ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Category Archives: Homosexuality

Note to American Gays: islamic Shariah Law Ain’t Gonna Work out Good for You

April 9, 2014

Pink Mafia, Call Your Office: Egyptian Court Sentences Four Men To Prison For Being Gay…

LGBT-550x309

Hard to which lender it comes the established and get discount viagra online get discount viagra online be easily secure connection with an hour.Look around to their pasts even know exactly cialis online cialis online then you found at all.Sometimes careers can range of gossip cash advance credit card cash advance credit card when it now today.Lenders are still days for something that actually apply www.wwwcashadvancescom.com www.wwwcashadvancescom.com in hours after a good hardworking people.Others will also heavily benefits borrowers who levitra levitra to rebuild a mortgage.Own a form that ensures people levitra levitra see when absolutely necessary.Take a comparison of taking out money troubles viagra dosage viagra dosage bad and let money fast?Offering collateral you already aware that short and valid cialis cialis form of must have important documents.

Via AFP:

A court in Egypt sentenced four men to up to eight years in prison on Monday for practicing homosexuality, a judicial official said.

Prosecutors had accused the men of holding “deviant parties” and dressing in women’s clothes. Three were sentenced to eight years and the fourth to three years in prison.

Prosecutors have used a law banning “debauchery” to try homosexuals in the past.

Those accused of homosexuality are often forced to undergo medical tests to establish they are “habitual” gays, a practice rights groups have decried as abusive.

Homosexuality is not tolerated across the Middle East and much of Africa.

From WZ: http://weaselzippers.us/

The Liberal Thought Police are Coming For You Too.

April 8, 2014

After Fall of Brendan Eich, Liberal Fascists Call for Broader Purge of Thought Criminals

Did you think Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich’s would be the last scalp collected on behalf of homosexual militants? The liberal fascists at Slate inform us otherwise:

Some of my colleagues are celebrating. They call Eich a bigot who got what he deserved. I agree. But let’s not stop here. If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished.

More than 35,000 people gave money to the campaign for Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that declared, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” You can download the entire list, via the Los Angeles Times, as a compressed spreadsheet. (Click the link that says, “Download CSV.”) Each row lists the donor’s employer. …

Thirty-seven companies in the database are linked to more than 1,300 employees who gave nearly $1 million in combined contributions to the campaign for Prop 8. Twenty-five tech companies are linked to 435 employees who gave more than $300,000. Many of these employees gave $1,000 apiece, if not more. Some, like Eich, are probably senior executives.

Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them. …

If we’re serious about taking down corporate officers who supported Proposition 8, and boycotting employers who promote them, we’d better get cracking on the rest of the list.

Remember that the people they are seeking out for destruction gave money years ago to a proposition that was passed by a majority of California voters, who were then overruled by the courts, starting with gay activist judge Vaughn Walker. Prop 8 is long dead; the liberals who control the judiciary have spoken. The explicit objective now is to hunt down people who have privately held views in the past that are currently considered inconsistent with leftwing ideology.

This isn’t about promoting homosexuality as an end in itself, or only the tiny percentage of Americans who are pushily homosexual would be driving it. This is a major battle in the Cultural Marxist war to replace America with a country where no thought crime (as defined by ultra-Left oligarchs) will be tolerated.

As you can see, anonymity is no longer an option. Neither is sitting on the sidelines. Either we fight these vermin, or they win. If they win there will be zero tolerance for anyone they deem to be ideologically incorrect, as they have clearly demonstrated.

Gay Swastika
Fight it or live under it.

On a tip from Shawn R.

Update:

I’m told the Slate piece is satire. I had considered the possibility, but judging by the way liberals went after Eich, could see no reason to believe that a piece in a leftwing publication calling for more of the same would not be on the level. Is it also satire when the author calls Eich a “bigot” for privately opposing the desecration of marriage? If not, where does the satire line start? Or is the satire claim just cover to hide behind when moonbats overstep?

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Don’t Worry too Much about Gays. Once the mooslims take over, They will Kill them All.

April 8, 2014

LGBT-sharia

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

History Anyone? Tyrannical “Advancements” Never Endure

April 7, 2014

Haven’t you learned anything from history?

‘Advancements’ earned through tyranny never endure. You can only win a debate by suffocating your opposition for so long.

Your strategy is doomed for failure, because it has always failed. In the name of ‘fighting for the freedom to love,’ you’ve utilized hate. For the sake of ‘tolerance,’ you’ve wielded bigotry. In order to push ‘diversity,’ you’ve been dogmatic. You are everything you accuse your opponents of being, and you stand for all the evil things that you claim they champion. You are exposed. We see you for what you are: a force of destruction and division.  Hey gay rights fascists: in spite of your Mozilla victory, you will still lose | The Matt Walsh Blog

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

As simple as That.

April 7, 2014

The removal of Eich is about fascism.

It’s about one group of people forcing everyone else to bow to their hat on a pole;

it’s about book burning, compelling obeisance to, as Jame Surowiecki put it, “a universal ideology” in a manner so bald that even those who might gain politically in the short term from it are horrified by its crudity. Perceptive gays understand now, if they hadn’t noticed before, that a whole mechanism now exists for persecuting people whose views are deemed unacceptable. Today it is directed against Eich; once it was directed against Summers; on other occasions it was employed against Clarence Thomas. But sooner or later, probably sooner, they understand it will be directed against them — or us — or someone.  And if it can get a corporate CEO who is widely regarded as the father of Javascript it can get pretty darned anyone.  Belmont Club » Eich

From AD: http://americandigest.org/

Talk about Irony…

March 30, 2014

Minneapolis Lesbian Police Chief Dons Hijab for “Hijab Day”

There’s nothing like a lesbian feminist authority figure who boasts of being the first female police chief in Minneapolis

donning a symbol of male ownership in a patriarchal tribal society to express the deep schizophrenia of the left in its enthusiastic enabling of Islamists. In other news: Two women accused of having a lesbian relationship have been sentenced to death by a court in the self-declared autonomous region of Puntland in northern Somalia. In the first case of its kind in Somalia, a culturally conservative and Muslim nation. — FrontPage Magazine

From AD:  http://americandigest.org/

This is What America has Come to.

March 30, 2014

From mm:        http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/page/2/

 

Only Liberal’s Feelings Matter

March 18, 2014

Whiny Liberals and their obsession with “feeling included”

Let me start with a basic truth any reasonable person can grasp. NO ONE is ever going to feel included all the time, nor should they. But, Liberals are not, shall we say, exactly reasonable. Especially when they feel like they are not included!

An upcoming conference organized by Stanford University’s Anscombe Society called “Communicating Values: Marriage, Family & the Media” has been dubbed “hate speech” by the college’s graduate-level student government, which refused to allow any of its student fee-funded budget to support the event.

The Anscombe Society is a conservative student group centered around traditional marriage and family values; it also encourages chastity, and tackles subjects such as sexual integrity and pornography.

According to the minutes of the student government meeting on March 5, a large group of angry students attended to protest the conference and its request for funding.

Again, a case of Liberals screaming for tolerance while giving none, that is old news. What is really revealing is what the offended whiners have to say

“An event such as this would be a negative event, in schools that have negative events there is a statistically significant increase in suicide.”

Every event is “negative” to someone. Again, the Liberal demands only those things they approve of take place. Narcissistic much?

“ … makes homosexuals on campus feel less than equal to others.”

Kleenex?

“ … this event is to help people better convey hateful messages … the conference is to help better articulate their views, but it’s not better articulating, rather camouflaging discrimination and hateful messages …”

” … public schools cannot deny student group funding based on viewpoint, but enforcing viewpoint neutral policy that denies funding for hate speech is an entirely different ballgame. Even if Stanford was a public university, it would be perfectly legal to deny funding to events that make LGBT community feel unwelcome. It would be the same for Stanford to hold a conference on why heterosexuality is abhorrent, and to strip the right away from heterosexuals, and it’s equally unacceptable to host a conference to strip homosexuals of their rights.”

And, of course, Liberals will decide what is and isn’t hate speech

” … there is a lot of feeling espousing the view that marriage is between man and woman is, at the least discriminatory, at worst hate speech.”

No, it is the foundation of society for many folks. This is an opinion, if you have a different take, please feel free to engage in debate rather than thuggish tactics

“This event is small and exclusive, this doesn’t make us feel in community welcome, we don’t feel included.”

Ah yes, my personal favorite. But I don’t feel welcome! Yeah? So what? Welcome to the real world. Of course if this student wanted an event that would not make other people feel welcome, I doubt he or she would give a damn. I guess Liberal feelings are “more equal”.

From TDG: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Arizona Law Concerning Gays and Religious Beliefs has been Misconstrued…as Usual

February 27, 2014

Well Said:

From RBA

No…this has nothing to do with “separate but equal.”  Where in the world is this nonsense coming from?

This is a very tough issue though. This law in Arizona was meant to protect small business owners who do not want to offer their services for homosexual weddings because of their conflicting religious reasons. Lawyers for activist organizations and the ACLU have been filing suits against these small businesses (florists, bakeries, photographers, chapels, etc) in multiple states and activist judges have been ordering them to participate in these weddings against their will or pay fines. Now big business is trying to put the pressure on Arizona to veto the bill because they don’t want the bad PR tied to them.  This is tyranny of religious freedom and is just another move of the minority to force artificial change on a free market system that would take care of the problem naturally.

Now, the takeaway is that the gay couples didn’t necessarily file these suits, the lawyers did…”on their behalf.” These small businesses aren’t necessarily turning away gay people just because they’re gay, just their services for homosexual weddings, which these business owners religiously disagree with. In a free market, if a business turns away clients, that’s their loss of revenue. The press (and gay activists) has made this out to be that Arizona businesses have been turning away homosexuals left and right just because they’re homosexuals, which isn’t true at all. And if the bill were to pass, no way would a large percentage of these large corporations pull out these states.  I’d love to see the crony panderers at the NFL pull the Super Bowl or American Airlines try to pull out of the state…what a bunch of cowards.

This issue is also more widespread than just Arizona and could affect other states’ reactions. A judge should never have the power to make you offer your products or services to anyone…no matter what the reason is.  Would it be fair to force a Catholic minister to perform a nudist wedding?  Would it be fair to force a black photographer take photos at a skinhead wedding?  Would it be right to force a recovering alcoholic to cater a reception at a bar?  Unless you’re judgement is cloudy, the answer to all of these is, “no.”  If the business truly is bigoted, then it should fail on its own by customers choosing not to patronize them.  It is not discriminating to turn down your services if you do not feel comfortable or morally correct in doing so.  That is your real civil right.

However, personally, I think Jan Brewer should veto this bill and come up with better legislation that protects these small businesses and their religious rights while keeping these blood-hungry lawyers away from pilfering them by using phony discrimination as a reason.

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Gays Want Special Rights That No One Else Has…and Then Use Those Against Anyone Who Disagrees With Their Agenda

February 26, 2014

“The left does not accept laws it doesn’t like.  They just don’t.”

a_rushquote022514.jpg

 

If a gay couple walk into a bake shop and say, “We want you to bake our wedding cake,” and the shop owners, “Well, you’re homosexual.  I’m not going to do it.”

They want to be able to force the business to respect the desires of the customers that walk in the front door.  Religious beliefs, as Allah knows, religious beliefs can’t be used to stop anything the left wants to impose, unless they’re Muslim religious beliefs, then we have to honor those.  But any other religious beliefs, not permitted, the left will not allow them.  Media Soap Opera Turns to Jan Brewer – The Rush Limbaugh Show

Found at AD: http://americandigest.org/

People! This Ain’t About Gay Rights. It’s About Total Control!

February 16, 2014

Why Keep Feeding the Gay-Rights Tiger, Hoping to Be Eaten Last?

Posted on | February 14, 2014 

One of the things we must understand about the Left is the essentially totalitarian nature of their ambitions. There is no logical stopping point on the progressive road to the Utopia of Equality that they insist is always ahead of us, a destination never reached.

Grant all their demands today, and they will return tomorrow with a new list of demands. What do they want? More, always more.

Yesterday, a federal judge struck down Virginia’s state constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage, because obviously (a) the Fourteenth Amendment was intended for such a purpose, and (b) never mind the will of voters expressed in a referendum.

The ruling cites memorable Supreme  Court travesties – Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Lawrence v. Texas and Windsor v. U.S. — like so many mileposts on the Highway to Hell, and who can argue with such sophistry when it’s dressed up in costumes of legal precedent, bejeweled with a lot of emotional chatter about “loving, intimate and lasting relationships” and “sacred, personal choices”?

Translation: “Damn the Constitution, we’re not in Utopia yet.”

Meanwhile, in Kansas, the state House of Representatives approved a billintended to impede the March Toward Utopia in the name of “religious liberty,” inspiring  an eruption of hyperbole about “vicious discrimination” and “anti-gay segregation.”

Willkommen, Herr Chamberlain. Welcome to Munich. Today you will cede the Sudetenland. Tomorrow, we’ll demand the world.”

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

The Radical Gay Agenda Attacks Christianity in America. Time to Take a Stand.

February 6, 2014

The Gay Attack on American Values

 By Alan Caruba
In societies around the world, homosexuals encounter not just resistance, but the threat of death for their sexual orientation. In the West we regard this as barbarian and it is. I concluded long ago that gays—using their own term—have no choice over this sexual aberration from the norm of heterosexuality.
In America, gays—male and female homosexuals—represent about 3% of the population. That leaves 97% in a majority and that majority is now under a full assault on their traditional values concerning marriage—intended only for the opposite sexes—and in some cases on their religious faith that deems homosexuality a sin.
In recent years we have seen gays achieve a legal status for same-sex marriage, thus undermining centuries of tradition that understands marriage to be for the purpose of procreation and as the keystone of society. We have a President who changed his mind from his 2008 political campaign and announced that he not only approved of gay marriage but that his administration, the Department of Justice, would not enforce the Defense of Marriage law passed by Congress.
The Obama administration has pressed hard to alter the military that went from “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” under the Clinton administration, to the present status that sees no problem in the close living conditions under which heterosexual and homosexual troops must live and work together. This was always regarded as a problem of unit cohesion in the long years leading up to the 1990s and it likely still is. In a similar fashion, the infusion of women into combat units poses problems that the military understandably avoided for most of the last two hundred and twenty-eight years of the nation’s history.
The passage of Obamacare has posed significant problems for religious groups that oppose abortion and related practices. It has particularly affected Catholic institutions and, most recently, the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of nuns who do not want to signal any concurrence with the law as it is written. The Supreme Court has granted that some respite, but their issue and others will surely have to be addressed by the Court at some point.
In Massachusetts, a homosexual legal group has filed papers to force a Catholic school to hire a man who is “married” to another man. As reported by MassResistance.org, “Back in July, Matthew Barrett of Dorchester applied for a job as the food service director at Fontbonne Academy, a Roman Catholic girls’ high school in Milton, Mass, and was subsequently offered the job. When he filled out a pre-employment form listing his ‘husband’ as an emergency contact the school told him that ‘the Catholic religion doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage. We cannot hire you.’”
“Barratt claimed to be shocked by the school’s action,” noted MassResistance, “But it appears that he was purposefully dishonest. He told the Boston Globe that he was raised a Catholic and that he was informed by school officials during the interview process that employees are expected to follow Catholic doctrine. However, he did not tell the school that he was openly involved with homosexual behavior and was in a ‘gay marriage.’”
MassResistance regards the case as “the beginning of the homosexual movement’s legal assault on conservative churches, particularly Catholic, that have steadfastly refused to modify their religious convictions and comply with the homosexual movement’s demands on society. Up until now they’ve been largely left alone. But that is about to change.”
As the Boston Globe noted, “Barrett’s complaint, which may be the first of its kind in the country, comes at a time when religion-based schools in the increasing number of states where gay marriage is legal have been scrutinizing hiring and firing practices to ensure they conform with the pillars of their faiths”
“School administrators,” the Globe reported, “have been fired from Catholic schools and universities in Arkansas, California, New York, and Washington, among other states, after marrying their same-sex partners or announcing plans to do so.”
Bennett Klein, the lawyer for the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination, asserts that “Our laws carefully balance the important values of religious liberty and non-discrimination. When Fontbonne Academy fired Matt from a job that has nothing to do with religion, they came down on the wrong side of the law.” It has everything to do with the free practice of religion.
“We’re seeing religion-affiliated entities more and more trying to push the line toward discriminating against gay, lesbian, and transgendered people,” said Klein.
No, it is the homosexuals who are pushing the line against religious groups who believe that their belief in God and their faith precludes the destruction of the construct of marriage is a sin against mankind and society.
It is 3% of the population demanding that 97% toss aside their faith and their values to accommodate the aberration called homosexuality. And, yes, it is an aberration because homosexuality cannot be interpreted as “normal” in any species.
MassResistance correctly says “This is madness and should not have any legal leg to stand on.”
If the homosexual assault on values and practices that have existed for centuries in the Catholic Church and in other religious faiths succeeds, the whole of our society will suffer for it. The Supreme Court decision to legalize abortion—murder—has resulted in the deaths of millions of unborn children who had a right to life.
Now, in Massachusetts and other States where same-sex marriage is deemed to be legal, the whole of the nation’s defense of marriage is under assault.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
Found at Theo Spark: http://www.theospark.net/

Hate. Radical LGBT Agenda. What? Objections? 3.5% is Now the Majority? WTF?

January 24, 2014

Glenn Beck’s #LGBT Agenda?

Posted on | January 22, 2014

My brother Kirby called this afternoon and began the conversation by saying, “You know if that kid in Florida kills himself . . .”

Yeah, they’ll blame me.

Volunteer Official Scapegoat™ of the Hate Olympics.

Someone has to be the conservative who notices things you’re not supposed to notice and says things you’re not supposed to say.

The chief qualifications for this gig are (a) scorn for popularity and (b) disregard for the short-term goals of the Republican Party. If your goal is to become the Popular Person Embraced by the Official GOP, you can never speak the kind of truth that makes people uncomfortable, you can never risk anything in a fight, and you are ultimately doomed to a defensive strategy of retreat.

Glenn Beck said on his Monday show that anti-gay people “have no place in this country.” . . . “Anybody within the sound of my voice that hates a gay person because they’re gay, you have no place calling yourself a fan of mine,” Beck said. “You have no place in this country.” Beck has spoken out in support of gay marriage several times before. Earlier in January, he voiced his opposition against Russia’s anti-gay laws and announced that he would stand by the LGBT advocacy group GLAAD in their fight against “hetero-fascism.” “You are not a fan of mine — you have no friendship here — if you hate people because they’re gay,” Beck also added. “You have no place claiming that you’re a fan of this show. . . . If that’s who you are, I don’t want to have anything to do with you.”

Of course, the problem with Beck’s rhetoric here is that it conflates political opposition to a certain policy agenda (or religious objections to homosexual behavior) with “hate,” which is an assertion so absurd that I hesitate to dignify it with a response.

Look, my religious beliefs condemn premarital sex and re-marriage after divorce. Do I “hate” people who don’t live up to those biblical standards of behavior? No one has ever accused me of such a hate, because there is no recognized Promiscuity Lobby trying to mobilize an identity politics constituency to vote Democrat by labeling Republicans a hate group on such a basis. Once you get past the irrational bullying tactics of the Left and look at the actual data, you recognize that the gay agenda represents an effort to re-order social norms on behalf of an extremely small (but quite vocal and well-funded) minority:

The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, a gay and lesbian think tank, released a study in April 2011 estimating based on its research that just 1.7 percent of Americans between 18 and 44 identify as gay or lesbian, while another 1.8 percent — predominantly women — identify as bisexual. Far from underestimating the ranks of gay people because of homophobia, these figures included a substantial number of people who remained deeply closeted, such as a quarter of the bisexuals. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey of women between 22 and 44 that questioned more than 13,500 respondents between 2006 and 2008 found very similar numbers: Only 1 percent of the women identified themselves as gay, while 4 percent identified as bisexual.

So the LGBT coalition encompasses 3.5 percent of the population, max, to whom the other 96.5 percent are expected to kowtow?

Never has such a large majority dog been so easily wagged by such a small minority tail, led by radicals who habitually impugn all opposition in the most vituperative language imaginable. Dana Pico at First Street Journal notes the implicit insistence “that homosexual relationships are just as good, just as wholesome, just as normal, as heterosexual ones,” i.e., compulsory approval. As I explained more than five years ago (“Gay Rights, Gay Rage,” The American Spectator, Nov.  17, 2008), those who speak of homosexuality in the language of “rights” are not about liberty, but rather about equality in the most radical sense and, as Richard Weaver famously warned, Ideas Have Consequences.

This is how we reach the point at which people believe they have the “right” to make you bake them a lesbian wedding cake. This is how we reach the point where no one is supposed to object to teenage boys getting paid for a six-way “bareback orgy” on video.

Do you think this kind of stuff is worth discussing? “You have no place in this country.” Ace says Glenn Beck is now “all about attempting to get TimeWarner and ComCast to pick up his cable channel.”

Yeah, because MSNBC needs more competition.

From The Other McCain:  http://theothermccain.com/

gladd: Fascist Faggots

December 29, 2013

@GLAAD Members Are Fascist Totalitarians. Period.

29SundayDec 2013

Posted by  in Homosexual Curriculum

GLAAD Members Are Fascist Totalitarians. Period.

My buddy, Doug wrote an excellent piece about the gay freaks @ GLAAD. If these ‘gays’ want to be together so bad, they need to call their union something else because marriage is from GOD. Who most of them hate with a passion.  These ‘gay’ fascists DEMAND GOD.  Who do they think they are???  They are so fascistic, they appoint Commies into the courts as judges, who over-rule the will of the people and they ‘marry’ each-other, regardless of the people.  THAT is not ‘gay’, that is cruel, fascist, NAZI and TOTALLY TOTALITARIAN.   Its sickening.

 Virtually the entire “gay rights” agenda is predicated on lies, but worse, most of the mainstream political establishment swallows them without the least bit of shame. It’s disgusting. As I wrote years ago, homosexual marriage is not a civil right.

Read The rest: GLAAD’s Fascist Totalitarianism

From MJ:  http://themadjewess.com/

The Only Thing “Vile” is the Radical Gay Movement and its Followers

December 24, 2013

Liberals Commandeer the Word “Vile”

This excerpt from Lewis’s Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass was highly instructive for moonbats:

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

As hard as it is to believe now, the word “liberal” once referred to freedom. It even comes from the same root as “liberty.” The Founding Fathers were once regarded as liberals, as were advocates of the free market like Adam Smith. These days “liberal” refers to belief in authoritarian statism. This is because the people who now call themselves liberals commandeered the word and twisted it to their purposes. They used to call themselves “progressives,” a word that once implied progress toward an improved future, but now means a coercive return to social and economic models reminiscent of failed 20th century communism. Presumably to prevent it from being used against them, they are now redefining the word “vile.”

When the bullying homosexual fascists of GLAAD denounced Phil Robertson as “vile” for adhering to traditional values and listing homosexuality among other sins to be avoided, this term was dutifully echoed by liberal apparatchiks like CNN’s loathsome Piers Morgan:

At 9:30 a.m. on December 19th, CNN’s Piers Morgan tweeted that the First Amendment “shouldn’t protect vile bigots” like Phil Robertson.

Morgan also denounced Robertson as “repulsively racist.” If “vile” can be turned into a pejorative version of “decent and moral,” “racist” can mean whatever libs want it to also.

Orienting your identity around a sexual obsession with the smelly filth-excreting anuses of members of the same sex is vile. Sanctifying unclean acts of perversion by demanding reverence and privileged status for those who indulge in them is vile. Acknowledging that sexual depravity is sinful is the opposite of vile. Unless the word’s meaning has now been officially reversed, in which case “vile” will eventually become a compliment, just as “liberal” has become an insult — arguably the worst insult imaginable.

piers-morgan-CNN
An apt graphic to illustrate the traditional meaning of the word “vile”.

Hat tip: Maggie’s Farm.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Real Americans are Sick of the Radical “Gay” Agenda. Their Agenda is Bigoted, Ugly, and Intolerant.

December 23, 2013

Mark Steyn Stands Firm With Phil Robertson

As John Hawkins correctly notes,

It’s incredibly refreshing to have someone under attack by the Left’s political correctness police who’s willing to stand firm instead of whimpering and hiding in a corner because he wants to make it all go away.

Hawkins is referring to Phil Robertson, who instead of licking the hand of the degeneracy-promoting liberal fascists who control television, has stood firm by his conventional values. The same applies to Mark Steyn. After being publicly chastised by his editor for siding with Robertson against the pink Nazis at GLAAD who have been attempting to destroy him for his decency, Steyn doubled down:

Having leaned on A&E to suspend their biggest star, GLAAD has now moved on to Stage Two:

“We believe the next step is to use this as an opportunity for Phil to sit down with gay families in Louisiana and learn about their lives and the values they share,” the spokesman said.

Actually, “the next step” is for you thugs to push off and stop targeting, threatening and making demands of those who happen to disagree with you. Personally, I think this would be a wonderful opportunity for the GLAAD executive board to sit down with half-a-dozen firebreathing imams and learn about their values, but, unlike the Commissars of the Bureau of Conformity Enforcement, I accord even condescending little ticks like the one above the freedom to arrange his own social calendar.

As for the editor who publicly denounced him, namely Jason Lee Steorts, Steyn writes:

It is a matter of some regret to me that my own editor at this publication does not regard this sort of thing as creepy and repellent rather than part of the vibrant tapestry of what he calls an “awakening to a greater civility”. I’m not inclined to euphemize intimidation and bullying as a lively exchange of ideas – “the use of speech to criticize other speech”, as Mr Steorts absurdly dignifies it. So do excuse me if I skip to the men’s room during his patronizing disquisition on the distinction between “state coercion” and “cultural coercion”. I’m well aware of that, thank you. In the early days of my free-speech battles in Canada, my friend Ezra Levant used a particular word to me: “de-normalize”. Our enemies didn’t particularly care whether they won in court. Whatever the verdict, they’d succeed in “de-normalizing” us — that’s to say, putting us beyond the pale of polite society and mainstream culture. “De-normalizing” is the business GLAAD and the other enforcers are in. You’ll recall Paula Deen’s accuser eventually lost in court — but the verdict came too late for Ms Deen’s book deal, and TV show, and endorsement contracts.

National Review has played a role in denormalizing in the past. Ostensibly a conservative publication, it serves the liberal establishment of which it is part by providing a phony opposition (much like the GOP), while restricting what conservatives are allowed to say.

Readers will recall that when John Derbyshire made certain undeniably accurate racial observations in a separate publication, he was promptly fired by National Review’s Thought Cop in Chief Rich Lowry for stepping outside the bounds of political correctness.

I’ve been wondering how long a sincere and gutsy guy like Steyn would last at NR, considering that he stood firm and won against the PC totalitarians who tried to gag him in Canada. Looks like we are about to find out:

I am sorry my editor at NR does not grasp the stakes. Indeed, he seems inclined to “normalize” what GLAAD is doing. But, if he truly finds my “derogatory language” offensive, I’d rather he just indefinitely suspend me than twist himself into a soggy pretzel of ambivalent inertia trying to avoid the central point — that a society where lives are ruined over an aside because some identity-group don decides it must be so is ugly and profoundly illiberal. As to his kind but belated and conditional pledge to join me on the barricades, I had enough of that level of passionate support up in Canada to know that, when the call to arms comes, there will always be some “derogatory” or “puerile” expression that it will be more important to tut over. So thanks for the offer, but I don’t think you’d be much use, would you?

Wow. As Bill Clinton would say, Steors had better put some ice on that.

Given the right conditions, a few sparks of boldness have been known set off major conflagrations. If Robertson and Steyn can stand up to the corrupt establishment, so can the rest of us.

gay fascists
People are finally beginning to put up resistance.

On tips from Varla and Rob Banks.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

Pajama Boy. Spawn of Gay baits?

December 23, 2013

rachel_maddow_chris_hayes_pajama_boy

Found at MB: http://moonbattery.com/

If You Believe the Bible, It is quite Clear. No Ambiguity.

December 23, 2013

The #PhilRobertson Saga. SO-Is The Christian New Testament “Homophobic?”

23MondayDec 2013

I have readers that are Jewish, Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Hindo, Seikh. Each one does not believe in the other persons religion and that’s fine.

However:  All one has to do is look up homosexuality in the Christian New Testament and this is what they will find:

1 Corinthians 6: 7-9

The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? 8 Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers and sisters. 9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a]10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

In the oldest religion (with the ONE, true GOD) Judaism, it is plainly written:

Leviticus 18:22

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination.

וְאֶת-זָכָר–לֹא תִשְׁכַּב, מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה:  תּוֹעֵבָה, הִוא

*************************************************

I get sick and tired of the lawless, ungoldy, evil, disgusting, left-wing filth telling people who practice their faiths what to believe and what not to believe.  The Commies believe in NO God at all and they dictate to us who DO believe?  NO.  I am tired of this.   Homosexuals have to turn to God the same as anyone else, they are not above God.  The words in my Bible were not written for you to turn it into whatever makes you feel good.  They were written so we could have peace in our lives.  Liberals don’t even want religion in state, vc versa yet they push abortion and birth control ON the church.. Go figure.  Hypocrites.

AND, because Phil is pissing off the Liberals so bad. I want him for President.

A home decor collage from November 2013

Oh, by the way…Phil is also racist now. (EYEROLL)

From The Mad Jewess: http://themadjewess.com/

Double Standards. Tolerance?

December 23, 2013

doublestandard

That about Sums it Up

December 23, 2013

yes1

Ducked up Again

December 23, 2013

ifphil1 loses Duck_Dynasty_Obama_Quack_Dynasty[1] controversial 0-67942300-1387645022-facebook_-110338833 0-62797200-1387646588-facebook_890090448

 

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

Duck Dynasty Roundup

December 23, 2013

0-56800700-1387582377-facebook_1083432422 anymore droned ducktape facts2 hypocrisy ifphil lieberals3 reason signup yes1

 

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

 

The Bible is quite Clear

December 23, 2013

A Positive Aspect Of The “Duck Dynasty” Kerfuffle: Identifying The Fools

Posted on | December 22, 2013

by Smitty

Such as O. Wesley Allen Jr.:

But other Bible experts said the Scripture Robertson cited isn’t quite clear about homosexuality.
“A lot of people misread this text because it’s so complicated,” said O. Wesley Allen Jr., an associate professor at Lexington Theological Seminary in Kentucky.
First, scholars say, we have to look at the context surrounding Paul’s letter.
The Christian leader is trying to get the quarreling Corinthians to stop taking each other to civil courts and being judgmental. “The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already,” Paul says.
Things were supposed to be different after they became Christian believers, Paul continues; they were supposed to stop their sinful ways.

There are plenty of areas for conjecture about the Bible, especially the beginning of creation and the apocalyptic end.

But to try to say that the Bible, at any point, is less than clear when it comes to sexuality is a public confession of unreliability. The human form is the human form. The reproductive system is not the digestive system. Sexual activity outside of marriage (which I should not have to state means the heterosexual context, not any of the current ‘novel’ geometries) means falling short of the optimal.

The clarification is welcome. We know whom to ignore. The other good news, as with the Chick-Fil-A blowback, is that the tolerant, easy-going Christians in this country are awakening to the danger of getting pushed around by the godless Commie sodomites who’ve trashed our culture and politics.

This is a crucial step in recovering the situation.

From The Other McCain:   http://theothermccain.com/

 

The Hater is on The Right

December 19, 2013

concerninglibertyfirst:</p>
<p>opinion A versus opinion Bboth are irrelevant to the scale of life and the universe.<br />
as is the same with this post.<br />
and tumble in general.<br />
stop taking life on the internet so seriously lol</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not opposing opinions though.

From RBA: http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/

Obama Thinks Perverts are Extra Special

December 19, 2013

Perverts Prioritized for ObamaCare

For our liberal rulers, those at the top of the caste system of political correctness come first — and at the very top of that pyramid of phony victimhood are those so psychiatrically defective as to construct their personal identities around being sexual deviants. So it is no surprise the freakazoids comprising the “LGBT community” have been prioritized to get treated at other people’s expense under ObamaCare:

As a critical deadline for signing up for insurance under President Obama’s health-care law approaches, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community has emerged as a major target for the White House and outside groups.

A disproportionate number of LGBT Americans are uninsured and qualify for federal premium subsidies to help buy coverage, and the administration is intensifying its efforts to get them enrolled before the end of the year.

Free healthcare! We’ll make someone else pay for it! Get yer free healthcare!

Millions of people who have been willing to pay for their coverage have had it canceled. ObamaCare has put insurance coverage in decline by a 14 to 1 margin. But then, under our tyranny of the minorities, that might make perfect sense.

Meanwhile, several outside groups are pitching in for the LGBT outreach, including Out2Enroll, a collaboration among the Sellers Dorsey Foundation, the Center for American Progress (CAP) and the Federal Agencies Project. The group is working to educate men and women in major cities about their options for coverage and how to navigate the system. According to CAP, 900,000 members of the LGBT community could get some form of subsidized health care under the law.

Have your wallet handy. Subsidized care for nearly a million people who define themselves by their devotion to an exceedingly unhealthy lifestyle known for spreading extravagantly expensive diseases like AIDS will not come cheap — and that’s not even taking into account the nightmarish surgical and pharmaceutical procedures that run up massive bills while transforming them into grotesque facsimiles of the opposite sex.

Here’s how our liberal overlords are spreading the word:

Wednesday Night Tea, a drag show in Shreveport, La., has started promoting the health-care law as part of its act. And Out2Enroll is launching a social media campaign this week that will have “naughty” elements as well as holiday cheer, according to Kellan Baker, associate director of the LGBT Research and Communications Project at CAP.

I believe “naughty” is LGBTese for explicitly obscene.

Here’s a glimpse at the top tier of the liberal caste system:

Wednesday-Night-Tea

Now get back to work so you can generate some tax revenue. Hormone therapy costs money.

On tips from R F and Ben S. Hat tips: Frontpage Magazine, NRO.

From MB: http://moonbattery.com/

I’m Standing with Phil…Phil Robertson

December 19, 2013

‘Stand With Phil’: See The Support Flooding The Internet For Suspended ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star

December 19, 2013

‘Stand With Phil’: See The Support Flooding The Internet For Suspended ‘Duck Dynasty’ Star – The Blaze

Just one day after Phil Robertson’s comments on homosexuality earned him an indefinite suspension from “Duck Dynasty,” the reality show star has received a strong show of support from the governor of his state and others.

.

. Louisiana Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal called it a “messed-up situation when Miley Cyrus gets a laugh, and Phil Robertson gets suspended.”

“Phil Robertson and his family are great citizens of the state of Louisiana. The politically correct crowd is tolerant of all viewpoints, except those they disagree with.” Jindal said in a statement. “I don’t agree with quite a bit of stuff I read in magazine interviews or see on TV. In fact, come to think of it, I find a good bit of it offensive. But I also acknowledge that this is a free country and everyone is entitled to express their views. In fact, I remember when TV networks believed in the First Amendment. It is a messed up situation when Miley Cyrus gets a laugh, and Phil Robertson gets suspended.”

Robertson told GQ Magazine in an interview that he didn’t understand why someone would choose to have sex with a man instead of a woman.

“It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me. I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical,” Robertson said.

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin also jumped in to defend the Robertson family patriarch, saying on Twitter that “free speech is (an) endangered species.”

Free speech is endangered species; those “intolerants” hatin’ & taking on Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing personal opinion take on us all

@SarahPalinUSA Sarah Palin

 

Other Robertson supporters have taken to social media to call for a boycott of network A&E, using the Twitter hashtag #ISupportPhil.

@sahmommn Here are some Hearst publications and TV stations. Boycott their advertisers. http://t.co/tJ0Ejgj9Wn #IStandWithPhil #TCOT

@casadezach Brian H.

 

——————————————————————————————————————–

How true. RT: @TexasMoonshine The only opinion that liberals are tolerant of is their own. #IStandWithPhil #IStandWithPhilRobertson

@jgoldies3 Jennifer Goldman

 

——————————————————————————————————————–

Please stand. #IStandWithPhil #IStandWithPhil

@traviscphillips Travis C. Phillips

 

——————————————————————————————————————–

Phil Robertson isn’t a “gay-hater” …C’mon, people.#thatisall

@AshleyCossin Ashley Nicole Cossin

 

A new “Stand With Phil” Twitter account had more than 700 followers as of Thursday morning.

Despite the support, many others also speaking out against Robertson.

MSNBC’s Twitter account referred to his comments as “homophobic.”

Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson is a man of many words. And some of those words are homophobic. http://t.co/CUpAndlEcX

@msnbc msnbc

 

Others called Robertson a “racist,” with one Twitter user writing, “I don’t know why anyone’s even surprised Phil Robertson turned out to be racist. Of course he’s racist. Look at him.”

I don’t know why anyone’s even surprised Phil Robertson turned out to be racist. Of course he’s racist. Look at him.

@butdiontho Dion

 

Gay rights group GLAAD said Robertson’s comments were unacceptable.

“A&E has sent a strong message that discrimination is neither a Christian nor an American value.” http://t.co/tEjfxfL5J7 #LGBT

@glaad GLAAD

 

“Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil’s lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe. He clearly knows nothing about gay people or the majority of Louisianans – and Americans – who support legal recognition for loving and committed gay and lesbian couples,” GLAAD spokesman Wilson Cruz said in a statement.

But that didn’t stop Glenn Beck on his radio program from offering to host “Duck Dynasty” on TheBlaze TV if A&E doesn’t keep the show.

Click HERE For Rest Of Story

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

I agree With Phil Robertson – Vaginas are a Lot Better

December 19, 2013

Is Phil Robertson Wrong?

Posted on | December 18, 2013

Robert Stacy McCain@rsmccainFollow

“It’s certainly a colorful expression of his personal preference.” http://hotair.com/archives/2013/12/18/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-suspended-by-ae-for-comments-on-homosexuality/ …@mkhammer, putting it mildly

You’ll excuse my confusion, but amidst the hyperventilating screeches — GLAAD claiming that Phil Robertson was pushing “vile and extreme stereotypes” — maybe I missed what it was the Duck Dynasty patriarch actually said that was wrong.

“It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me.”

Is it a “vile and extreme stereotype” to say that gay men engage in anal sex with each other? Or is it in some way objectionable for heterosexuals to say that they prefer the opposite sex? Why is this offensive? To whom is it offensive and why?

“We are extremely disappointed to have read Phil Robertson’s comments in GQ, which are based on his own personal beliefs and are not reflected in the series Duck Dynasty,” A&E said in a statement, which was reported by The Hollywood Reporter. “His personal views in no way reflect those of A+E Networks, who have always been strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community. The network has placed Phil under hiatus from filming indefinitely.”

Again: Why? Not just why has Phil Robertson been placed on hiatus, but why is A&E obliged to proclaim that they are “strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community”? Is someone threatening to sue them for discrimination?

Mary Katharine Ham points out that Duck Dynasty “averages 14 million viewers per episode,” 4 million more than the much-ballyhooed finale of AMC’s Breaking Bad. A major reason for the show’s popularity is the down-to-earth backwoods Bible-thumping wholesomeness of the Robertson family, whose values Phil Robertson rather bluntly expressed in a magazine interview.

It would seem to me that A&E is cutting off its entertaining nose to spite its profitable face, and that once again the tail is wagging the dog: The gay minority (no more than 4% of the population) dictating to the straight majority, as if the 96% had no rights at all.

Robert Stacy McCain@rsmccainFollow

Remember back when “gay” was not a synonym for “constantly in a frothing fit of outraged political anger”? http://twitchy.com/2013/12/18/selective-outrage-glaad-slams-phil-robertson-after-letting-alec-baldwin-slide/ …

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

 

Lots of “Gay” News today but it is Anything But Happy. RSM has the Scoop.

December 19, 2013

This Is Not News: Carl Herold and His ‘Domestic Partner’ Charles Dunnavant

Posted on | December 19, 2013

Interesting which crimes get overlooked by the national media:

Two Alabama men have been charged with imprisoning and filming their sexual abuse of a minor for use in child pornography made with the son of one of the accused. Domestic partners Charles Dunnavant and Carl Herold face a litany of charges ranging from sexual torture and sodomy to exposing a person to an STD and child pornography production. The young boy, only nine-years-old, was held hostage in the Huntsville house of horrors for eight months, during which he was sexually assaulted, abused, sodomized and exposed to an STD by both men while a camera caught all the depraved details, according to a court filing cited by WHNT. . . . ‘They held the child captive for eight months and there are no standards, taboos or lines this defendant and his co-defendant hesitated to cross,’ Huntsville Police Department investigator Chad Smith testified in court Monday, according to WHNT.

Yes, this is strictly a local news story:

Dunnavant lived with Herold  in Huntsville. . . . Dunnavant was arrested at a family home in Lincoln County, Tenn., Friday investigators said. During a hearing Monday seeking to raise Dunnavant’s bond from $276,000 cash-only to $1 million cash-only, Huntsville Police Department investigator Chad Smith testified he was contacted by the FBI in early November about the possibility of a child sex victim in Huntsville. Smith said investigators came across numerous photos depicting sexual torture involving a child.

This has no ramifications or significance outside Alabama. However, if somebody says something that offends gay people . . .

Hyping the absurd Duck Dynasty controversy, Chad Griffin of the gay-rights lobby Human Rights Campaign said this: “Phil Robertson’s remarks are not consistent with the values of our faith communities or the scientific findings of leading medical organizations. We know that being gay is not a choice someone makes, and that to suggest otherwise can be incredibly harmful.”

Got that? It is “incredibly harmful” even to “suggest” that individuals are capable of rational action. No, according to “scientific finding,” we are told, sexual behavior is biologically determined, utterly beyond our control, and our sexual preferences are so hard-wired and overpowering that incredible harm will result if we attempt to conform our actions to moral ideals or social norms.

Ideas Have Consequences, as Richard Weaver once famously observed, and this idea — what I’ve called the “Desire Is Destiny” view of sexuality — has consequences far beyond the narrow and selfish purposes of HRC’s Chad Griffin, who is interested only in fundraising, political power and his own $360,000 annual pay.

Chad Griffin is not some idealistic humanitarian, you see. He’s a highly paid professional activist, a full-time anger merchant who oversees an organization whose top dozen officials, himself included, rake off a combined $2.56 million a year. Most people don’t understand that there is a sort of political industry at work — Gay, Inc. — and there are many hundreds of people who earn their livings from various gay advocacy groups, not to mention other similar gigs, e.g., “Queer Theory” professors at universities.

All these people wake up every morning and go to work where they spend the entire day laboring to destroy morality in America. Given the enormous resources and manpower devoted to this project, we certainly ought not be surprised by their successes.

And never mind what they might consider a “success.”

Thanks to Robert Stacy McCain at: http://theothermccain.com/

Obama loves his Gay Pajama boy

December 19, 2013

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

Mad Medic Has Some Thoughts on Phil…

December 19, 2013

Shitstorm…

So DD’s Phil Robertson exercised his first amendment rights..

And has caused all kinds of hysterical, “My feelings is hurt”, ‘Not politically correct’ etc…Has the ‘racist’ card been played yet? Has Buck Ofama chimed in? Because this would be one of those items he would jump into…

Anyhow, tough shit. I may or may not agree totally with Mr Robertson, but is his right to speak his mind..

His right protected by the 1st Amendment, 1st Amendment is there to allow us to speak our minds….

Not protect your feelings. You wimps.

Damn…

And then you poke around and read some of the adamant protect my 2nd Amendment, leave my guns alone blogs and see those folks pissin’ on the 1st Amendment…Damn that is a bit hypocritical…Like alot of the lefty newsies and what not, the LGBT society screaming about their feelings hurt…Has any shithead in the LGBT society ever paid attention to how they act in public? Especially during one of their ‘parades’? Disgusting displays, offensive..I am offended…..But I ignore your antics, just attention seeking they are…

So all you damn hypocrites, especially those whom write so well about the 2nd Amendment.

Quit being hypocrites..

Is all or nothing with the Constitution and Bill of Rights…

Quit acting like LIEberals and picking and choosing…

Ed.Note: I agree completely with Mad Medic. No one is allowed to have any beliefs or convictions except liberals. If anyone disagrees with them or their agenda in any way, they are smeared and destroyed. So F*#k off liberals and queers. Phil don’t need your money or your approval. And the rest of us don’t either. ZTW

From MM: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/