ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Category Archives: Crime

Obama Ordered the IRS to Target Conservatives and Everybody Knows It

June 19, 2013

Poll: 70% Believe IRS Decision To Target Conservatives Was Made In DC, Not Cincinnati…

But… but… but… rogue employees!

Distrust Growing: 70% Believe IRS Decision to Target Conservatives Was Made in DC – Rasmussen

While the controversy over the National Security Agency surveillance program has dominated the news recently, concern about the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations remains high and is inching up. Despite the large number of controversies engulfing official Washington, the number of people following the IRS scandal has actually increased in recent weeks.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 82% of voters nationwide are now following the IRS targeting story, including 44% who are following the story “Very Closely.” The overall number of voters who are following is up from 74% a month ago.

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Benghazi and The Lying Cowards in Washington

June 14, 2013

Found at 90 miles: http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/

More Crime and Corruption Under Hillary at The State Dept.

June 14, 2013

State Department Hired An Alarming Number Of Agents With Criminal Records

13Jun

State Department Has Hired Agents With Criminal Records, Memo Reveals – New York Post

The State Department has hired an alarming number of law-enforcement agents with criminal or checkered backgrounds because of a flawed hiring process, a stunning memo obtained by The Post reveals.

The background problems are severe enough that many of the roughly 2,000 agents in State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security can play only limited roles in agency efforts to police bad conduct and prosecute wrongdoers.

The problems in the bureau are the latest revelation in an exploding scandal that also involves accusations that members of former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s security detail and those of the US ambassador to Belgium solicited prostitutes overseas.

.

A whistleblower charges that State tried to cover up multiple scandals by removing them from an inspector general’s report.

Read more at The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Benghazi Cover Up Scandal All Around Hillary

June 14, 2013

Long-Time Clinton Aide Involved In Cover-Up Of Benghazi And Ambassador/Underage Hooker Scandal

13Jun

Long-Time Clinton Aide Involved In Cover-Up Of Benghazi And Ambassador/Underage Hooker Scandal – Yid With Lid

.

One of the closest members of the Hillary Clinton team and a long-time aid of both Hilary and Bill Clinton , Cheryl Mills is named in the internal memo from State Department Office of Inspector General about the coverup of Ambassador wrong-doing.

Read more at The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Obama and Benghazi: Liar, Murderer, Tyrant, Traitor.

June 14, 2013

Benghazi: Did Obama Order A Hit??? (Craig Andresen)

13Jun

Benghazi: Did Obama Order A Hit??? – Craig Andresen

Benghazi.

There’s not a chance in the world that we’re forgetting about Benghazi amid all the other revelations of abuses of power swirling around this corrupt administration like dirty water going down the toilet.

Not a CHANCE.

Yesterday, an important hearing that didn’t draw much attention drew mine.

While most are centered on the talking points, I have always insisted there are other, VERY important questions which need to be asked and answered.

Among them… WHO ISSUED THE STAND DOWN ORDERS???

Yesterday, we may well have drawn too close for Obama’s comfort to that answer.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, was in the hot seat yesterday and when the topic of the stand down orders reared its head, Dempsey’s response was telling.

First, he said there were NO stand down orders.

. ……….

What he stated was, “They weren’t told to stand down. A ‘stand down’ means don’t do anything. They were told that the mission they were asked to perform was not in Benghazi, but was at Tripoli airport.”

Dempsey stated that the Special Forces Unit, tasked with a standing order to rescue the Ambassador in the event of trouble and then to rescue all personnel of the Libyan Mission had been instructed, by their command in Stuttgart, Germany, to…

STAY IN TRIPOLI… AT THE AIRPORT… BECAUSE THE PERSONNEL FROM BENGHAZI WERE, “ON THEIR WAY AND THEY WOULD BE BETTER USED AT THE TRIPOLI AIRPORT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM WAS A MEDIC.”

.

Clearly, the best… THE BEST use of a SPECIAL FORCES UNIT… TRAINED TO RESCUE THOSE UNDER FIRE AND EXTRACT THEM FROM HARM’S WAY… is NOT as AIRPORT MEDICS and only because ONE of them was a medic.

The notion is SO absurd it defies ANY sense of logic whatsoever.

What makes this even MORE astonishing is that the order, their task of rescue and extraction, was a STANDING ORDER.

That means that NO further orders would have been necessary for that Special Forces Unit to swing into action.

NONE!!!

However… there WOULD be a need to supersede that STANDING order to keep them at the Tripoli airport as medics.

So… Whether you refer to it as a STAND DOWN order or as a CHANGE of ORDERS…

One thing is CLEAR…

Their standing orders WERE changed.

Now then…WHO gave that change of orders?

. ……….

WHO COULD give that change of orders???

Only one person.

Only ONE can alter such a standing order and that ONE would have been…

OBAMA.

Nobody else has the authority to supersede the standing rescue and extract orders.

NOBODY.

Why am I so sure it HAD to be Obama?

Simple.

Dempsey stated, “THEY WERE TOLD…” not “I told them…” and the ONLY heads to roll after Benghazi were those of General Carter Ham and Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette… BOTH OF WHOM WANTED TO SEND MILITARY ASSETS TO ASSIST IN RESCUING OUR PEOPLE IN BENGHAZI.

HAD SOMEONE ELSE, OTHER THAN OBAMA, CHANGED THOSE ORDERS RESULTING IN THE DEATHS OF 4 AMERICANS, SOMEONE ELSE’S HEAD WOULD HAVE ROLLED OUT OF THE WEST WING AND INTO THE ROSE GARDEN!!!

Let me spell this out as clearly as possible.

Within the first minutes of the attack on the Consulate, while Obama was still in the situation room at the white house, HE had to communicate with the Special Forces Command in Stuttgard and order the Special Forces unit IN Tripoli to STAY in Tripoli and shortly thereafter, Obama walked out of the room, never to return that night and never to check in for updates on the situation.

HE HAD TO KNOW DAMN WELL THAT STEVENS AND OTHERS WOULD NOT, BECAUSE OF HIS ORDERS, HAVE A CHANCE TO SURVIVE!!!!!

HE… OBAMA…DIDN’T JUST LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE… HE ORDERED THEM TO BE LEFT THERE TO DIE!!!

.

So now, we have the why?

WHY would Obama issue the change of orders? Why NOT go in and attempt the rescue and extraction of diplomatic personnel?

ESPECIALLY when you have 2 former Navy SEALS painting enemy targets with lasers?

The only obvious answer is startling.

That being… Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith and whoever else might lose their lives that night, September 11th, 2012… were preordained NOT to come back alive.

There was no telling, at the time OF the first attack, the one on the Benghazi Consulate, how long it was going to be in progress. 10 minutes? 30? An hour? 2 or 3 hours?

.

NOBODY knew. Those Special Forces should have been in the air within MINUTES of the revelation that the Ambassador and the Consulate was under attack.

Remember too, that Tyrone Woods was NOT supposed to have led a small team the mile or so from the CIA annex to the Consulate to offer assistance either.

REMEMBER that because, THAT means, perhaps, NOBODY was supposed to have gotten out of that Consulate alive.

That TOO sheds a new light on why the CIA annex was later attacked.

Could THAT attack, the one on the annex, been meant to have been an attempt to erase any knowledge or witnesses from the attack on the CONSULATE???

Is this why we have yet to hear from ANY of the survivors of either attack?

Where ARE they?

WHO are they and WHY have we not heard a word from them in 9 months???

. ……….

Perhaps even more importantly…

WHAT, EXACTLY, DID AMBASSADOR STEVENS KNOW THAT MADE HIM EXPENDABLE?????

Now… Add to this the FACT that our FBI was kept OUT of Benghazi, cooling their heels in Tripoli for 3 weeks after the attacks.

Why?

Why? When JOURNALISTS had free run of the place and the very terrorists did too?

What was scrubbed from that Consulate before the FBI was allowed in and WHO ordered them NOT to go to Benghazi?

CNN discovered the Ambassador’s personal journal and IMMEDIATELY, the State Department demanded its return.

WHY???

Why, when the NYT could walk right up and talk to the terrorist, supposedly in charge of the attacks, while he sipped a frappe at a sidewalk café, can WE not find the rat bastard to this very day?

WHY????

.

When you take the revelation from Dempsey’s testimony, under oath yesterday, and add it to all that preceded the Benghazi attacks… The drawing down of OUR security teams in Benghazi, ignoring prior attacks on our Consulate, the British Ambassador and the Red Cross, the warnings issued by what was left of our security teams and Ambassador Stevens himself of al Qaeda blanketing Benghazi and THE HIRING OF ANSAR AL-SHARIA TO PROVIDE “SECURITY” AT THE CONSULATE IN BENGHAZI…

More and more, this is looking like a planned execution of our Ambassador from the INSIDE.

A coordinated HIT JOB and COVER UP planned in the oval office and carried out by Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi.

So… Why didn’t anybody on that congressional committee PRESS Dempsey as to who gave the order to turn a Special Forces team into airport medics?

Because, I suspect, there was nobody there who had the wherewithal to ask such a question.

.

Oh… There COULD have been such a Congressman there but… coincidentally, he was defeated in November when St. Lucie County had a 141% voter turnout, the recount was stalled by democrats in positions of power past the deadline for counting ballots and, to this day, thousands of MILITARY ballots remain… UNCOUNTED.

That’s right… I suspect that were LT. COL. ALLEN WEST still on that committee… THE most important question NOT asked yesterday… WOULD have been asked.

WHO CHANGED THE STANDING ORDER TO RESCUE THE AMBASSADOR TO… STAY IN TRIPOLI IN CASE SOMEBODY NEEDS A BANDAID?????

Obama, like O.J. Simpson… Just keeps looking in all the wrong places for the killers.

Click HERE For Rest Of Story

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

Time to Use The RICO Act Against This Corrupt Obama Regime

June 10, 2013

It’s RICO Time! How To Stop The Obama Administration Crime Wave

10JUN

It’s RICO time! How To Stop The Obama Administration Crime Wave – Canada Free Press

Urgent. While some Tea Party groups testified at theHouse Ways and Means Committee Hearing last week over the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) abuse of power for targeting and harassing them and approximately 500 other conservative groups when they sought tax-exempt status, if you are looking for a political judicial solution, such as congress, impeachment or a special prosecutor to solve the tsunami of unlawful acts coming out of Washington, you are looking in the wrong place.

.

What the IRS did tilted President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election in his favor.

The bottom line is this. You can’t get justice within the political system in America anymore because the politicians own it. What stopped the mob? The Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). What will stop the Obama administration? RICO.

For years, as documented in The Whistleblower: How the Clinton White House Stayed in Power to Reemerge in the Obama White House & World Stage, there has been a special justice and rights class system for Washington’s ruling elite that doesn’t apply to everyday Americans. It has taken a toxic, crippling grip on America, which is why corrupt politicians remain in power and are never held to account.

First, the IRS is not a scandal but a branch of the criminal abuse of power that runs in an octopus-like tree fashion throughout America’s government agencies. It is part of the shady backroom deals that became ObamaCare. Did you think it was a coincidence that ObamaCare dramatically expanded the IRS’s authority, size and budget? Were you surprised when Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius admitted she had pressured pharmaceutical companies to support ObamaCare? Who gets to decide who lives and who dies? ObamaCare’s political appointees and perked bureaucrats do. What’s ObamaCare? A forced tax for health services you must pay for or else you will be fined for services that these politicos and bureaucrats may or may not give you.

In the mob world, the Obama administration’s activities are called shakedowns, kickbacks, extortion, bribes, and payola. The political appointees and bureaucrats are the capos, crew, foot soldiers and wise guys. You get paid if you play. If you don’t pay, you don’t get to play. Security and safety comes at a price and anything goes to stay in power. Let’s call the Obama administration what it is: organized crime and treat it as such. The mob, the political mafia currently known as the Obama administration, has taken over Washington. It’s RICO time.

The federal Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organization Act, written by G. Robert Blakely, a University of Notre Dame law school professor, was enacted in 1970 specifically to target the mob and address the infiltration of legitimate businesses by organized crime.

In the U.S. the act of engaging in criminal activity as a structured group is referred to as “racketeering.”

Today RICO needs to be applied to the political mob that has infiltrated the government agencies and the White House beginning with the IRS and spreading out into other agencies and beyond.

The best part of RICO is that it “provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.” That means State and local lawyers, sheriffs, attorney generals, and prosecutors can bypass the corrupted Federal justice system and start throwing down the gauntlet now. From there it will spread up into D.C. “The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering. It allows the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them, closing a perceived loophole that allowed someone who told a man to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because he did not actually do it.”

What stopped the mob? RICO. What can stop the Obama administration? RICO.

Intimidation, threats, whatever, just like the mafia, the Obama administration’s Justice Department has abusively targeted journalists from Fox News andAssociated Press for doing their government watchdog job. Popular radio show host, Canada Free Presscolumnist, Doug Hagmann, who has been diligently reporting on the Benghazi cover-up, has been specifically singled out and targeted by the National Security Agency(NSA). Do not be deceived. What happened to Hagmann is far more serious than has been talked about thus far. The NSA wasn’t simply collecting phone numbers and locations as occurred in the Verizon/NSA case that broke after the Hagmann incident was reported. Instead NSA collected a voice-recorded conversation between two media people. NSA was collecting content. Editors and sources are next. It’s RICO time.

On cue, in predicable damage-control-and-distraction form, Washington’s special justice class Attorney General Eric Holder and chair of the Senate intelligence committee, Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), swooped in to defend the NSA’s collection of phone records of U.S. citizens after the Verizon/NSA case broke. It’s been approved by Congress and going on for years, they said. Then they claimed it helped get terrorists (not the shoe-bomber, Times Square bomber, Fort Hood shooter, Boston Marathon bombers etc. but I digress).

Who is the enemy that Washington is supposedly protecting U.S. citizens from – FOX NewsAssociated Pressreporters, CFP writers/radio show hosts, Christians, returning vets and Conservative terrorists? Shouldn’t the Obama administration be protecting Americans from the al Qaeda /freedom fighter/rebel/terrorists who hate America that they have been arming in Syria to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad – which directly led to the Benghazi nation-state attack that killed four Americans? Forgive me, again I digress.

What the Obama administration is doing is dangerously upside down. Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness. As Hagmann’s DHS insider recently put it, “It’s a political dissident list,” the Obama administration is collecting, “not an enemy threat list.” History tells us about what happens next unless this is stopped. It’s RICO time.

Shakedowns, payola, whatever, like the mob, Obama’s Labor Department demanded $1 million from theAssociated Press for information about political appointees that the “transparent” administration is supposed to hand over under the Freedom of Information Act. The cardinal rule in journalism is you don’t pay for information. In the Obama White House, if you don’t pay you don’t get to play. This street-thug shakedown tactic is two pronged because the Obama mafia, like the mob world, have actively been silencing and intimidating the journalists, and by extension the whistleblowers and sources who speak to them about government malfeasance. In the mob world, like the Obama administration, they see whistleblowers and sources as rats. It’s RICO time.

Moreover, the “transparent” Obama administration has been using secret government email accounts to avoid scrutiny. They learned well from the Clinton unaccountable, lawless era. What’s the $1 million shakedown going to get the Associated Press anyways? In mob lingo, it’s called “spring cleaning.” It’s RICO time.

In the eyes of the Obama administration, like the mob, they are above the law. Thanks to a corrupted political justice system, as documented in The Whistleblower, a compromised, cowardly Republican Party, who long ago sacrificed the rule of law and their principals to get a seat at the table, the Obama administration, like the Clinton and Bush administrations before them, are above the law. Remember the Republicans have already rolled over on Benghazi. Same goes for let’s-make-a-deal special prosecutors like Special Counsel Judge Kenneth Starr, Robert Fiske, and Robert Ray. (Note: Starr nailed some Clinton team-players. The disposable suckers, useful idiots, and fall guys lower down on the rung. Ask Web Hubbell.) It’s RICO time.

From foot soldier to capo, just like the mob, if you are an Obama administration team player, not afraid to get your hands dirty, and an especially good liar, like United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, you get promoted. Same goes for IRS agents who were also promoted, like Stephen Seok, who signed many of the intimidating letters sent to conservative nonprofits and so forth. It’s RICO time.

How many scandals in the Obama administration will it take to reclassify their activities as a crime wave?

To bypass the corrupted political system to hold the Obama administration accountable, anyone who has been targeted by the IRS, their lawyers should immediately file local civil RICO suits. We know the corruption, despite what the Obama administration tried to make you believe, is not isolated to one rogue IRS office in one city. Civil RICO can be brought at the local levels as a civil action first that doesn’t require the government to participate.

As it evolves, as criminal acts are brought forward through the discovery process, it can lead to a broader prosecution which can be brought to a grand jury at the Federal level. RICO can also nab corrupt, bought-and-paid for Republicans.

“You get a turncoat and some collaborating wiretaps – you get some very compelling testimony,” Blakely, the creator of RICO, said in an interview. “That’s how you can bring down the mob.”

Al Capone mob tactics are in the Obama White House

Did you know that the mob crime syndicate in Washington learned from the very best? Take it from Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s mentor, Saul Alinsky, the godfather of community organizing, who dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, to Lucifer. Alinsky apprenticed with notorious mob boss Al Capone. Alinsky’s tactics were mob tactics – just like we have been seeing out of Washington. Just like many of us have been warning would happen since before Barack Obama was elected president. Unfortunately, we have been vindicated. The Chicago mob has taken over America.

In Alinsky’s own words, he learned the mob ways when he first befriended, Big Ed Stash, a professional assassin, and the Capone mob’s top executioner. In a 1972 interview with Playboy, the interviewer asked Alinsky why professional criminals would allow an outsider like him to see how they operated.

Alinsky said: “Why not? What harm could I do them? Even if I told what I’d learned, nobody would listen. They had Chicago tied up tight as a drum; they owned the city, from the cop on the beat right up to the mayor. Forget all that Eliot Ness sh-t; the only real opposition to the mob came from other gangsters, like Bugs Moran or Roger Touhy. The Federal Government could try to nail ‘em on an occasional income tax rap, but inside Chicago they couldn’t touch their power. Capone was the establishment. When one of his boys got knocked off, there wasn’t any city court in session, because most of the judges were at the funeral and some of them were pallbearers. So they sure as hell weren’t afraid of some college kid they’d adopted as a mascot causing them any trouble. They never bothered to hide anything from me; I was their one-man student body and they were anxious to teach me. It probably appealed to their egos.”

Alinsky was right. Right now Washington is tied up tight as a drum. Simply re-insert “Chicago” with “Washington,” “city” with “America” and the solution is obvious. What stopped the mob? The Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act. What will stop the Obama administration? RICO.

Need I say more? Get busy. It’s RICO time.

To help get the RICO solution out there, and fire up your local prosecutors, lawyers and law enforcement personnel please forward this article and check out theBlowtheWhistle’s Store at Zazzle where everything from “You’re going to miss me when O whacks me!” T-shirts and “It’s RICO time” bumper stickers are available.

Click HERE For Rest Of Story

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/page/2/

Obama Commits Felonies…Don’t Forget It.

June 7, 2013

From 90 miles: http://ninetymilesfromtyranny.blogspot.com/

So It’s Now “OK” for Teen Lesbos to Rape Other Teens?

June 4, 2013

Special Rights for Teen Lesbians?

Posted on | June 3, 2013

You know how the “Free Kate” crowd say they have no agenda beyond “fairness” and “equality”? There is reason to doubt:

View image on Twitter

 

It’s difficult to describe my reaction to Kristin Ireland’s tearful “Lifetime movie” sympathy for Paige in Pennsylvania, jailed for being an 18-year-old having sex with a 14-year-old girl.

According to Ireland, this is a story about “railroading and “discrimination,” as if 18-year-old guys in Pennsylvania were routinely banging 14-year-olds without any fear of prosecution.

I think not, ma’am.

And I think Kristin Ireland wouldn’t be boo-hooing if this was a teenage boy doing time for statutory rape. No, her sympathy is reserved entirely for her fellow lesbians, and so therefore either:

  1. We must create a special Gay Jailbait Loophole to prevent the prosecution of “consensual” gay sex with 14-year-olds; or
  2. We must effectively end all prosecution for such crimes, hetero or homo, because equal application of the law would occasionally result in some 18-year-old lesbians going to jail for dating ninth-graders, and this would make Kristin Ireland cry.

Do these people ever think in terms of contingencies or unintended consequences? Can they not remove themselves from the emotional zone where tearful mothers bemoan the fate of their criminal children?

“Sure, Johnny stole that car, but lots of teenagers steal cars and get away with it. Why did they send my poor Johnny to jail?”

Nobody’s making a Lifetime movie about that, are they? No, and if Johnny the Teenage Hoodlum gets caught banging a 14-year-old, Kristin Ireland doesn’t give a damn about that, either.

It’s all about the Sacred Sapphic Sisterhood with her, and so the parents of Paige’s sexual conquest who objected to their daughter’s initiation into that sorority at age 14 are just hateful bigots.

Ditto for any parent who might object to their 14-year-old son playing naked leapfrog with 18-year-old guys, and we don’t know if Kristin Ireland if willing to extend the acceptable range beyond this specific 18/14 spread, or whether she’d grant enough leeway for a 19-year-old to take your 13-year-old to the Seventh-Grade Dance (and then go parking at Lover’s Lane afterwards, of course).

Exactly where Kristin Ireland would draw the line is hard to determine, but we can only hope it’s somewhere short of the point at which a perp tearfully tells us, “But she willingly got in the van — she said she wanted to help me find my puppy — it was consensual!

A Lifetime movie, indeed.

 

UPDATE: If it’s OK for lesbians to have sex with 14-year-olds, certainly there’s no reason 16-year-olds should be off-limits, right?

On March 21, Garcia picked up the girl, and went to Starbucks for coffee. It was at the coffee shop that the teacher told the teen about her romantic dream involving the student. A week later, Garcia texted the girl to inform her she had just broken up with her boyfriend, and the pair expressed personal feelings for each other. The teen told Garcia she needed to see her, and the teacher picked her up in a rental car to drive the girl back to her apartment, “where they kissed passionately for the rest of the evening.” The following day, the pair reportedly went shopping together for a sex toy at the Katz Boutique and Sex Shop.

“Her romantic dream”! And only haters could object.

UPDATE II: Thanks to the commenter who found this July 2010 sentencing record for Warren, Pa.:

Paige Moriah Johnson, 19, of 2407 Lenhart Rd., to six to 24 months in a state correctional institution, $825 in fines and fees and pay the cost of prosecution for corruption of minors; and to six to 12 months in a state correctional institution consecutive to the first sentence and undergo a sexual offenders evaluation for corruption of minors. Johnson was ordered to have no contact with victim in the case.

This is evidently the “Paige” whose case drove Kristin Ireland to tears, and it so happens that the next case in the docket is this:

James Edward Vroman, 22, of Centerville, Pa., to 12 to 24 months in state correctional institution, pay the cost of prosecution, $750 in fines and fees and undergo a sexual offenders evaluation for statutory sexual assault; and to three to 12 months in a state correctional institution consecutive to the first sentence and 100 hours community service for interference with custody of children. Vroman was ordered to have no contact with the victim in the case.

So it’s not just females who are doing time for messing with jailbait, but Kristin Ireland weeps no tears for James Vroman.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

Robert Stacy McCain Has More on The Katy Hunt Lesbo Rape Scandal

June 4, 2013

But … It Was Consensual!

Posted on | June 4, 2013

The case of 18-year-old Kaitlyn Hunt, charged with a felony for having sex with a 14-year-old, has elicited the support of the American Civil Liberties Union, which calls this “behavior that is both fairly innocuous and extremely common.” Well, OK, if 18 and 14 is no problem, how about 13 and 19? And how about a foursome?

Three 19-year-old northwest Indiana men have been charged separately with child molesting involving the same 13-year-old girl, the Post-Tribune is reporting. Charles K. Nafus III, of the 2600 block of County Line Road in Lake Station, Ind., admitted he was the girl’s boyfriend, was aware of her age and that he’d had sex with her numerous times at his home, court records state. Tevin Sevelles Carlisle, of the 700 block of McCool Road in Portage, Ind., also admitted to police he had sex with the girl at Nafus’ home in Lake Station, the probable cause affidavit states. Kelly Rushing Jr., of the 100 block of Beverly Lane in Hobart, Ind., also told police he had sex with the girl while Nafus was present at Rushing’s home, and that the three of them engaged in sexual activity.

This is the fundamental problem with the “Free Kate” crusade: How many loopholes can we create in the law, or how much leniency can be applied in sentencing, before we approach the abyss of sexual anarchy, where anything goes and only “haters” dare object?

If you’re going to cut an 18-year-old some slack for having sex with a 14-year-old in a school toilet (which is merely “high school romance,” according to Kaitlyn Hunt’s father), on what legal grounds do you object to three 19-year-olds gang-banging a 13-year-old?

Maybe Kristin Ireland will see a “Lifetime movie” scenario here.

From The Other McCain: http://theothermccain.com/

Let’s Ask Lee Rigby if islam is a “Religion” of Peace. It is an Ideology of Evil.

June 4, 2013

MUSLIM LIES! The truth about the so-called ‘Islamophobic wave of attacks’ on Muslims after the brutal murder of a British soldier by a Muslim savage

Contrary to widespread Muslim propaganda about mosque attacks and assaults on Muslims, the vast majority of incidents recorded were anti-Muslim messages on Facebook and Twitter. (What a surprise, Muslims lying to get pity)

105801_story__ph1

UK Daily Mail  Claims that large numbers of Muslims were attacked in the aftermath of the  Woolwich murder were questioned yesterday. A Government-funded project warned it had received more than 200 reports of Islamophobia following British soldier Lee Rigby’s murder, including attacks on mosques and Muslim women.

Project director Fiyaz Mughal said the figure represented a ‘substantial spike’ in hate crimes and warned of ‘a sustained wave of attacks and intimidation’ against Muslim communities across Britain.

But more than half of the incidents reported to the Tell Mama (Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks) hotline related to offensive messages on Twitter, Facebook or online blogs, and only a tiny minority were physical attacks, it has emerged.

measuringantimuslimattacks

The claims raised questions  about the way Tell Mama presented its figures in the days after  Drummer Rigby’s murder, amid repeated calls for calm to avoid reprisal attacks. Mr Mughal said Tell Mama had received 162 reports of anti-Muslim prejudice in a 48-hour period.

Between four and eight incidents are normally reported daily to the charity, which receives £214,000 a year in funding from the Department for Communities and Local Government to provide data and reports on attacks against Muslims to combat hate crime.

A total of 212 incidents were reported between the Woolwich murder on May 22 and the end of last week. The attacks received widespread coverage alongside warnings from Mr Mughal of a ‘cycle of violence’ against Muslims which had led to ‘a sense of endemic fear’.

article-2334897-19F4A967000005DC-798_634x324

But while they included a petrol bomb attack on a mosque in Grimsby and in another incident in Essex where a man entered a mosque armed with a knife, only 17 cases involved individuals being physically targeted, a Sunday newspaper reported.

article-2334897-1A0607E7000005DC-32_634x478

Six people had things thrown at them and most of the other 11 incidents related to attempts to rip off women’s headscarves or other items of Islamic dress.

More than half – 120 – related to offensive or abusive messages on social networking sites including Facebook and Twitter.

Contacted by the Daily Mail, Mr Mughal refused to discuss the figures, which he said would be independently checked by Birmingham University for a report next month. Any attempt to downplay the significance of verbal or online abuse was ‘an affront to hate crime reporting’, he said.

4714

He was also challenged on the figures during an interview on Radio 4’s Sunday programme, when he conceded that the number of physical attacks was ‘quite small’.

He said: ‘We are talking mainly about generalised abuse, targeted comments said at a street level as well as targeted comments online. ‘So most of it is generalised abuse, thankfully it is not extreme violence.

‘This is not just an issue of attacks, physical attacks against individuals, this is about looking at the whole picture.’ In a statement on the Tell Mama website, the project said verbal and online abuse were ‘recordable hate incidents’ along with violent assaults and attacks on mosques.

105801_story__3

 From Bare Naked islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Islam is Exactly The Problem…The Only Problem

June 3, 2013

Islam is the Problem

Posted byDaniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish Blog
Written by Daniel Greenfield
On a mild London afternoon, two Muslims rammed a car into a British soldier returning to the barracks after working at the Tower of London. They shouted Allah Akbar and hacked and slashed at his body in an attempt to behead him. By the time they were done, his body could only be identified through dental records.
Shortly afterward, British Prime Minister David Cameron said that “there is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act”. London Mayor Boris Johnson added, “It is completely wrong to blame this killing on Islam.”
Now former Prime Minister Tony Blair has thrown in his two pence writing, “There is not a problem with Islam. For those of us who have studied it, there is no doubt about its true and peaceful nature.”
Blair previously claimed to have read the Koran every day, but apparently did not get as far as Chapter 5, which contains the verses that the Muslim murderers quoted after their butchery. And that’s understandable. Between his business deals with the Qatari royal family, which is behind much of the terrorism in the Middle East, the Kuwaiti royal family and the royals of the United Arab Emirates, it stands to reason that Tony probably never got past a few verses a day.
It’s easy to picture Tony Blair after a hot muggy day of clasping the greasy hands of Emirs and Sheikhs and trading his expertise for blood money, remembering to always  eat with the right hand, not the left, returning to his five star hotel room, climbing into bed with his room Koran, flipping it open to the first chapter, reading, “In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful” and deciding that sounds peaceful enough, letting his head hit the pile of plush pillows and calling it a day. If Tony had made it as far as Chapter 2, where the Koran proclaims “Fight in the cause of Allah”, then the expert on Islam might have been able to entertain some doubts about its truly peaceful nature.
In what the Daily Mail describes as a “brave assault on Muslim extremism”, Blair writes, “There is not a problem with Islam…  But there is a problem within Islam – from the adherents of an ideology that is a strain within Islam.”
It is rather sad that political bravery now consists of admitting that there may be some sort of problem within Islam and that it “is not the province of a few extremists… the world view goes deeper and wider than it is comfortable for us to admit.”Having exhausted all his courage by admitting that there is a problem somewhere within Islam, Blair bravely avoids admitting it by babbling about international affairs and the need to intervene in Syria.
Over in Afghanistan, Lee Rigby, the murdered soldier, might have been credited with a brave assault on “Muslim extremism”. Blair, writing a Daily Mail article that concedes that the problem may be a bit bigger than just that legendary tiny minority of extremists is hardly in that category.
Political courage now involves minimizing a grave threat less than all the other politicians who are also minimizing the grave threat. If the political consensus is that the mountain is nothing but a molehill, the brave pol courageously comes out and says that it’s actually a minor hill.
But let’s take Blair at face value for a moment. If there is a problem within Islam, then how can the problem not be with Islam? If Tony Blair had picked up a virulent intestinal parasite on a trip to Dubai, wouldn’t there be a problem both within Blair and with Blair? If there is an epidemic of drug abuse in the United Kingdom, isn’t there a problem both with and within the UK? Can there really be a problem within Islam that involves the willingness of millions of Muslims to kill in the name of Islam that is not also a problem with Islam?
The purpose of Blair’s meaningless distinction is to contend that it’s not a structural problem with Islam, but some sort of aberrant mutation brought on by Western colonialism. The trouble with that is that it requires a willful refusal to address the actual text of the Koran and the entire body of Islamic history.
Even if we were to assume that the problematic “strain” of Islam is not universally representative, who exactly is Tony Blair to declare it so based on his casual readings of a book that contains more death threats per page than the Daily Mail’s comments section?
Governments are not supposed to define the nature of religion or pick and choose between various sects. And indeed the legality of declaring that one form of Islam is legitimate and another is not has frequently been challenged.
It is the role of Muslims to argue amongst themselves what is and isn’t legitimate Islam. Such an argument is currently being waged in Syria using the theology of heavy artillery and death squads. Perhaps Tony Blair should think twice before involving the UK in such an Islamic religious debate or trying to hold one at home.
No government should be determining what is and isn’t legitimate Islam. What they should be doing is addressing threats emanating from Islam. There is no need to study the Koran in order to understand those threats. Muslim terrorists have been willing to patiently explain that they are killing us in the name of Islam. We can take them at their word or, like Blair and Boris, foolishly argue the doctrines of their religion with them.

If Tony Blair returned home from Kuwait City with the Swine Flu, the authorities would quarantine him without making any fine distinctions as to whether there was something wrong with Tony or within Tony. Like the nature of the one true Islam, that is a metaphysical question that governments are not qualified to answer.
If the UK quarantines foreigners and even natives with the Swine Flu, which has killed far fewer Brits than Islamic terrorism, should it not begin quarantining the even more dangerous strain of Islam?
It was Blair’s government that brought the Islamic plague to the United Kingdom in large numbers as part of a deliberate policy to forcibly transform the UK into a multicultural paradise. That policy has led to constant killings by the affected and the spread of strains of Islam to non-Muslims like the two Woolwich attackers.
There is no question that Islam is the problem. When men kill in the name of Islam, they are making a bloody statement that Islam is the problem. The only remaining question is whether to stop importing more strains of the terrorist disease before it’s too late or to waste more time splitting hairs on what exact percentage of the affected are truly dangerous.
1 in 4 British Muslims said that the 7/7 bombings were justified. If 1 in 4 visitors from Pakistan were infected with the Swine Flu, there would be an immediate ban on travel from Pakistan. It may be time to apply the logic of the quarantine to stop the Islamic strain that Blair brought to the United Kingdom.

From Sultan Knish: http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

Criminals Running The Justice Department

May 30, 2013

From Theo: http://www.theospark.net/

Can Britain Be Saved?

May 28, 2013

In Defence of the ‘Backlash’.

28TuesdayMay 2013

 

Edl_in_woolwich_009

The word ‘backlash’ is a curious one to apply to the mood of English society following the events of last week. Nevertheless, the BBC, Daily Telegraph and numerous other media outlets invariably chose to label the disgust present in every patriotic soul these past few days, an ‘Anti-Muslim backlash’, as if it were a change of heart, or an irrational misunderstanding.

The word ‘backlash’ is usually employed when talking about something that has previously been over-praised. The television series ‘The Office’ for example was praised so much and so often, that within weeks of the final episode being broadcast, pop-culture scribblers began to predict a ‘backlash’ against it. For me this isn’t what we’ve seen over the past few days.

This has not been so much a backlash as the natural response to an act of evil by a morally healthy population.

The day before last, some hot-headed liberal emailed this blogger to accuse me of taking pleasure in the Woolwich tragedy. He charged me with being ‘excited and delighted’ by the event and the way it would bolster my ‘prejudice’.  He’s wrong about ‘delight’, but I won’t lie and say he is entirely wrong regarding ‘excitement’. Something within me was undeniably excited when news broke of the Woolwich attack. It was the urge to take the battle to the enemy. I knew this particular atrocity would prove more socially explosive than the usual assaults on our transport infrastructure. The victim was a young, rosy-cheeked soldier wearing a ‘Help for Heroes’ sweater. His killer was a Qur’an-quoting thug showing zero remorse. Good and evil were thus both clearly identifiable. How could people not be whipped up into anger by such an event?

Still, I’m far from justifying everything that has occurred since then. According to the BBC, there have been arson attempts on Mosques, Death threats sent to Islamic community centres, and racist graffiti painted on the walls of multicultural enclaves. Most famously, a Muslim woman in Woolwich was rumoured to have had her Hijab ripped off by a passing youth.

I won’t defend the breaking of the law. But as to the people who commit these actions, they are not without legitimate grievance. Our elected leaders are plainly doing nothing to address the conditions which led to the murder. David Cameron spoke, ludicrously, of the attack as being a ‘betrayal of Islam’, and not, as a braver leader might have put it, an ‘application’ of the faith. With leaders like these, how are young people supposed to feel?

The exception to all this moping about, has been – predictably – the English Defence League. Just hours after the murder occurred, EDL activists were in Woolwich, chanting and making themselves known. They were filling a void left by our police, our politicians and our media.

Lamentably, the same old classist rhetoric has come forth from those who should know better. Yes, yes, we know most EDL members are (gasp!) ‘working class’, and that consequently they sound different to the people who read the news. That doesn’t make them any less human, or any less English, or their patriotism any less valuable.

The poor are always more essential in times of conflict than the rich. It’s been that way in this country for centuries. Shakespeare wrote these lines in ‘Richard II’:

‘The pale-face’d moon looks bloody on the earth And lean-look’d prophets whisper fearful change; Rich men look sad and ruffians dance and leap, The one in fear to lose what they enjoy, The other to enjoy by rage and war.’

What was true in Shakespeare’s age is true in ours. The chattering classes in London want to deny that war is upon us because they fear the conditions of war; they fear ’losing what they enjoy’. The ruffians by contrast, with nothing to play with but abstract ideals like Queen and country, are joyfully stepping up to the plate. Good for them, I say!

Soon, the dust will settle on this particular tragedy. Anger cannot last forever and grows weary like any other emotion. But from what I’ve seen in this ‘backlash’, the people of this country are louder, braver and more morally confident than ever before. We may not be there yet, but we are getting closer to the final straw that brings the country, young and old, into concert. For now, let’s wish the EDL well. I hope they make clear to the Muslims that, whatever else they might think of this world (and this life), England is not a faint or negotiable concept and that once roused, its people do not fall quickly back to sleep.

D, LDN.

From Defend The Modern World: http://defendthemodernworld.wordpress.com/

Melanie Phillips Points out More Insanity from Britain as Leaders Bury Their Heads in The Sand While islam Destroys Them

May 25, 2013

24 May 2013

Stiff competition for Most Fatuous Reaction award

Published in: Melanie’s blog

There’s been some stiff competition over the past 24 hours for the coveted award of Most Fatuous Reaction to a Jihadi Atrocity.

I hooted at the commentator visiting from planet Zog, who had thus totally missed all the barbaric snuff movie beheadings and eviscerations and human bomb attacks carried out by jihadists over the past two decades across the world and who wailed, poor dear, that ‘none of it made any sense’.

I enjoyed the pointed satire of the commentator who intoned that we were all guilty of causing the two jihadis to hack poor Drummer Rigby to death and tried to behead him, while claiming they were fulfilling the edicts of the Koran and waiting for the police to arrive in order to try to murder them too – but then I realised that it wasn’t satire at all.

I marvelled at the languidly superior commentator who drawled that the problem in Woolwich had been caused by ‘testosterone’ and that the real threat to all of us was actually from the collapsing EDL and the all-but collapsed BNP.  And at the even more languidly superior commentator, who flicked barbs at Britain’s ‘hyperbole’ and ‘hysteria’ and implied that in Woolwich Britain kind of had it coming to it since it had been perceived as indifferent to ‘the appalling impact of a drone attack on a Pashtun village’.

Nice.

But worthy contenders as all these are for this prestigious award, I have decided that two further notable contributions tie in equal first place. In a statement described by the Spectator as ‘sensitive and calm’ the Prime Minister, David Cameron, told the nation that the Woolwich attack ‘was also a betrayal of Islam’ ,’ there is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act’ and the fault lay ‘solely and purely with the sickening individuals who carried out this appalling attack’.

In similar vein the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson said:

‘It is completely wrong to blame this killing on the religion of Islam but it is also equally wrong to try to draw any link between this murder and British foreign policy or the actions of British forces who are risking their lives abroad for the sake of freedom. The fault lies wholly and exclusively in the warped and deluded mindset of the people who did it.’

So to the Prime Minister and the Mayor, there was nothing to connect the Woolwich atrocity to Islam at all.  But on his little video rant, one of the killers drew explicitly on the Koran as the inspiration for his attack:

‘Surat at-Tawba through…many, many ayat throughout the Qur’an that…we must fight them as they fight us…’

which refers to a number of exhortations to ‘fight the unbelievers and ‘kill the polythesists wherever you find them’ and other such stuff in similar vein..

Nothing to do with Islam? It’s as absurd as saying the Inquisition had nothing to do with the Catholic Church, or the Holocaust had nothing to do with Nazism but these things were just the product of a few warped and deluded individuals.

If indeed such terrorism is nothing to do with Islam, why is it justified by the Islamic high establishment? As the liberal Egyptian thinker Tarek Heggy wrote last year:

‘The cornerstone of the theory, which is the essence of Islamic thinking, is that humans must not set the rules governing relations between people, but that these can only be set by the Almighty. To this day, not a single leader of any movement of political Islam has reconsidered the idea of hakemeya [the Islamist view of man-made laws] introduced by Sayed Qutb in his famous treatise, “Signposts Along the Road” … Thus the Islamist has a constant problem with man-made constitutional and legal rules.…

‘Certainly the leaderships of most schools of political Islam refuse to describe the suicide attacks launched by Muslim fanatics against civilians as terrorist attacks. Certainly too none of them consider Osama bin Laden a terrorist. Indeed, most hold him in high regard…’

What’s bizarre is that jihadis are treated as genuine Muslim spokesmen — see the way broadcasters were giving one of them air-time yesterday — but when it comes to analysing an Islamic terror attack, that very same political and media establishment falls over itself to agree with those extremists that its perpetrators are not real Muslims at all.

Even more absurd, these craven politicians are now being left behind by Muslims themselves. In the Guardian, for example, Usama Hasan has written:

‘British society, including its Muslim communities, needs to move beyond the routine condemnation of terrorist attacks and plots – there have been dozens since 9/11. We need instead to address the extreme Islamist ideology that al-Qaida and its sympathisers promote to incite attacks against soldiers and civilians worldwide in both war-torn and peaceful countries. Muslim leaders need to take ownership of the specifically religious aspects of the problem, that is to say the twisted theology that easily brainwashes vulnerable people, some of whom are intelligent university students and graduates.’

Maybe Usama Hasan could have a quiet word with the Prime Minister and Mayor of London.

FRom Melanie Phillips: http://www.melaniephillips.com/stiff-competition-for-most-fatuous-reaction-award

True British Patriot, Tommy Robinson, Discusses mooslim scum Who Have Invaded Britain

May 24, 2013

My good friend, Tommy Robinson, leader of the English Defence League, talks about the Muslim pigs who beheaded the soldier and the Muslim scum who are destroying the UK

h/t bains from Bare Naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Will Britain Wake Up? What Does it Take for People to See islam’s True Nature?

May 23, 2013

YES! Anti-Muslim backlash over the beheading of a British soldier by Muslim savages has begun

images-2English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson said: “They’re chopping our soldiers’ heads off. This IS Islam. That’s what we’ve seen today. They’ve cut off one of our soldier’s heads in the streets of London. Our next generation are being taught through schools that Islam is a religion of peace. It’s not. It never has been. What you saw today IS Islam. Everyone’s had enough. There has to be a reaction, for the government and police to listen, to understand how outraged the British public are.”

881322-london-machette-attack

ORIGINAL STORY AND VIDEOS HERE: london-british-soldier-wearing-help-for-heroes-shirt-hacked-to-death-and-beheaded-in-broad-daylight-by-two-muslim-savages-shouting-allahu-akbar

Guardian (h/t realist)  Members of the English Defence League congregated near Woolwich Arsenal station on Wednesday night after plans for a protest were circulated on social media. Scores of supporters of the English Defence League  allegedly chanted anti-Muslim slogans in Woolwich hours after the beheading of a British soldier and the shooting of his two suspected assailants.

edl-rally-228

About 100 men, including some wearing balaclavas printed with “EDL”, engaged in running battles with police for less than an hour.

A police commander said officers cited section 60 of the Public Order Act, which allowed them to stop and search individuals within a specific area without evidence of a crime being committed. (Except if they’re Muslims)

WOOLWICH-1

The men congregated near Woolwich Arsenal station with flags bearing the cross of St George after plans for a protest were circulated on social media. Hundreds of police including riot police were stationed around Woolwich. The first clashed began just after ten before the men were pursued and blocked in at a pub close to a local mosque.

Elsewhere, two men were arrested after separate attacks on mosques. A 43-year-old man is in custody on suspicion of attempted arson after reportedly walking into a mosque with a knife in Braintree, Essex. The secretary of the mosque, Sikander Saleemy, told Channel 4 News he felt it was a “revenge attack”. (Well, DUH!)

603490_475891489155388_561526973_n

“We absolutely condemn what happened in Woolwich, but it had nothing to do with us. (Oh here it comes, violence has nothing to do with Islam…except violence IS always about Islam)  It was an appalling act of terror – but it wasn’t Islamic in any way. I wish it wasn’t described like that, because sadly people will now start to blame Muslims.”

c60bf53ef017d3cbd2c1f970c700wi-vi

Meanwhile, police in Kent were called to reports of criminal damage at a mosque in Canterbury Street, Gillingham, at 8.40pm. A spokesman said a man was in custody on suspicion of racially aggravated criminal damage.

486813_189408251215077_643918416_n

From Bare Naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

More on the Britain Terror Killing Commited by mooslims in The Streets of London

May 23, 2013

British Muslim who beheaded soldier on public street: “Many many suras in the quran…….”

Most news orgs cut the quran reference out. Why? Who and what are they defending? Their silence and scrubbing is sanction of the savage. (vid hat tip Suneil)
Mark Durie
Today in Woolwich, England, a man reported to be a British soldier was  cut down by two Anglo-African Muslims wielding knives and a machete.   One of the killers, speaking in a home-grown English accent, is heard on video to say:

“We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you.  We  must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a  tooth. I apologise that women have had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe.  Remove your government, they don’t care about you.”

Eyewitnesses said that the victim had been wearing a ‘Help for Heroes’ t-shirt.  Help for Heroes is a charity to help British soldiers wounded in current conflicts.
Eyewitnesses also reported that the killers attempted to behead the  soldier, and that they asked bystanders to call the police, and moved  towards the police as if to attack them, as soon as they appeared.
While some said the killers were crazed, the contrary seems to be the  case.  They appear to have been acting in accordance with a  theologically determined logic which can be understood on the basis of  Islamic teachings.  In the midst of perpetrating this carnage, they  found time, calmly and clearly, to explain their motivations on camera.
The killer captured on video was referencing passages from Islamic  sacred texts. “We must fight them as they fight us” is a reference to a  phrase found repeatedly in the Koran:

fight in the cause  of Allah those who fight you … And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for fitnah (oppression, persecution) is worse than slaughter; …  if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. ” (Sura 2:190-9)

fight the polytheists all together as they fight you all together”  (Sura 9:36)

Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is Able to give them (believers) victory” (Sura 22:39)

The Arabic word for ‘fight’ used in the Koran in these passages is qātilū which literally means fighting to kill.  (See here for an explanation of the meaning of Sura 2:190-91, a passage used by Muslim jurists to justify killing.)
The reference ‘an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth’ is also from  the Koran (although ultimately borrowed from several passages in the  Mosaic law):

And We prescribed for them therein: The life for the life, and the eye for the eye, and the nose for the nose, and the ear for the ear, and the tooth for the tooth, and for wounds retaliation. (Sura 5:54)

The Muslim killers here are invoking a religious ruling that it is  permissible to fight and kill people who wage war against Muslims.  As  Bin Ladin put it in his letter to the American people:

“It is commanded by our religion and intellect that the oppressed have a right to return the aggression. Do not await anything from us but  Jihad, resistance and revenge.”

The belief which seems to underly the Woolwich attack is that because  the British government is fighting a war against Muslims in Muslim  lands, it is therefore legitimate for Muslims to wage jihad against the  British.  British people, who voted the government into power, are also  considered to be personally culpable, which is why they ‘will never be  safe’ and are told to ‘remove your government’.
The killer’s language is strikingly reminiscent of Bin Ladin’s November  2002 letter to the American people, in which he not only spoke of  ‘removal’ of governments (in Muslim lands), but also explained that it  was legitimate to attack American civilians because they are the ones  who voted their government into power:

“… the American people are the ones who choose their government by  way of their own free will; a choice which stems from their agreement to its policies. … The American people have the ability and choice to  refuse the policies of their Government and even to change it if they  want. … the American army is part of the American people. … This is  why the American people cannot be not innocent of all the crimes  committed by the Americans and Jews against us. … Allah, the Almighty, legislated the permission and the option to take revenge. Thus, if we  are attacked, then we have the right to attack back. …  whoever has  killed our civilians, then we have the right to kill theirs.

The phrase ‘you people will never be safe’ is reminiscent of Muhammad’s  instruction to his followers to invite non-Muslims to Islam by telling  them aslim taslam “Accept Islam and you will be safe” (see here).  The implication is that non-Muslims are not safe because their blood  and property can be taken until they convert.  Thus Muhammad said to his cousin Ali, on the eve of the attack against the Jews of Khaibar:

“Fight (qātilū) until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and  Muhammad is His Messenger [i.e. until they convert to Islam] and when  they do that, then their blood and their riches are inviolable [safe]  from your hands.” (Sahih Muslim. Book of the Merits of the Companions of the Holy Prophet 4:29:5917).

It seems  the killers desired martyrdom in accordance with their  beliefs, because they asked bystanders to call the police and  immediately moved to attack the police when they arrived on the scene.
This slaughter on the streets of Woolwich has all the hallmarks of a  theologically motivated attack, and keys to understand it can be found  in the Qur’an and the teachings of Muhammad.

Posted by  from Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

IRS Official – Lois Lerner – Just Another Member of The Obama Team of Criminal Goons

May 23, 2013

IRS Tyrant Lois Lerner was former FEC Tyrant Terrorizing Conservative and Christian Groups while Refusing to Pursue Obama’s Illegal and Foreign Contributions

Adwanedwan8

Obama’s campaign contributions from Gaza

Did you ever wonder why the FEC (Federal Election  Commission) never took any action on all the charges about Obama’s  eligibility and foreign campaign donations? Longtime Atlas readers remember the blockbuster stories I broke during the early summer 2008 on illegal contributions, foreign contributions, contributions from Hamas-controlled areas in Gaza, and non-existent donors (scroll here). I documented it all in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Adminstration’s War on America. Good article on it here: Obama’s Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes

I submitted everything to the FEC and David Keene, then Chairman of the ACU, but the FEC did nothing despite repeated inquiries.
While everyone was concentrating on Lois Lerner’s  Congressional testimony today, this little pearl went unnoticed (but it did not escape eagle eyed Atlas reader Van). Before Lois Lerner got her current job at the IRS as head of the Tax-Exempt Division, she  worked at the FEC as head of the Enforcement Division, where she had a  rather contentious track record for targeting conservatives.

Lois Lerner, IRS official and director of IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division is at the center of the IRS scandal.  Lerner was formerly head of the Enforcement Office at the Federal Election Commission (FEC) where there are reports of her politically motivated harassment of conservative groups, according to a May 20 report on “The Weekly Standard.”

Lerner brought her skulduggery and utter disregard for the law to her new job  with the IRS. Another Obama socialist and lawbreaker on the warpath using the full authority and power of the US government to terrorize and bully American citizens. Has any other person so singlehandedly influenced not just one, but two elections? Obama always rewards his lieutenants. Think Jarrett,  Axlerod, Emanuel, Holder, ad nauseum.

The government has been infiltrated by these Socialist Progressives and America  haters who stuff themselves at the public trough while avoiding any  accountability in their subversion of the law.  The Obama years will be remembered most for their imperious lawlessness.

Lerner got a bonus in the $150K range and has now been  appointed to run the enforcement division of Obamacare. You just can’t make this stuff up. Remember, the IRS is armed and considered law enforcement.
“IRS’s Lerner Had History of Harassment, Inappropriate Religious Inquiries at FEC Targeted Christian Coalition” Weekly Standard, May 20, 2013

Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with  the tax agency’s growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the  IRS’s  Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS harassed   hundreds of conservative and Tea Party groups for over two years, Lerner  has been criticized for a number of untruths—including  the revelation that she apparently lied about planting a question at  an  American Bar Association conference where she first publicly   acknowledged IRS misconduct.

Still, Lerner has her defenders in the government and the media. Shortly after the scandal broke, The Daily Beast published an article headlined “IRS Scandal’s Central Figure, Lois Lerner, Described as ‘Apolitical.’” Insisting Lerner, and the IRS more broadly, were not not politically   motivated has been a central contention of those trying to minimize the  impact of the scandal.

The trouble with this defense is that, prior to joining the IRS,   Lerner’s tenure as head of the Enforcement Office at the Federal   Election Commission (FEC) was marked by what appears to be politically   motivated harassment of conservative groups.

Posted by  from Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

Britain Has Sown the Wind and They Are Reaping the Whirlwind – Allowing mooslim Immigrants to Come in and Destroy Them

May 23, 2013

UNREAL: It Took British Cops 20 Minutes To Respond To Islamist Terror Attack Because They Had To Wait For Officers With Guns To Show Up…

Mind-blowing to think cops in the UK don’t carry guns.

Via Telegraph:

… “One of the guys had a knife that looked about a foot long and a machete and the other bloke had a gun.

“They started slashing him up with the knife and hitting him in the stomach with the machete.

“I don’t think it took long before he was dead.

“There were people passing by who were screaming and running away. I’ve never seen anything like it.

“I’m still really shaken up.

“When he was dead, they dragged him out into the road and left him there.

“It was strange, they didn’t run off, they just stood there as if they were waiting for the police.

“It must’ve taken about 20 minutes for the police to arrive, I think it must’ve been because they were waiting for armed police.

“The police officers got out of the car and the two black men ran towards them with the gun.

“The police shot them.

“They fell to the ground. Then a helicopter landed.

“Think it must’ve been an air ambulance.

 

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

British Soldier Beheaded In London By Attackers Shouting “Allahu Akhbar” – Update: Police Call It “Islamist Terrorist Attack” – Update: Video Of Attacker Talking – Update: ”We Swear By Almighty Allah We Will Never Stop Fighting You”…

The British government just announced it is likely “terror related.” Gee, ya think?

Report: British Soldier Beheaded Outside London Barracks — Bloomberg News

A U.K. lawmaker said he believed that a serving British soldier was killed outside of an army barracks in southeast London and two suspects are in custody.

The London Times reported that one of the attackers shouted “Allahu Akhbar” (“God is Great in Arabic) as they attacked the soldier with meat cleavers.

One of the suspects is injured and in the hospital and no other people are being sought, Nick Raynsford, a lawmaker who represents the Greenwich and Woolwich areas of London, said in an interview on Sky News. The incident may have started because of a traffic accident, he said.

“Sadly one patient, a man, was dead,” London’s Ambulance Service said in a statement. “Staff treated two other patients, both men, who were taken to hospital, one of them in serious condition.”

London police said on Twitter they were responding to a “serious incident” on John Wilson Street in the Woolwich area. More than 30 police officers are still at the scene.

Keep reading…

Update: The pair was asking people passing by to take pictures so they obviously wanted this to get as much publicity as possible.

Via Sky News:

Sky sources understand that senior police officers believe the killing was likely to be a politically-motivated Islamist terrorist attack.

Dozens of weapons – including a number of knives – and pools of blood could be seen on the ground, where a man wearing a Help for Heroes T-shirt is said to have been attacked by two men.

Sky sources say that following their attack, witnesses heard the pair chanting “Allahu akbar” – and asking passers-by to take photographs of them.

Armed officers arrived at the scene and opened fire on two men thought to be the attackers. The two are now in hospital with gunshot wounds.

Update: “In our lands women have to see this every day… you people will never be safe.” Note his blood-stained hands.

Update: New video source added.

Update via CNN:

[T]he two suspects in the killing were injured in a confrontation with police and have been taken to two hospitals, where they are being treated.

CNN affiliate ITN aired a video showing a man with bloody hands and holding a meat cleaver, who says, “We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you.”

The man, who is black and appears to have a London accent, carries on: “The only reasons we killed this man this is because Muslims are dying daily. This British soldier is an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth.”

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

O’Sucka Can’t Hide His Lying Mouth…Lies, Lies, Lies Just Spewing Out

May 17, 2013

@SarahPalinUSA Rips Obama A New One

16 May 2013 @ 20:57

Her latest posting on Facebook is worth quoting in full [tip of the fedora to Arko Leviathan via Luke K-Ski]:

Scandalous Hat Trick

Mr. President, when it rains it pours, but most Americans hold their own umbrellas. Today in the Rose Garden you dismissed the idea of a Special Counsel to investigate the IRS scandal. With that, your galling political hubris shined bright in the midst of today’s dark clouds.

TCOTS-Sarah-Palin-Miss-Me-Yet-001Mr. President, how can we trust your Justice Department to conduct an independent investigation when there is a systemic violation of the Hatch Act throughout your administration?

Surely you are aware that the Hatch Act prevents certain federal employees from engaging in political activity. Specifically, it’s illegal for these federal employees to engage in action in support of or in opposition to a political party, a candidate for partisan political office, or a partisan political group.

Yet that is exactly what’s happened within the IRS, the Justice Department, and in the Benghazi cover-up. This scandalous hat trick is on your watch. It is not believable that you knew nothing about Obama administration actions in dealing with these scandals. And in regards to Benghazi, when you should have taken appropriate action to save American lives – for instance by calling in the Marines – you were AWOL. Just weeks before the election your team scrubbed the Benghazi talking points in 12 different versions, lied to the American people about some YouTube video being to blame for the deaths of brave Americans who put our country first, and you prove Michael Barone right when he writes, “What actually happened in Benghazi was out of sync with the Obama campaign line.” That’s why you all did what you did. Pure raw politics were at play during a horrific time of loss.

For more evidence of Hatch Act violations right under your nose, simply consider DOJ’s “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into the free press. Do you think they picked up some political talk when tapping the phones in the House press gallery?

Your team is out of control. Those who cannot remember the past and learn from it are doomed to repeat it, and that is exactly what is happening. Look back exactly 40 years ago this week and apply that disheartening chapter of American history to the team you’ve chosen and lead today.

Some of us warned America; we cautioned voters in 2008 that a community organizer with no executive experience and no sense of accountability would be a very poor choice for the nation’s top management position.

Mr. President, you said today that you have “complete confidence” in the Attorney General. America doesn’t. Eric Holder needs to appoint an unbiased Special Counsel to investigate the illegal political action of this administration. And then Eric Holder needs to resign.

Most Americans see ominous dark clouds looming beyond the White House Rose Garden, Mr. President. They’ll roll away only when light is shined on the Obama administration’s antics, and America will only recover when you cease avoiding responsibility in this mission of yours to fundamentally transform America. For that to happen, the press had better learn from their experiences of being duped and provide a deserving public fairer, more intelligent coverage.

Speaking of coverage, glad you finally called in the Marines… shame it was just to hold your umbrella.

It’s a shame they weren’t there to escort this disgrace from The White House grounds.

From Camp of the Saints: http://thecampofthesaints.org/

Eric Holder: “I Know Nothing!”

May 16, 2013

Eric Holder “seems to be proud of how little he knows.”

Says Dana Milbank.

“I don’t have a factual basis to answer the questions that you have asked, because I was recused,” the attorney general said.
On and on Holder went: “I don’t know. I don’t know. . . . I would not want to reveal what I know. . . . I don’t know why that didn’t happen. . . . I know nothing, so I’m not in a position really to answer.”…
But when the Justice Department undermines the Constitution, recusal is no excuse.

Posted byAnn Althouse: http://althouse.blogspot.com/

Stormbringer Gives Some Insight on Benghazi…

May 14, 2013

STILL SPINNING BENGHAZI: LATEST LIES

Ret. CIA Director Gates just tried to dismiss all the Benghazi critics with his take on the limitations of US military capabilities:

Gates: Some Benghazi critics have “cartoonish” view of military capability
Oh R-E-A-L-L-Y-?-?-?  How very I-N-T-E-R-E-S-T-I-N-G for you to say that.  Well I don’t have a “cartoonish” view of the military – having spent a quarter of a century wearing the war suit in Special Forces and maintaining a close professional association with Special Operations units to this day . . .
. . . let’s go through this by the numbers:
“We don’t have a ready force standing by in the Middle East, and so getting somebody there in a timely way would have been very difficult, if not impossible.”
Not exactly true – we had the Commander’s In Extemis Force (CIF) eight hundred miles away on a training mission in Croatia; less than six hours out by C-130. Perhaps not close enough to respond to the initial assault on the Consulate but they certainly could have made a difference during the follow-on fight at the CIA Annex compound.  Closer to the fight, at least four Special Forces operators in Tripoli who were ordered – by somebody – to stand down.
I know about the CIF because that is my old outfit – everywhere we went we were required to bring our go-to-war pallets with full basic load of ammunition. In the event of a terrorist attack on one of the diplomatic missions in our theater, our job was to march to the sound of the guns.  To turn off the standing orders requires a direct order from the National Command Authority – i.e the President, the Vice-President, the Secretary of Defense or the Assistant Secretary of Defense.  One of those four gave the order to stand down, in other words.
Suggestions that we could have flown a fighter jet over the attackers to “scare them with the noise or something,” Gates said, ignored the “number of surface to air missiles that have disappeared from [former Libyan leader] Qaddafi’s arsenals.”
I’m going to throw out the 15-yard Bullshit Flag here; we know that over 6 hours elapsed from the beginning of the attack to when the CIA operators were killed by mortar fire – from a heavy mortar emplacement they had laser target designators on, and had requested air support hours earlier in neutralizing. They had also given higher HQ 8-digit coordinates on the mortars, as close as it gets in combat targeting.  Former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods (who died during the second phase of the attack, on the CIA Annex) were “lazing” enemy mortar position.  They weren’t doing that for the good of their health – they were doing it because they had reason to believe there were air assets overhead; and they were on the phone speaking to somebody, directing them to laze those targets.
Furthermore, Libya does not have Syria’s Anti-Aircraft-Artillery (AAA) defense-in-depth. Sure, there are shoulder-fired man-portable anti-aircraft defense systems (MANPADS) available – but these are inneffective against a couple of fast-movers flying less than 200′ off the deck with their afterburners on.  By the time the zoomies scream on by causing a couple of sonic booms over the bad guys, Hajii would be saying, “Holy Hookah Pipes, what was THAT???”  I have personally seen this tactic defuse an attack on a political target in the Philippines.
“To send some small number of special forces or other troops in without knowing what the environment is, without knowing what the threat is, without having any intelligence in terms of what is actually going on on the ground, would have been very dangerous.  It’s sort of a cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces,” he said. “The one thing that our forces are noted for is planning and preparation before we send people in harm’s way, and there just wasn’t time to do that.”
Again, bullshit. We had actionable intelligence live from the battlefield.  Our guys on the ground – to include former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods – were tooling around town between the Consulate and the Annex, and were reporting what they saw. On top of that, we had at least one drone, and various reports mention the presence of an AC-130 gunship – which would explain what Doherty and Woods were doing with the lasers.
The Ultimate Rebuttal:
Gates can say what he wants – one aspect of this entire disgraceful affair that nobody is addressing is the relief-for-cause of General Ham, commander of US Africa Command at Kelly Kaserne in Stuttgart, Germany, the evening of the attack, 11-12 September 2012:
Upon notification the attack in Benghazi was taking place, AFRICOM Commander General Ham immediately notified the CIF unit and communicated to the Pentagon that his forces were ready to deploy.
General Ham then received the order to stand down. His alleged response was screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second-in-command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.
On October 18 2012, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced:  ”President Barack Obama will nominate Army Gen. David Rodriguez to succeed Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command and Marine Lt. Gen. John Paxton to succeed Gen. Joseph Dunford as assistant commandant of the Marine Corps.”
It is very intriguing that Ham is immediately reassigned less than eighteen months into a three year tour. Maybe Ham attempted to send a reaction force against orders, or maybe he simply gave his chain-of-command a piece of his mind about hanging Americans to dry. At the very least the CIF and whatever other forces were available could have made those who killed our people pay while they were still on the scene.
Analysis:
What I’m seeing here is somebody trotted out former CIA Director Robert Gates, to assist with the mitigation and spin doctoring of BenghaziGate.  Team Obama either has something they’re holding over his head, or – get this – they’re promising him a nice juicy plum.  Say, an ambassadorship in London or Rome or Paris, or maybe even a spot on the ticket with the HildeBeest in 2016.  Think about it; nothing could give Hillary more legitimacy in the area of foreign affairs and national security than to have a Republican former Secretary of Defense, former Director of Central Intelligence as her running partner?
The kind of people who rise to the top of organizations such as the Department of Defense and the CIA are raging egomaniacs – if not during their rise to the top, then certainly after breathing the rarified air at the top.  Dangle a carrot like that in front of them, and a guy like Gates will sell his mother.  Selling out his country is small potatoes, in comparison.
Wnat I’m waiting for is to hear what Petraeus has to say about all this – he testified on Benghazi and spouted the party line, and for his troubles the Obamatrons threw him under the bus.  It will be very interesting to hear what he has to say if they bring him out, the second time around.
- STORMBRINGER SENDS at http://seanlinnane.blogspot.com/

How About This… You Lying Piece of Shit…

May 3, 2013

Found at Mad Medic: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

Do We Have a “Gun” Problem or a “Blacks With Guns” Problem?

May 2, 2013

Posting it how I received it…

From BillyBob at 4:46 PM
In case you are unfamiliar with Juan Williams, he used to be on NPR, the liberal radio network and they fired him over a comment he made. He is now on Fox News Network as the balanced side of liberal opinions. There is a great deal of truth in this email. Mr. Williams deserves credit for even mentioning it.
Blacks, Guns & Crime
Juan Williams, a black commentator, wrote an interesting article recently entitled “ Race and the Gun Debate.” (Wall St. Journal, Mar 27, 2013) Among the statistics he cites are that 54% of all murders involve black victims, virtually all of whom were killed by black murderers, and yet blacks comprise only 13% of the population.
These are familiar numbers, but, as Williams points out, although more than half the “gun problem” can be laid at the feet of blacks, the gun debate never seems to mention this. If it were mentioned, the obvious thought that might occur is maybe it’s blacks that need to be regulated and not guns.
Three years ago I wrote the following in the prologue to my book They Came For Our Guns, They came For Our Freedom:

The single most important factor that has caused the political left to demand an end to private firearms ownership is that the underclass has, over the last fifty years, expanded exponentially, bringing with it an exponential increase in crime. Many of these criminals come from the single-parent families encouraged by the welfare system, a dysfunctional government give-away favored by the far left. The absence of fathers has led large numbers of children to seek gangs as a substitute for parenting not available at home. Not content with having created an entire class of welfare-bred criminals, the political left now seeks to protect this underclass by rendering ordinary citizens defenseless against crime perpetrated by these criminals.”

In sum, both blacks and whites are part of this criminal underclass, but, as Juan Williams points out, blacks, a 13% minority, are doing 54% of the killing and dying. That needs to be said.
Why is this happening? According to Juan Williams, the out of wedlock birth rate for blacks is now 72%. This leads to more than 70% of black mothers being on welfare raising more than 70% of black children without fathers.
That’s part of the problem. Another part, Williams says, is:

“ a dysfunctional gangster-rap culture that glorifies promiscuity, drug dealers and the power of the gun.”

So now we have black culture of violence financed by the welfare system producing what are – by any measure – distorted values. One might think this needs to be addressed.
Not so. The President of the United States recently invited the gangster rapper Jay-Z to his inauguration. Jay-Z is the black poster boy for the value system that Juan Williams says is destroying the black community. Inviting him to the presidential inauguration is, by implication, an endorsement of the mindlessness characteristic of Jay-Z and his supporters.
But Obama is not a moralist. He is a politician who panders himself to the black vote and avoids criticizing the criminal culture that has enslaved his people. Obama made no move toward gun control until a white madman killed young children at Sandy Hook . In Obama’s mind, that single act instantly transformed the “gun problem” into a white (not black) problem. It is about white misconduct, not about blacks, black culture or black behavior.
Guess what.
It’s still about blacks.
They are victims and killers in disproportionate numbers. An occasional white maniac does not erase that. People who want to reduce homicide by gun need to focus on curbing a black culture that has caused the problem in the first place.
Banning guns to cure black murderousness, crime and cultural deficiencies is like banning popsicles to deal with an outbreak of the Ebola virus.
Found at Hell on Earth: http://hellonearth-1.blogspot.com/

30 out of Thousands of Reasons to Hate This Evil SOB

May 2, 2013

30 Reasons To Dislike Barack Obama (John Hawkins)

1May

30 Reasons To Dislike Barack Obama – John Hawkins

. ……….

As a conservative, picking out things you don’t like about Barack Obama is kind of like pointing to the wettest part of the ocean. It also goes beyond politics. Not only is Barack Obama wrong politically, he’s not a good guy, “cool,” or even moderately likable. To the contrary, he’s one of the nastiest, least admirable people in politics and he gets by based on a phony persona he created when he ran for President in 2008 – along with the help of press corps liberals that work to protect him like they’re on his payroll. Based on his performance and his personality, Barack Obama deserves to be the least popular man ever to sit in the White House.

1) Nobody but an ass would say, “It’s very rare that I come to an event where I’m like the fifth- or sixth-most interesting person.

2) He’s a former (maybe, who really knows?) coke-snorting pothead who governs with all the care and due diligence you’d expect from a coke-snorting pothead.

3) Barack Obama actually said, “The private sector is doing fine.” Given that the private sector has never at any point been doing fine since he became President, he’d have to be dumb, dishonest or delusional to say something like that.

4) He is a bigger liar than Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter put together. There’s nothing the man says you can count on him meaning unless he’s saying something nice about himself.

5) He’s made racist comments about white people. Just to name one example,

“That’s just how white folks will do you. It wasn’t merely the cruelty involved; I was learning that black people could be mean and then some. It was a particular brand of arrogance, an obtuseness in otherwise sane people that brought forth our bitter laughter. It was as if whites didn’t know that they were being cruel in the first place. Or at least thought you deserving of their scorn.”

6) His whole campaign in 2012 revolved around telling people Mitt Romney was an awful human being because he had money. Meanwhile, Barack Obama is worth 10 million dollars. What a hypocrite!

7) He once picked his nose on camera.

8) “The same guy who lectured the country on the importance of civility after Gabrielle Giffords was shot also refers to people he disagrees with politically as ‘teabaggers.’

9) He ate a dog once which is just gross.

10) He actually said, “Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you. ” We’re talking about people who murder babies for a living and he’s asking God to bless that? What a despicable man.

11) He went to Jeremiah Wright’s church for twenty years and considered the man his spiritual mentor even though his utterly vile former pastor is anti-white, anti-Semitic and anti-American. Ultimately, the only reason Obama threw him under the bus at all was because Wright criticized him.

12) He looks like a pansy when he rides his little bike in mom jeans.

13) He throws like a six year old girl.

14) Americans dying in Boston or Benghazi? Obama was so indifferent he might as well have been talking about what he was having for lunch. But when gun control failed, that he got upset about.

15) He’s the single least competent man ever to sit in the White House; yet he’s arrogant to the point of narcissism. He’s like a third string high school basketball player who thinks he should be playing in the NBA all-star game.

16) He’s made an ass of himself by publicly inserting himself into both the Henry Louis Gates arrest and the Trayvon Martin case when he should have just shut his big yap and let justice take its course.

17) He habitually demonizes successful people and businesses.

18) He actually told Hispanic Americans that Republicans WERE THEIR ENEMIES, “If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s gonna be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.

19) America lost its AAA credit rating for the first time since 1917 on Obama’s watch and he blamed it on the Tea Party. Yes, seriously.

20) One out of every five Americans is on food stamps thanks to Barack Obama and in his mind, that’s a good thing because it makes those people more dependent on the government and therefore likely to vote for the Democrats.

21) He decimated the American health care system with Obamacare, even though the American people didn’t want it and the bill was universally opposed by every Republican in the House and Senate except Olympia Snowe, who later voted in favor of repealing it.

22) He once threw his own GRANDMOTHER under the bus. HIS GRANDMOTHER.

“I can no more disown (Jeremiah Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”

23) Time and time again he has said and done things that indicate that he doesn’t like America, is ashamed of the country and finds the whole nation to be slightly embarrassing.

24) Obama passed the DREAM ACT by fiat and illegally, unconstitutionally started the process of giving work permits to illegals.

25) There are Americans and Mexicans dead because of Fast and Furious and Obama is covering it up Nixon-style by asserting executive privilege.

26) He spends more time golfing and going on vacations than he does in meetings on economic policy.

27) He’s spending so much money that it’s almost singlehandedly destroying the economic future of America. One day, kids will be pointing to his picture when they’re asked about the moment when the American dream began to die.

28) This is a man who demands credit for his “bipartisanship” while he says things like, “But I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess. I don’t mind cleaning up after them, but don’t do a lot of talking.” What a jerk.

29) After it came out that the Korean rapper Psy had wished death not just on American soldiers, but their wives and children, Obama made a point of shaking his hand publicly even though the fact he was in the same room with him had been controversial.

30) Barack Obama may be the most crooked President ever to sit in the Oval Office. His campaign contributors at Solyndra got 535 million dollars they couldn’t pay back and he broke the law to help his union cronies at GE and Chrysler while taxpayers lost 25 billion dollars on the deal. In a better, more honest world Obama would deserve to face possible JAIL TIME for what he did there.

. Click HERE For Rest Of Story

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

As Usual…Obama Lies and Says He Knows Nothing

May 2, 2013

From The Daley Gator: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

“Benghazi Happened a Long Time Ago” – Really? Are You That Full of S#*t?

May 2, 2013

UH OH! White House in deep doo doo as they continue their shuckin’ and jivin’ over Benghazi

jay-carney1-e1304686726781Jay Carney: “Let me be clear. Benghazi happened a long time ago.  We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appear before Congress to provide information related to Benghazi. The politicization of this issue is unfortunate and it continues unabated.”

From Bare Naked islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Boston Bombing: Dead Americans Killed by mooslims Following islam. Simple as That.

May 1, 2013

Hamas-linked CAIR forces Michigan Schools board member to take down a Facebook poster it finds offensive

That’s why I am posting it here and may give it a permanent place in my sidebar. The poster (below), from a Roseville Community Schools board member, depicted the three dead victims killed by Muslims in the Boston Marathon bombings:

FacebookPost-full-e1367390244733

Candg News  Board Vice President Alfredo Francesconi, who reposted the poster from a friend’s wall, said, “I just saw it and reposted it,” said Francesconi April 22, a few days after the poster went up on his wall. “I didn’t mean to offend anyone. I didn’t think anything of it and it doesn’t mean anything to me if someone said they were offended by it.”

However, after learning that the post had offended, he immediately took it down but he maintained there was some truth behind the words.

Not everyone felt the same. On April 22, the Eastsider received an email regarding the post, saying that the photo insinuates all Muslims are terrorists and that posting it was inappropriate, especially from a school board member in a district where Muslim children attend school.

Representatives from CAIR (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations) felt the same way about the post. “We are firm believers in free speech (BIG FAT LIE), even if it is anti-Muslim bigoted speech, but when you are in a public position, you should be aware of the image you create by re-posting something like this,” said Ibrahim Hooper (photo below) , the national communications director at CAIR.

IBRAHIM 'Uncle Dougie' HOOPER OF CAIR

IBRAHIM ‘Uncle Dougie’ HOOPER OF CAIR

“Particularly someone associated with an educational institution should be especially careful of the image they create, as it creates an atmosphere where Muslim students feel besieged.” (That’s the idea!)

Dawud Walid (phot0 below), the executive director of CAIR Michigan, said even though the state hosts the largest, and still growing, population of Muslim-Americans, anti-Muslim sentiment still exists in some areas (and growing larger by the day).

DAWUD WALID, notorious Jew-hater

DAWUD WALID, notorious Jew-hater

“We’ve seen similar posts before, but they’re not usually from that part of the state,” Walid said. “I know for a fact there are Muslim children in Roseville and such reckless comments, although unjustifiable, could be understood if the person lived in a rural area where there was no Muslims, but it’s mind-boggling that a public official, especially in metro Detroit, would post that.”

708_large

Francesconi said that he didn’t mean to indicate that all Muslims were involved in terrorist activity and, as soon as he learned the post had been viewed as offensive, he removed it from his wall. “No, I don’t think all Muslims kill Americans,” he said. “It’s not Muslims. It’s Muslim extremists. I’m not racist and I’d take it down if it offended anyone, but I don’t care what people think of me. I’m not racist and I did not mean it in a racist way.” (What ‘race’ is Islam?)

Walid was happy to hear the post had already been removed by the time he heard about it, but said if children saw the post, it could lead to increased instances of bullying, especially following the Boston Marathon bombing. “We have had increased complaints of bullying in a number of schools, primarily in Oakland County,” he said.

School Board President Theresa Genest did not return contact attempts at press time.

thumbs_stuggi-to-picdump-bild-33

From Bare Naked islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

What Really Kills People? It is not Guns.

April 29, 2013

From Mad Medic: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/

Congress is Full of Nothing But Crooks and Commies…

April 25, 2013

Found at Mad Medic: http://maddmedic.wordpress.com/page/2/