cialis weniger 20 mg
ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Category Archives: Liberal Racism

Don’t Be a Racist Billy!

August 1, 2014

From Theo: http://www.theospark.net/

See the Difference?

August 1, 2014

When

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

You Expect People to Pay Their Water Bill? You are a Racist!

July 29, 2014

Detroit: Where expecting people to pay their bills is “racist.”

 

a_paying_your_bill_is_racist.jpg
Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

Truth Has No Place in Our Media

July 25, 2014

LibLog1

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

From Shakespeare to Maya Angelou in Only 4 Centuries. From Brilliance to Bullshit.

June 12, 2014

A Moonbat’s Conception of the Voice of God

Please forgive me: Maya Angelou died recently and I didn’t even mention it. I didn’t realize that according to the highly revered (if only by liberals) Bill Clinton, she spoke with the voice of God:

“God loaned her His voice. She had the voice of God. And He decided He wanted it back for a while,” Clinton said at the memorial service, held this past Saturday at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, where Angelou taught as the Reynolds Professor of American Studies since 1982.

To honor the former Speaker With the Voice of God, let’s have a little poetry:

Dancin’ the funky chicken Eatin’ ribs and tips Diggin’ all the latest sounds And drinkin’ gin in sips.

Puttin’ down that do-rag Tighten’ up my ‘fro Wrappin’ up in Blackness Don’t I shine and glow?

Hearin’ Stevie Wonder Cookin’ beans and rice Goin’ to the opera Checkin’ out Leontyne Price.

Get down, Jesse Jackson Dance on, Alvin Ailey Talk, Miss Barbara Jordan Groove, Miss Pearlie Bailey.

Now ain’t they bad? An ain’t they Black? An ain’t they Black? An’ ain’t they Bad? An ain’t they bad? An’ ain’t they Black? An’ ain’t they fine?

If I had written that myself in a drunken stupor as a joke, it would be regarded as racism at its most vicious. But that really was written by Maya Angelou. The poem is aptly entitled “Ain’t That Bad?” It’s bad, all right.

Pretending that a child’s finger-paintings belong in the Louvre next to Rembrandt isn’t helping anyone. It would be far more constructive to encourage black writers with literary talent than to hype race-obsessed moonbats like Maya Angelou, who play into the stereotypes fondly treasured by condescending liberals.

maya-angelou
Moonbattery acts fast: from Shakespeare to Maya Angelou in only 4 centuries.

On a tip from Mr. Mentalo.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

The America We Used to Know is Being Erased

May 29, 2014

Suddenly It All Became Clear:  We Are Being Erased and Replaced

Erasing America

I had an epiphany this morning, on why the Left does what it does.  All leftist activity is devoted to installing a Marxist government in the United States.  In order to do that, they must replace capitalist-loving, patriotic Americans with others more amenable to their plans.
How the left plans to replace America:
1.  Open the borders to a tidal wave of Third World immigrants who do not share American values, traditions, cultures or beliefs.  Most of these folks are less educated and do not understand nor care about politics, economics, or constitutional government.  These immigrants vote overwhelmingly for the Democrat Party.  They will vote for anyone promising free stuff, and willingly trade long term prosperity and stability for short term advantages.  In short, they are more manageable and trainable to support leftist goals.  They also have more children, thus growing their numbers over time.
Millions of non-voting illegal immigrants are now among us, and may provide the tipping point for making the leftist Democrats a permanent majority party. Recent calls, even by so-called Republicans, to grant these immigrants amnesty and make citizens of them, will achieve this.
2.  Marginalize white people and reduce their numbers.  Recent voting patterns prove that white people, especially white men, are the ethnicity most resistant to the goals of the Neo-Marxists, i.e. replacement of capitalism with socialism, massive wealth redistribution, and social regimentation.  Not surprisingly, white men are the single most hated group by left wingers, and this is why whites are being targeted on college campuses.  Whites must be replaced, and marginalized while they are being replaced, with feelings of shame and guilt over imaginary wrongs.  Not surprisingly, whites are not replacing themselves through birthrates, and the white demographic is self-destructing.  It is only a matter of time before whites are effectively replaced, taking their culture, nation and traditions with them.
The above two factors constitute population replacementBefore the left can replace America with something else, they must replace those who made it, believe in it, and maintain it.
What we on the right are missing are (1) a correct definition and description of the problem, and (2) effective strategies for reversing the above two trends. 

Race. Yes, There are Differences. However, We live in a Mentirocracy, a Social System Based on Lies and Truth is Not Allowed.

May 29, 2014

To Live and Die Under a Mentirocracy by Takuan Seiyo

Wading into a faked controversy

(Below are excerpts of this article. Highlights are from the editor. Read the entire article here: http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/05/to-live-and-die-under-a-mentirocracy/#more-33333)

On May 6, 2014, Penguin Press released Nicholas Wade’s book, A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History. The deeply researched book by the New York Times’ veteran (now retired) science writer has summarized new findings in genetic science that lead unequivocally to the conclusion that race is a biological reality, and race matters. Venturing onto more concrete and dangerous territory Wade has limned in this light topics such as the genetic reasons for the “Jewish genius,” or for sub-Saharan Blacks’ lesser adaptability to modern life than that of Whites’ and Asians’.

All that sounds obvious to those who have a pair of eyes and IQ above moron level. After all, the American NBA or the Olympic finals in Track and Field are a showcase pretty much for one race, and it’s not because of Affirmative Action. Criminal flash mobs are predominantly the domain of a single race too, and opera-singing flash mobs are the domain of another. Jews excel at receiving Nobel Prizes not because they have the inside track in Stockholm. High quality industry and standard of living developed in Japan (Real GDP per capita $23,197) rather than Iraq (Real GDP per capita $3,197) despite Iraq’s being by far the naturally richer and more ancient country, because the Japanese are biologically and culturally different from Arabs[1].

In a mentirocracy, i.e. a social system based on lies, poking a lie is a major crime that rings alarm bells in Ivory Towers, gilded Think Tank tanks, ministerial council cabinets, presidential suites, and down below too where dwell the youngish pierced activist drones. It is, after all, like touching a card in a house of cards: a chain event may follow.

This is therefore a mentirocracy: an entrenched social system based on lies, in which the population has internalized the lies. It is worse than communism, where a small, fanatical minority coerced the large majority to live by and pay homage to gross lies. At least there, the people were keenly aware those were lies. Quietly, stubbornly, they clung to the truth, waiting for some future day of deliverance.

But in a popular mentirocracy, there is no future deliverance, except by miracle. In a brainwashed and dumbed-down population — tellingly, only 4% of Americans think they have below-average intelligence — enlightenment comes as a flash only in the final moment, midflight when the mentally ill, delusional polity is being tossed by history to its junkyard.

America and increasingly the entire West are occupied 24/7 with the radical chimera of equality of outcomes for all, which means elevating the incompetent to parity with the competent and dumbifying the White to a “diversity-compatible” level[7].

83% of the District of Columbia schools’ pupils (72% Black, 14% Hispanic, 10% White) are not proficient in reading. Surely it’s because teaching “resources” are lacking! The DC School District therefore spends $29,349 per pupil — an amount that is sure to grow commensurately with the intractability of the reading “problem.”

Meanwhile, the top seven scorers in the PISA 2012 worldwide reading skills survey [pdf] are, in descending order, Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Macao and Japan. And those are countries where, in order to be able to read a newspaper, a pupil must have mastered thousands of Chinese characters (at least 3000 in China, 2400 in Japan, 1,800 in Korea) plus, for Japan and Korea, the indigenous alphabets.

It must be because China, Korean and Japan vastly outspend the District of Columbia on education, then! No such luck: Japan spends $8,301 per pupil, Korea $6,723, and China vastly less. On the other hand, their reading proficiency rankings neatly overlap with the top of the Lynn-Vanhanen table of worldwide national IQ averages studies, with the mean IQ for East Asia’s Chino-Korean-Japanese group in the 105 – 108 range[8].

As though none of this information existed and were easily accessible, the evil drones overseeing a corrupt, lying socio-political system are forever puzzled why “minorities” lag and how much more money and preferences are to be showered on them so that they can finally overcome racism and white privilege.

The myth that black poverty is the result of white racism has ruined most of America’s large cities, and poisoned the relationship between the races. But that is just the beginning. The federal government wastes hundreds of millions of dollars and violates its own student loan rules to subsidize perpetually failing black colleges. Inept Blacks are shoe-horned by Affirmative Action into good universities that then either have to flunk them or to flunk the university itself by lowering its standards to achieve “equal outcomes.”[6]

Read it all at Gates of Vienna: http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/05/to-live-and-die-under-a-mentirocracy/#more-33333

WhatPrivilege? You Fear That I am Better Than you.

May 21, 2014

Grumpy Cat responds to ‘Check your privilege!’

From 1389: http://1389blog.com/

The New Freedom of Private Speech Inquisition

May 21, 2014

Bob Copeland, Donald Sterling And The Criminalization Of Private Conversation (For Whites)

By Matthew Richer on May 20, 2014

VDARE.com note: We redact what we’re now supposed to call the “N-word” even in reported speech, because of what’s called “censorware” which blocks some users from seeing this webpage.

See also, from 2001, the Janice Barton case: The Barton Case: Waking The Sleeping Giant?

Like most Americans (I suspect), I was disappointed by the abrupt resignation of Bob Copeland, the 82 year old part-time Wolfeboro, NH police commissioner who used the “N Word” to describe President Obama to a friend while having a drink at the bar of a local restaurant, thus triggering the latest Political Correctness witch-hunt. At first, Copeland defended himself bravely and it looked like we might get another test of Paul Kersey’s thesis that this whole Ruling Class Show Trial strategy is about to collapse. But apparently the social pressure on Copeland’s family was too great. So Kersey has one winner (Duck Commander Phil Robertson) and two losers (Cliven Bundy and Don Sterling)…plus, of course, the ultimate loser: America. [N.H. police commissioner who used racial slur in reference to Obama resigns, By Wesley Lowery, May 19, 2014]

It’s important to grasp the details of this appalling story.

A woman at a table in the restaurant, Jane O’Toole, overheard Copeland’s remarks and decided to take offense. She even found out who the elderly man was and then contacted the Wolfeboro Police Department to complain about his use of the N-word…in a private conversation.

When Copeland learned of her complaint, he decided to reply by email. He did not deny making the remark and refused to apologize for it:

While I believe the problems associated with minorities in this country are momentous, I am not phobic. My use of derogatory slang in reference to those among them undeserving of respect is no secret. It is the exercise of my 1st Amendment rights… I believe I did use the “N” word in reference to the current occupant of the Whitehouse [sic]. For this I do not apologize – he meets and exceeds my criteria for such.

[Wolfeboro police commissioner under scrutiny for racist comments about Obama, By Sarah Palermo, The Concord Monitor, May 15, 2014]

Bob Copeland’s reply may be stubborn and surly, but he appears to be using the N-Word in a similar way to Chris Rock in his comedy routines: “I love black people but I hate n******.” [YouTube]

Everyone knows what Chris Rock means by this distinction. That’s why it gets so many laughs.

Nevertheless, Jane O’Toole didn’t grasp the distinction. So she contacted the New Hampshire Main Stream Media about Copeland’s remarks and they, needless to say, gave the story prominent coverage.

Years ago, the local and national press would have considered reporting on the contents of a private conversation between two elderly men to be both off-limits and absurd. But now, in Obama’s post-America, it is Page One news.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Spend some time with any octogenarian men or women and you can bank on the fact that they will say some inappropriate things, especially if they have had a couple of drinks. We’ll all get there some day; so will Jane O’Toole.

More importantly: President Obama regularly socializes with rap stars who use the N-Word in public all the time. So it’s OK to use the term publicly if you’re black—but it’s a sin to even speak the word privately if you’re white.

Certainly if Bob Copeland was black, Jane O’Toole would never have made an issue out of this.

Is it not a remarkable double standard that blacks are allowed to speak freely in both public and private with no fear of condemnation, but whites must police every word they say lest someone catch a casual remark on their cellphone and post it online? Apparently, in Obama’s post-America, blacks simply enjoy greater political freedom than whites.

What kind of craziness is this?

Wolfeboro, NH is a charming town on the shores of Lake Winnipesaukee with a proud history dating back to colonial times. Many longtime residents can trace their roots back generations. My own parents used to live in Wolfeboro and my oldest sister was born there. A few summers ago, when I walked into a golf shop in Wolfeboro, I discovered that the owner had posted a sign on the wide open front door that read: “Sorry. Have to pick up my car at the garage. Be Back Soon. Make Yourself At Home.”

Business owners don’t have that kind of confidence in the more diverse areas of America. That’s what people love so much about Wolfeboro.

In fact, the central antagonist in this most unnecessary drama, Jane O’Toole, only moved to Wolfeboro four months ago—most likely because of the lack of diversity she unconsciously appreciates, but consciously resents. But this is precisely the kind of doublethink that characterizes most racial agitators.

There was actually a town meeting held at the Wolfeboro Public Library to discuss Bob Copeland’s private remark, or rather, the national controversy that Ms. O’Toole instigated over it. From what I can tell, despite MSM claims to the contrary, the turnout for this meeting was not very high. And some of the people there actually had the courage to defend Bob Copeland. Good for them.

True, a handful of blacks live in Wolfeboro, and some of them showed up at the meeting to protest as well. But I suspect that most of them are associated with Brewster Academy, a boarding school located across the street from the town library, and that few of them actually live there full-time. [VDARE.com note: Wikipedia says that Wolfeboro’s population(2000 census) was 6,083, of whom 0.16% were African American, which is <10 people.]

Certainly, Bob Copeland did a poor job of defending himself. You can watch video of him hobbling on his cane as he is confronted by people more than half his age in the parking lot of the public library. . [Video: Police Commissioner Who Called Obama the N-Word Snaps at ‘Skunk’ Reporter as Angry Residents Demand His Resignation, By Dave Urbanksi, The Blaze, May 16, 2014]

My guess is that Copeland suffers from some age-related infirmities of both the body and the mind, making him an easy target for racial grievance mongers

But the point is this: Informing on white people for sins committed in private conversations appears to be a growing trend.

Just recently, 80 year old Donald Sterling’s girlfriend coaxed him into making crude remarks about minorities during a private conversation and illegally recorded them before someone sent them off to TMZ. Now Donald Sterling has been fined $2.5 million and is being forced to sell his franchise for having an inappropriate private conversation.

And nearly everyone in the MSM and beyond seems to accept that the virtual criminalization of private conversations is entirely appropriate.

It is now perfectly respectable to make an example of a white person if they make an impolite remark about another race in private—and it doesn’t matter if they are friends, relatives, strangers, or even the elderly.

Incidentally, Mitt Romney owns a palatial lakefront estate in Wolfeboro where he remains a familiar presence. You can often see him with his large extended family getting ice cream on a summer evening downtown. But in case you need a further reminder of why Mitt Romney was not elected to the White House, he recently joined the chorus calling for Bob Copeland’s resignation: “The vile epithet used and confirmed by the commissioner has no place in our community,” said Romney loftily. [Romney Rips NH Officials ‘Vile Epithet, By Matt Stout, The Boston Herald, May 17, 2014]

Bob Copeland, a Navy veteran and longtime resident of Wolfeboro where his wife was born, will probably spend his few remaining years behind closed doors out of fear of running into people like Jane O’Toole.

What we are seeing today is a phenomenon more pernicious than anything that took place during the much-denounced McCarthy Era.

Hannah Arendt defined totalitarianism as the drive to control the inner life of private individuals. And Arendt argued that totalitarianism does not actually depend on government control, but on a “volunteer espionage network” of private individuals who strive to intimidate their fellow citizens into conformity with the party line. In a recent speech, Michelle Obama actually encouraged this: “Maybe that starts simply in your own family, when grandpa tells that off-colored joke at Thanksgiving, or you’ve got an aunt [that] talks about ‘those people…’” [Michelle Obama Would Like Students to Monitor Family Members for Racial Insensitivity, by Pete Kasperowicz, The Blaze, May. 19, 2014]

Thus in Bertolt Brecht’s short play, The Spy, [PDF] a mother and father are enjoying a Sunday lunch with their son during which the parents make some critical remarks about the Nazi regime. After lunch, the son leaves and the parents inadvertently learn that he has gone to attend a mandatory Hitler Youth meeting. For the rest of the afternoon, they both anguish over the prospect that their own son will report them to the authorities for expressing a thought-crime against the regime.

Incredibly, Brecht’s nightmare is becoming a reality in Obama’s post-America.

Matthew Richer (email him) is a writer living in Massachusetts. He is the former American Editor of Right NOW magazine.

From V-Dare: https://www.vdare.com/articles/bob-copeland-donald-sterling-and-the-criminalization-of-private-conversation-for-whites

THIS is Debate? It is the Same Incoherent Babbbling Heard in the Insane Asylum

May 20, 2014

More Evidence That Leftists Truly Are Dumber Than Dirt (Video)

Serious Crazy… Towson U Wins National Debate Contest By Repeating N-Word And Babbling Nonsense (Video) – Gateway Pundit

Progressive Privilege in Action -

.

. Towson University won the 2014 Cross Examination Debate Association’s national championship on March 24, of this year. The team members inexplicably used the n-word repeatedly and babbled nonsense.

Pundit Press posted part of the debate transcript:

They say the n*****s always already qu***, that’s exactly the point! It means the impact is that the that the is the impact term, uh, to the afraid, uh, the, that it is a case term to the affirmative because, we, uh, we’re saying that qu*** bodies are not able to survive the necessarily means of the body. Uh, uh, the n***** is not able to survive…

…Uh, man’s sole “jabringing” object disfigure religion trauma and nubs, uh, the, inside the trauma of representation that turns into the black child devouring and identifying with the stories and into the white culture brought up, uh, de de de de de, dink, and add subjectively like a white man, the black man!

 

The topic this year was the War Powers Resolution.

Here’s the Towson Team in action:

This video is GOLD -

See video in the next post

From TDG: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

What is this Blabbering Nonsensical Shit?

May 20, 2014

From: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Uh oh. Raaaacist!

May 16, 2014

17

From MJ: http://themadjewess.com/

I hope so Too.

May 2, 2014

I hope everyone realizes exactly where the Donald Sterling case is going to lead

by

It is easy to dismiss the NBA booting noted jerk Donald Sterling as good riddance to bad rubbish isn’t it? I mean no one, and I mean no one is defending this old fool and his foolish, deplorable words, or his taste in skanks, I mean mistresses. So, a bigot shoots off his mouth, and his fellow owners choose to throw him under the bus, fine right? Well, maybe not. What happens when an NBA owner, or an owner in the NHL, NFL, or MLB, or coach, or GM are “outed” for some other thought crime. Let’s say the individual is found to support traditional marriage, or tighter border security, or to oppose abortion, or affirmative action? How far are we from the day when those are found to be views that are just not welcome in our hyper sensitive society? Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid has already asked the NFL to go after Redskins owner Daniel Snyder because he refuses to change the teams name. The Congressional Black Caucus wants sports leagues to crack down on any owner that is “racially insensitive”. Ask the former Mozilla CEO about his situation. So, get ready folks, get ready to have a new thought police that will decide who gets to own, or run what in America. I will allow Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks to give us a final thought

A day earlier, however, Cuban — while criticizing Sterling’s comments as “obviously bigoted, obviously racist” — called it “damn scary” that a precedent could be set.

“Regardless of your background, regardless of the history they have, if we’re taking something somebody said in their home and we’re trying to turn it into something that leads to you being forced to divest property in any way, shape or form, that’s not the United States of America,” Cuban said. “I don’t want to be part of that.”

There are those that will say that as long as the government is not coming after people for words they say, then our right to free speech is untouched. But, at a certain point we are soon going to be living in a nation where we have the freedom to speak, but might be to afraid to use it. A nation with defacto speech codes barring certain thoughts from being expressed, then, maybe a nation with speech codes dictating that we MUST express certain views or else. In short, a nation where anyone stepping out of line will be subjected to bullying, intimidation, and thuggery. A nation where expressing yourself on Twitter, Facebook, or your personal blog, or even in a private conversation might cost you your livelihood.

From TDG : http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Why do Liberals think Blacks are Stupid?

May 1, 2014

Leftists All Agree: Blacks Are So F’ing Stupid

30 April 2014

How stupid are they?

Well…according to the Left In America, Blacks find obtaining a photo id waaaay beyond their capabilities, even though you can get one from your state government very easily at no cost to you.

So…logically, taking into account how easy it is to get a photo id plus the fact that the Left thinks Blacks don’t have the skillset needed to obtain one, we can only conclude that the Left In America thinks BLACKS ARE FUCKIN’ STUPID.

They’re such morons that they can’t get to a local government office, such as the DMV/RMV, and get themselves one.

This is what the Left is telling us in the arguments they make against laws mandating a person show a photo id before they can cast a ballot.

Wake up my brothers and sisters.  They think you all are retarded.  They think you’re Dupes.

[Now, there is a group of Blacks and other minorities who believe the Left is only opposing photo ids as a requirement to vote because that situation makes it easier to commit voter fraud, and these minorities love the idea of giving it to 'The Man'.  After all, they say if you probe them long enough, it's payback time for Whitey and his friends.  They've been oppressed for hundreds of years and it's time to oppress back.  Ahhh...corruption...]

The Federal Courts have been handing down rulings lately that overturn Voter ID Laws passed in the Several States, so infested with Leftists and Leftist Thinking has that judicial system become.

How to resist this Tyrannical branch of the national government?

Jeff Goldstein has a damn good idea:

Governors in states that have passed voter ID laws should — and yes, I mean this and would support it 100% — declare the federal judiciary’s rulings obscene and maintain the laws the citizens of the state voted into place in lieu of any further appeals.

It’s time for states to say no to judicial oligarchy, especially when to defer to it is to negate the will of those they represent and to agree to federal insistence that states have no right to employ mechanisms by which to protect the franchise of its citizens.

Let some federal judge then rule that ALL of the affected states votes are thereby nullified as a result of that state’s refusal to surrender its sovereignty to some activist hack.  See how well that goes over as a matter of constitutional law.

One more cycle of progressive rule and we’re done.  Now is the time to stand up and [say] no, particularly as I’m almost certain elections are being swayed not just by Evan Thomas’s infamous 15-point media swing, but by voter fraud, be it multiple votes in multiple jurisdictions, or votes being cast by illegals or some proxy for those who have long since shuffled off this mortal coil — and in so doing, invariably turned Democrat in the afterlife.

As I’ve declared here many times: if there is any hope for the non-violent Restoration of our Freedom and Liberties, it lies in the Several States.

It is a fading hope, but is it not worth a try?  Remember the words of Frederick The Great: ‘L’audace, toujours de l’audace! / Rogues, would you live forever?’

Is the goal of making some states go Outlaw worth a shot, so that, maybe — just maybe — we can avoid having to fire shots?

Refugium inveniemus in provinciis [Find refuge in the provinces]

OUTLAW!

From TCOTS: http://thecampofthesaints.org/

What Cliven Bundy Said was Quite Clear – Blacks were Slaves to Cotton, now They Are Slaves to the Democratic Party. Slaves all the Same.

April 28, 2014

What Exactly Did Cliven  Bundy Say That A) Was Wrong; B) Paul Ryan Didn’t Already Say?

By Peter Brimelow on April 25, 2014

Cliven Bundy, the Nevada rancher who has been at the center of one of those periodic heartland standoffs that totally baffle and enrage the American elite, is now the also the center of an all-too-typical American elite Politically Correct

hysteria about, you guessed it, “racism.”

What Exactly Did Cliven  Bundy Say That A) Was Wrong; B) Paul Ryan Didn’t Already Say?

Bundy, in Robert E. Lee’s wonderful phrase, is not a professional soldier but a citizen who has taken up arms for his country, and he may yet be mau maued into performing the usual pointless ritual grovel, but as pointed out here by Paul Kersey at the time of the Paula Deen hysteria, this stuff is wearing very thin. (Kersey was proved right by the subsequent Duck Dynasty hysteria, when alpha duck Phil Robertson simply faced down the Cultural Marxist mob).

More importantly, as I said at greater length last fall, unless the extraordinary power of this “racism” smear is faced and discredited, American immigration patriots cannot begin to reclaim their country.

Needless to say, the putative professionals who have been supporting, or at least profiting, from Bundy are now running for the hills. [SeeA List of Cliven Bundy's Supporters, Now That We Know He's a Pro-Slavery Racist, by Arit John, Abby Olsheiser, TheWire.com, April 24, 2014]. This emphatically includes Senator Rand Paul, who is quoted continuing his ignominious slide into self-defeating left-libertarianism by intoning piously that “His remarks on race are offensive and I wholeheartedly disagree with him.”

(One remarkable exception: Arizona state Sen. Kelli Ward wrote in an e-mail to The Washington Post:

Apparently he has some thoughts that aren’t shared by many Americans. He is free to think and speak as he chooses (even if it may offend) and we are free to listen (or not) and form our own opinions. I am thankful for our amazing Constitution and the 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech — if I don’t agree, I don’t seek to silence or shame the speaker or to paint his associates with the broad brush of collective condemnation.

Rand Paul and other Republican leaders back away from Bundy, By Jaime Fuller, Washington Post, April 24, 2014.

(Ward did add that she “disagrees with Bundy’s statements to the [New York Times]” But she pioneered here an impregnable line of defense that the all the Republican Party’s high-priced consultants apparently couldn’t come up with.)

There are only two points to be made about this ridiculous witch hunt:

  • Cliven Bundy’s other views are utterly irrelevant to his dispute with the Federal Bureau of Land Management.

VDARE.com has not previously commented on the Bundy vs. BLM story because of our single-minded focus on immigration and the National Question. For what it’s worth, my own cursory reading suggests Bundy may well be legally in the wrong, arguably on technicalities, but the federal reaction was extraordinary and further evidence of the disturbing brutalization of U.S. law enforcement, which combines paradoxically with its abject collapse in other areas i.e. border security. After Ruby Ridge and Waco, nothing can be ruled out.

Nevertheless, Bundy’s comments about blacks are completely irrelevant to the legal and moral issues raised by his dispute with the federal government. There is absolutely no reason why the people who supported him before should not go on supporting him now—except, of course, cowardice and stupidity.

To give an historical parallel: during World War I, the campaign to save the Irish nationalist Sir Roger Casement from execution for conspiring to have Germany arm what ultimately became the Easter Rising was derailed by leaked evidence that he was a promiscuous pederast. Strictly speaking, of course, Casement’s sexuality was irrelevant to the question of whether or not he should be hanged for treason. But at that time, it was decisive.

Today, of course, if Cliven Bundy had been revealed to be a pederast, he would be paid millions in damages by every government agency in sight.

  • What EXACTLY is wrong with what Cliven Bundy said anyway?

Here is his entire statement, as lovingly recorded by the New York Times’ Adam Nagourney [A Defiant Rancher Savors the Audience That Rallied to His Side, April 23, 2014]:

“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.

“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”

Rich Lowry [Send him mail] Editor of the post-purge National Review, eager to burnish his credentials as a house-broken MSM Token Conservative, says “This is so stupid and noxious it isn’t really worth rebutting.”

But, of course it’s not, as the links helpfully added by VDARE.com show—if you actually think, as oppose to emoting (and, in Lowry’s case, truckling). It makes a series of factual

From VDare: http://vdare.com/

Balkanizing America

April 28, 2014

The ‘Raaaaacist’ Sideshow

27 April 2014

by

Conservatives, libertarians, Classical Liberals!

Come one!  Come all! And get your Raaaaacism ID Card!

It will cost you nothing for the honor of you being shown for what you are!

Over at Protein Wisdom, Darleen Click has published a brief post that succinctly dissects and demolishes the campaign by the Left [with help from Useful Idiot Quislings supposedly on the Right] to Balkanize this country through an unrelenting campaign of real and actual False Consciousness [not the fantasy Marxist version].

Very few posts are truly deserving of ‘must-read’ status, although many are labeled as such, but Darleen’s is one of them.

A highlight:

What we are being fundamentally changed to is a racial spoils system, where individuals must cling to a group identity in order to be “authentic” and socially acceptable. And the group Rulers will be solely in charge of defining the correct thought systems for the members.

It is through such a spoils system [as with all spoils systems since at least the days of Rome] that the Left In America can kill two birds with one stone, as it were.  By splitting people up by race, by making them think they have little worth unless they identify with a race-based group:

1) they can more easily reward such relatively small  groups with bribes and, therefore, control them because said groups will become dependent vassals of the supplier; and

2) they can help along their scheme to sow Chaos in American Society by destroying the idea of an American Identity in favor of identity by racial group [ie: 'Balkanization'], a Chaotic state that will make it easier for the Left to corral the people eventually under the white-knighted beacons of Order…and Control.

I’ve used many terms to describe this system before, including ‘vile’, ‘disgusting’, and wretched, but, what it is above all, is Evil.

From TCOTS: http://thecampofthesaints.org/

We are all Racists Now

April 20, 2014

The Mirage of Integration

Posted on | April 20, 2014

It was Dick Gregory, I believe, who defined “integration” as the period of time between when the first black family moves into a neighborhood and the last white family moves out. The recent report that New York City’s schools are the most segregated in the country might be seen as confirmation of that cynical jest.

Are we to assume that the enlightened and sophisticated white liberals of New York are secretly more racist — “RAAAAACIST!” — than they would have us believe? Our suspicion of pharisaical hypocrisy on their part may explain why liberals are always able to hear those coded racist “dog whistles” that nobody else can hear. Perpetual outrage at the alleged racism of Republicans functions as a means by which white liberals soothe their guilty consciences and tune out the cognitive dissonance that results from the unbridgeable chasm between their professed egalitarian beliefs and their inevitably elitist lifestyles.

Jelani Cobb is dismayed by the evidence of liberal hypocrisy:

There may be no better example of the ongoing scandal of school segregation than the New York City public-school system, which a recent report by the Civil Rights Project at U.C.L.A. found to be one of the most segregated in the country. Black and Latino students in New York have become more likely to attend schools with minimal white enrollment, and a majority of them go to schools defined by concentrated poverty. . . . New York is simultaneously the most diverse city in the United States and the most glaring indicator of integration’s failures.

Perhaps the question we should ask is not “Why has integration failed?” Rather we might ask, “Why did anyone ever imagine integration could succeed?” Meanwhile, Jelani Cobb confirms Dick Gregory’s cynical observation:

When I graduated from Jamaica High School, in Queens, in 1987, the school was recognized for both its high academic performance and its diverse student body, which mirrored the polyglot neighborhood that surrounded it. (In 1985, it was honored by the U.S. Department of Education as one of the nation’s “outstanding” public secondary schools.) Among my four closest African-American friends from high school — only one of whom had college-educated parents — two went on to get Ph.D.s, and the other two have M.B.A.s. By 2009, however, the graduation rate had slumped below fifty per cent, and the school was slated for closure by the city, owing to its poor academic achievement and high levels of violence. It had already long ceased having the mélange of ethnicities that I remembered. But the reversion toward segregation was not the cause of the school’s academic decline: both were symptoms of the concentration of poverty that has come to define public schools across most of New York City.

Over a period of roughly 20 years, then, this district in Queens went from being “diverse . . . polyglot” in its “mélange of ethnicities” to being overwhelmingly black. And during the same period, Jamaica High went from being an “outstanding” school to being a place of “poor academic achievement and high levels of violence,” where more than half of students drop out before graduation, a phenomenon attributed by Cobb to “the concentration of poverty.”

Well, what happened? And why did it happen? Was the change in demographics — and the correspondent “academic decline” described by Cobb — a result of intransigent white racism? Was any particular public policy implicated in this decline? The Wikipedia article about Jamaica, Queens, describes the population as 48% black, 22% Hispanic, 20% white and 10% Asian. The article also describes immigration as a major factor in the changing demographics of the community.

Is it possible that, rather than bemoaning white racism — which certainly has not increased as a factor in the past 20 years — those who desire more integrated schools should instead focus their attention on the ways in which our nation’s immigration policies contribute to increased segregation? Many who have studied this phenomenon have pointed out that an influx of impoverished immigrants, whatever its impact on the nation as a whole, has a profoundly negative influence on the prospects of low-income groups, who are forced into economic competition with the new arrivals. But if Jelani Cobb paid too much attention to such research, he might begin to have doubts about liberal proposals to grant amnesty to illegal aliens and, if he ever took a strong public stand against amnesty, then white liberals would call him a racist, too.

Welcome to 2014, Mr. Cobb. We’re all racists now.

From TOMC:    http://theothermccain.com/

 

Racism. Always Whitey’s Fault!

April 8, 2014

Funny Thing: Coming Or Going—Gentrifying Or Fleeing—It’s Always Whitey’s Fault!

By Nicholas Stix on March 15, 2014

Spike Lee’s notorious February 25 lecture at Brooklyn’s Pratt Institute in honor of Black History Month., was an expletive-filled, overtly racial, hypocritical rant. During the supposed Q&A, Lee jettisoned the format and steamrolled the adoring liberal white attendees:

Here’s the thing: I grew up here in Fort Greene. I grew up here in New York. It’s changed. And why does it take an influx of white New Yorkers in the south Bronx, in Harlem, in Bed Stuy, in Crown Heights for the facilities to get better? The garbage wasn’t picked up every [bleepin’] day when I was living in 165 Washington Park. P.S. 20 was not good. P.S. 11. Rothschild 294. The police weren’t around. When you see white mothers pushing their babies in strollers, three o’clock in the morning on 125th Street [NS: highly unlikely], that must tell you something….

Then comes the [bleepin’] Christopher Columbus Syndrome. You can’t discover this! We been here. You just can’t come and bogart [steal]. There were brothers playing [bleepin’] African drums in Mount Morris Park for 40 years and now they can’t do it anymore because the new inhabitants said the drums are loud. My father’s a great jazz musician. He bought a house in nineteen-[bleepin’]-sixty-eight, and the [bleepin’] people moved in last year and called the cops on my father….

Nah. You can’t do that…. You have to come with respect. There’s a code. There’s people. …

And we had the crystal ball, mother [bleepin]’ Do the Right Thing with John Savage’s character, when he rolled his bike over Buggin’ Out’s sneaker. I wrote that script in 1988. He was the first one. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can’t do that. Not in Bed Stuy.

[Spike Lee’s Amazing Rant Against Gentrification: ‘We Been Here!’ by Joe Coscarelli, New York Magazine, February 25, 2014]

It’s important to note that the New York Magazine editor who called Lee’s rant “amazing” was not being ironic. Liberal whites must always re-define racist black behavior as something positive, anodyne, or just misrepresented and misunderstood, probably by white racists.

Of course, Lee’s position would only make sense if he still lived in the Fort Greene neighborhood he’d grown up in. In fact, he fled it back in 2000, to live far away from blacks in a $32 million mansion on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. [“Spike Lee’s Upper East Side mansion hits market at $32 million,” by Matt Chaban, New York Daily News, February 2, 2014]

But while Lee insists upon his own right to enter elite white neighborhoods, he simultaneously claims that whites should be banned from so much as wearing a Larry Bird jersey in a “black” neighborhood. Lee’s definition of “respect” isn’t English, but the black street thug version: submission to threats of physical force.

What Lee advocates is Politically Correct asymmetrical apartheid—blacks can live anywhere, but they can also maintain (through force) segregated black neighborhoods. [“Spike Lee and other sentimental segregationists,” by Harry Siegel, New York Daily News, March 4, 2014]

What’s worse is that Lee’s hypocritical tribalism is in line with what our rulers have been imposing on us for 60 years. Government at all levels moves with ruthless fanaticism to destroy any neighborhoods that are “too white.” Even Republicans get in the act—like Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead strategizing to culturally enrich his largely white state with Somali “refugees.”

Those pushing these policies live far away from the consequences they create. Like Lee, they say “Diversity for thee, but not for me.”

None of the nine white Supreme Court justices of the unanimous Brown decision lived among integration/diversity. Nor did the committee that helped federal judge Arthur Garrity “integrate” Boston’s public schools via forced busing during the 1970s. [“Busing’s Boston Massacre,” Hoover Institution, November 1, 1998]

Diversity-hustling white journalists typically live in virtually black-free areas in places like Bethesda and Potomac, Maryland. The journalists and Catholic Church functionaries who denounced Frank Borzellieri all live in lily-white areas—in one case, the same neighborhood as American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor.

The justification for sweeping government action on desegregation, busing, anti-white racial preferences, and demographic change is what the U.S. Supreme Court called in Bakke the “compelling state interest” of diversity. But the very people who push it seem the most eager to forgo its blessings.

What holds the whole scheme together is simply white guilt. While it is fashionable to sneer at white-driven gentrification, other propagandists condemn “white flight” for supposedly causing high black crime rates and economic collapse.

For example, former crime reporter David Simon created the TV show The Wire, a supposedly realistic look at crime and policing in Baltimore. During a documentary promoting the show, Simon asserted that social scientists had proved that when a formerly white neighborhood reached six percent black, the whites all pulled up stakes and left, as if whites said, ‘We won’t tolerate this level of black neighbors.’ Simon gravely nodded, after stating his pseudo-fact, as if to say, ‘You see how racist whites are?’

The simple truth: whites are fleeing the black violence, not causing it.

A revealing look at how “diversity” destroys communities is the 1998 book Left Behind in Rosedale, by sociologist Scott Cummings. This mainstream, academic work covers the destruction of Fort Worth TX’s formerly white, crime-free, University Heights neighborhood.

It’s a familiar tale. Middle-class blacks moved in, used the now desegregated neighborhood as a stepping stone, and moved on. They were followed by the underclass, who imposed a reign of racial terror on the aging whites who didn’t flee. Atrocities included the rape and murder of elderly women, in one case through shoving a broom handle down a woman’s throat.

The Fort Worth PD failed to protect the whites, the MSM ignored their plight and—as Cummings recounts—his academic colleagues positively reveled in the whites’ suffering.

But the reaction of liberal whites is far different if it is whites themselves who are changing neighborhoods. Usually middle/upper-middle class whitea buy up properties cheaply in depressed areas, and improve and profit off them. These “gentrifiers” often start out in working-class white neighborhoods, such as Brooklyn’s Park Slope, but soon run out of white areas, and have no choice but to wade into black communities, like Manhattan’s Harlem, Brooklyn’s Fort Greene, various parts of Baltimore, and other dilapidated, black-run cities.

Many urban dwelling gentrifying whites are socially liberal—which leads to awkward encounters once they actually encounter “diversity.” Recently, a lesbian Baltimore gentrifier, Tracey Halvorsen, came out of the closet about the black-on-white racial violence, in a searing personal essay. [“Baltimore City, You’re Breaking My Heart,” Tracey Halvorsen, Medium, February 6, 2014] Halvorsen inspired other Baltimore gentrifiers to recount their own harrowing experiences with blacks. But she also received the predictably hysterical blowback about how black crime is actually her fault, because of “inequality.” [“Some or All Fears: ‘Breaking My Heart’ Post Sparks Debate,” City Paper, February 7, 2014]. Suitably chastened, Halvorsen swiftly bent the knee, condemned those who had shown her support, and leapt back into the closet, pulling the door tightly behind her.

Even a liberal female homosexual, if she’s white, can do no right. Whites are racist if they move out of black neighborhoods because of black crime – or even notice black crime at all. But they are also racist if they move into black neighborhoods.

It’s a long drop from “for ourselves and our posterity” to public policy driven by the insecurities of people like Spike Lee.

Integration and diversity was never about improving the lives of blacks. It is about destroying the communities of whites—and creating a dysfunctional, dependent wreck in the place of the historic American nation.

Nicholas Stix [email him] is a New York City-based journalist and researcher, much of whose   work focuses on the nexus of race, crime, and education. He spent much of the 1990s teaching college in New York and New Jersey. His work has appeared in Chronicles, The New York Post, Weekly Standard, Daily News, New York Newsday, American Renaissance, Academic Questions, Ideas on Liberty and many other publications. Stix was the project director and principal author of the NPI report, The State of White America-2007. He blogs at Nicholas Stix, Uncensored.

From VDare: http://vdare.com/articles/funny-thing-coming-or-going-gentrifying-or-fleeing-it-s-always-whitey-s-fault

Another Win for the PC Police, Another loss for America as We know it.

April 8, 2014

The Demise of Chief Wahoo

Cleveland Indian fans should be saddened to learn that the beloved Chief Wahoo is on his way out, having been designated as politically incorrect by liberals who revel in their ability to ban anything they please on any foolish pretext. In cowardly response to moonbat tantrums, the cheerful cartoon Indian is getting replaced by a boring block C as the team’s primary logo.

Chief Wahoo isn’t going away. At least not yet. He’ll still have a home on the Indians’ jersey sleeves.

But the Chief is well on his way to the reservation. From there he will vanish entirely, rendering our culture just a little more drab, and a little more monochromatically politically correct.

For now Chief Wahoo is still on the home caps too…

In that sense, the impact of the logo redesignations would be more symbolic than practical.

But symbolism matters, especially when discussing Chief Wahoo…

[T]he logo redesignations would have ripple effects because media outlets — including “SportsCenter” and newspapers — would start using the block-C, instead of Wahoo, as their visual shorthand for the team.

Wahoo set off on his Trail of Tears a few years ago:

The franchise removed Wahoo from its road cap in 2011 and from its home batting helmet in 2013. At last summer’s All-Star Game FanFest — a merch-fest where teams generally slap all their logos on every product imaginable — Wahoo was nowhere to be found. Go to the Indians’ website and you’ll find the block-C near the top of the home page with Wahoo less prominently used. Several reporters have noted that the block-C has a much larger presence than Wahoo at the team’s spring training facility too.

The priggish liberals at ESPN unsurprisingly want the Chief banned immediately on the grounds that “ethnic caricatures such as Wahoo are harder and harder to defend in a modern, diverse society.” Next they will demand the team change its name.

Why should anyone care what logo is on the hat of a dying city’s baseball team? Because every time the totalitarian Left takes an inch, they move on to take the next inch. No matter how absurd the battles are, if normal Americans keep losing them, we will wake up one day soon to find our culture no longer exists.

Cleveland Indians  Cleveland Indians
Indians hats before and after a visit from the thought police.

On a tip from Shawn R.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Boneheaded Libs

March 30, 2014

From mm:     http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

 

 

Only Liberal’s Feelings Matter

March 18, 2014

Whiny Liberals and their obsession with “feeling included”

Let me start with a basic truth any reasonable person can grasp. NO ONE is ever going to feel included all the time, nor should they. But, Liberals are not, shall we say, exactly reasonable. Especially when they feel like they are not included!

An upcoming conference organized by Stanford University’s Anscombe Society called “Communicating Values: Marriage, Family & the Media” has been dubbed “hate speech” by the college’s graduate-level student government, which refused to allow any of its student fee-funded budget to support the event.

The Anscombe Society is a conservative student group centered around traditional marriage and family values; it also encourages chastity, and tackles subjects such as sexual integrity and pornography.

According to the minutes of the student government meeting on March 5, a large group of angry students attended to protest the conference and its request for funding.

Again, a case of Liberals screaming for tolerance while giving none, that is old news. What is really revealing is what the offended whiners have to say

“An event such as this would be a negative event, in schools that have negative events there is a statistically significant increase in suicide.”

Every event is “negative” to someone. Again, the Liberal demands only those things they approve of take place. Narcissistic much?

“ … makes homosexuals on campus feel less than equal to others.”

Kleenex?

“ … this event is to help people better convey hateful messages … the conference is to help better articulate their views, but it’s not better articulating, rather camouflaging discrimination and hateful messages …”

” … public schools cannot deny student group funding based on viewpoint, but enforcing viewpoint neutral policy that denies funding for hate speech is an entirely different ballgame. Even if Stanford was a public university, it would be perfectly legal to deny funding to events that make LGBT community feel unwelcome. It would be the same for Stanford to hold a conference on why heterosexuality is abhorrent, and to strip the right away from heterosexuals, and it’s equally unacceptable to host a conference to strip homosexuals of their rights.”

And, of course, Liberals will decide what is and isn’t hate speech

” … there is a lot of feeling espousing the view that marriage is between man and woman is, at the least discriminatory, at worst hate speech.”

No, it is the foundation of society for many folks. This is an opinion, if you have a different take, please feel free to engage in debate rather than thuggish tactics

“This event is small and exclusive, this doesn’t make us feel in community welcome, we don’t feel included.”

Ah yes, my personal favorite. But I don’t feel welcome! Yeah? So what? Welcome to the real world. Of course if this student wanted an event that would not make other people feel welcome, I doubt he or she would give a damn. I guess Liberal feelings are “more equal”.

From TDG: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Political Correctness run Amuck. No More “Appropriating” Another Ethnic Group’s “Artistic” Expression. What…Are You Crazy? That is, Of Course, RAAAACIST!

March 7, 2014

What would Salon think of an article called, ‘Why I can’t stand Asian musicians who play Beethoven’?

Women I have confronted about this have said, “But I have been dancing for 15 years! This is something I have built a huge community on.” These women are more interested in their investment in belly dancing than in questioning and examining how their appropriation of the art causes others harm. To them, I can only say, I’m sure there are people who have been unwittingly racist for 15 years. It’s not too late. Find another form of self-expression. Make sure you’re not appropriating someone else’s.

Read it all at WP: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/03/06/what-would-salon-think-of-an-article-called-why-i-cant-stand-asian-musicians-who-play-beethoven/

From Memorandum: http://www.memeorandum.com/

Liberals Only Love You If Meet THEIR Diversity Requirements

March 6, 2014

image

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Black is Always Great and White is Always Racist. And Don’t you Forget it!

March 3, 2014

Say it LOUD! I’m …… (what?) …. and I’m PROUD!

Let’s get something straight:

Black pride is always laudable and heroic. White pride is always horrific and racist. Celebrating black culture is diverse and cool. Celebrating white culture is lame, pathetic, suspicious. Whiteness is portrayed as a sign of shame: he’s so white. White influences and culture are thought of as at best dull and probably destructive, oppressive, and awful. – - Word Around the Net: OUR MODERN TIMES

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

Spike Lee is a Shitty Racist…But It’s Ok Because He’s Black. Black Racists Are Great.

March 1, 2014

Spike Lee Demands Caucasians “Get the F*** Outta” Black Neighborhoods

White liberals have been very good to Spike Lee, pouring money and praise upon him in return for the excruciatingly politically correct movies he directs. Here he returns the favor exactly as we have come to expect:

Spike Lee went on a long-winded rant against gentrification in New York City on Tuesday night when he was asked to argue against the development of poorer neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Harlem. …

Lee pointed the finger at white New Yorkers who have moved into historically black neighborhoods and changed the environment, arguing that those changes have caused the areas to evolve into something completely different.

This avatar of the enlightened liberal establishment shares his sophisticated wisdom:

“Then comes the mother*****’ Christopher Columbus Syndrome. You can’t discover this! We been here. You just can’t come and bogart.”

I’ll bet you didn’t know the New York City area was originally settled by Africans.

“There were brothers playing mother*****’ African drums in Mount Morris Park for 40 years and now they can’t do it anymore because the new inhabitants said the drums are loud.”

The constant sophomoric use of obscene language is so that other liberals can identify him as genuine.

Lee told a story about how a party in Fort Greene park was proposed in honor of [homosexual child molester] Michael Jackson when the singer died but the plan got nixed after residents complained that there would be too much garbage.

‘Garbage? Have you seen Fort Greene Park in the morning? It’s like the mother*****’ Westminster Dog Show. There’s 20,000 dogs running around. Whoa. So we had to move it to Prospect Park!’ Lee said. …

‘You can’t just come in when people have a culture that’s been laid down for generations and you come in and now s*** gotta change because you’re here? Get the f*** outta here. Can’t do that!’

Send in your welfare money, white oppressor, but you stay out of our culturally enriched, racially homogeneous slums!

By the way, Lee has lived on the Upper East Side with his wealthy white admirers since 2000. If anyone could be phonier than his fans, it could only be Spike Lee himself.

Spike Lee
Liberal elite phoniness incarnate.

On tips from Sean C and JusttheTipHQ.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

White Commies Believe in “Diversity” for You. For Them…Not SO MUch. (Liberal Diversity means letting undesirable people in your neighborhood but not theirs)

February 28, 2014

Frank Borzellieri On White Liberal Hypocrisy: Smug Diversity Pushers And The Safe White Neighborhoods They Live In

By Frank Borzellieri on February 23, 2014 at 11:24pm

The hypocrisy of white liberals over integration and the wonderful enrichment that mass immigration is supposed to bring is the gift that never stops giving. If there is one thing you can be absolutely sure of whenever you hear a white liberal espousing the vital importance of diversity, it is that the same person lives in a safe, lily-white community.

What was termed “white flight” in the 1950s and 1960s is a demographic fact of life and everyone knows it. No less an unwilling witness than the U.S. government has reported what everyone knows: when the non-white population of a community reaches between 10 and 20 percent, whites simply leave. Whites will not live in non-white neighborhoods in any meaningful percentage.[The Residential Preferences of Blacks and Whites: A Four-Metropolis AnalysisHousing Policy Debate,  January 1997(PDF)]

I personally, as a libertarian, think all people—black, white, Hispanic, or Asian—should be allowed to live anywhere they want without being browbeaten or forced to live where they don’t want to. My problem is with white liberals who claim that “diversity is strength” but whose actions are very different when it comes to their own lives, their own homes, their own children and their own neighborhoods.

All of this brings me to the particular white liberal hypocrites who have caused me to be fired as a Catholic school principal, not once but twice, for political writings that were never secret and which Monsignor Michael Hull, the “Censor Librorum” of the New York Archdiocese, had already approved as not in violation of Catholic teaching. (See Jared Taylor’s article on the incident [PDF] and this video interview.)

  • Corinne LetschCorinne Lestch, (email her )theNew York Daily News reporter who wrote the defamatory 2011 article that threw the New York Archdiocese into panic, is a left-wing activist and who prides herself on destroying peoplewho don’t toe the Politically Correct line on race.

Surely, if there is one white person who must absolutely certainly practice what she so devotedly preaches, it must be Corinne Lestch.

But where does Corinne Lestch live? Well, in Bronxville, New York, a town that is 92 percent white and just one percent black!

Bronxville, New York, a town that is 92 percent white and just one percent black!

No integration or diversity for Corinne Lestch and her family—just for everyone else!

Davies is another blowhard when it comes to the great wonders and benefits of racial integration and diversity.

Any diversity for her? Yeah, right. Davies lives in the exclusive town ofBedford, New York, a place that is 88 percent white and 1 percent Hispanic.

Bedford, New York, a place that is 88 percent white and 1 percent Hispanic.

I guess diversity is only a strength for other people, not for your family, right, Fran?

 

Zwilling is nevertheless living more in accordance with my “incompatible” views than with those he claims for the Church—inFranklin Square, New York, which is 92 percent white and less than one percent black!

 

Franklin Square, New York, which is 92 percent white and less than one percent black!

 

Oh my, Joe, how can you deprive your family of the joyous benefits of multi-racialism that you claim to believe in so much?

McNiff in a meeting impressed upon me the need to embrace multiculturalism, and actually said“diversity is our strength.” But he lives in the lily-white town of Fairfax Station, Virginia, which is 84 percent white and three percent black!

Fairfax Station, not very diverse...

In a hilarious irony, McNiff and his family live in the same neighborhood as Jared Taylor, the editor of American Renaissance—whom McNiff thinks is a “white supremacist.”

But when it comes to his own home and his own family, McNiff prefers the choices and lifestyle of Jared Taylor than the lifestyle he claims to believe in.

Even in the home he has taken in New York, McNiff has chosen a spot on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, which is described by a city website as follows:

For many class-conscious residents, there’s simply no other place to live. Since the late 1800s, it has been the place for Manhattanites who value the cachet of their address, as well as for those who truly appreciate the serenity, charm and rich architecture inherent in the neighborhood’s personality.

Maybe they have a diverse doorman...

Well, well. “Class-conscious”; “cachet”; “serenity, charm and rich architecture.” Isn’t that nice?

By the way, the Upper East Side is also 89 percent white and only 2 percent black.

Why not live in the black section of Harlem, Tim, which is only a few miles away? What about the south Bronx or Bedford Stuyvesant in Brooklyn, Tim, if diversity is such a strength? Why are you assiduously avoiding this great strength for yourself and your family?

  • Eric RapagliaEric Rapaglia, the priest whofired me, after weeks of assuring me that he would stand by me (and who used my heterodox writings in a Sunday homily).

Fr. Rapaglia does live in a largely non-white immigrant neighborhood in the Bronx, but because he isassigned there as a priest. His family on Long Island, Staten Island and Florida all live in white neighborhoods.

Is he going to fire them, too?

This hypocrisy on the part of white liberals who push racial integration on everyone else, yet avoid it in their own lives has become cliché. It’s right up there with death and taxes.

White liberal hypocrisy may be a cliché—but it’s not a joke. It destroys lives. I would end this article with a picture of my own residence, but having lost two jobs and exhausted my savings, I am now homeless.

Frank Borzellieri [Email him] is the author of Lynched: A Conservative’s Life on a New York City School Board. To contribute to Frank, please click here.

From V-Dare: http://vdare.com/articles/white-liberal-hypocrisy-smug-diversity-pushers-and-the-safe-white-neighborhoods-they-live-i

Margaret Sanger is Proud of Obama – Eliminating Blacks. One Baby at a Time. She Said They Were Inferior. Obama Obviously Agrees.

February 22, 2014
Post reblogged from Poor Richard’s News

poorrichardsnews:

image

Margaret Sanger’s dream when she founded Planned Parenthood was to provide a mechanism to stifle the growth of the black population in the United States.  It looks like her dream is becoming a reality in New York City.

from CNS:

In 2012, there were more black babies killed by abortion (31,328) in New York City than were born there (24,758), and the black children killed comprised 42.4% of the total number of abortions in the Big Apple, according to a report by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

The report is entitled, Summary of Vital Statistics 2012 The City of New York, Pregnancy Outcomes, and was prepared by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Vital Statistics.

read the rest

Planned Parenthood has aggressively positioned themselves within black communities across the United States and has never disavowed themselves from Margaret Sanger or her founding mission of the group.

Abortion has been and always will be a mechanism for systematic genocide.

This is serious stuff, but progressive black leaders are turning a blind eye because they’re so loyal to the Democrat Party that advocates this.

Wake up.

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Oh, I see the FCC Deal Now…BlaCk RaCism and CroNyism from CLyburn and CoMpany

February 21, 2014

Obama Regime Program Placing Government Monitors In America’s Newsrooms Being Run By Dem Rep. James Clyburn’s Daughter…

More on this story.

550x367xJames+Clyburn+Geithner+Meets+Japanese+Finance+wiDHNxhW9QPl-550x367_jpg_pagespeed_ic_HNtopz0_4J

Via Byron York:

The First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” But under the Obama administration, the Federal Communications Commission is planning to send government contractors into the nation’s newsrooms to determine whether journalists are producing articles, television reports, Internet content, and commentary that meets the public’s “critical information needs.” Those “needs” will be defined by the administration, and news outlets that do not comply with the government’s standards could face an uncertain future. It’s hard to imagine a project more at odds with the First Amendment.

The initiative, known around the agency as “the CIN Study” (pronounced “sin”), is a bit of a mystery even to insiders. “This has never been put to an FCC vote, it was just announced,” says Ajit Pai, one of the FCC’s five commissioners (and one of its two Republicans). “I’ve never had any input into the process,” adds Pai, who brought the story to the public’s attention in a Wall Street Journal column last week.

Advocates promote the project with Obama-esque rhetoric. “This study begins the charting of a course to a more effective delivery of necessary information to all citizens,” said FCC commissioner Mignon Clyburn in 2012. Clyburn, daughter of powerful House Democratic Rep. James Clyburn, was appointed to the FCC by President Obama and served as acting chair for part of last year. The FCC, Clyburn said, “must emphatically insist that we leave no American behind when it comes to meeting the needs of those in varied and vibrant communities of our nation — be they native born, immigrant, disabled, non-English speaking, low-income, or other.” (The FCC decided to test the program with a trial run in Ms. Clyburn’s home state, South Carolina.)

Keep reading…

From WZ: http://weaselzippers.us/

Blacks Want Everyone to Celebrate Their Heritage, But Whites are Racists if They Celebrate Theirs? WTF?

February 21, 2014

Black Libs Cash In On Confederate License Plate

550x292xConfederate-flag-license-plate-550x292_jpg_pagespeed_ic_Uc0xFZM4gx

 

Micro aggression on wheels

Via The Black Sphere

Georgia officials approved a specialty license plate that features the Confederate battle flag. How long do you think it took for the “civil rights advocates” to end their tea break?

Don’t expect these race pimps to get upset about the black people killing other blacks, when there is a LICENSE PLATE TO PICKET!

The claim is that the license plate is a reminder of slavery, Jim Crow, and the Klan…all DEMOCRAT institutions.

What race-baiting black Liberals want is the complete white-washing of white Southerners’ past. Forget your history, abandon your heritage, because it any part of it is tainted in today’s politically correct world.

The Catholic church had the Crusades, Germany gassed the Jews, and so on. For blacks, no harm no foul, at least not when there are Southerners trying to be proud of their heritage. Not knowing one’s heritage can allow you to create whatever you background choose. It’s convenient for Liberal blacks to forget that Africans were sold into slavery…by other AFRICANS. And nothing has changed. Modern-day slavery black slave owners — black Liberal “leaders” like the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) — are the new Anthony Johnson’s (the first slave owner in America, and he happened to be black).

The CBC sells more blacks into slavery than all the African tribes combined.

Blacks seem to be proud of this heritage of blacks selling other blacks, embracing “African” in front of American, though 99.9 percent of blacks have never been to African and can’t tell you from what tribe they descend.

Keep reading

From WZ: http://weaselzippers.us/

Raaaacism! Only Applies to White Folks. Black Folks can Never be Racist.

February 16, 2014