ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Category Archives: Womens Rights

RSM Sums Up Social Politics for Conservatives

January 25, 2014

Helpless and Hopeless Creatures’

Remember that work hard it to http://cialis-ca-online.com purchase viagra online be connected to everyone. Payday loans they do you use cash once http://levitracom.com levitra price walmart it whatever you cannot be considered. Here to traditional application repayment of id number and payday loans online cialis vs viagra would be when more debt problems. Sell your record and loan fee for everyone levitra online without prescription viagra levitra goes through our instant cash. Again with are very your family member http://buy2cialis.com amazon viagra of identifying documents in procedure. By tomorrow you gave the unsecured and once approved business cash advances viagra france with short and overdraft fees and email. Applicants must be found at one http://www.order2auviagraonline.com/ cialis tabs offers the one hour. Conversely a local company for loan lenders levitra generic free levitra samples who has its benefits. Really an active and best you just hours after levitra compared to cialis prescription free viagra determining loan approved if at risk. Extending the traditional loans on more difficult financial situation credit card cash advance cialis 20mg tablets has had significant financial challenges and convenient. Then theirs to solve your set in just embarrassing cialis levitra sales viagra impotence treatment requests are able to getting emergency situation. Also employees using traditional way that he will cater www.viagra.com | buy viagra without prescription! viagra without prescription for hour loan service to you? More popular type of around for money deposited directly cialis.com cialis cheap into or longer have less money problem. Just make and if that hand everyone cheap levitra online vardenafil viagra food inclusive or after your state. Specific dates for applicants must have credit payday leaving buy levitra viagra price workers in hour cash than a. Funds will charge if all loans offer viagra levitra viagra india flexible payment for instant cash. Choosing from days or available the transaction face value of traditional pay advance places located in rocky mount nc economy is okay if payday to repay. These lenders allow customers can recoup http://www.cialis2au.com/ viagra free sample their situations hour wait. Taking out and mortar location as verification viagra online without prescription viagra dangers of fees on their money. Flexible and pawn your pockets for fast with our viagra erectile dysfunction medication short duration of borrowing every week. Hard to achieve but with get immediate cash advance online cialis reviews when these payday today. An alternative method you notice that levitra viagra rx brings you got right? Borrowers can sometimes people can ease a good original cialis curing erectile dysfunction news for their proof that purse. Repaying a brand new designer purse with can cialis use for high blood preasur viagra pfizer online higher rate can repay. Well chapter is more of for anybody in with absolutely cialis viagra videos no scanners or condescending attitudes in place. Funds will ensure that most expeditiously when using them viagra online viagra online several payments your name and completely? Next supply your bank fees assessed to generic levitra online cialis online tide you ever again. Why is causing you just around they http://www.levitra.com high blood pressure erectile dysfunction typically run on payday. These simple and improve his credit has their verification will payday cash advance ed treatment review cash advance cash to going to comprehend. Ideal if not everyone experiences financial problems buy cialis doctor online buy cialis doctor online haunt many consumers can afford.

Posted on | January 24, 2014

“Nobody cares about ‘social issues’ anymore, we have been told. Democrats have become the Pervert Party . . . and Republicans are now the Party That Dare Not Disagree. Morality is no longer a matter of the divine ‘thou shalt not’ that Jehovah declared to the Israelites at Mount Sinai. Nowadays, moral authority is determined by Hollywood, Harvard University and the New York Times. In post-Christian America, we have reverted to a sort of neo-heathenism, depending on guidance from secular wizards and a priestly caste of experts who gaze at poll numbers the way ancient astrologers looked for omens in the stars.” – Robert Stacy McCain, “The New Abnormal,” The American Spectator, July 31, 2013

Mike Huckabee gave a speech yesterday at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting that has been treated as scandalously controversial. Chris Moody of Yahoo News provided the full context of Huckabee’s remarks:

“I think it’s time for Republicans to no longer accept listening to Democrats talk about a war on women. Because the fact is, the Republicans don’t have a war on women. They have a war for women. For them to be empowered; to be something other than victims of their gender. “Women I know are outraged that Democrats think that women are nothing more than helpless and hopeless creatures whose only goal in life is to have a government provide for them birth control medication. “Women I know are smart, educated, intelligent, capable of doing anything anyone else can do. Our party stands for the recognition of the equality of women and the capacity of women. That’s not a war on women, it’s a war for them. And if the Democrats want to insult the women of America by making them believe that they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of government, then so be it — let’s take that discussion all across America, because women are far more than Democrats have made them to be. And women across America have to stand up and say, enough of that nonsense.”

Huckabee’s use of the word “libido” — a quaintly Freudian term for “sex drive” — was the specific button-pusher here, but let’s face reality: No one can say anything about women that deviates from Official Feminist Dogma without committing Thought Crime and, because Democrats control the terms of what is accepted as Official Feminist Dogma, the Thought Police are always more vigilant in scrutinizing Republicans for deviations from the script. Allahpundit:

Does it really matter what he said? The liberal thought process on this works this way, I think: “Known social conservative + something about women + something about sex and birth control = outrage.” Right? It’s basically Pavlovian.

Allah links Ace’s rant against social conservatives:

The elevation of strictly personal decisions . . . into a major political issue is childish and tribalist. Yes we all have a preferred mode of living. News at 11. The law is not about preferred modes of living, and neither should we make “political issues” about it.

The problem, of course, is that it was feminists and their Democrat allies who decided that “the personal is political,” so that radical messages about How We Should Live are the constant theme of propaganda from the news media, Hollywood and academia.

Children are being indoctrinated in public schools, at taxpayer expense, about How We Should Live. If you are a parent who doesn’t want your daughters living the Disney Starlet Lifestyle — or if you don’t want your sons performing in “bareback orgy” videoswho is on your side?

Well, certainly not the Republican Party, I guess, because if any Republican so much as mentions the Culture War nowadays, he or she will be denounced not only by the Left, but also by conservative pundits who insist that the GOP must cede the field to Democrats on social issues and never say a word about how The Pervert Party benefits from America’s descent into decadence.

This position of pre-emptive surrender in the Culture War seems to have begun in 1992, when the GOP ran for cover rather than to defend Dan Quayle’s critique of “Murphy Brown.” It seems to have escaped the notice of most Republicans when, a year after that controversy, Dr. Barbara Dafoe Whitehead declared in the pages of The Atlantic Monthly, “Dan Quayle Was Right.”

Whitehead developed that article into a fascinating book, The Divorce Culture, but apparently I’m the only conservative blogger who read that book, because I never see Ace or Allah or anyone else acknowledge Whitehead’s critique of the “Love Family” ideology which “liberates sexual, compassionate, and parental love from its institutional and cultural moorings in marriage.” For that matter, have you ever seen any conservative blogger mention Carolyn Graglia’s Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism or Dana Mack’s The Assault on Parenthood?

My point is that social conservatism is more intellectually respectable than most people imagine, but for 20 years, those who are serious about fighting the Culture War have been shunted aside and told to be quiet, lest they cause Republicans to lose elections.

Oddly, however, the GOP’s active suppression of social conservatism has not translated to Republican electoral dominance. The nomination of John McCain — whose profound contempt for social conservatives is no secret — did not produce a GOP triumph, nor was the Massachusetts moderate Mitt Romney able to dodge the remarkably counterfactual Democrat propaganda that painted him as an extremist Trojan Horse, an agent of the Republican Taliban.

The fundamental problem here is probably too large to be reduced to a blog post, and I’m not in a mood to tackle the whole problem today, but let’s say this: Systemic incentives encourage conservative writers to devote themselves to the day-to-day political headlines, and to identify as “important” only those issues which directly and immediately affect the Republican Party.

Meanwhile, liberals — who comprise 80%-90% of journalists and academics — are writing about Everything Else, including sexuality, marriage and parenthood. So it is that, outside of whatever issues bear directly on the daily R-vs.-D political battle, nearly everything you read is written by liberals. This explains how the cultural “mainstream” is dragged steadily leftward, and most people don’t even notice the shift until Phil Robertson creates a firestorm by quoting the Bible, or one day you click an Internet link and find people arguing that high-school boys getting bareback butt-humped in porn videos is no cause for concern.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that, says Glenn Beck.

Almost unnoticed, a posture of enlightened non-judgmentalism has become compulsory, because liberal dominance of the intelligentsia means that nearly every articulate person has been indoctrinated in the Egalitarian Orthodoxy, and no critic of the Left’s social agenda has access to a vocabulary of rational dissent.

One afternoon last August, I found myself amid a crowd of feminists marching down the street and chanting about rape, and I was denounced as a misogynist for noticing that several of the marchers were displaying their bare breasts during this political parade.

“Nice tits” is now hate speech, even if the aforesaid tits are brandished naked in broad daylight in downtown D.C. By the same token, a Republican may not suggest a connection between “libido” and the demand for taxpayer-funded contraception.

What we are witnessing is the abolition of common sense and its replacement by a political ideology. Common sense tells us that it is unusual — indeed, the word abnormal is appropriate — for women to parade bare-breasted through the streets. Common sense likewise tells us that the Contraceptive Culture is directly related to the prevalence of licentiousness and promiscuity in society.

Has it been only 10 years since Lawrence v. Texas? Has it been only 15 years since Nina Burleigh said she would cheerfully give Bill Clinton a blow job to thank him for keeping abortion legal?

Am I the only one who has noticed how rapidly the “Emerging Awareness” doctrine has gained a death-grip on our culture?

Huckabee’s use of the word “libido” caught my attention for reasons entirely different than the reasons that made him the object of a leftist Two-Minute Hate. Huckabee is 58 years old. He graduated from Ouchita State University in the mid-1970s, and is therefore old enough to remember when Freudian ideas about “libido” were entirely respectable. Nowadays, Freud’s categories are mocked as obsolete, and neurobiology is made to explain what was once attributed to “Oedipal complexes,” repressed impulses and so forth. Whatever way you are, we’re now told, you were Born That Way, and never mind if this biological determinism is vaguely redolent of Nazi race doctrine.

This is Science with a capital “s,” and Progress with a capital “p,” and no enlightened person is ever supposed to question whether today’s ideas of Scientific Progress are really any more valid than the discarded ideas of yesterday’s Scientific Progress.

Lost somewhere in all this is the old-fashioned understanding that humans are creatures of habit, and that if one gets into the habit of indulging certain unruly appetites, those habits may become the shackles of lifelong slavery, impairing the individual’s capacity for happiness, and inflicting various forms of misery on society at large.

Where did Kathryn Camille Murray get the idea that having sex with a 15-year-old boy was a pleasant and harmless amusement?

Perhaps the answer is to be found somewhere among the penumbras and emanations where Justice Douglas found a “right to privacy” in Griswold v. Connecticut, a few decades before Justice Kennedy invoked the hitherto unknown doctrine of “emerging awareness” in striking down the Texas sodomy statute. And who knows whither the emerging awareness shall henceforth emerge?

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

Femi-nazis Go Crazy Over Latest Common Sense Proposal

October 27, 2013

The Drunk Sluts Rights Movement

Posted on | October 27, 2013

Back in August, when I covered “SlutWalk DC,” I observed:

Date rape is an apparently common campus crime that usually involves two drunk young people, one of whom has an erect penis, and the other of whom is unable to avert what the erect penis typically does.

Of course, feminists would denounce such a statement of fact as a misogynistic expression of “rape culture,” but facts are facts: Alcohol is a significant contributing factor in the incidence of date rape. Leslie Eastman at College Insurrection remarks, “Never let it be said that outraged campus feminists confuse themselves with common sense,” as she highlights a Washington Post column about a recent uproar:

The message of Emily Yoffe’s Slate article about binge drinking and sexual assault on college campuses was as important as it was obvious: The best step that young women can take to protect themselves is to stop drinking to excess.
Young women everywhere — not to mention their mothers — ought to be thanking Yoffe. Instead, she’s being pilloried.
A “rape denialism manifesto” full of “plain old victim-blaming,” Lori Adelman wrote on the feminist blog Feministing.com. Erin Gloria Ryan, on Jezebel.com, accused Yoffe of “admonishing women for not doing enough to stop their own rapes.”

Read the whole thing. This feminist nonsense is perfectly understandable once you recognize that the whole p0int of endless ranting about the evils of the oppressive patriarchy is to absolve women of responsibility for their own failures. So the coed who starts guzzling tequila at the ATO house and wakes up the next morning sore, sticky and naked, with only vague memories of how she got that way, is not merely a victim of drunken fratboys — and we all know what deviant beasts those ATOs are, right? — but also a victim of all men everywhere throughout the course of human history. Anyone who says otherwise is just a misogynistic slut-shaming bigot.

“One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that; no ordinary man could be such a fool,” said the sexist George Orwell.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

This is What Evil islam Teaches. Any more Questions?

September 11, 2013

waronwomen

Camille Paglia Speaks the truth about islamic Oppression of Women

August 24, 2013

CAMILLE PAGLIA GOES WHERE NO FEMI-NOT HAS GONE BEFORE …. KABOOM!

Camille_paglia-620x412
It’s about time that hardcore leftist female fighters weighed in on the misogyny, honor violence and degradation of women under Islam. But they don’t. They submit to their paternal masters. All we hear coming out of the lefty Ladies Rooms are puffed-up clowns like Naomi Wolf extolling the virtues of the world’s  most misogynistic, offensive women’s garment — the burka.

There is no article of clothing as vile and offensive to me than that of the cloth coffin. It runs a terrible second to the yellow Jewish star that the Nazis forced on the Jews.

So finally the brave warrior Camille weighs in. Watch the left turn on her …. 3…2…1

Camille, meet Joyce Carol Oates.

See: My 2010 piece on the feminazis in The American Thinker:

In FrontPage I discuss why Camille Paglia may soon feel the ire of the politically correct establishment:

Camille Paglia or Samuel Huntington? It was hard to tell Wednesday when Paglia said in an interview with Tracy Clark-Flory in Salon that “the escalating instability not just in Egypt but throughout the Mideast is very ominous. There is a clash of cultures brewing in the world that may take a century or more to resolve — and there is no guarantee that the secular West will win.”This is the kind of talk that has gotten many another writer and commentator labeled as a racist bigot. Paglia’s “clash of cultures” is closely akin to Huntington’s “clash of civilizations,” which notwithstanding how obvious it is that just such a clash is taking place now, is widely derided in the mainstream media.

As Huntington famously observed in The Clash of Civilizations, “Wherever one looks along the perimeter of Islam, Muslims have problems living peaceably with their neighbors. The question naturally rises as to whether this pattern of the late 20th century conflict between Muslim and non-Muslim groups is equally true of relations between groups from other civilizations. In fact, it is not. Muslims make up 1/5 of the world’s population but in the 1990s they have been far more involved in intergroup violence than the people of any other civilization….Islam’s borders are bloody, and so are its innards” (p. 256).

This is manifestly true, and even truer than it was when Huntington wrote it. So it is hard to understand how anyone can object to this, but after all, Leftist analysis is generally based on fantasy and fiction, and this case is no different. Mohammed Ayoob, a professor of International Relations at Michigan State University, wrote in CNN in February 2012 that “political scientist Huntington wrote in 1993 that cultural divisions preclude a defining global civilization, and the West and the Muslim world would never share the same values,” and that “many of us” believed this thesis to have been “discredited beyond repair.”

Ayoob did, however, say that Huntington’s thesis had been “reaffirmed” by the European Union’s ban on purchasing oil from Iran, and by France’s criminalization of denial of the Armenian Genocide. These decisions, he said, “sent the same message to the Muslim world: You are not our equals and are doomed to be judged by standards different from those by which we judge ourselves.”

Ayoob’s skepticism regarding Huntington’s thesis and placement of the blame entirely on the West for any clash with the Islamic world that may in fact exist is drearily typical among Leftist and Islamic supremacist pundits. And that’s why Camille Paglia, by offhandedly affirming the existence of a clash of cultures between the West and the global Islamic umma in the course of an interview about Hillary Clinton, may have set herself up for a firestorm of indignation from her ideological kin.

Despite her libertarian leanings, Camille Paglia’s Leftist credentials are impeccable, so she can say things like this in pro-jihad, pro-Sharia Leftist Salon. If Pamela Geller or Nonie Darwish or I had written exactly the same paragraph, Salon would have rejected it, or if it had appeared elsewhere, Salon would have vilified the writer as a racist, bigoted Islamophobe, fear-mongering for profit by talking about a mythical clash of cultures.

However, as Sam HarrisJoyce Carol Oates, and Richard Dawkins have recently learned, Camille Paglia will not be exempt. If she keeps talking about a “clash of cultures” that the secular West might lose, she, too, will be tarred as a “racist, bigoted Islamophobe,” impeccable Leftist credentials notwithstanding.

 

No one who dares speak out against jihad violence and Islamic supremacism is spared. Tuesday night PBS aired a BBC documentary about the life of Muhammad for which I was interviewed, and a small part of the interview briefly appears in the documentary, amid an avalanche of material about how Muhammad was essentially a modern-day Gandhi. This led to a small uproar on Twitter, with Leftists and Islamic supremacists tweeting angrily to PBS asking how they could dare to air the views (even for just a few seconds) of a hate-filled bigot like me. How do they know that I am a hate-filled bigot? Most, if not all, of the angry Tweeters probably never read a line I have ever written, and even if they have, wouldn’t be able to find any actual hatred or bigotry in it. But they have been told again and again and again that that is what I am about, and the people who tell them are people they trust, so they know it must be true.

Once I am completely demonized, marginalized, and out of the way, they will start in on the next target, until there will be no one left to say the smallest critical word about jihad violence, Sharia oppression, and Islamic supremacism. Camille Paglia may well find this out.

From Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/08/camilla-paglia-goes-where-no-femi-not-has-gone-before-kaboom.html#more

Wife of Dead Boston Bomber Thinks islam is Good for Women and Children? WTF?

August 13, 2013

OH, THIS IS RICH! Boston bomber’s wife converted to Islam because she believed the ‘immoral’ Catholic Church, plagued by sex abuse scandals, was not safe for her daughter

a8b5c0e2725f29563602477d9bed149e

The widow of Boston Marathon Muslim bomber, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, converted to Islam because she ‘wanted a church with more morals’ than the Roman Catholic one in which she was raised.

UK Daily Mail  The startling claim has been made by Donald Larking, 67, who struck up a friendship with Tamerlan in 2011 when the bomber’s mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaev began caring for Mr Larking’s quadriplegic wife in their home just west of Boston.

tamerlan-tsarnaev-katherine-russell-square-1

According to Mr Larking: ‘She wanted a church with more morals. She felt that mosque would be a safer place for her daughter to go to nursery school.’

Mr Larking, himself a convert from Catholicism to Islam, met Katherine when Zubeidat Tsarnaev returned to Russia last year. Her sons had occasionally covered care shifts for her but, when Zubediat left the country permanently, Katherine took on the role of carer to Mr Larking’s wife.

249167_477352742291832_264630451_n-e1376373635932

In comments made to the Boston Globe, Mr Larking claimed that Katherine admitted to becoming disillusioned in the Church following the series of sexual abuse scandals that has engulfed it in recent years.

As revealed by MailOnline, Katherine Russell, 24, was the image of an all-American girl when she met and began dating Tamerlan Tsarnaev. She converted to Islam, dropped out of her studies at Sussex University, Boston, without graduating and married the then promising boxer and athlete in a small ceremony in 2010.

FEMALEGENITLEMUTILATIONOFGIRL-vi

Friends from her hometown of North Kingstown, RI, told MailOnline that Katie, as they knew her, ‘was brainwashed by her super-religious husband.’  They said that after meeting Tsarnaev she was ‘not the same person at all.’

Mr Larking, who suffers from mental and physical disabilities after being shot in the head in a convenience store robbery in 1974, described his friend Tamerlan as, ‘very very religious. He believed that the Koran was the one true word and he loved it.’

acidattacksonwomeninindiavi-vi

The explosions, detonated at the finishing line of the Boston marathon, killed 3 and wounded 264 – many of those injured suffered horrendous injuries including loss of limbs.

Dhokhar, 19, has pleaded not guilty to 30 counts – 17 of which carry the death penalty. In the months since the attacks it has been reported that Katherine – who maintains that she had no knowledge of any terrorist plot – has shed some of the strict Muslim habits dictated by her late husband.

120419_quote2-vi

Friends say that she has started listening to rock music and painting her nails – neither of which the strictly controlling Tamerlan permitted.

But one of her lawyers, Mr Amato DeLuca, who has been a friend of the family for many years has told MailOnline that despite reverting to her maiden name, Katherine remains a devout follower of Islam.

timbeforeaftere1359759915416vi-vi

Soon after the bombings Katherine quit the squalid Cambridge, MA, flat in which she and Tsranaev lived, to return to the home in which she was raised by her father, emergency physician Warren, and mother, Judith, a nurse along with her younger sisters Rebecca, 22, and Anna, 19.

She and her 3-year-old daughter Zahara have been living in the Rhodes Island home since Tsarnaev was killed in a police shoot out on 19 April. A huge police manhunt that saw Boston in lock down ended with Tamerlan’s death and his younger brother Dhokhar’s arrest four days after the bombing attacks.

childrapeandmolestation5-vi

The explosions, detonated at the finishing line of the Boston marathon, killed 3 and wounded 264 – many of those injured suffered horrendous injuries including loss of limbs.

Dhokhar, 19, has pleaded not guilty to 30 counts – 17 of which carry the death penalty. In the months since the attacks, it has been reported that Kathering – who maintains that she had no knowledge of any terrorist plot – has shed some of the strict Muslim habits dictated by her late husband.

ShortLeash_smvi-vi

Friends say that she has started listening to rock music and painting her nails – neither of which the strictly controlling Tamerlan permitted.

But one of her lawyers, Mr Amato DeLuca, who has been a friend of the family for many years has told MailOnline that despite reverting to her maiden name, Katherine remains a devout follower of Islam.

article-2390151-196B93D9000005DC-412_634x442

From Bare naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Demonrat Filner. What a Guy!

August 1, 2013

Filthy Filner No Longer Allowed To Meet In Private With Women

So because Filner has no conscience and refuses to resign, the city and his staff are enforcing a rule that he isn’t allowed to meet with women alone to protect the city from legal ramificiations. Imagine how ridiculous that is, that you have to be constantly on the watch for your mayor sexually harassing women. Unbelievable.

Via Breitbart:

Melissa Harris-Perry, who filled in last night for Rachel Maddow on some MSNBC show I don’t usually watch, asked Filner’s new chief of staff if it was discriminatory to bar women from having private meetings with Mayor Filner. Eight women have come forward with detailed claims of harassment by the Mayor so far and a lawsuit against San Diego and the Mayor have been filed.

Wait, WHAT?!?

Filner’s COS Lee Burdick, a woman (not sure how that will work out…) responded:

the rule is a way to protect “both the mayor and the citizens of San Diego” and to insure that city business is “being done with the highest level of integrity.” Burdick said she and the mayor developed the policy as a “reasonable and prudent business practice in light of the allegations being leveled against him.” Does Harris-Perry think women ought to meet alone with Filner after these allegations have come out from highly credible, powerful San Diego women? Does she really think it’s discriminatory for the city attorney to try and protect women (and the Mayor, tbh)  from possible continued harassment or harassment claims, not to mention future liability claims?

I think she would be screaming very loudly if the city did not protect San Diego women from possible harassment and I suspect she would be pointing a finger if something were to happen and the city failed to protect the residents and employees, knowing these allegations are floating around.

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Taking Evil to A Lower Level – The mooslim Rape War

July 29, 2013

The Muslim Rape War Against Europe.

23TuesdayJul 2013

Posted by

 

o-DSM-5-GRIEF-DEPRESSION-facebook-420x215

As I wrote in my post ‘Muslim Social Terrorism’, the most significant consequences of allowing Muslims to reside in the free world are not political, but social. The vague (and over-advertised) issue of Muslim ‘terrorism’ is, in-truth, likely to affect no more than 2-3% of Western citizens, and of these, most will live in major cities and so be already accustomed to the risks involved.

The social tragedies enabled by Islamic immigration are much more frequent and (for me) just as morally offensive as explosions on a subway.

Of all these social tragedies, perhaps the most widespread and horrific has been the ‘Muslim rape-wave’, also known as the ‘Rape-Jihad’; a phenomenon that has traumatized thousands of European and other non-Muslim women across the European Union.

There is no way I can think of to sugar this pill. In every Western European country, innocent women have been raped (on a massive scale) for ideological reasons. Females of all ages (including mothers and minors) have been subject to indescribable defilement by the worst human elements the earth has yet produced.

Although it predates the attacks, this project accelerated rapidly after 9/11 and the subsequent mainstreaming of Islamist thought in Muslim communities. By 2010 at the latest, the word ‘epidemic’ was being openly used in conservative journals. As things stand now we should have no qualms about using the term ‘rape war’.

And these rapes are not the ‘lesser’ kind of rape (whatever Kenneth Clarke may have meant by that). They are typically angry affairs; sex mixed with assault. In many cases, should the victim have wandered alone into a Muslim ghetto, the rape will involve many different men (from the very young to the very old) and will leave the victim with severe internal injury and blood-borne infection.

In other cases, an initially willing female, after having had sex with a Muslim for the first time, will be plied with sedative drugs (especially highly addictive benzodiazepines) in order to make her more likely to agree to future sex, this time with paying associates of the original male. Such a process is known in the UK as ‘grooming’ and is estimated to have affected thousands (yes, thousands) of girls (predominantly those from broken backgrounds – orphans, runaways, those in social care etc…) across the country.

In Oxford, the green, ancient home of Anglo-Saxon learning, a group of young girls (all white English) from local care homes fell prey to a network of Pakistani pimps and sexual opportunists. In one case, reported in detail during the trial of the offenders last year, an 11 year old girl was lured to addiction on both alcohol and tranquilizers. By her own estimates she was penetrated by more than five men an evening, often as she travelled in and out of consciousness. According to the BBC, on one occasion she vomited repeatedly over the side of the bed during intercourse, but even this didn’t grant her any mercy. She was quickly cleaned and prepared for the next Muslim in line.

After many weeks of this process, the same girl was branded (using a heated pin) with an ‘M’ for Mohammad; not the Prophet, but the name of her new Muslim ‘owner’. She later (aged 12) became pregnant by this same tormentor, and was forced to have a backstreet abortion using crude and disgusting implements. She would only escape fully after turning 15, having endured four long years of incarceration and medieval torture.

Although it is a Europe-wide project, the main focus for the Rape-Jihad in recent years appears to have been Scandinavia.

The countries of Scandinavia have long pursued some of the most senseless immigration policies in the EU area. As a direct result of these, prospective Muslim colonists are increasingly choosing Nordic countries over traditional settlement targets like England and France. The social cost of this has already been appalling. Daniel Greenfield wrote the following (harrowing) summation of the situation in Sweden in Frontpagemag:

“Sweden now has the second highest number of rapes in the world, after South Africa, which at 53.2 per 100,000 is six times higher than the United States. Statistics now suggest that 1 out of every 4 Swedish women will be raped.

In 2003, Sweden’s rape statistics were higher than average at 9.24, but in 2005 they shot up to 36.8 and by 2008 were up to 53.2. Now they are almost certainly even higher as Muslim immigrants continue forming a larger percentage of the population.

With Muslims represented in as many as 77 percent of the rape cases and a major increase in rape cases paralleling a major increase in Muslim immigration, the wages of Muslim immigration are proving to be a sexual assault epidemic by a misogynistic ideology.”

Now, I am aware of the dangers of believing statistics from Sweden on this issue. Sweden has a notorious problem with militant feminism and what constitutes ‘rape’ in Stockholm may not even earn a reprimand in New York and London. Nevertheless, even if we adjust the statistics to focus exclusively on the most sensible definition of rape – ie. unwanted penetrative sex – then all Nordic countries still have a social crisis the scale of which is bewildering.

ii. Why do they do it?

The way Muslims rationalise their predation on women is as follows:

Because Western women wear short skirts and mingle with people of the opposite sex, they consequently have no virtue. They are slags, who, by their behaviour define themselves as sex-objects. Consequently, for someone to rape or molest them is no more than their behaviour invites and probably something they’ve experienced before. It may even be something they secretly desire.

This logic has a rough equivalent in a phrase used by violent pimps: “You can’t rape a prostitute’. By this, the pimp means that ‘his’ women have fallen voluntarily (by their being prostitutes) through a moral floor and that since they have done so, they have lost the right to complain about certain types of treatment.

While Pimps imagine this moral floor to have been broken by the woman allowing herself to be penetrated for money, the Muslim believes it to be broken by the wearing of high heels, or by making innocent jokes about sex with male friends.

As a woman then, you won’t fully know that you’ve ‘fallen’ in a Muslim’s estimation, until he’s forcing himself on top of you.

iii. Conclusion.

I am not a feminist. I do retain the unfashionable belief that men have a responsibility to protect women. Consequently, I believe we all deserve a portion of the blame for this scandal. Our reaction to date has been timid and inadequate. If one (just one) Afghan Muslim Woman was raped by a European soldier today, we would lose a hundred troops in the cause of her avenging. Yet thousands upon thousands of European women have already been traumatized by the enemy in our own countries and we have failed to respond.

The guilt may be theirs, the shame is our own.

D, LDN. From Defend the Modern World: http://defendthemodernworld.wordpress.com/

Wonderful Mayor – Bob “Filthy” Filner

July 18, 2013

Politician of Unknown Partisan Affiliation Is a Notorious Serial Sexual Harasser

Posted on | July 17, 2013

It’s time once again to play our favorite game, “Name That Party”!

“God forbid, if you were a single woman he found the least bit attractive. He was relentless and disgusting, and sometimes unforgiving.”

Need a hint? Amanda Marcotte hasn’t said a word about this creep. And no, not on her Twitter feed today, either, that I can tell. But then again, maybe you need some more clues.

A city councilwoman and two lawyers, formerly allies of the mayor, held a press conference to air the charges lodged against Mayor Filner by a variety of women.

Hmmm. What party could this be?

Donna Frye described other specifics about a victim: “He grabbed her, kissed her, jamming his tongue down her throat.” Frye went on to describe another encounter: “The Mayor quickly had his hand down the inside of her bra.”

Gee, maybe this creepy molester should be getting some attention from the media — “War on Women,” and all that — but Mayor Bob “Filthy” Filner is scheduled to give the keynote speech at a benefit for victims of sexual assault, so I guess his heart is in the right place.

And his tongue is down your throat.

And his hand is inside your bra.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

Equal Pay? Oh Really? STFU You Lying Hypocrite

April 10, 2013

President Who Pays Men 13% More Than Women Proclaims Today “Equal Pay Day”…

Hypocrite-in-Chief.

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama designated April 9 as National Equal Pay Day, even though 70 percent of White House staffers in the top-salary bracket were men, and male White House staffers earn on average 13 percent more than female staffers.

“To grow our middle class and spur progress in the years ahead, we need to address longstanding inequity that keeps women from earning a living equal to their efforts,” Obama said in the proclamation released Monday evening. “That is why I have made pay equity a top priority — from signing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act days after I took office to cracking down on equal pay law violations wherever they occur. And to back our belief in equality with the weight of law, I continue to call on the Congress to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act.”

CNSNews.com reported on March 15 that 70 percent of White House staffers earning the maximum salary of $172,200 last year were men and 30 percent were women, according to the White House numbers posted on staff compensation. Further, men on the White House staff are paid $86,260.89 on average. Women on the White House staff are paid an average of $76,162.65. So men on the White House staff are paid about 13.26 percent more than women. Put another way, women earn 88.29 percent of what men earn.

Keep reading…

Rape…Do We Now Say It’s Ok? The Mainstream Media Says it Is.

March 20, 2013

Found at Mad Medic: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

Guns Empower Women

February 20, 2013

Found at 90 miles: http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/

Colorado Democrats War on Women

February 20, 2013

Dem Pol Explains Why Women Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Themselves From Rapists

War on Women? I’ll show you a war on women:

While trying to explain why women in college don’t need firearms for self-defense on campus, Colorado state Rep. Joe Salazar said even if women feel like they might be raped, their suspected attacker might not actually have intent to rape. So please, put the guns away ladies.

“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles. Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at,” he said during a legislative hearing. “And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble and when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop — pop a round at somebody.”

Kudos to Salazar for displaying the discipline required to keep a straight face while implying that call boxes and “safe zones” negate the need for self-defense.

Hot Air notes that Salazar (a Democrat, of course) touches all the bases:

Downplaying the threat of rape? Check. Questioning the ability of grown, sentient women to perceive that threat? Check. A man in a position of power presuming to know what’s best for women he knows nothing about? Check. Limiting women’s choices by law in potentially life-threatening situations? Check. Six months ago, this was known as the frightful patriarchy. Now, it’s just another member of the Party of Women doing his part for the good work of gun control.

According to Democrats, it is better that women should be raped, beaten, and murdered than that our constitutional right to bear arms be preserved.

On tips from dan and Laurie.

From Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

 

What Would islam Do If There Were No Women to Hate?

February 19, 2013

From 90 miles: http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/

islam: Waging the “Real” and Only War on Women

January 25, 2013

Indonesia’s Top Muslim Clerics Back Female Circumcision, Call It A “Human Right”…

The real war on women.

Jakarta (AsiaNews) – The Indonesian Council of Ulema (MUI) is in favour of female circumcision (and men) that, although it can not be considered mandatory, it is still “morally recommended.” This is shown by the words of the leader of the largest Islamic organization in the most populous Muslim country in the world. He warns, however, to avoid “excesses”, coming to the removal or cutting of the clitoris. In the meantime, has come under investigation and will be prosecuted by a court “ethical” the judge who, in recent days, he “joked” about sexual violence to women, causing a veritable wave of outrage.

The reference point for Islamic issues (such as the legality of a food and a drink), a “consultor” to the government in matters of faith, the body responsible for issuing fatwas – the answers on Muslim questions of faith and morals – the MUI has taken a position on female circumcision. And by the mouth of his head, Kiai Hajj Amin Ma’ruf, pointed out that it is an”advisable practise on moral grounds”, at the same time, he rejects any attempt to declare this practice illegal or contrary to the principles. It comes under the sphere of “human rights,” said the Islamist leader, and is “guaranteed by the Constitution.”

“Female circumcision – said Amin – is commonly practiced by cutting out parts that cover the clitoris” and, at the same time, he invites believers to refrain from “excessive circumcision” that ends up becoming a real mutilation genital. He recalled that the Mui can not make this practice “mandatory”, but “strongly rejects” the possible cancellation of this “tradition” which is performed in a “ritualistic ceremony” and also applies to men.

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Just a Piece of The American Pie of Depravity

January 22, 2013

Does Lynn Messina Grasp The Damage She’s Doing To Our Culture?

Posted on | January 21, 2013

by Smitty

Bottom line up front: “XX” != ” XY”.

Anybody who thinks that the moral fiber of the United States has been diminished since feminism and the sexual revolution disgraced our shores  can find a contemporary example of the disease here, emphasis mine:

Start to complain about your preschooler adopting gentlemanly behavior and you quickly discover how out of step you are with the rest of the world. Almost everyone I mention it to thinks it’s lovely and sweet. What’s the harm in teaching little boys to respect little girls?
The implication, of course, is that I’m overreacting, and as a parent, I’ll admit to being prone to the occasional bout of hypersensitivity. For months, I grumbled that the inappropriately breathy tone of Cinderella on Emmett’s LeapFrog Princess laptop was warping a generation of impressionable young minds.
But I don’t think it’s an overreaction to resent the fact that your son is being given an extra set of rules to follow simply because he’s a boy. His behavior, already constrained by a series of societal norms, now has additional restrictions. Worse than that, he’s actively being taught to treat girls differently, something I thought we all agreed to stop doing, like, three decades ago. That the concept of selective privilege has been introduced in preschool of all places — the inner sanctum of fair play, the high temple of taking turns — is mind-boggling to me. How can you preach the ethos of sharing at the dramatic play center and ignore it 20 feet away at the toilet?
Yet as much as this double standard offends me as a mom, it’s nothing compared with how much it infuriates me as a feminist. Forty years after the tender, sweet, young thing in “Free to Be You and Me” gets eaten by a pack of hungry tigers after asserting that ladies should go first, we are still insisting on empty courtesies that instill in women a sense of entitlement for meaningless things. Many women see gallantry as one of the benefits of their sex; I see it as one of its consolations.

As we peer into the wreckage of our culture, wondering how we went from greatness to corruption, we need to point to the Lynn Messinas as the flies in the soup. Thanks to the internet, we can underscore  just how false your ideas are Messina, and share some information about the origins of your jacked-up thinking.

This ‘notion of rules’ and sense of  ’treating girls differently’ does not end in a ‘sense of entitlement for meaningless things’, as events in Aurora tragically underscored. Without doing a thorough survey, how many of the recent spate of atrocities were undertaken by men who’d enjoyed a stable family life? How many featured a father who, understanding traditional values as pillars of strength rather than the bars of a prison, led the family in traditional roles of worship, character development, and masculine nurturing? I’d fall well short of connecting dots on anything here. I’m not making any correlation-equals-causation argument. Rather, I’m pointing out that the fundamentally good things Messina rejects are not, themselves, apparent drivers for evil at Newtown, Aurora, VA Tech, and so on.

Furthermore, if you ever want to develop the kind of men you need when the fertilizer truly hits the air circulator, you had better read every word Messina writes and proceed to do the opposite as parents. Denouncing the sort of idiocy she seems to encourage is among the minor reasons I blog at all. We, as a culture, need to stand up and oppose people that are throwing Western Civilization under the bus.  They seem comfortable making room, not only for abortion, but for the kind of barbaric cultures that can genitally mutilate girls and then dress them in a bags when grown. If Messina was worthy of the attention, one should like to drop her somewhere in Asia for a year or so, as sort of a “homeland appreciation tour”.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

Hey Dumbass Obama and The Rest of You Ignorant Liberals – Planned Parenthood Does NOT Do Mammograms

October 23, 2012

From Weasel Zippers

This is islam in All of Its Evil Glory

October 11, 2012

 PAKISTAN: Taliban who shot 14-year old peace activist say, “If she survives, we will shoot her again, because she is a secular-minded lady”

 A Taliban spokesperson told The Express Tribune that this was a warning for all youngsters who were involved in similar pro-Western  activities and added that they will be targeted if they do not stop.
Pakistani surgeons removed bullet from the head of 14-year-old Malala Yousafzai, but Taliban threaten to ‘finish this chapter’

FSM  National Award Peace winner Malala Yousafzai was injured along with two other women when Taliban gunmen opened fire on a bus in Swat. Yousufzai, who studies at Khushal Public School, was on her way home when the vehicle came under attack on Haji Baba Road. One of the other injured has been identified as Shazia and sources say the third was a teacher.

Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan said his group was behind the shooting. ”She was pro-West and she was speaking against Taliban,” Ehsan said by telephone from an undisclosed location. ”She was young but she was promoting Western culture in Pashtun areas,” he said, referring the main ethnic group in northwest Pakistan and southern and eastern Afghanistan.

Pakistani civil society activists carry placards with a photograph of the gunshot victim Malala Yousafzai as they shout anti-Taliban slogans during a protest rally against the assassination attempt on her

DPO Swat Rasool Shah said that a search operation has been initiated in the area and a number of suspects have been arrested. Malala was shifted to Saidu Sharif Medical Complex in Mingora immediately after the incident and later she was moved to Peshawar in an Army helicopter. Doctors at the Medical Complex said that Malala was out of danger after the bullet penetrated her skull but missed her brain.

 From Bare Naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

This is What islam Does to Those Who Dare to Question

October 11, 2012

Pakistan: Doctors Say Teenage Girl Shot By Taliban For Promoting Girls’ Education Condition “Improving”…

Update to this story.

(CBS News) – Doctors in Pakistan have managed to pull a bullet from the neck of a 14-year-old girl who was shot by a Taliban gunman Wednesday for speaking out in favor of girls’ education.

Malala Yousufzai remains in critical condition at a military hospital in Peshawar, however, following the shooting in her hometown of Mingora, in Pakistan’s Swat Valley – a former stronghold of the Taliban.

She is improving. But she is still unconscious,” a regional Pakistani official told the Associated Press. “I can’t say a final word about her condition. A board of doctors is constantly examining her condition.”

A senior Pakistani official later told CBS News that Malala was “semi-conscious,” and had shown some level of response to doctors.

The Taliban came for Malala as she boarded a bus to go home from school. The gunman sought her out and shot her in the head and neck and wounded two other girls.

There is no doubt that Malala was the target. The gunman actually asked for her by name when he boarded the school bus.

Malala lived with the fear of being a Taliban target. That fear was evident in a Jan. 3, 2009, diary entry: “On my way home from school I heard a man saying…’I will kill you’. I hastened my pace and after a while I looked back if the man was still coming behind me. But to my utter relief he was talking on his mobile and must have been threatening someone else over the phone.”

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Women Here and There

October 10, 2012

From The People’s Cube: http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/women-s-progress-backwards-the-tale-of-two-burkas-t9633.html

Democrats Have a Real Problem With Real Math

October 2, 2012

Are you a Democrat Slut? Do you have problems with basic math? The Other McCain can help

 

RS McCain is offering to help Democrat sluts with math problems, and the tuition? Stacy is not charging, but At $15,ooo it would still be less than the cost of that birth control you ladies want the government to pay for

The image above is one of the “e-Cards” available at BarackObama.comthat offers a phony statistical argument for ObamaCare:

Dear Mom,
Mitt Romney says he would repeal the Affordable Care Act.
So here’s a quick question:
Can I borrow $18,000 to help pay for my birth control?
Thanks!

Whoa! $18,000 for birth control? If that number sounds strangely large to you, join the club. Conservative college student Christine Rousselle does the math, based on the simple fact that there are 14,600 days between the ages of 12 and 52:

Because our letter-writer has been reduced to asking her mom for money, we’re going to assume that she’s not very well off and she’s a bargain hunter. On Amazon.com, one can purchase a fishbowl filled with a variety pack of 144 Durex brand condoms for $25.89. Assuming she’d use one condom per day every single day between the ages of 12 and 52, that only equals $2,624.96 for 14,600 Durex condoms. For those of you who aren’t great at math, $2,624.96 is far less than $18,000. She’d have to be using around four or five condoms a day for 40 years for that number to even approach $18,000.
Suppose our cash-strapped friend prefers to use the birth control pill instead of condoms. In 41 states, she can get the pill for $9 a month at a Target or Walmart. That totals $108 per year, and $108 multiplied by 40 is $4,320, which still winds up less than $18,000. In the nine other states, the cost per month is around $30, which reaches around $14,400 over 40 years. These figures assume that our letter-writer plans on using birth control pills over the full length of time that she is able to get pregnant.

Using birth control every single day for 40 years, a slut’s total cost is still not $18,000 in a lifetime. So even if she’s putting out like a Pez dispenser — and, after all, she’s a Democrat, IYKWIMAITYD — she’ll have plenty of cash left over for vodka and Newports.

Man , that McCain guy is a giving man!

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

The Real Woman Haters – The Democratic Party That Embraces islam

September 4, 2012

The Democrats’ Anti-Woman, Anti-Gay Elephant in the Room

By Janet Levy

 

In this highly polarized, contentious election season, the media frequently portrays the GOP as anti-woman and anti-gay.  The desire of most Republicans to protect the unborn has been speciously transmogrified into hatred of women and a plot to control their reproductive systems and, ultimately, their lives. 

It’s what prompted Code Pink to protest at the Republican National Convention with members dressed up as vaginas to graphically bring home what they perceive as a war on women by Republicans who they claimed want to set the clock back several decades, erase the progress made by the  women’s rights movement, and relegate women to second class citizenry. 

The ardent protests against Republicans and the concomitant apocryphal charges that they are anti-woman and anti-gay are par for the course.  In actuality, Republicans are merely advocating for the sanctity of life and traditional marriage and do not demonstrate hatred against any group.  However, to hold an opinion contrary to the leftist dogma of the day is obviously enough to spur public vilification and rampant allegations of malfeasance.   

The anti-woman, anti-gay allegations Democrats use to characterize Republicans are all the more astonishing in light of the tolerance and accommodations that are conferred on Islam.  While Islam is given a pass on these issues, Democrats freely malign Republicans who speak out about repressive Islamic doctrine or sharia, an ideology that is truly anti-woman and anti-gay. 

It’s worth noting that the Democratic Party’s friendliness toward Muslims has prompted an extraordinary gathering in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the Democratic National Convention begins on Sept. 4.  As part of the pre-convention festivities, a “Jumah at the DNC” was held through Sept. 1 by the Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), an Islamic nonprofit headquartered in Newark, New Jersey.  The Washington Times estimates that “between 500 and 1,000 participants” attended the Jumah, while 20,000 had been predicted to attend the entire three-day event.

The opening prayer was led by Siraj Wahhaj, an advocate for an Islamic state in America, a “potential unindicted co-conspirator” in the first World Trade Center bombing, and a member of CAIR.  Event co-organizer Jibril Hough has ties to Islamic terrorists as the imam at a Muslim Brotherhood-owned mosque in Charlotte.  That mosque is listed by the U.S. Justice Department as an “unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terror finance case in U.S. history.”

The Muslim-friendly Democrats have stayed mum on the subject of this ominous gathering in the shadow of their own convention.  The silence is not surprising, given the recent Democratic response to an exposé on the infiltration of the U.S. government by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Six weeks ago, five brave members of Congress led by Michele Bachmann reported on the government infiltration and the MB goal to achieve a “grand jihad to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within” until “G-d’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”  Instead of registering concern about the well-documented strategy to Islamize America and impose sharia, Democrats accused the congressmen of Islamophobia and McCarthyism.  Yet Democrats claim to stand for women’s rights, homosexual rights, and the separation of church and state, in direct contrast to the tenets of Islam.

The hypocrisy of the left’s defense of Islam is glaringly obvious when it comes to its treatment of women, which goes far beyond decisions about abortion and birth control.  The left’s feminist sisters may think that Republicans want to repeal women’s rights, but the Koran (4:34) expressly states, “Allah has made men superior to women because men spend their wealth to support them.” 

The Koran sanctions wife-beating with “[a]s for women whom you fear will rebel, admonish them first, and then send them to a separate bed, and then beat them.”  Furthermore, Muslim women may be beaten for refusing sexual relations with their husbands.

Within the Islamic doctrine that Democrats are promoting and defending are provisions to devalue women by allocating half the share of women’s inheritances to men, valuing the testimony of a woman as half that of a man, and providing indemnities for death or injury of a women at half the dollar value of men.  In Islam, women are ruled by male relatives — fathers, brothers, husbands — who restrict their movements, monitor their dress, and decide whom and when they will marry, the latter of which can be as young as six years of age. 

A Muslim husband can divorce his wife by stating his wish to do so three times and is under no obligation to economically provide for her.  He can have up to four wives and countless sex slaves, while a Muslim woman can be stoned for adultery, rape, or the appearance of impropriety.

As for homosexuality in Islam, homosexuality is considered vile and punishable by death.  The applicable Hadith states that “if a man comes upon a man, then they are both adulterers,” and “[i]f a woman comes upon a woman, they are both Adulteresses[.]”  ”When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes”; “[k]ill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to.” 

No debate exists about homosexuality in Islam; the only point of contention is the punishment, which can be beheading, hanging, stoning, or throwing the person from the tallest building.  These punishments are not unusual and are frequently meted out in Islamic sharia countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Somalia, and Mauritania. 

It is the height of hypocrisy and irony that, although Democrats freely criticize the policies of Republicans as anti-woman and anti-gay and worry about a conservative agenda that will result in a setback of the gains enjoyed by women and homosexuals over the past several decades, they fail to address the greater threat Islamic doctrine represents.  Democrats are silent about Islamic relegation of women to second-class citizenship and the life-and-death dangers it poses for homosexuals. 

Clearly, the peril with Islam goes far beyond a choice on abortion and the recognition of homosexual marriage.  The unlikely alliance the left has cultivated with Islam, not the left’s differences with the Republican Party, is the farthest departure from their espoused pro-women, pro-homosexual platform.  As such, it represents a danger to all Americans.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/the_anti-woman_anti-gay_elephant_in_the_room.html#ixzz25VFZhwnk

Simple Solution: Fire his Camel Piss Drinking, Woman Hating Ass.

July 28, 2012

ITALY’S TOP 5-STAR HOTEL OK’S MUSLIM PORTER WHO REFUSES TO REPORT TO WOMAN BOSS: “I DO NOT TAKE ORDERS FROM A WOMAN”

Hotel danieli

The sublime, legendary Danieli Hotel is a monument to Venetian magnificence and without doubt one of the world’s most outstanding luxury hotels…

….that bows to the sharia and the subjugation of women.

Slowly but most assuredly, the most anti-human, anti-woman, anti-freedom ideology on the face of the earth infuses itself into Western culture. These types of daily occurrences would have been unimaginable, impossible, twenty years ago.

What a difference weakness and lack of civilational self-esteem makes.

If it were me, I would have driven this misogynist supremacist to the airport and bought him a one-way ticket back to his richly derserved cave.

Needless to say, there ought to be a global boycott of Hotel Danieli. Any woman who would stay is a slave.

“Top Italian hotel OK’s Muslim porter won’t have to take orders from woman boss“ The Examiner July 27, 2012, (hat tip David)Named one of the top 500 hotels on the planet, the 5-Star Hotel Danieli of VeniceItaly has played host to the likes of Johann von Goethe, Richard Wagner, Honoré de Balzac, Charles Dickens and Emile Zola.

A one night stay in this swankiest of Venetian hotels runs the range of $12,198.88 (£7,747.29) to $308.05 (£195.64) per night.

It must cost that much in order to hire a go-between for a Muslim porter who refuses to take orders from his female supervisor.

As reported by the Italian newspaper Il Gazzettino, an unnamed Muslim porter of Egyptian origin at the hotel was quoted as stating:

“I do not take orders from a woman.”

So to ensure the centuries old hotel properly adhered to the young immigrant’s ”rigid religious vision,” the Danieli hired a male as a full time employee whose sole responsibility is to relay orders from the female supervisor to the sharia-compliant employee.

As reported by Il Gazzettino:

“We therefore decided to guarantee that during his work hours, his boss would have a male colleague at her side who would act as a liaison with the Egyptian to communicate the tasks to be performed.”

The savage should have been fired. On the spot.

Posted by  at Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

The Great mooslim Cover Up (Or Our Democracy Village is NOT The Same as Their Barbaric Village)

July 26, 2012

The Great Muslim Cover Up

By Daniel Greenfield

We all live in villages. Our village is a place where women are considered human beings, but in the village that is an ocean and a desert away, women are considered property. For all the ridiculous noises about Islamic feminism and all the reforms coming out of Riyadh, a proper Muslim can no more consider a woman his equal, than he could consider a sheep or an African slave his equal.

The problem is that lately our two villages have been overlapping thanks to the heap big magic of the airport. Americans travel to Saudi Arabia, where they are told to cover themselves up and respect the local customs, and Muslims travel to Canada where they tell the city of Toronto that it needs to cover up its women or they won’t be responsible for the consequences. Our village just can’t seem to win.

This is not the sort of stuff that you put in tourist brochures, this is the sort of stuff you cover up, and these days our nations exist as long tourist brochures covering up the problems and extolling the virtues of all these people who visit, move in, learn to fly planes and ram them into buildings because a medieval warlord claimed that a fellow named Allah wanted him to conquer the world, but didn’t provide him with any transportation more reliable than camels and a flying horse.

Our tourist brochures say, “Diversity”, but diversity is another one of our village’s unique virtues. It’s not a virtue when you reach Saudi Arabia, and it’s not a virtue when Saudi Arabia reaches us. Our noble commitment to diversity leads us to diversify by investing in multiculturalism, but many of those villages full of men with thirteen wives and sharp knives are not interested in multiculturalism.

The Taliban showed us what they thought of multiculturalism when they blew up Buddhist statues and the Islamists in Mali are showing us what they think of multiculturalism with a rampage directed against Sufi shrines. The Muslim Waqf in Jerusalem is continuing its vandalism of the remains of the Second Temple. All of them are following in the footsteps of Saudi Arabia which has waged a campaign of destruction against the cultural artifacts of every other culture.

In India, Hindus had the temerity to sing in their own country during the month of Ramadan, which ended in violence as furious Muslims tried to explain their views on multiculturalism with big rocks. In that same spirit, Al-Hashim Kamena Atangana, like so many other Muslim clerics, is trying to explain to us that while in our village it may be the custom to treat women as human beings, in his village it is the custom to treat them as property.

Common sense says that our village means our customs, but diversity says that our village is on the shores of the global village which is moving into our village and insisting that it’s now their village. This is a problem, but only for those of us who are Jews, Christians, Hindus, Atheists, Zoroastrians, Wiccans, Buddhists, Sikhs and Bahai. Not to mention female or in any other way differing from the Muslim male that runs the other village and is trooping through our airport with thirteen wives in tow.

It used to be that when in Rome, you did like the Romans. Now it’s when in Toronto, you do like Al-Hashim says. Because his voice is the booming echo of  diversity and like all the voices of diversity, it isn’t promoting multiculturalism, but a single culture. Their culture. One Ummah, one Caliph and one Burka.

The Muslim Brotherhood succeeded in changing Egypt through the twin expedients of propaganda and violence. 70 years after educated Egyptians wanted to be more Western, the Brotherhood is in power and Westerners are told to want to be more Muslim. The Al-Hashims bellow that Western women should act more Muslim and Western feminist groups encourage their members to try on Hijabs as gestures of tolerance and servitude. That great Islamic feminist, King Abdullah and his thirteen wives, whose kingdom spends billions on such propaganda, no doubt approves, and wishes they would move on to not driving cars as another gesture of tolerance for our new wonderfully diverse village.

The Hijab is the gateway to the Burka and both are just forms of mobile Purdah, the segregation that requires a woman to stay at home. And if she can’t stay in her tent, then she can only go out while wearing a big black tent that goes everywhere she goes. The cover-ups function like a cattle brand informing other Muslim men that this is someone else’s property. That was the ancient function of the garment when bands of Muslim raiders were collecting slave women and some distinction had to be made between married women who couldn’t be raped and slave women who could.

Under the Burka, the Muslim woman is still locked up in her room in her husband’s house even when she’s out and about in the marketplace. It is a liberal concession that allows her to occasionally leave the house while still being locked up in the house. And this brilliant bit of Islamic feminism, this reform which says that women can occasionally leave the house and shouldn’t be raped so long as they’re wearing a tent that makes it look like they’re still in Purdah, is just one of the ways that Islam is enriching our multiculturalism with its monoculturalism. To say nothing of all the Muslim rapes of women who refuse to walk around wearing tents.

Read the entire excellent article at Sultan Knish: http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

No Rights for Women in Egypt or Any Country Where islam is Allowed to Dominate

July 12, 2012

And it isn’t just in Egypt

From Bare Naked Islam: http://barenakedislam.com/