Category Archives: EPA Fascism
Environmentalism and Communism. What Difference Does it Make?

Found at 90 miles: http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/
Commie, Liberal, Bitch Barbara Boxer has Another Brilliant Fascist Idea…
“Comprehensive” Global Warming Bill, Would Tax Carbon Emissions…

Admitted Socialist Bernie Sanders and in-the-closet Socialist Barbara Boxer, how’s that for a dream team?
Via Daily Caller:
Liberal senators are helping President Barack Obama make good on his plan to address climate change during his second term, and are set to announce comprehensive legislation on the topic later this week.
Democratic Sens. Bernie Sanders and Barbara Boxer will hold a news conference on Thursday to announce new legislation that would put a fee on carbon dioxide emissions to help fund green-energy projects such as wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass.
The legislation would also compensate consumers for higher energy bills.
In his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, President Obama threatened to use his executive authority if Congress failed to act on climate change.
From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/
America Ain’t Kansas – It’s Sodom and Sinking Lower
LIBERAL AMERICA—THE SODOM THAT PRETENDS IT’S KANSAS
“In America,” Jim Kalb recently remarked, “everything is normal”—meaning that no matter how radical, extreme, and perverted things become in our society, they are and must be seen as ordinary, traditional, and unthreatening.
The result is the peculiar phenomenon that I have described as the “radical mainstream.” On one hand, liberals and their mainstream-conservative enablers boast of America’s transformational progress since the mid-twentieth century; on the other hand, they claim that we haven’t changed at all. The fact that all kinds of moral and constitutional norms have been shattered, and that nihilism, gross sexual libertinism, and statism are the new norm, is never allowed into public consciousness. The liberals suppress the ugly truth of what America has become, in order to maintain the legitimacy of liberal society; and the conservatives join in the suppression, because their goal is to keep their place at the liberal table; they know that anyone who speaks the truth about the radical transformation of America will no longer be welcome…. — AmNation
From American Digest: http://americandigest.org/
Say Hell No To Wind Turbines – If You Want to Be Healthy
Wind Turbine Syndrome
It’s not just that wind farms are nearly useless extravagantly expensive boondoggles that hideously mar the landscape. They also pose a serious threat to our health. The constant low-frequency noise they emit causes wind turbine syndrome, symptoms of which include:
…dizziness; balance problems; memory loss; inability to concentrate; insomnia; tachycardia; increased blood pressure; raised cortisol levels; headaches; nausea; mood swings; anxiety; tinnitus; palpitations; depression…
In December 2011, in a peer-reviewed report in the Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Dr Carl Phillips — one of the U.S.’s most distinguished epidemiologists — concluded that there is ‘overwhelming evidence that wind turbines cause serious health problems in nearby residents, usually stress-disorder type diseases, at a nontrivial rate’.
The combination of low-frequency noise and amplitude modulation also stimulates an alert response, putting restful sleep out of the question.
Low-frequency sound has so much potential to cause harm, the military has studied its use as a weapon:
A 1997 report by the U.S. Air Force Institute For National Security Studies notes: ‘Acoustic infrasound: very low frequency sound which can travel long distances and easily penetrate most buildings and vehicles.
‘Transmission of long wavelength sound creates biophysical effects, nausea, loss of bowels, disorientation, vomiting, potential organ damage or death may occur.’
The malefic effects of wind turbines are not limited to the dangerous even when subaudible noise they produce:
From economists such as Edinburgh University’s Dr Gordon Hughes we are told that wind energy is unreliable and intermittent, with no real market value because it requires near 100 per cent back-up by conventional fossil-fuel power.
From research institute Verso Economics we are told that that for every ‘green job’ created by taxpayer subsidy, 3.7 jobs are killed in the real economy.
It is said that thanks to the artificial rise in energy prices caused by renewable subsidies, expected to reach £13 billion per annum by 2020, at least 50,000 people a year in Britain are driven into fuel poverty.
And newly released Spanish government research claims that each turbine kills an average 300 birds a year (often rare ones such as eagles and bustards) and at least as many bats.
Those bats eat mosquitoes by the millions; mosquitoes are mankind’s worst enemy (unless you count progressives).
So why do whole fields of these evil towers keep sprouting?
As Matt Ridley noted recently in The Spectator, there are ‘too many people with snouts in the trough.’ …
In Britain, onshore wind farms are subsidised by a levy on consumer bills at 100 per cent; offshore wind is subsidised at 200 per cent: no matter how little energy the turbines actually produce, in other words, healthy returns are guaranteed.
At least until such a time as wasteful public spending on this kind of lunacy begins to bring down whole countries, as has been happening in Spain.
In a free market economy, no one would build wind turbines because they make no sense economically. But under moonbat economics, making sense would be inappropriate.

On a tip from Byron.
One Court At Least Slows Down the Fascist Thugs at The EPA
Federal Court: Obama’s EPA Recognizes No Legal Limits
Federal Court: Obama’s EPA Recognizes No Legal Limits – Washington Examiner
The Obama administration suffered a major legal defeat today when a federal court threw out the Environmental Protection Agency’s strict new power plant emission regulations.

In a 2-to-1 decision posted Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that the EPA’s new Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, targeting the 28 states that generate the majority of the electricity in the United States, exceeded the agency’s legal authority. The EPA had previously estimated that the regulations would inflict $2.7 billion in economic costs on the private sector.
Under the Clean Air Act’s “good neighbor” provision, the EPA is authorized to regulate sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions that cross state lines. But the Obama EPA ignored legal precedent and the plain text of the statute by enacting limits that far exceeded the scope of the law. The court’s ruling reads:
EPA seems reluctant to acknowledge any textual limits on its authority under the good neighbor provision. At oral argument, EPA suggested that “reasonableness” is the only limit on its authority to use cost-effectiveness to force down States’ emissions. EPA would not rule out the possibility that under the good neighbor provision, it could require a State to reduce more than the State’s total emissions that go out of State. But such a claim of authority does not square with the statutory text – “amounts” of pollution obviously cannot “contribute” to a downwind State’s pollution problem if they don’t even reach the downwind State.
Obama’s Cross State EPA rule is just one of many costly regulations currently in the pipeline. The DC Court of Appeals is also hearing an appeal to the EPA’s major stationary source maximum achievable control technology (Utility MACT) rule. That regulation, which limits mercury emissions from power plants, is expected to inflict more than $10 billion of harm on the U.S. economy.
“The D.C. Circuit Court has vacated EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) but that doesn’t tell the whole story of this Administration’s record in the courts,” Sam Batkins, American Action Forum’s Director of Regulatory Policy, said. “Based on our calculations, judges across the ideological spectrum, including the President’s appointees, have struck down 15 major regulations, with a total cost of $4.6 billion.”
From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/
Cars Were Getting Better Mileage Way Back in 1975

From It Ain’t Holy Water: http://itaintholywater.blogspot.com/
Carbon Credit Craziness…
Paying Third World Countries to Create More Global Warming Gases
Not all of the deleterious consequences of liberal authoritarianism are deliberately malevolent. Many are simply unintended. Assuming that progressives really do believe in anthropogenic global warming, this serves as a classic example:
When the United Nations wanted to help slow climate change, it established what seemed [to moonbats] a sensible system.
Greenhouse gases were rated based on their power to warm the atmosphere. The more dangerous the gas, the more that manufacturers in developing nations would be compensated as they reduced their emissions.
But where the United Nations envisioned environmental reform, some manufacturers of gases used in air-conditioning and refrigeration saw a lucrative business opportunity.
They quickly figured out that they could earn one carbon credit by eliminating one ton of carbon dioxide, but could earn more than 11,000 credits by simply destroying a ton of an obscure waste gas normally released in the manufacturing of a widely used coolant gas. That is because that byproduct has a huge global warming effect. The credits could be sold on international markets, earning tens of millions of dollars a year.
That incentive has driven plants in the developing world not only to increase production of the coolant gas but also to keep it high — a huge problem because the coolant itself contributes to global warming and depletes the ozone layer.
Our supranational moonbat rulers couldn’t care less about pouring vast amounts of our money down the drain, especially if the drains are located in non-Western countries. But how can they live with themselves, knowing that they contributed to the oppression of polar bears by creating more gases alleged to make it be hot out? Simple: from their point of view, good intentions trump anything that happens in the real world.

On a tip from Byron.
From Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/


























