economics in 1965 and has served as an assistant and associate professor. Swamy said that the Indian response to his op-ed has been positive. “I don’t think anyone in India, except the left wing, has been upset by my article,” he said. “There has been wholesale support.”
But the backers of the petition were hardly supportive of the piece. “Not allowing Hindus to convert to any other religion, not allowing other groups to vote unless they proudly declare their Hindu ancestry—it’s honestly kind of absurd,” Pinto said.(What a great idea)
Kumar and Pinto both said that while freedom of speech is an integral part of a thriving academic community like Harvard, Swamy’s comments crossed a line. (Here they go again. Lefties only like free speech when it agrees with their ideas)
“They stereotype an entire population of people,” Pinto said. “How can this man who expresses these views, who’s basically saying that India should only be for Hindus and not for other people, and denigrating all Muslims, how can he teach students at Harvard?” (Because muslims are trying to destroy India as a Hindu country just asthey do in every other non-muslim country)
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/
If you’re hungry right now, you won’t be after you read this article. There are some pretty horrendous facts about fast food and other food favorites out there if you’re willing to dig a little. Keep reading to learn about ten disgusting food facts that McDonald’s and other food giants likely don’t want you to know about.
10 The average fast food patron eats 12 pubic hairs in a given year
We’ve all got the occasional hair in our food at one point or another. Ingesting unwanted hair is more likely to occur at fast food restaurants… and it’s not just the hair that grows on the top of heads that you need to worry about.
9 The strawberry flavor in a McDonald’s milk shake contains 50 artificial flavors
Apparently, real strawberries are expensive. So fast food companies like McDonald’s choose to use a ridiculous concoction of 50 chemicals to effectively imitate the flavor of one real-world food. These chemicals include ethyl acetate, phenythyl alcohol and solvent.
8 This is where chicken nuggets come from
Before reshaping, foods like chicken nuggets, hot dogs, bologna and pepperoni look like a disgusting sludge of pink paste. This is done through a process called mechanical separation, which is a cost-effective way to “smooth out” bone remnants left after the de-boning process. The process results in excessive bacteria, which is fixed by washing the meat in ammonia. To cover up that delicious ammonia flavor, the meat is then re-flavored artificially and dyed to resemble to type of meat it once was.
7 There are bugs and rodent hair in your peanut butter
FDA laws allow for an average of 30 insect fragments per 100 grams of peanut butter. In that same half cup of peanut butter, you’ll also find at least one rodent hair (on average). Yum! Now that’s good eating!
6 Shellac is an important ingredient in jelly beans
Shellac is a type of finishing product that is typically used to improve the shine of wood and furniture. However, it can also be used to improve the shine of certain foods, such as jelly beans. Where does shellac come from? Why, it’s secreted by an insect in Thailand called the Kerria Iacca of course!
5 Various viruses can be found on processed lunch meat
Food production companies have long sought ways to combat unhealthy microbes found on processed foods such as lunch meat and hot dogs. A few years ago, the FDA approved the use of bacteriophages (a.k.a. viruses) that help kill these dangerous microbes. So, basically, viruses are purposely being added to your food to improve shelf life.
4 If not for one ingredient, drinking a can of Coke would make you vomit
While cocaine was long taken out of Coca-Cola long ago, the current formula is still formulated to get you high. Each can of Coke contains 10 teaspoons of sugar. This is 100 percent of your recommended daily intake. In normal circumstances, the extreme sweetness of this much sugar would immediately cause you to vomit uncontrollably. However, since all that sugar is addictive and keeps you coming back for more, Coca-Cola adds phosphoric acid -– an ingredient that cuts the sweetness to manageable levels.
3 Processed cheese is less than 51 percent cheese
A more accurate name for Kraft Singles and other packaged cheeses is “cheese-like substance.” Any cheese product labeled as processed or pasteurized includes additives, chemicals and flavorings that account for up 49 percent of the total product. As a result, that cheap cheese in your grocery store has just enough real cheese in it to allow companies to call it cheese.
2 Fast food salads contain chemicals used in antifreeze
Choosing to “eat healthy” at a fast food restaurant isn’t necessarily a good idea. To prolong crispness, packaged salads are dusted with Propylene Glycerol, a chemical commonly found in antifreeze. In its concentrated form, the chemical has been known to cause eye and skin irritation.
1 Chicken McNuggets contain beef
Many fast food chicken items contain beef additives used to enhance flavor and juke health stats. Chicken McNuggets, the Wendy’s Grilled Chicken Sandwich, and KFC Grilled Chicken Sandwich are a few examples. Check the ingredients, and you’ll see no sign of such atrocities. That’s because such beef additives are listed as “extract” or “essence.”
Jeff Wysaski Jeff Wysaski is a freelance humor writer based out of Los Angeles. He has written for such esteemed online sites as Manolith, COED Magazine and Pleated Jeans. When not behind his laptop, Jeff can probably be found at a comedy show, eating a sandwich or practicing his latest ribbon dancing routine.
Thanks to Guyism for these “details” at:http://guyism.com/lifestyle/disgusting-food-facts-you-didnt-know.html
Why does Peter King continue to allow this muslim asskissing racist bitch to speak at his muslim radicalization hearings?
At a hearing of the House Committee on Homeland Security today about the radicalization of young Somali American muslims by the al-Shabaab terrorist group, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) said the committee should hold a hearing on “right-wing extremists” in the United States.
CNS NEWS - Jackson Lee used much of her allotted five minutes to question panelists with expertise on radicalization about the alleged hacking into telephones of 9-11 victims by the now-closed News of the World tabloid in England.
“I would add to that, that I would like to have a hearing on right-wing extremists, ideologues who advocate violence and advocate, in essence, the terrorizing of certain groups,” Jackson Lee said.
Before Jackson Lee was recognized by Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the committee chairman, the panel of witnesses gave details about how al-Shabaab, an affiliate of al-Qaeda, is recruiting young Somali men who live in the United States to travel to that African nation to participate in terrorist training camps.
“Early in 2011, Canadian national security officials confirmed the disappearances of dozens of young Canadian Somali males who had traveled to Somalia to fight for the Al Shabaab, a terrorist group that is officially allied with al Qaeda and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula,” said Ahmed Hussen, Canadian Somali Congress National President, at the hearing. “Three of these individuals have died in Somalia fighting for this group.”
“The unique and extraordinary threats to national security that foreign terrorist organizations present to the United States are abundantly clear,” W. Anders Folk, former assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, testified. “Al-Shabaab’s successful recruitment of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, and the existence of a base of ideological and actual support for al-Shabaab in the United States raise a number of issues that require study in order to ensure that the United States maintains its safety in the face of the threat posed by the group.”
Minnesota has one of the largest Somali populations in the United States, according to witnesses who testified at the hearing. In his opening remarks, Chairman King described how the hearing would reveal the “direct threat” al-Shabaab poses to the United States.
“You will hear how al-Shabaab, who bin Laden called one of the most important armies of Islam, is engaged in an ongoing, successful effort to recruit and radicalize dozens of Muslim-American jihadis, who pose a direct threat to the U.S.,” King said.
Jackson Lee, however, focused on what she called domestic “hate groups,” and asked that a 39-page document on such groups be added to the congressional record of the hearing, which King allowed. She also asked that two Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents regarding domestic terror cases be added to the record. “My concern with the focus of the hearings that we have had is the isolation of certain groups,” Jackson Lee said. (Yes, the group committing all the terrorism in America. DUH!)
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/
A Clash Of Histories
By: Daniel Greenfield
The clash of civilizations is also a clash of histories. The Western view of history is progressive. A march upward from barbarism to greater phases of enlightenment. This view is fairly modern and fairly liberal, yet closely associated with the success of Western civilization. In progressive history, human techniques from the technological to the social can be used to improve life and make the world a better place.
The Islamic view of history is regressive. A lost golden age followed by unbelief and heresy, culminating in a struggle by the believers to restore Islamic dominance. Everything that humans do independently of Islam makes the world a worse place. The perfect touchstone of history was Mohammed. And the only way that history can be set right is by restoring the lost and corrupted caliphates.
Both the progressive and the regressive views of history have their limitations. The progressive views tends to unrealistically overestimate its own progress. It does this by dismissing 99 percent of what came before it as bunk and barbarism, and places itself at the pinnacle of history. Using the Dark Ages as a prop, history is divided between the medieval and the enlightenment, superstition and knowledge.
Overlooked is the knowledge that civilization and barbarism actually come in cycles. And that the ancients were not stupid or ignorant, often they were quite sophisticated. But they were unable to retain, integrate and build on what they had until it formed the core of a stable and self-sustaining civilization. Despite our technological sophistication, we are actually poorer than them in vital areas, and there is every sign that our own civilization will implode the way that theirs did. The surest sign of this may be that the intellectual elites of the West have begun to make the switch to a regressive model of history. The environmental movement and the postmodern left have become the champions of a regressive history which demands that we turn back the clock and learn to imitate the slums of the Third World in order to become a better society.
That the people doing this are some of the best and the brightest, the graduates of elite institutions and the thinkers and philosophers of the West, who have followed the dark road of social revolution into oblivion and have come away with no reason for their cultures and nations to go on living– testifies to the peril that the West finds itself in.
The progressive model of history is on life support. In its pure form, it hardly exists outside of scientific circles, rationalist atheists and patriotic Americans. And the former two often incorporate it into a global admixture that depends on a Wellsian world-state through the United Nations. An organization founded on a progressive worldview, but that in the hands of the left and its Third World allies has become a regressive influence.
That just leaves the regressive model of history with its lost golden age and its distaste for a humanity whose petty faults are in the way of a full restoration.
We are most familiar with the Islamic version of regressive history, whether it is Osama bin Laden or an exhibit on Islamic science. Both depend on a heavily distorted and romanticized history. False history which must remain false in order to justify the pursuit of an impossible goal. A golden age.
Islamic reformers, unlike Western reformers, reform backward. Their goal is to reach back to the past. The Wahhabis with their purge of modern corruptions of Islam exemplify the hypocrisy of regressive history. Their embrace of modern techniques and ideas to force the restoration of a medieval tyranny is sophisticated and self-destructive. They seek to deny change, even while they ride it.
The biggest appeal of regressive history is purity. The romanticisation of the past is a universal impulse. Few Europeans really want to damage the mythology of chivalry with an accurate appraisal of what knights were really like. Every romantic image of the past, from King Arthur to the Vikings, is not improved by close scrutiny. But few Europeans also want to return to a feudal society. That is not the case in Islam.
Imagine what Europe would be like if some 90 percent of the population wanted to restore feudalism, theocracy and the ducking stool for women. There’s no need to imagine it. It’s called the Muslim world. And a rising percentage of the European population consists of Muslims who are implementing Sharia, Burqas and Jihad in its major cities.
But the Muslim Jihad is not irrational, it’s arational. Muslims don’t believe in reason as a solution to human problems. They believe in no human solution at all, only the abnegation of humanity to Allah through a clerical guardianship. This is their means of creating a perfect society.
Progressive history accepts human imperfection and builds on it. Regressive history rejects it as a force of evil. Instead it holds up a beacon of a golden past, the promise of absolute purity that rejecting and thereby transcends all human flaws. The daily submission of Muslims arises out a contempt for the individual as a moral actor, and replaces him with the collective Ummah, the receptacle for their transcendence under the guidance of the clerics. The Jihad abandons individual morality for collective bloodshed in the name of creating a perfect society through world domination.
The perfect society is impossible, and the pursuit of it is an excuse for never lifting yourself out of the mud. Its disdain for any society that is less than perfect makes reform seem pointless, and its extremism excuses all lesser crimes and abuses. Having no faith in the present or the future, it has no reason to live but the endless struggle to restore a perfect past. This is the pathology of Islam.
Working societies are built on a hope for the future. Islam has no hope for the future. It may use modern tools, but it never values them, let alone the gifts and sciences that brought them into being. Its gaze is hopelessly dingy, rimmed with disgust for anything that is less than perfect. The tools are inferior copies of what the Koran makes possible. The societies are corrupted and decadent. Even religion isn’t right. Islam is striving, but always for the past.
Machiavelli is second nature to Muslims, but only as practice, not as understanding. Deceit is constant and the most overly complex plans are drawn up all the time. Everyone is practiced at manipulating everyone else and accordingly there is no real trust outside the family. And little trust even inside it. And all of this only goes to reinforce the essential Islamic message of human worthlessness. None of it is used to usher in reforms, because Islamic polarity views reforms as black and white. Driving out one group and putting the perfect people into power. Leader worship leads to disappointment, uprisings and a new leader to worship. The cycle repeats itself over and over again.
European expectations of Muslim integration were flawed from the start. Muslims may identify with countries, but their pessimistic worldview was never compatible with Western democracy. They lack the faith in humanity that is essential to the republican experiment. And instead became easy prey for itinerant preachers recording venomous sermons promising them a new bloody golden age, awful in its perfection.
Rather than identifying with their new countries, Muslim immigrants instead decided to replace them. To remake them into the same Caliphate mirage under the guardianship of quarreling clerics and greedy uniformed thugs. And no amount of visits to mosques and Ramadan dinners thrown by Western leaders will change that. It only accelerates the process.
The Western fallacy is the failure to understand that there is no meeting point with Islam. That its numbers are large enough and its ambitions serious enough that it cannot be ignored, and that its orientation is so fundamentally different that it cannot be reconciled at any cost. Multiculturalism assumes that harmony can come by paying enough attention and respect to every culture. But tolerance and co-existence, the assumptions that lie at the heart of multiculturalism, are alien to the purity that is at the heart of Islam.
Islam’s aim is unity. The absolute collectivism of the Ummah standing over the diminishing number of Dhimmis who have not yet been convinced to take the plunge into the Sharia pool. It views a society that is based on division as corrupt and confused. Multiculturalism is alien to its ideological DNA. It cannot accept the equality of those who are different. The very idea of it is blasphemous.
Pre-Mohammedan Arabia was multicultural and tolerant. Today it is a land of Muslim masters and imported non-Muslim slaves, funding the spread of that same social setup and worldview around the world through violent and non-violent means. And this Islamic feudalism is the closest that Muslims ever get to their perfect society. A setup that only works as long as there’s enough loot to divide up among all the powerful families.
This Islamic dead end is not where Europe is headed. If a Eurabia ever comes into being, it will not be half as pleasant as that. Europe is filling up with Muslims, but with Muslims who often have little in common with each other, except their mutual hatred of the Jew and the Christian. Any region that they dominate will look like Lebanon or Iraq in Saddam’s day. Either a permanent civil war broken by truces and agreements, or a tightly run dictatorship.
Lebanon is the likelier model for Eurabia, the remnants of a European influenced society devolved into countless factions and treacheries. A country where the government is weak and the factions are strong. Where every structure falls apart and every agreement falls apart into infighting. But even that is optimistic. The people of Lebanon have things in common that the people of Eurabia will not. And it will take a thousand years until European history has been as thoroughly eradicated as the pre-Mohammedan history of the peoples of Islam was.
All this is the inevitable outcome of a clash of histories. The progressive against the regressive.
If the West still believed in progress as a moral imperative, it would have no trouble holding the gates. And understanding why the gates need to be help. But the worldview that made that possible is in decline.
The left rejected commercial progress as capitalist, but continued to embrace technological progress and cultural development. Then it rejected technological progress as destructive, culture as perspective and stated that the highest moral principle was for the West to save the world by destroying itself. And under their leadership that is the way it has been ever since.
While the regressive history of Muslims at least embraces their own past, or that of their Arabian conquerors, the left’s regressive history is not national, cultural, religion or even specific. Instead it is primitivism itself that it seeks out. The backward and the barbaric, the poor and the lacking, that is their new compass. Having lost all native religion, they are on a free floating quest for spirituality, in opposition to materialism. The content of that spirituality does not concern them, only the rejection of what little Western culture they have does.
And the sizable number of Muslim immigrants and the Islamic world is more than happy to step into this vacuum created by the willing abandonment of Western civilization. To take another shot at restoring their glory days in gory ways.
Behind the clash of civilizations is this clash of histories. The momentum of colliding declines. The barbarism that undoes civilization, but only once the civilization has undone itself.
Ed. – This is a timely and right on post from the Mad Jewess that America has to heed. Repentance is the only thing that is going to save the United States. We must wake up and turn from the direction we are heading. An excellent post and thanks to her for speaking the truth. ZTW
I lived in NY during the days after 9/11. Grief everywhere, countless memorials in the papers in many towns, American flags by the bushels. Weeping, screaming, crying: A terrorized city. George Bush, being the leader of the country at that time told the world that “These people want to attack freedom”. Bush, being the leader offered nothing to people, spiritually. He, then, had the audacity to tell the world that “Islam is a religion of peace”. No it isn’t. Islam is a ‘religion’ of murder.
In 2003, I was in Saugerties, NY (Upstate) and came across the NYTimes. I was reading in the art section. I glanced through it, quickly. Then put it down. My friend had an article from that same section. She was reading something, then she got up with a disgusted look in her face. I asked what was wrong. She said “I don’t feel sorry for NYC or America at all, look at this! Downtown NYC is building a ‘museum of sex!!” At first, I wanted to tell her that all NYers were not responsible for this. I was so wrong. She exclaimed; “We get everything we deserve.”
Wow… Just wow. At that time, maybe I was a little more moderate in my views. I don’t remember. But, after living in NYC in the late 2000′s, I knew she was right, and not just about NYC, but America in general. What had we learned, as a nation after 9/11? Nothing. America has become more depraved. Did America stop the genocide of babies (aborted?) No, we murder just as many, and only the Catholics stand in the gap, pretty much. Did we observe the unhealthy and abomination of the ‘gay’ lifestyle? No. We started passing laws against God and allow ‘gays’ to be married. Did we get rid of our porno? No, we added more. Did our foreign policy change? No, it became worse, & in 2005, we cursed Israel. Did we elect in a leader that was/is godly in 2008, to repair our depraved, damaged nation? No, we elected in a Muslim/Marxist pig named Barack Hussein Obama. Brilliant…
So, America is reaping what it has sown. We are now a disgusting nation that curses God. We curse Israel, and because of this, we are cursed with natural disasters out of control. Will Norway follow our same bad example? Will Norway turn from its cursing and bless God? Will they stop cursing Israel, now? As for the people murdered, of course we all feel bad, we went through the same thing. But, when a country turns their backs on God, there is no ‘innocence‘ anymore.
All I can say is Repent Norway, don’t do what we have done. Repent and turn to God. Don’t become worse like America and England has done.
From The Mad Jewess at: http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/
REPENT AMERICA, REPENT.
Turn to God before its too late. God of the BIBLE.
From The Mad Jewess at: http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/
Nothing but nothing could excuse the horrific mass murder committed by Anders Breivik in Norway on July 22 that left 92 people dead. But his core beliefs that mass muslim immigration to Western Europe, enabled by Cultural Communist elites who want to destroy Western civilization and capitalism, European traditions, patriotism and Christianity, is shared by millions of people suffering under the scourge of multi-culturalism.
Washington Times -(H/T Susan K) – Breivik believes an impending economic meltdown will generate armed grassroots resistance in Europe. He spelled out his beliefs in what he saw as the threats to the European identity posed by radical Muslims and multiculturalists in a series of messages obtained exclusively by The Washington Times. The messages were sent to a source who corresponded with Mr. Breivik on Facebook in July 2009.
Our source said that Mr. Breivik “seemed completely normal” at first though clearly highly focused on the issue of Islam in Europe. In a brief introductory message on July 11, Mr. Breivik said that he had “been working full time on a compendium about the Islamisation of Europe now for almost two years” entitled “September 11th, 2083.”
The next day in a longer message he began by observing that “the U.S. is much better off than Western Europe, that’s for sure. I’m from Oslo btw,” he continued, “which [has] about 20% Muslims now. The Muslim ‘ghettofication process’ on the east side of my city is pretty radical. Most of these Muslims are religiously conservative non-educated individuals from NW Pakistan and Somalia which makes it even more challenging. The only positive aspect I guess is that they live in their own enclave (parallel society) with little to no interaction with Norwegian society.”
European cities “about to burst”
Mr. Breivik expressed his annoyance that Norway is portrayed in the media as “a socialist, culturally diverse utopia.” The truth of the matter, he wrote, “is that a majority of Norwegians (like most other Western European countries) have opposed mass Muslim immigration for decades. Its really starting to boil here (especially after the Muslim riots in Oslo a few months back which resulting in the trashing of half the city) although the mainstream Norwegian media are doing whatever they can to systematically conceal the truth. Even though we host the most successful anti-Islamisation party in Europe (Progress party, 22% last election) it doesn’t make much of a difference as every single proposal is categorically rejected by the seven multiculturalist parties.
“However, France and the Netherlands and select European major cities are in an even worse state. It will be interesting to follow the development there closely. Paris, Marseilles, Brussels are about to burst.”
Mr. Breivik said he devoted much of his book to tackling what he believed was the “root cause of Islamisation, namely multiculturalism/cultural communism. Europe has always been based on a Judeo-Christian culture and it’s essential that we continue to fight for that. In that regard, it’s positive to witness how the ‘old school nationalists’ all around Europe are conforming by rejecting the old racist and anti-Jewish views. The new Conservatist ‘new right’ is rapidly developing into a pro-Israel, anti-Jihad alliance.
“Most peoples’ prediction is that it won’t end well though. We will not be able to stop the current demographic warfare waged against Europe by the Global Islamic Ummah. It is likely that the end game will be a ‘strongman’ result further down the road (in about 3-7 decades). An increasing number of metropolitan Europeans are sick of living in dhimmitude [i.e., subjugation of non-Muslims to Islam].”
Impending “economic downfall”
Mr. Breivik believed that an impending economic crisis would be the trigger for action against the perceived Islamic threat. “Today Western Europeans refrain from reacting since they live in economic prosperity,” he wrote, “and to stand up for their ideas would send them into suffering. However, in a few decades we will have an economic downfall that will make the current recession look like a picnic. And at that point standing up for their ideas will come at no extra cost, since the suffering is already prevalent.”
But ultimately Mr. Breivik did not think that the traditional European identity would be overwhelmed. “I’m optimistic,” he wrote. “Europeans won’t allow it to go too far and we will never allow the creation of future ‘mini-Pakistans.’”
The emerging European resistance
On July 13, Mr. Breivik sent a thousand-word message going into more detail regarding his views of the threat posed by Muslims in Europe, and the possible responses. He also gave some insight into himself and his motivations. “A few years ago… I had different priorities in life,” he wrote, “me, myself and I.” He said that his “best friend for many years (in my childhood) was a Pakistani. He resented everything about Norway and Norwegians (me being the exception). I have known a lot of Muslims over the years which triggered my interest for Islam. … I sold my company a few years back which allowed me to focus full time on the current compendium I’m writing; ‘September 11th, 2083.’ I’ve lived quite ascetic since then.”
Mr. Breivik said that the issue he was focused on was not new. “People have been describing the problem for almost 10 years,” he wrote, “but they refrain from presenting solutions, reason being that the democratic mechanics will most likely not be able to solve or correct our current course. We’ve seen it several times in history. Once an ‘Empire’ focuses all its resources on being ‘good’ instead of being ‘powerful’ it will succumb. If an empire doesn’t believe in ‘something,’ it will be defeated by anything. It’s understandable though that intellectuals are afraid of stating the obvious. They don’t want to be labeled as extremists.”
Mr. Breivik believed that there would come a time when people in Europe would turn to violence. “I think we will see the first real signs of European resistance or even armed resistance within 10-15 years in certain European metropolitans” (See video below) he wrote. “I’ve seen and heard of numerous suspect ‘accidents’ already, even in Norway. For example a data central in Oslo was torched a few weeks ago. It severely delayed the registration of new asylum seekers etc. It’s not a secret that the current European governments have gone to great lengths to cover incidents like these up to avoid the ‘inspirational’ effect.”
For the police there are “too many individuals to monitor”
But Mr. Breivik did not think that the alleged media coverup of armed European resistance could continue. “I doubt they will succeed to cover up incidents like these for much longer,” he wrote. “Islam is reaching critical mass in several European cities right about now (20%) which is indicative of the Police being unable to counter all attacks. [There] will simply be too many individuals to monitor. They have already stopped hundreds of Jihadi attacks since 7/7 [the London mass transit bombings] and 9/11.”
Mr. Breivik believed that the new European nationalism was not anti-Semetic like the Nazis and other 20th Century extremist movements. To the extent anti-Semetism existed in Europe, he maintained, it was in the “Socialist spectrum.” But “it’s not the case for the people nor the majority of political parties. It’s the Cultural Communists – Socialist Left Party, and the Labour Party (both are in government atm). Both of the right wing parties, Høyre (Conservatives) and especially the Progress Party (the only anti-Islamisation party) are very pro-Israel.
“Cultural Communist elites”
“There is a core of Cultural Communist elites in Western Europe who really want to destroy Western civilization, European traditions, national solidarity and Christianity (Israel by default) but the majority of the multiculturalists are mostly just ignorant of the truth or are just going with the flow. It was a mistake not to arrest these hardcore communists after the Cold War. Now we are paying the price.
Mr. Breivik also believed that anti-Americanism in Europe was mainly the product of internationalist elites and biased media. “A majority of Europeans love the U.S.,” he wrote, “just like a majority of Europeans support Israel’s fight against Jihad. But considering the fact that 80-90% of the media + politicians ‘officially’ support Cultural Communist views it’s only natural that the coverage is extremely biased.
“Actually, every ‘suppressed’ poll I’ve seen indicate that a majority support our views to some degree. They are just unwilling to flag their views publicly as they know it will involve stigma. Another portion agree in principle but are just lying to themselves (because the multiculturalist system has taught them to feel shame if they have given sympathies). It’s also a gender factor. All the statistics I’ve seen indicate that 70% of males support Cultural Conservatism (anti-Islamisation) while the same amount of females support Cultural Communism (Islamisation).”
The coming European conflagration
Despite his belief that the power structure was arrayed against the purported grassroots resistance to Islamification, Mr. Breivik believed this could be overcome. “The biggest challenge in all of this is that people don’t have a clue what Islam is,” he wrote “The key is therefore to propagate the truth about Islam. All the potent information is out there, and the blogging scene is making it increasingly harder for the establishment to suppress the truth. I’m very optimistic because I know that Islam is the Achilles [Heel] of the Cultural Communists. Multiculti is a self-defeating ideology when Islam is involved. It will take time, and will most definitely result in a lot more human misery along the way, but their own greed have in fact created the foundation for their own downfall. Continued ghettofication, mass Muslim immigration combined with high birth rates will make sure of that. European capitals are the lab rats in this regard. You will most likely be able to learn from our example when Europe soon will burn once again in a few decades.”
Mr. Breivik predicted that the coming conflagration in Europe would have the characteristics of a religious war. “I expect that a huge confrontation (European cultural civil war) will be followed by the creation of a strong Cultural Conservative block which will form a strong anti-Jihad alliance with Russia, Israel, India and other countries with similar problems,” he wrote. But he was unsure whether the United States would become involved in this clash of civilizations. “I really hope the U.S. will be a part of this future alliance,” he wrote, “but I find the U.S. much harder to analyze and predict (too many variables).”
Breivik a “pioneer in this fight”
“A majority of the people I know support my views,” he wrote, “they are just apathetic. They know that there will be a confrontation one day, but they don’t care because it will most likely not happen within the next two decades.” He said he was a “pioneer in this fight, and I have no doubt whatsoever that we will see a political shift in our favor sooner than we might expect. It might look grim at the moment, but we are after all fighting a self-defeating ideology (Cultural Communism that is, not Islam). The only pragmatic approach towards Islam is to isolate it to Muslim countries once we are in a position to do so — on September 11th, 2083.”
Thanks to Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/