cialis weniger 20 mg
ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Category Archives: LGBT Bullshit

Michael Sam: A Pro Football Player or Pro Gay Instigator?

July 23, 2014

The truth is that Michael Sam seems more interested in being professionally gay

than being a pro-football player; so Tony Dungy’s right to say he’ll be a circus.

In fact, the reaction to Dungy’s innocuous comments prove it. People said the same sort of thing about Tim Tebow a zillion times and guess what? Tebow is out of the league even though Tebow’s popularity, position, and talent level made him much more of an asset to a team than Sam. Yet, you have liberals going nuts because Tony Dungy said what 31 teams in the league probably think of Michael Sam.

— John Hawkins | Right Wing News

Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

Lunacy Reigns and Evil Triumphs

July 18, 2014

HIV Explodes Among Homosexuals as Ideologically Deranged Authorities Continue to Make Situation Worse

The relentless promotion of homosexuality by the liberal establishment is having its predictable effect:

“We are seeing exploding epidemics,” warned Gottfried Hirnschall, who heads [the World Health Organization's] HIV department.

Infection rates are rising again among men who have sex with men — the group at the epicentre of AIDS pandemic when it first emerged 33 years ago, he told reporters in Geneva. …

In its new recommendations for combatting the HIV/AIDS pandemic, published Friday, the UN health agency therefore for the first time “strongly recommends men who have sex with men consider taking antiretroviral medicines as an additional method of preventing HIV infection”.

US authorities made the same recommendation in May.

This is equivalent to advising people to take Advil before smashing their fingers with a hammer. More constructive advice would be along the lines of: If you do not want to contract the horrific, lethal diseases associated with homosexual depravity, then don’t engage in it. But that message would run contrary to The Agenda.

Taking pre-exposure prophylaxis medication, for instance as a single daily pill combining two antiretrovirals, in addition to using condoms, has been estimated to cut HIV incidence among such men by 20-25 percent, WHO said…

Morality would cut it by about 100%.

The progressive establishment aggressively aggravates the problem by working to normalize behaviors that spread HIV, on the grounds that this allows greater access to healthcare, thereby facilitating the treatment of diseases that degenerates voluntarily bring upon themselves through homosexuality, intravenous drug use, prostitution, et cetera.

Globally, transgender women [i.e., men pretending to be women] and injecting drug users, for instance, are around 50 times more likely than the general population to contract HIV, while sex workers have a 14-fold higher chance of getting infected, WHO said.

So you can see why we should normalize their lifestyles by decriminalizing and destigmatizing their vices, as WHO demands.

HIV and the AIDS it causes aren’t the only problems closely associated with homosexuality:

Researcher Dale O’Leary, reporting in the prestigious Linacre Quarterly, says the problem of sexually transmitted diseases in the gay community is such that scientists are calling it not an epidemic or a pandemic but a “syndemic,” a linked set of health issues involving two or more afflictions acting in concert within a specific population. According to the medical literature, among men who have sex with men this includes syphilis, gonorrhea, and HIV but also such pathologies as partner violence, drug abuse, and psychological disorders.

You could almost get the impression that the Bible has it right about homosexuality being inherently wrong.

It’s a good thing that despite all the promotion and special treatment associated with politically celebrated homosexual status, admitted homosexual/bisexuals still make up less than 3% of the US population, according to the very government that places top priority on imposing reverence for their potentially lethal brand of perversion.

On tips from Artfldgr, Jester, Bodhisattva, Ben S, and Henry.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Why are The 98% Bowing to the 2%?

July 17, 2014

How Gay is America? Not So Much

 

gay2percentpix.jpg
 

How in the world can 2% of the American population end up dominating,

in many ways, an entire political party and entertainment pop culture? Because there is an answer to this.  ….I mean, if you have knowledge that 2% of the country is gay, why would anybody do prime-time television programming oriented?  That’s certainly not mass appeal, so why would you do it?  A-ha.  You’re not doing it for mass appeal.  There’s a political agenda behind it.  This is my point.  There’s a political agenda to everything that the left does.  And part of the political agenda is creating mirages, creating falsehoods, making what isn’t true look real.

– - Rush Limbaugh

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

Right Now the Ambassador is F#*king a Sheep…

July 8, 2014

Kerry: ‘I’m Working Hard to … Have Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Ambassadors’

Wonderful. America is going to be represented abroad by a freak show.

The country is going to hell, sissified neocon Tamerlanes in panties bankrupt us with brainless wars they don´t understand, the schools make us an international joke, but the Secretary of State rushes to fill the consulates with sexual abnormalities. Washington begins to make a Weimar bordello look like Mormon Sunday school. I picture myself showing up at some embassy for an interview and being told, “The ambassador will be with you in a moment. Just now, he’s fucking a sheep.”

Fred On Everything

Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

The World is Batshit Crazy. Ad Absurdum. Boys aren’t Really Boys and Girls Aren’t Really Girls? These People need a Straight Jacket.

June 27, 2014

You do not have to be Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs to write for Slate

Slate is the MSNBS of online magazines, and, here is the latest outrageous outrage they have discovered. Beware Infant Gender Assignment!

Obstetricians, doctors, and midwives commit this procedure on infants every single day, in every single country. In reality, this treatment is performed almost universally without even asking for the parents’ consent, making this practice all the more insidious. It’s called infant gender assignment: When the doctor holds your child up to the harsh light of the delivery room, looks between its legs, and declares his opinion: It’s a boy or a girl, based on nothing more than a cursory assessment of your offspring’s genitals.

Declares his opinion? And you say this “opinion” is based on something as flimsy as genitals? SHOCKING! I mean, yes, in fact gender IS defined by genitals, just as writing for Slate is defined on absurdity. I am trying to conger up how the “evil” gender assignment goes. The doctor, holds up a child, peers at the genitals, and calmly calls the nurse over.

“Excuse me nurse, but this baby appears to have a penis, do you concur?”

“Why yes doctor, that looks like a penis to me”

“So, this baby then, must be a boy”

“Why yes doctor, yes”

See, this is OUTRAGEOUS! And thankfully, we have an outraged American to expose this shockingly shocking outrageously outrageous outrage! I know I am outraged! and we all should be. I mean think about where this might lead! The Slate piece continues

We tell our children, “You can be anything you want to be.” We say, “A girl can be a doctor, a boy can be a nurse,” but why in the first place must this person be a boy and that person be a girl? Your infant is an infant. Your baby knows nothing of dresses and ties, of makeup and aftershave, of the contemporary social implications of pink and blue. As a newborn, your child’s potential is limitless. The world is full of possibilities that every person deserves to be able to explore freely, receiving equal respect and human dignity while maximizing happiness through individual expression.

Wait, what? How dare this Slate writer call that infant an infant? Who the Hell are they to place that kind of label on that baby? I mean, yes, the fact IS that it is an infant, but facts do not matter. I mean, if a penis or vagina do not have anything to do with gender, then how does a baby actually being a baby mean anything either? But, this is important stuff, it MUST BE because only really important topics are covered in Slate right? Either that or this writer is as crazy as they come

With infant gender assignment, in a single moment your baby’s life is instantly and brutally reduced from such infinite potentials down to one concrete set of expectations and stereotypes, and any behavioral deviation from that will be severely punished—both intentionally through bigotry, and unintentionally through ignorance. That doctor (and the power structure behind him) plays a pivotal role in imposing those limits on helpless infants, without their consent, and without your informed consent as a parent. This issue deserves serious consideration by every parent, because no matter what gender identity your child ultimately adopts, infant gender assignment has effects that will last through their whole life.

See! Your child’s life will be RUINED, R-U-I-N-E-D RUINED if a doctor is allowed to say it is a boy, or it is a girl! Oh there are several layers of KRAZY here folks I mean this MUST be a hoax right? No one could possibly believe the absurdities uttered here right? I mean even Slate must no allow this level of KRAZY right? Wrong!

Why must we force this on kids at birth? What is achieved, besides reinforcing tradition? What could be the harm in letting a child wait to declare for themself who they are, once they’re old enough (which is generally believed to happen around age 2 or 3)?

What insanity is this? When was the last time you, as a parent, grandparent, or uncle as I a witnessed a 2 or 3-year-old “declare themselves”? I doubt anyone has, but what would it sound like? Let us think here.

Think of a family gathering. As the adults are drinking their coffees, here comes young Patrick, age 3. “Excuse me everyone” Patrick says, clinking a fork on a water glass. “I am glad I have you all hear, I have something I need to say. I am, in fact, a girl, or rather a woman, trapped in a little boy’s body. Yes, yes, I do have a penis, but do not label me because of that you genderist bastards! I am woman, hear me roar! So, I have a list of demands here, call them my Gender Justice List if you will.” I have more here, but you will have to wait for the book to be published. it is called “My fight for Gender Justice: How My Inner Vagina and I beat Genderism!”

Of course, that is a bit of absurdity to illustrate how wrong, foolish, inane, insane, BATSHIT CRAZY this writer really is. Yes, Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs!

From TDG: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

The AMA says Biological Reality is a Myth

June 17, 2014

AMA Rejects Biological Reality, Proclaims People Are Whatever Sex They Feel Like Being

Look what NBC snuck in with a piece about the AMA ruling that cheerleading is now a sport last week:

In other action Monday, the AMA said transgender people should be able to switch the sex designation on their birth certificates without having sex-change surgery.

Most states make the operations a prerequisite. But the new AMA policy acknowledges that gender identity doesn’t always match a person’s birth anatomy.

An AMA report says identification documents that are consistent with gender identity rather than anatomy is essential to basic social and economic functioning. …

The new policy won praise from the National Center for Transgender Equality.

No doubt the AMA treasures this pat on the head from one of the creepy cabals of militant perverts that have been allowed to drive policy not just for the government, but also for private sector pillars of the liberal establishment.

Surprisingly, AMA stands not for American Moonbat Association but for American Medical Association, despite this organization appearing to be far more competent in the political than the medical arena. After all, a brief chat about the birds and bees when I was a little kid imparted more than enough medical expertise for me to know that girls are girls not because they say they are, or because our rulers say they are, but for certain biological reasons that pertain not to liberal dogma but to physical reality.

These biological reasons have been officially discarded now. People don’t even have to make a token nod toward physical reality by surgically disfiguring themselves into grotesque parodies of the opposite sex. All a guy has to do is say he is a girl et voilà: a magical transformation takes place, fully endorsed by the AMA.

Stopping just short of full-blown psychosis, the high priests at the AMA also proclaim that

patients deserve medical care that is appropriate to their birth anatomy even if they self-identify as the opposite sex.

That is, the patient is one sex officially; however, the patient is also not that sex but rather the other sex. Doctors will need to sharpen their doublethink skills.

Why do we care what these PC weenies declare in their pompous and clearly politically motivated proclamations? After all, girls will be girls and boys boys no matter what they choose to call themselves, and no matter what bizarre lies are printed on their revised birth certificates.

Here’s why:

Homosexuality had been universally regarded in some sense as a psychosexual illness from before recorded history. But in 1973, it was removed from the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Officially, it is no longer a disease.

That set the stage for the situation we find ourselves in now. We are not only forbidden to criticize even the most repugnant and obviously unhealthy perversions, we are compelled to celebrate them. We are required to pretend they are normal, and the highly impressionable may even believe they really are normal. Small children are turned over to sexual deviants to be subjected to unwholesome upbringings at best, and sometimes molestation. Already, the official normalcy of perversion has been exploited to attack the Christian religion, with potentially devastating consequences for our national character and public morality, not to mention freedom of worship.

DSM-V has taken the inevitable next step by minimizing the abnormality of thinking you are a different sex than you really are. The often very serious psychiatric illness “gender identity disorder” no longer exists:

The new manual will diagnose transgender people with “Gender Dysphoria,” which communicates the emotional distress that can result from “a marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender.” This will allow for affirmative treatment and transition care without the stigma of disorder. … [The American Psychiatric Association] also released new health guidelines for transgender patients, as well as a position statement affirming transgender care and civil rights. Both documents align with a new standard for respecting trans people in the medical community.

That is, not only perversion but insanity as well is now officially endorsed by the authorities.

I don’t want to think about what progressivism may compel them to normalize in DSM-VI.

When objective reality takes a backseat to moonbat ideology, officials are telling us that 2 + 2 ≠ 4. Once they can get people to go along with that, all extremes of tyranny and insanity become possible.

On a tip from Steve T.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

This Country Sinks Lower and lower into The Sewer

June 11, 2014

Transgender Priest at Washington National Cathedral

The only time liberals will show a sincere interest in Christianity is when they see an opportunity to subvert it in order to destroy it. They have been making headway:

The most visible Episcopal church in the U.S. is hosting its first openly transgender priest this month.

The Rev. Cameron Partridge is set to give the June 22 sermon at the Washington National Cathedral in Northwest.

Dean of the cathedral, the Rev. Gary Hall, said in a statement that he hopes Mr. Partridge’s presence sends a message of support for the transgender community.

“We at Washington National Cathedral are striving to send a message of love and affirmation, especially to LGBT youth who suffer daily because of their gender identity or sexual orientation,” he said. “We want to proclaim to them as proudly and unequivocally as we can: Your gender identity is good and your sexual orientation is good because that’s the way that God made you.”

Sin is good because God made you prone to indulge in it. I must have missed that lesson in Sunday school.

The fallacy is so crude and obvious, it seems absurd to go to the trouble to point it out. But as George Orwell said,

“We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.”

Here goes with the obvious:

The liberal argument is essentially that we are defined by our behavior, and all people are equal, therefore all behavior is equal.

This same argument could be applied to any other behavior proscribed by the civilized norms that have served us so well for the past 2,000 years. I steal things, therefore I’m a thief. Thieves are equal to honest people, so let’s celebrate theft. God loves thieves too, right?

The gay rights agenda is driven not just by sexually deviant activists but exceedingly aggressively by the entire liberal establishment because it is not actually about equality, or even about homosexuals. It is about destroying Christianity, a traditional bulwark against statist tyranny.

Christian bakers and photographers being forced to take part in morally repugnant parodies of Christian ceremonies is only the beginning. Once the Supremes declare homosexual “marriage” to be a constitutional right, anyone whose faith prevents them from revering it will be subject to legal persecution. That includes literally all Bible-believing Christians.

But it doesn’t include Episcopalians, whose church has been thoroughly subverted by the Left and now serves to advance an anti-Christian agenda. Getting back to the story:

Mr. Hall also announced that the Right Rev. Gene Robinson, the first openly gay Episcopal priest, would be presiding the same service with Mr. Partridge. He retired from his post as a bishop in New Hampshire and now works at the Center for American Progress.

Here we get to the root of the matter. CAP is a Soros-funded radical left-wing organization for which the only imaginable god is an all-powerful oligarchical collectivist government.

The service caps off two weeks of LGBT advocacy for the cathedral. It participated in this year’s Capital Pride events, and Mr. Hall said the service would include readings by local LGBT community members.

The technical term for a church involving itself in these activities is blasphemy.

cameron-partridge
Cameron Partridge with her familiar.

On tips from Dean D and Bodhisattva.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Domestic Terrorism Against Godly Americans from The Radical LGBT Loonies

June 9, 2014

Armed & Dangerous: The Terrorism of the LGBT Radicals

Joanne  Moudy | Jun 08, 2014

Joanne  Moudy

When the word ‘terrorism’ is used today, most people equate it with Muslim extremists, radical bombings and hijacked aircraft.  But there’s another form of terrorism happening right here in America, and the perpetrators are out to destroy the very fiber of our Judeo-Christian heritage and U.S. Constitution.  Welcome to the bloody LGBT battlefield where everyone is fair game in a relentless, multifaceted assault on our humanity.

Make no mistake about the LGBT intentions.  No longer content to ‘fit in’ or simply be ‘accepted’ by others for living an odd lifestyle, today they are out to castrate the minds and hearts of others into supporting their deviant faith – or crush those who might oppose their ranting into oblivion.  As per the LGBT website, their goal is “…to seek to change the hearts and minds of Americans to ‘equality’…” – unless you happen to be an American who doesn’t want to be brainwashed.

Read the entire article at Townhall.com: http://townhall.com/columnists/joannemoudy/2014/06/08/armed–dangerous-the-terrorism-of-the-lgbt-radicals-n1848920/page/full#!

Celebrating Perversion in Grade School

June 9, 2014

Grade School Children Brainwashed to Celebrate Sexual Perversion in Oakland Public School

The establishment media is complicit in the “fundamental transformation” of America, so we can hardly expect it to be forthcoming regarding what that transformation entails. That’s why sites like this one are grateful for first-hand reports on situations unlikely to be exposed on the evening news. This email from a concerned parent is a prime example:

I am a parent in Oakland, California and I have a kindergartner in public school. My child came home [Thursday] and told me about the MANDATORY assembly for gay “pride” month. Parents had NO idea this was going to happen and I’m totally blindsided by it.

There is a video on the school’s website showing the assembly… It was nothing more than homosexual indoctrination about the meaning of the rainbow flag and “queer” history. On stage was the rainbow flag but NO American flag. And then a “gay men’s chorus” sang songs about homosexual “freedom.”

This is an elementary school and children as young as 5 were present. Like I said, parents were NOT informed in advance. My child brought home a bookmark with the rainbow flag on it and a quote from radical lesbian poet activist, Audre Lorde, whose work includes a book called “Uses of the Erotic.” This is for Elementary School! …

Then they show videos about how all “families” are the same – two dads, two moms, etc. The video of the entire assembly is on the school website:

If you send children to a government school, you may be subjecting them to this nauseating brand of brainwashing, which is intended to undermine millennia-old conceptions of family and morality. If you pay property taxes, you finance it.

Let’s close today’s lesson with a quote from a Founding Father of progressivism:

When an opponent declares, “I will not come over to your side,” I calmly say, “Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.”

The Culling Won’t Happen Fast Enough to Save Us

June 5, 2014

To put it bluntly, a great culling is underway.

 

a_paul_fuerst_der_doctor_schnabel_von_rom_hollaender_version.jpg
 

Feminists, Atheists, Trangenderend Otherkin – these groups are not reproducing at replacement levels.

Even amongst the groups which are having children, there is a predominance of r-strategy reproduction; the ghetto single-mother model (which is fast overtaking white society, as well) might be producing the greatest quantity of children, but they’re not producing the sort of fit competitors who’ll be able to survive the upcoming economic hangover…. This is what it looks like when a Mechanical God dies: the human refuse in its veins flows straight into the sewer… all the while, continuing to sing praises to the Great God Leviathan.

 

These people are not going to listen.

You’ve seen the arguments on Twitter, on Facebook – you’ve seen their inability to think rationally, or report honestly.  These people have bought into the religion of Modernism™ hook, line, and sinker, and for their sins they shall suffer.

In Praise of Anonymity – Stares at the World

Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

The Liberal Thought Police are Coming For You Too.

April 8, 2014

After Fall of Brendan Eich, Liberal Fascists Call for Broader Purge of Thought Criminals

Did you think Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich’s would be the last scalp collected on behalf of homosexual militants? The liberal fascists at Slate inform us otherwise:

Some of my colleagues are celebrating. They call Eich a bigot who got what he deserved. I agree. But let’s not stop here. If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished.

More than 35,000 people gave money to the campaign for Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that declared, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” You can download the entire list, via the Los Angeles Times, as a compressed spreadsheet. (Click the link that says, “Download CSV.”) Each row lists the donor’s employer. …

Thirty-seven companies in the database are linked to more than 1,300 employees who gave nearly $1 million in combined contributions to the campaign for Prop 8. Twenty-five tech companies are linked to 435 employees who gave more than $300,000. Many of these employees gave $1,000 apiece, if not more. Some, like Eich, are probably senior executives.

Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them. …

If we’re serious about taking down corporate officers who supported Proposition 8, and boycotting employers who promote them, we’d better get cracking on the rest of the list.

Remember that the people they are seeking out for destruction gave money years ago to a proposition that was passed by a majority of California voters, who were then overruled by the courts, starting with gay activist judge Vaughn Walker. Prop 8 is long dead; the liberals who control the judiciary have spoken. The explicit objective now is to hunt down people who have privately held views in the past that are currently considered inconsistent with leftwing ideology.

This isn’t about promoting homosexuality as an end in itself, or only the tiny percentage of Americans who are pushily homosexual would be driving it. This is a major battle in the Cultural Marxist war to replace America with a country where no thought crime (as defined by ultra-Left oligarchs) will be tolerated.

As you can see, anonymity is no longer an option. Neither is sitting on the sidelines. Either we fight these vermin, or they win. If they win there will be zero tolerance for anyone they deem to be ideologically incorrect, as they have clearly demonstrated.

Gay Swastika
Fight it or live under it.

On a tip from Shawn R.

Update:

I’m told the Slate piece is satire. I had considered the possibility, but judging by the way liberals went after Eich, could see no reason to believe that a piece in a leftwing publication calling for more of the same would not be on the level. Is it also satire when the author calls Eich a “bigot” for privately opposing the desecration of marriage? If not, where does the satire line start? Or is the satire claim just cover to hide behind when moonbats overstep?

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Don’t Worry too Much about Gays. Once the mooslims take over, They will Kill them All.

April 8, 2014

LGBT-sharia

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

History Anyone? Tyrannical “Advancements” Never Endure

April 7, 2014

Haven’t you learned anything from history?

‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure. You can only win a debate by suffocating your opposition for so long.

Your strategy is doomed for failure, because it has always failed. In the name of ‘fighting for the freedom to love,’ you’ve utilized hate. For the sake of ‘tolerance,’ you’ve wielded bigotry. In order to push ‘diversity,’ you’ve been dogmatic. You are everything you accuse your opponents of being, and you stand for all the evil things that you claim they champion. You are exposed. We see you for what you are: a force of destruction and division.  Hey gay rights fascists: in spite of your Mozilla victory, you will still lose | The Matt Walsh Blog

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

As simple as That.

April 7, 2014

The removal of Eich is about fascism.

It’s about one group of people forcing everyone else to bow to their hat on a pole;

it’s about book burning, compelling obeisance to, as Jame Surowiecki put it, “a universal ideology” in a manner so bald that even those who might gain politically in the short term from it are horrified by its crudity. Perceptive gays understand now, if they hadn’t noticed before, that a whole mechanism now exists for persecuting people whose views are deemed unacceptable. Today it is directed against Eich; once it was directed against Summers; on other occasions it was employed against Clarence Thomas. But sooner or later, probably sooner, they understand it will be directed against them — or us — or someone.  And if it can get a corporate CEO who is widely regarded as the father of Javascript it can get pretty darned anyone.  Belmont Club » Eich

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

Talk about Irony…

March 30, 2014

Minneapolis Lesbian Police Chief Dons Hijab for “Hijab Day”

There’s nothing like a lesbian feminist authority figure who boasts of being the first female police chief in Minneapolis

donning a symbol of male ownership in a patriarchal tribal society to express the deep schizophrenia of the left in its enthusiastic enabling of Islamists. In other news: Two women accused of having a lesbian relationship have been sentenced to death by a court in the self-declared autonomous region of Puntland in northern Somalia. In the first case of its kind in Somalia, a culturally conservative and Muslim nation. — FrontPage Magazine

From AD:  http://americandigest.org/

This is What America has Come to.

March 30, 2014

From mm:        http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/page/2/

 

Liberals Only Love You If Meet THEIR Diversity Requirements

March 6, 2014

image

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Arizona Law Concerning Gays and Religious Beliefs has been Misconstrued…as Usual

February 27, 2014

Well Said:

From RBA

No…this has nothing to do with “separate but equal.”  Where in the world is this nonsense coming from?

This is a very tough issue though. This law in Arizona was meant to protect small business owners who do not want to offer their services for homosexual weddings because of their conflicting religious reasons. Lawyers for activist organizations and the ACLU have been filing suits against these small businesses (florists, bakeries, photographers, chapels, etc) in multiple states and activist judges have been ordering them to participate in these weddings against their will or pay fines. Now big business is trying to put the pressure on Arizona to veto the bill because they don’t want the bad PR tied to them.  This is tyranny of religious freedom and is just another move of the minority to force artificial change on a free market system that would take care of the problem naturally.

Now, the takeaway is that the gay couples didn’t necessarily file these suits, the lawyers did…”on their behalf.” These small businesses aren’t necessarily turning away gay people just because they’re gay, just their services for homosexual weddings, which these business owners religiously disagree with. In a free market, if a business turns away clients, that’s their loss of revenue. The press (and gay activists) has made this out to be that Arizona businesses have been turning away homosexuals left and right just because they’re homosexuals, which isn’t true at all. And if the bill were to pass, no way would a large percentage of these large corporations pull out these states.  I’d love to see the crony panderers at the NFL pull the Super Bowl or American Airlines try to pull out of the state…what a bunch of cowards.

This issue is also more widespread than just Arizona and could affect other states’ reactions. A judge should never have the power to make you offer your products or services to anyone…no matter what the reason is.  Would it be fair to force a Catholic minister to perform a nudist wedding?  Would it be fair to force a black photographer take photos at a skinhead wedding?  Would it be right to force a recovering alcoholic to cater a reception at a bar?  Unless you’re judgement is cloudy, the answer to all of these is, “no.”  If the business truly is bigoted, then it should fail on its own by customers choosing not to patronize them.  It is not discriminating to turn down your services if you do not feel comfortable or morally correct in doing so.  That is your real civil right.

However, personally, I think Jan Brewer should veto this bill and come up with better legislation that protects these small businesses and their religious rights while keeping these blood-hungry lawyers away from pilfering them by using phony discrimination as a reason.

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Gays Want Special Rights That No One Else Has…and Then Use Those Against Anyone Who Disagrees With Their Agenda

February 26, 2014

“The left does not accept laws it doesn’t like.  They just don’t.”

a_rushquote022514.jpg

 

If a gay couple walk into a bake shop and say, “We want you to bake our wedding cake,” and the shop owners, “Well, you’re homosexual.  I’m not going to do it.”

They want to be able to force the business to respect the desires of the customers that walk in the front door.  Religious beliefs, as Allah knows, religious beliefs can’t be used to stop anything the left wants to impose, unless they’re Muslim religious beliefs, then we have to honor those.  But any other religious beliefs, not permitted, the left will not allow them.  Media Soap Opera Turns to Jan Brewer – The Rush Limbaugh Show

Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

People! This Ain’t About Gay Rights. It’s About Total Control!

February 16, 2014

Why Keep Feeding the Gay-Rights Tiger, Hoping to Be Eaten Last?

Posted on | February 14, 2014 

One of the things we must understand about the Left is the essentially totalitarian nature of their ambitions. There is no logical stopping point on the progressive road to the Utopia of Equality that they insist is always ahead of us, a destination never reached.

Grant all their demands today, and they will return tomorrow with a new list of demands. What do they want? More, always more.

Yesterday, a federal judge struck down Virginia’s state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage, because obviously (a) the Fourteenth Amendment was intended for such a purpose, and (b) never mind the will of voters expressed in a referendum.

The ruling cites memorable Supreme  Court travesties – Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Lawrence v. Texas and Windsor v. U.S. — like so many mileposts on the Highway to Hell, and who can argue with such sophistry when it’s dressed up in costumes of legal precedent, bejeweled with a lot of emotional chatter about “loving, intimate and lasting relationships” and “sacred, personal choices”?

Translation: “Damn the Constitution, we’re not in Utopia yet.”

Meanwhile, in Kansas, the state House of Representatives approved a billintended to impede the March Toward Utopia in the name of “religious liberty,” inspiring  an eruption of hyperbole about “vicious discrimination” and “anti-gay segregation.”

Willkommen, Herr Chamberlain. Welcome to Munich. Today you will cede the Sudetenland. Tomorrow, we’ll demand the world.”

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

The Way that Liberal Hate Groups Operate. A Parable.

February 16, 2014

And I’m a Russian Wolfhound

Posted on | February 14, 2014 

Just call me Borzoi. And I know what you’re thinking: “Borzoi? But you don’t look anything like a Russian wolfhound! As a matter of fact, on closer inspection, you seem to be a golden retriever.”

Haters.

Yes, I am aware that those documents from the American Kennel Club — a notorious group of hatemongering breedists —  identify me as a so-called “pure bred” golden retriever, but in my heart, ever since I was a little puppy, I always knew I was different.

Finally, after years of struggle against oppression, I found the courage to be the dog I really was, and “came out” as a Russian wolfhound.

My brave struggle has continued and, while I know how much you admire my courageous trans-breed activism, it’s important that you not offend me like Piers Morgan offended Janet Mock:

There were several problems with the language Morgan used. For starters, he repeatedly asserted that Mock had formerly been a boy. He also said that Mock had surgery to become a woman. Mock was a woman long before she had the surgery she felt she needed to reflect that. Part of the fight for transgender rights and justice is a fight for self-determination: to be able to proclaim who you are without anyone else adding caveats.

Sure, I know what you’re thinking: “What’s wrong with stating a simple fact? Janet Mock was, indeed, born as a boy named Charles with XY chromosomes and Charles did, in fact, undergo surgery to remove his testicles and rearrange his genitalia to create a simulacrum of a vagina. Actually, the whole point of Janet Mock’s celebrity activism — the book contract, the TV interviews — is the experience of having undergone this transition process. Why, then, is Piers Morgan a transphobic bigot for making reference to these facts?”

You don’t understand. You’ll never understand our struggle for acceptance, our fight against discrimination and bigotry. While you can’t possibly understand, you are permitted to admire us for our heroic courage — but only in language we approve.

Janet Mock is a woman. And I’m a Russian wolfhound.

Get over it, haters.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

The Radical Gay Agenda Attacks Christianity in America. Time to Take a Stand.

February 6, 2014

The Gay Attack on American Values

 By Alan Caruba
In societies around the world, homosexuals encounter not just resistance, but the threat of death for their sexual orientation. In the West we regard this as barbarian and it is. I concluded long ago that gays—using their own term—have no choice over this sexual aberration from the norm of heterosexuality.
In America, gays—male and female homosexuals—represent about 3% of the population. That leaves 97% in a majority and that majority is now under a full assault on their traditional values concerning marriage—intended only for the opposite sexes—and in some cases on their religious faith that deems homosexuality a sin.
In recent years we have seen gays achieve a legal status for same-sex marriage, thus undermining centuries of tradition that understands marriage to be for the purpose of procreation and as the keystone of society. We have a President who changed his mind from his 2008 political campaign and announced that he not only approved of gay marriage but that his administration, the Department of Justice, would not enforce the Defense of Marriage law passed by Congress.
The Obama administration has pressed hard to alter the military that went from “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” under the Clinton administration, to the present status that sees no problem in the close living conditions under which heterosexual and homosexual troops must live and work together. This was always regarded as a problem of unit cohesion in the long years leading up to the 1990s and it likely still is. In a similar fashion, the infusion of women into combat units poses problems that the military understandably avoided for most of the last two hundred and twenty-eight years of the nation’s history.
The passage of Obamacare has posed significant problems for religious groups that oppose abortion and related practices. It has particularly affected Catholic institutions and, most recently, the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of nuns who do not want to signal any concurrence with the law as it is written. The Supreme Court has granted that some respite, but their issue and others will surely have to be addressed by the Court at some point.
In Massachusetts, a homosexual legal group has filed papers to force a Catholic school to hire a man who is “married” to another man. As reported by MassResistance.org, “Back in July, Matthew Barrett of Dorchester applied for a job as the food service director at Fontbonne Academy, a Roman Catholic girls’ high school in Milton, Mass, and was subsequently offered the job. When he filled out a pre-employment form listing his ‘husband’ as an emergency contact the school told him that ‘the Catholic religion doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage. We cannot hire you.’”
“Barratt claimed to be shocked by the school’s action,” noted MassResistance, “But it appears that he was purposefully dishonest. He told the Boston Globe that he was raised a Catholic and that he was informed by school officials during the interview process that employees are expected to follow Catholic doctrine. However, he did not tell the school that he was openly involved with homosexual behavior and was in a ‘gay marriage.’”
MassResistance regards the case as “the beginning of the homosexual movement’s legal assault on conservative churches, particularly Catholic, that have steadfastly refused to modify their religious convictions and comply with the homosexual movement’s demands on society. Up until now they’ve been largely left alone. But that is about to change.”
As the Boston Globe noted, “Barrett’s complaint, which may be the first of its kind in the country, comes at a time when religion-based schools in the increasing number of states where gay marriage is legal have been scrutinizing hiring and firing practices to ensure they conform with the pillars of their faiths”
“School administrators,” the Globe reported, “have been fired from Catholic schools and universities in Arkansas, California, New York, and Washington, among other states, after marrying their same-sex partners or announcing plans to do so.”
Bennett Klein, the lawyer for the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination, asserts that “Our laws carefully balance the important values of religious liberty and non-discrimination. When Fontbonne Academy fired Matt from a job that has nothing to do with religion, they came down on the wrong side of the law.” It has everything to do with the free practice of religion.
“We’re seeing religion-affiliated entities more and more trying to push the line toward discriminating against gay, lesbian, and transgendered people,” said Klein.
No, it is the homosexuals who are pushing the line against religious groups who believe that their belief in God and their faith precludes the destruction of the construct of marriage is a sin against mankind and society.
It is 3% of the population demanding that 97% toss aside their faith and their values to accommodate the aberration called homosexuality. And, yes, it is an aberration because homosexuality cannot be interpreted as “normal” in any species.
MassResistance correctly says “This is madness and should not have any legal leg to stand on.”
If the homosexual assault on values and practices that have existed for centuries in the Catholic Church and in other religious faiths succeeds, the whole of our society will suffer for it. The Supreme Court decision to legalize abortion—murder—has resulted in the deaths of millions of unborn children who had a right to life.
Now, in Massachusetts and other States where same-sex marriage is deemed to be legal, the whole of the nation’s defense of marriage is under assault.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
Found at Theo Spark: http://www.theospark.net/

Killing Means Nothing to Killary

January 29, 2014

image

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Hate. Radical LGBT Agenda. What? Objections? 3.5% is Now the Majority? WTF?

January 24, 2014

Glenn Beck’s #LGBT Agenda?

Posted on | January 22, 2014

My brother Kirby called this afternoon and began the conversation by saying, “You know if that kid in Florida kills himself . . .”

Yeah, they’ll blame me.

Volunteer Official Scapegoat™ of the Hate Olympics.

Someone has to be the conservative who notices things you’re not supposed to notice and says things you’re not supposed to say.

The chief qualifications for this gig are (a) scorn for popularity and (b) disregard for the short-term goals of the Republican Party. If your goal is to become the Popular Person Embraced by the Official GOP, you can never speak the kind of truth that makes people uncomfortable, you can never risk anything in a fight, and you are ultimately doomed to a defensive strategy of retreat.

Glenn Beck said on his Monday show that anti-gay people “have no place in this country.” . . . “Anybody within the sound of my voice that hates a gay person because they’re gay, you have no place calling yourself a fan of mine,” Beck said. “You have no place in this country.” Beck has spoken out in support of gay marriage several times before. Earlier in January, he voiced his opposition against Russia’s anti-gay laws and announced that he would stand by the LGBT advocacy group GLAAD in their fight against “hetero-fascism.” “You are not a fan of mine — you have no friendship here — if you hate people because they’re gay,” Beck also added. “You have no place claiming that you’re a fan of this show. . . . If that’s who you are, I don’t want to have anything to do with you.”

Of course, the problem with Beck’s rhetoric here is that it conflates political opposition to a certain policy agenda (or religious objections to homosexual behavior) with “hate,” which is an assertion so absurd that I hesitate to dignify it with a response.

Look, my religious beliefs condemn premarital sex and re-marriage after divorce. Do I “hate” people who don’t live up to those biblical standards of behavior? No one has ever accused me of such a hate, because there is no recognized Promiscuity Lobby trying to mobilize an identity politics constituency to vote Democrat by labeling Republicans a hate group on such a basis. Once you get past the irrational bullying tactics of the Left and look at the actual data, you recognize that the gay agenda represents an effort to re-order social norms on behalf of an extremely small (but quite vocal and well-funded) minority:

The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, a gay and lesbian think tank, released a study in April 2011 estimating based on its research that just 1.7 percent of Americans between 18 and 44 identify as gay or lesbian, while another 1.8 percent — predominantly women — identify as bisexual. Far from underestimating the ranks of gay people because of homophobia, these figures included a substantial number of people who remained deeply closeted, such as a quarter of the bisexuals. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey of women between 22 and 44 that questioned more than 13,500 respondents between 2006 and 2008 found very similar numbers: Only 1 percent of the women identified themselves as gay, while 4 percent identified as bisexual.

So the LGBT coalition encompasses 3.5 percent of the population, max, to whom the other 96.5 percent are expected to kowtow?

Never has such a large majority dog been so easily wagged by such a small minority tail, led by radicals who habitually impugn all opposition in the most vituperative language imaginable. Dana Pico at First Street Journal notes the implicit insistence “that homosexual relationships are just as good, just as wholesome, just as normal, as heterosexual ones,” i.e., compulsory approval. As I explained more than five years ago (“Gay Rights, Gay Rage,” The American Spectator, Nov.  17, 2008), those who speak of homosexuality in the language of “rights” are not about liberty, but rather about equality in the most radical sense and, as Richard Weaver famously warned, Ideas Have Consequences.

This is how we reach the point at which people believe they have the “right” to make you bake them a lesbian wedding cake. This is how we reach the point where no one is supposed to object to teenage boys getting paid for a six-way “bareback orgy” on video.

Do you think this kind of stuff is worth discussing? “You have no place in this country.” Ace says Glenn Beck is now “all about attempting to get TimeWarner and ComCast to pick up his cable channel.”

Yeah, because MSNBC needs more competition.

From The Other McCain:  http://theothermccain.com/

gladd: Fascist Faggots

December 29, 2013

@GLAAD Members Are Fascist Totalitarians. Period.

29SundayDec 2013

Posted by  in Homosexual Curriculum

GLAAD Members Are Fascist Totalitarians. Period.

My buddy, Doug wrote an excellent piece about the gay freaks @ GLAAD. If these ‘gays’ want to be together so bad, they need to call their union something else because marriage is from GOD. Who most of them hate with a passion.  These ‘gay’ fascists DEMAND GOD.  Who do they think they are???  They are so fascistic, they appoint Commies into the courts as judges, who over-rule the will of the people and they ‘marry’ each-other, regardless of the people.  THAT is not ‘gay’, that is cruel, fascist, NAZI and TOTALLY TOTALITARIAN.   Its sickening.

 Virtually the entire “gay rights” agenda is predicated on lies, but worse, most of the mainstream political establishment swallows them without the least bit of shame. It’s disgusting. As I wrote years ago, homosexual marriage is not a civil right.

Read The rest: GLAAD’s Fascist Totalitarianism

From MJ:  http://themadjewess.com/

The Only Thing “Vile” is the Radical Gay Movement and its Followers

December 24, 2013

Liberals Commandeer the Word “Vile”

This excerpt from Lewis’s Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass was highly instructive for moonbats:

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

As hard as it is to believe now, the word “liberal” once referred to freedom. It even comes from the same root as “liberty.” The Founding Fathers were once regarded as liberals, as were advocates of the free market like Adam Smith. These days “liberal” refers to belief in authoritarian statism. This is because the people who now call themselves liberals commandeered the word and twisted it to their purposes. They used to call themselves “progressives,” a word that once implied progress toward an improved future, but now means a coercive return to social and economic models reminiscent of failed 20th century communism. Presumably to prevent it from being used against them, they are now redefining the word “vile.”

When the bullying homosexual fascists of GLAAD denounced Phil Robertson as “vile” for adhering to traditional values and listing homosexuality among other sins to be avoided, this term was dutifully echoed by liberal apparatchiks like CNN’s loathsome Piers Morgan:

At 9:30 a.m. on December 19th, CNN’s Piers Morgan tweeted that the First Amendment “shouldn’t protect vile bigots” like Phil Robertson.

Morgan also denounced Robertson as “repulsively racist.” If “vile” can be turned into a pejorative version of “decent and moral,” “racist” can mean whatever libs want it to also.

Orienting your identity around a sexual obsession with the smelly filth-excreting anuses of members of the same sex is vile. Sanctifying unclean acts of perversion by demanding reverence and privileged status for those who indulge in them is vile. Acknowledging that sexual depravity is sinful is the opposite of vile. Unless the word’s meaning has now been officially reversed, in which case “vile” will eventually become a compliment, just as “liberal” has become an insult — arguably the worst insult imaginable.

piers-morgan-CNN
An apt graphic to illustrate the traditional meaning of the word “vile”.

Hat tip: Maggie’s Farm.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Real Americans are Sick of the Radical “Gay” Agenda. Their Agenda is Bigoted, Ugly, and Intolerant.

December 23, 2013

Mark Steyn Stands Firm With Phil Robertson

As John Hawkins correctly notes,

It’s incredibly refreshing to have someone under attack by the Left’s political correctness police who’s willing to stand firm instead of whimpering and hiding in a corner because he wants to make it all go away.

Hawkins is referring to Phil Robertson, who instead of licking the hand of the degeneracy-promoting liberal fascists who control television, has stood firm by his conventional values. The same applies to Mark Steyn. After being publicly chastised by his editor for siding with Robertson against the pink Nazis at GLAAD who have been attempting to destroy him for his decency, Steyn doubled down:

Having leaned on A&E to suspend their biggest star, GLAAD has now moved on to Stage Two:

“We believe the next step is to use this as an opportunity for Phil to sit down with gay families in Louisiana and learn about their lives and the values they share,” the spokesman said.

Actually, “the next step” is for you thugs to push off and stop targeting, threatening and making demands of those who happen to disagree with you. Personally, I think this would be a wonderful opportunity for the GLAAD executive board to sit down with half-a-dozen firebreathing imams and learn about their values, but, unlike the Commissars of the Bureau of Conformity Enforcement, I accord even condescending little ticks like the one above the freedom to arrange his own social calendar.

As for the editor who publicly denounced him, namely Jason Lee Steorts, Steyn writes:

It is a matter of some regret to me that my own editor at this publication does not regard this sort of thing as creepy and repellent rather than part of the vibrant tapestry of what he calls an “awakening to a greater civility”. I’m not inclined to euphemize intimidation and bullying as a lively exchange of ideas – “the use of speech to criticize other speech”, as Mr Steorts absurdly dignifies it. So do excuse me if I skip to the men’s room during his patronizing disquisition on the distinction between “state coercion” and “cultural coercion”. I’m well aware of that, thank you. In the early days of my free-speech battles in Canada, my friend Ezra Levant used a particular word to me: “de-normalize”. Our enemies didn’t particularly care whether they won in court. Whatever the verdict, they’d succeed in “de-normalizing” us — that’s to say, putting us beyond the pale of polite society and mainstream culture. “De-normalizing” is the business GLAAD and the other enforcers are in. You’ll recall Paula Deen’s accuser eventually lost in court — but the verdict came too late for Ms Deen’s book deal, and TV show, and endorsement contracts.

National Review has played a role in denormalizing in the past. Ostensibly a conservative publication, it serves the liberal establishment of which it is part by providing a phony opposition (much like the GOP), while restricting what conservatives are allowed to say.

Readers will recall that when John Derbyshire made certain undeniably accurate racial observations in a separate publication, he was promptly fired by National Review’s Thought Cop in Chief Rich Lowry for stepping outside the bounds of political correctness.

I’ve been wondering how long a sincere and gutsy guy like Steyn would last at NR, considering that he stood firm and won against the PC totalitarians who tried to gag him in Canada. Looks like we are about to find out:

I am sorry my editor at NR does not grasp the stakes. Indeed, he seems inclined to “normalize” what GLAAD is doing. But, if he truly finds my “derogatory language” offensive, I’d rather he just indefinitely suspend me than twist himself into a soggy pretzel of ambivalent inertia trying to avoid the central point — that a society where lives are ruined over an aside because some identity-group don decides it must be so is ugly and profoundly illiberal. As to his kind but belated and conditional pledge to join me on the barricades, I had enough of that level of passionate support up in Canada to know that, when the call to arms comes, there will always be some “derogatory” or “puerile” expression that it will be more important to tut over. So thanks for the offer, but I don’t think you’d be much use, would you?

Wow. As Bill Clinton would say, Steors had better put some ice on that.

Given the right conditions, a few sparks of boldness have been known set off major conflagrations. If Robertson and Steyn can stand up to the corrupt establishment, so can the rest of us.

gay fascists
People are finally beginning to put up resistance.

On tips from Varla and Rob Banks.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Pajama Boy. Spawn of Gay baits?

December 23, 2013

rachel_maddow_chris_hayes_pajama_boy

Found at MB: http://moonbattery.com/

The Hater is on The Right

December 19, 2013

concerninglibertyfirst:</p>
<p>opinion A versus opinion Bboth are irrelevant to the scale of life and the universe.<br />
as is the same with this post.<br />
and tumble in general.<br />
stop taking life on the internet so seriously lol</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not opposing opinions though.

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Obama Thinks Perverts are Extra Special

December 19, 2013

Perverts Prioritized for ObamaCare

For our liberal rulers, those at the top of the caste system of political correctness come first — and at the very top of that pyramid of phony victimhood are those so psychiatrically defective as to construct their personal identities around being sexual deviants. So it is no surprise the freakazoids comprising the “LGBT community” have been prioritized to get treated at other people’s expense under ObamaCare:

As a critical deadline for signing up for insurance under President Obama’s health-care law approaches, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community has emerged as a major target for the White House and outside groups.

A disproportionate number of LGBT Americans are uninsured and qualify for federal premium subsidies to help buy coverage, and the administration is intensifying its efforts to get them enrolled before the end of the year.

Free healthcare! We’ll make someone else pay for it! Get yer free healthcare!

Millions of people who have been willing to pay for their coverage have had it canceled. ObamaCare has put insurance coverage in decline by a 14 to 1 margin. But then, under our tyranny of the minorities, that might make perfect sense.

Meanwhile, several outside groups are pitching in for the LGBT outreach, including Out2Enroll, a collaboration among the Sellers Dorsey Foundation, the Center for American Progress (CAP) and the Federal Agencies Project. The group is working to educate men and women in major cities about their options for coverage and how to navigate the system. According to CAP, 900,000 members of the LGBT community could get some form of subsidized health care under the law.

Have your wallet handy. Subsidized care for nearly a million people who define themselves by their devotion to an exceedingly unhealthy lifestyle known for spreading extravagantly expensive diseases like AIDS will not come cheap — and that’s not even taking into account the nightmarish surgical and pharmaceutical procedures that run up massive bills while transforming them into grotesque facsimiles of the opposite sex.

Here’s how our liberal overlords are spreading the word:

Wednesday Night Tea, a drag show in Shreveport, La., has started promoting the health-care law as part of its act. And Out2Enroll is launching a social media campaign this week that will have “naughty” elements as well as holiday cheer, according to Kellan Baker, associate director of the LGBT Research and Communications Project at CAP.

I believe “naughty” is LGBTese for explicitly obscene.

Here’s a glimpse at the top tier of the liberal caste system:

Wednesday-Night-Tea

Now get back to work so you can generate some tax revenue. Hormone therapy costs money.

On tips from R F and Ben S. Hat tips: Frontpage Magazine, NRO.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/