cialis dosage options
ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Archives

October 2012
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Remember Benghazi and The Brave Patriots Who Died There

October 31, 2012   

benghazi

From Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

Obama Hung SEALS out to Dry in Benghazi – Basically, He Caused Their Murder

October 31, 2012   

Benghazigate

From Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

The Jerusalem Post Exposes The Benghazi Coverup

October 31, 2012   
Benghazi – October Surprise

 The terrorist attack on the Benghazi Consulate and CIA annex on 9/11 were continually blamed on a YouTube video by the Obama Administration. Now as the facts emerge the truth is horrendous and beyond belief. I sat down with a former CIA operative of 20 years, Clare Lopez, for a candid interview of why.

 

 First, the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was blamed on the YouTube video “Innocence of Muslims”. According to U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, it caused a demonstration out in front of the U.S. Consulate that “began spontaneously” and “then spun out of control”,

 “The information, the best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack. That what happened initially was that it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video. People gathered outside the embassy and then it grew very violent and those with extremist ties joined the fray and came with heavy weapons, which unfortunately are quite common in post-revolutionary Libya and that then spun out of control.”

 “But we don’t see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack. Obviously, we will wait for the results of the investigation and we don’t want to jump to conclusions before then. But I do think it’s important for the American people to know our best current assessment.”

 We all know how it went, everyone from the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to the Press Secretary Jay Carney, to the Director of National Security James Clapper and President Obama himself all were on the YouTube video bandwagon until the wheels fell off.

 But as time has gone on, new bits and pieces have emerged. The information on the attack makes the deaths of the four Americans that much more senseless. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, both former Navy SEALs working under the State Department, were killed alongside information management officer Sean Smith and U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens.

 Emails from Benghazi have surfaced showing that Obama, the FBI, CIA, the State Department, the military, as well as other intelligence offices within the government knew within two hours, that the attack on the Benghazi consulate had been carried out by terrorists.

 

 A live feed of audio and video were being watched at the White House and now we find out from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that the request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate as well as the attack hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA command.

 Two times the CIA operatives were told to “stand down” when they requested to go to the aid of the Ambassador and his team.

 It has also come out that the 2 former SEALs who were murdered had gone against orders and rescued those who remained at the consulate along with the body of Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack.

 Given what can only be called a “cover-up” by the Obama Administration I sat down with one person I know and trust when it comes to matters of the CIA, Clare Lopez, Vice President of the Intelligence Summit.

 Clare M. Lopez’s bio is by itself a who’s who of counter-intelligence. She is a strategic policy and intelligence expert with a focus on Middle East, homeland security, national defense, and counterterrorism issues. Lopez began her career as an operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), serving domestically and abroad for 20 years in a variety of assignments, acquiring extensive expertise in counterintelligence, counternarcotics, and counterproliferation issues with a career regional focus on the former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans. She has served in or visited over two dozen nations worldwide, speaks several languages, including Spanish, Bulgarian, French, German, and Russian, and currently is studying Farsi.

 Now a private consultant, Lopez is a Professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies (CI Centre- www.cicentre.com ). Formerly, she was Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee, a Washington, DC think tank, from 2005-2006. She has served as a Senior Scientific Researcher at the Battelle Memorial Institute; a Senior Intelligence Analyst, Subject Matter Expert, and Program Manager at HawkEye Systems, LLC.; and previously produced Technical Threat Assessments for U.S. Embassies at the Department of State, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, where she worked as a Senior Intelligence Analyst for Chugach Systems Integration.

 Gadi Adelman: Clare, thank you so much for this interview. Let me jump right in to this. You and I pretty much knew, and I say you and I, I mean along with many other people in the counter-terror field, we knew right from the beginning that something wasn’t right and Amb. Susan Rice was out there on 5 TV shows saying that this was a spontaneous riot that erupted from a demonstration.
At what point did you realize that something’s not Kosher here?

 Clare Lopez: You mean as far as the Administrations characterization of the attack?

 GA: Yes, I uploaded a video less than 24 hours after the attack on YouTube, thank God YouTube has dates, I uploaded a video saying that Al-Qaeda was behind this.

 CL: Yes, I wrote an article that night as a matter of fact, which ran the very next day on September the 12th on RadicalIslam.org. I was up late the night of 9/11 writing that article, so it was obvious to me too.

 GA: I have heard from 3 people and tell me if you are aware of this as well, that The White House, the Pentagon, the State Department, and our military monitored the battle in real time starting with the first phone calls directly from Benghazi.

 CL: Yes.

 GA: When the CIA annex requested permission to go to the aid of the consulate they were told two times to “stand down”.

 CL: Correct.

 GA: Two SEALs went in against orders…

 CL: Former SEALs, former SEALs that were on contract to the CIA.

 GA: Correct, former SEALs, they went anyway, against orders and died about 4 hours later.

 CL: They died at the annex building after they saved everyone that was still alive at the first compound; they went back with all of them to the annex building, it was there that the attack continued; it never stopped. They were fired upon during the entire ride running the gauntlet through the streets back to the annex and the attack then continued at the annex and that’s where they were eventually killed.

 GA: Right, so they arrived back at the annex at about midnight which would have been about three hours after the initial attack began.

 CL: Yes.

 GA: Okay, that’s important because of some other things that have come out. At that point they again called for military support and help and a third time were denied.

 CL: Yeah.

 GA: Regardless that they were taking fire at the CIA safe house or annex, that request was denied. There were no communication problems at the annex according to those that were present on the ground.

 CL: That’s right.

 GA: The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters and in fact at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun while mortars were being fired on them and the CIA compound.

 CL: Yes, Woods was up there. Tyrone Woods, he was the one on the roof.

 GA: Now Tyrone Woods father has come out and is saying that his son had taken a position with a laser to guide in what would have been planes, drones or missile support. So he was there honed in on a target waiting for back up that never arrived?

 CL: Yeah.

 GA: The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than 4 hours and now here’s the point, the Sigonella Naval Air base in Italy is only 480 miles away…

 CL: Yeah, they could have gotten there in time.

 GA: Okay, so by f-18 it’s under an hour but even with a C-130 carrying commandos it’s 2 hours away.

 CL: I’d say even less maybe, but yeah. I was thinking a Spectre AC-130 gunship.

 GA: Yes, the AC-130 gunship that has the Gatling gun in the side, it’s like a tornado…

 CL: Yeah, it’s unbelievably lethal, devastating power and accuracy, I mean pinpoint accuracy, the technology is amazing.

 GA: I read yesterday that two Tier One Special Operations groups were at Sigonella including Delta Force which happened to be training in Europe.

 CL: Yes, I read that too.

 GA: More information has come out that no less than two drones were overhead during the attack and one of those drones was actually ordered in from Tripoli and sending back images in real time.

 CL: Yes, my understanding is that the one was replaced by the other, maybe it ran out of fuel and the second one came in and took its place.

 GA: Okay, so this battle was sent on video directly to the ‘Situation Room’ at the White House, would that not be a proper assumption?

 CL: Yes, yes it was.

 GA: Just the other day, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said,
There was no “real-time information” to be able to act on, “and you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on. We felt we could not put forces at risk in that situation”.
Isn’t that what the military does?

 CL: That’s what their supposed to do. And that’s one of the things that the military does, everywhere, everywhere around the world, whether they be land based or on a ship, whatever it may be, they practice over and over again repeatedly the rescue of civilians and the rescue of embassy personnel in each area wherever it is that they’re posted. They have drills, they have plans, they have practice situations, and they have role players that play the part of attackers or assault teams, the bad guys basically. And they practice this over and over and over again.

 GA: And that makes me wonder and this is conjecture on my part, but knowing what I do about the SEAL teams, how many of those guys were on submarines or ships right off the coast of Libya?

 CL: They were there. I mean in different places, there were loads of assets and every one of them had practiced just exactly this scenario repeatedly. I don’t mean to say Benghazi, but I mean a rescue situation where an American mission is under attack.

 GA: Now it turns out that around 5 pm eastern time, which would have been only about an hour and a half in to the attack, that President Obama met with Vice President Biden and Secretary of Defense Panetta in the White House for over an hour…

 CL: Yes, this is all in the press, right.

 GA: So would you go so far as to say that it would be pretty clear that Obama watched in real time and did nothing while 4 Americans were murdered?

 CL: Yeah, that’s very clear, yes.

 GA: Then, at some point later President Obama went to bed. Whether it was before or after everyone had died we’ll probably never know, but he had that super important fund raising trip in Las Vegas the next day and here’s what gets me. He gets up the next day and he skips, yet again, his National security briefing.

 CL: Yes, that’s right.

 GA: Here’s some questions for you, from your 20 years with the CIA, why do you think that Hillary Clinton has been so absent since all this has started to come out?

 CL: I don’t know, I really don’t know, she was there early on putting out the false narrative story about the video and obviously she was the one that gave the orders to Amb. Susan Rice to go on the Sunday talk shows and give the same story. I don’t know. I don’t even know what to say.

 GA: The silence on her part has been deafening. I heard that she has proof that would clear her of all this and her husband, former President Clinton wants her to come forward and she refuses.

 CL: I don’t lend much credence to that at all, because, number one, throughout the months of 2012 requests were made repeatedly for additional security for Benghazi, the site security team that had been there up until August was withdrawn against everybody’s wishes, including the team itself which would have stayed, and the other thing is, that within the Department of State there is the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, sometimes called just DS – Diplomatic Security or DSS- Diplomatic Security Service and these are her people, she can order them anywhere in the world whenever she wants to. They are specifically security people, many of them former military, to go to any American diplomatic post in the world as she so chooses. That’s her propagative as Secretary of State.

 GA: Would she need to clear that with Obama or would she have just done that?

 CL: No, these are her people, her assets if you will, this is her department, her chain of command, all she had to do was say “DSS, send some more people to Benghazi” and they would have been gone. It would be different if she wanted to assign a Marine Security Guard Detachment because that has to go in coordination through DOD (Department of Defense), so those things you can understand have to have different approvals, but her own people, her own department, her own security service which exists for the purpose of defending American missions abroad, she had total authority of those people. She could have sent them anytime and she didn’t have to ask anyone to do it.

 GA: Lt. Colonel Andy Wood was the head of one of those fast security teams…

 CL: Yes, he testified before Congress…

 GA: He requested as the leader of that group to stay in Benghazi…

 CL: Yes, they were there from February to August. That was the period of time that they were assigned, that was the extent of their mission, it’s not that they were pulled out early, that was the end of it as it was planned. But at that point everybody said security demands more support and his team wanted to stay, Chris Stevens wanted them to stay in Benghazi, everyone wanted them to stay. But Secretary of State Clinton pulled them out.

 GA: So that would have been Clinton’s call there?

 CL: Yeah.

 GA: Is there any chance that Obama told her “pull them out” if she had gone and discussed it with him or she would have just made that decision on her own?

 CL: Yes, it could have come from the White House, but we don’t know.

 GA: Why do you think that media, for the most part, is ignoring something this huge?

 CL: It’s a good question isn’t it? That’s a really good question. Political? I have no idea. It boggles the mind, I don’t know.

 GA: Do you believe that this was a cover up from the very beginning?

 

CL: Oh yes, the gun running of course, that was the thing.

 

GA: That was my next question; do you believe that this administration is smuggling weapons to Al-Qaeda?

 CL: Well, not… I mean… The short answer is yes. They were working with the very same Al-Qaeda linked relationships in Libya to gather up and buy back and collect weapons from Gaddafi’s stock pile that were missing from the revolution in Libya last year and what it looks like is that they were shipping them onwards to Syria.

 GA: Some of those weapons have already shown up in the Sinai on the southern border of Israel.

 CL: Yes, they’ve gone to the Sinai and they’ve also gone to Mali and to other places in western Africa and they’ve also gone to Syria. That was the operation, that’s what they were doing.

 GA: If the truth of all this ever does come out, what do you think should happen to all those involved? And when I say involved that includes President Obama.

 CL: A complete investigation. Congressional hearings and an investigation.

 GA: With what we know, as far as sitting there and watching four Americans, including an ambassador die, does that not fall under the grounds of treason?

 CL: Well, that’s what an investigation would be needed to look at. There are a number of Congressmen now who are talking about calling for hearings.

 GA: Clare I really appreciate you taking the time for this.

 CL: Thank you for covering this Gadi, very good.

 I must remind everyone of the opening statement given by President Obama in the last  debate that was moderated by Bob Schieffer. The President stated,

 “Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the American people safe, and that’s what we’ve done over the last four years”.

 Somehow I doubt that the families of Christopher Stevens, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods or Sean Smith believes that.

 Gadi Adelman is a freelance writer and lecturer on the history of terrorism and counterterrorism. He grew up in Israel, studying terrorism and Islam for 35 years after surviving a terrorist bomb in Jerusalem in which 7 children were killed. Since returning to the U. S., Gadi teaches and lectures to law enforcement agencies as well as high schools and colleges. His articles have appeared in The Jerusalem Post, Frontpage Mag, Family Security Matters and dozens of other sites. He can be heard every Thursday nightat 8PM est. on his own radio show “American Akbar” on Blog Talk Radio. He can be reached through his website gadiadelman.com.

From The Jerusalem Post: http://blogs.jpost.com/content/benghazi-october-surprise

More Damning Facts Emerge About Benghazi

October 31, 2012   

Obama Met With Panetta and Biden at WH As Benghazi Terror Attack Unfolded, refused help as people were murdered

Every day brings a new blockbuster.  Obama has lost the military, the State Department and the Intelligence community. It’s one leak after another. He has made enemies of all of them. He betrayed them all.

We will find out every detail of Obama’s abandonment of the American people and trasonous cover-up of this act of war.

“Obama Met With Panetta and Biden at WH As Benghazi Terror Attack Unfolded”

CNS, October 30, 2012
 
(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama met with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Vice President Joe Biden at the White House on Sept. 11, 2012 at 5:00 PM—just 55 minutes after the State Department notified the White House and the Pentagon that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack. The meeting between Obama, Panetta and Biden had been scheduled before the attack took place, and the Department of Defense is not commenting now on whether the three men were aware when they met that day of the ongoing attack or whether Obama used that meeting to discuss with his defense secretary what should be done to defend the U.S. personnel who at that very moment were fighting for their lives in Benghazi.“Secretary Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates,” Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Defense Department spokesman, told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. “However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisors are appropriate for disclosure.”

The fact that the president had been scheduled to meet with Vice President Biden and Defense Secretary Panetta at 5:00 p.m. on Sept. 11 had been publicized  in the Washington Daybook–a planning service to which news organizations subscribe–and included on the official White House schedule posted online by the White House itself.

The State Department email notifying the White House and Pentagon of the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack was obtained by CBS News and reported by Sharyl Attkisson on Oct. 23, almost six weeks after the attack.

The terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi began at about 9:40 p.m. Benghazi time—or about 3:40 p.m. Washington, D.C. time. “The attack began at approximately 9:40 p.m. local time,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in written testimony submitted Oct. 10.

About 25 minutes after the attack started—at 4:05 p.m. Washington, D.C. time—the State Department sent an email that went to multiple recipients, including two at the White House and one at the Pentagon.

The subject line on this email said: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack.” The text of the email said: “The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and our COM personnel are in the compound safe haven.” It went on to say: “The Operations Center will provide updates as available.”

In her testimony to the Oversight Committee, Charlene Lamb indicated that soon after the attack started, she was able to monitor it from Washington, D.C., in “almost real time.”

“When the attack began, a Diplomatic Security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA,” Lamb testified. “Based on our security protocols, he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, the Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time.”

According to Lamb, three U.S. agents used an armored car to approach the safe haven at the U.S. consulate to rescue a U.S. security agent on the roof of the facility and also to try to retrieve Amb. Chris Stevens and Sean Smith, an Air Force veteran and State Department communications specialist.

“Despite thick smoke, the agents entered the building multiple times trying to locate the Ambassador and Mr. Smith,” Lamb testified. “After numerous attempts, they found Sean Smith and, with the assistance of members of the U.S. quick reaction team, removed him from the building. Unfortunately, he was already deceased. They still could not find the Ambassador.”

It was not until 11:00 p.m. Benghazi time—or just as Obama’s 5:00 p.m. meeting with Panetta and Biden was starting in Washington, D.C.—that the U.S. agents in Benghazi decided to abandon the main consulate facility there.

“At 11 p.m. members of the Libyan 17th February Brigade advised they could no longer hold the area around the main building and insisted on evacuating the site,” Lamb testified. “The agents made a final search for the Ambassador before leaving in an armed vehicle.”

But the battle was far from over.

“Upon arriving at the annex around midnight, they took up defensive positions, including on the roof,” Lamb testified. “Shortly after their arrival, the annex itself began taking intermittent fire for a period of time.”

The battle continued, with the attackers now using mortars, and it was only in the “early morning” that two more Americans were killed and two more were wounded.

“In the early morning, an additional security team arrived from Tripoli and proceeded to the annex,” Lamb testified. “Shortly after they arrived, the annex started taking mortar fire, with as many as three direct hits on the compound. It was during this mortar attack that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed and a Diplomatic Security agent and an annex quick reaction security team member were critically wounded.”

Doherty and Woods were both former Navy Seals who served in both the Iraq and Afghan wars. They were working as U.S. security personnel in Libya.

When exactly did Obama learn that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack and whom did he order to do something about it? The White House is not saying.

“I can tell you, as I’ve said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives,” Obama told KUSA TV in Denver on Friday. “Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to.”

Fred Lucas of CNSNews.com asked the White House on both Monday and Tuesday to reveal exactly when Obama learned the U.S. mission in Benghazi was under attack and who exactly Obama directed to “make sure that we are securing our personnel” there. The White House did not respond.

At an Oct. 25 Pentagon press briefing, a reporter noted that “there was, in fact, a drone over the CIA annex [in Benghazi] and there were intelligence officials fighting inside the annex.” He then asked Panetta: “Why there wasn’t a clear intelligence picture that would have given you what you needed to make some moves, for instance, flying, you know, F-16s over the area to disperse fighters or dropping more special forces in?”

Read the rest.

Posted by  from Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/#

muslim Brotherhood has Infiltrated All Levels of Society

October 31, 2012   

New DVD exposes the inner workings of the Muslim Brotherhood inside the U.S. and how its front groups control the media and Hollywood

Coming just days before the November 6th U.S. presidential election, the film, entitled  ’Jihad in America: The Grand Deception’ highlights a growing problem of Islamic subversion within the U.S. that neither political party candidate has been asked by the media, or anyone else, to address.

ORDER HERE: GRAND DECEPTION 

In case you are new to BNI, the Muslim Brotherhood, now in charge of the Egyptian government and making major advances throughout the Middle East, was established in 1928 and is  the parent organization of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and Hamas. The producer of the film is Steven Emerson, executive director of Investigative Project on Terrorism, himself the target of death threats because of his work over the course of decades exposing Islamic extremist networks.

KEITH ‘Coundown to No Ratings’ OLBERMANN, FORMERLY OF MSNBC, PUT EMERSON ON HIS WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD LIST

CFP  Several years in the making, the film describes how Muslim Brotherhood fronts, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have pursued a strategy described in secret documents as the “Civilization-Jihadist Process” of destroying Western civilization from within and making America into an Islamic state.

The film includes FBI wiretaps of Islamists in the U.S. disguising their support of terrorist groups like Hamas and declaring, “Politics, like war, is deception.”

In addition to secret wiretaps and videos of Muslim Brotherhood activities, the film includes newly declassified documents and interviews with law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and journalists.

Although the film suggests the Muslim Brotherhood front groups are operating as illegal agents of a foreign power, there is more at stake than just subversion. The film contends that the Muslim Brotherhood is directly involved in radicalizing American Muslims who then carry out terrorist missions.

Despite the advances of the Muslim Brotherhood here and abroad, there has been a failure by political leaders to even acknowledge the nature of the problem. The film shows Obama Administration Attorney General Eric Holder during a congressional hearing, refusing to even use the term “radical Islam” in describing terrorism by Muslim militants. But the Bush and Clinton Administrations are also criticized in the film for ignoring the threat and entertaining Muslim Brotherhood operatives at the highest levels of government.

Below is an excerpt from a conversation about Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) camps in Oklahoma:

The film also examines the case of Army Officer Nidal Malik Hasan, a self-described “solider of Allah” with links to al-Qaeda who is accused of killing 13 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting. The Obama Administration has described this mass murder as “workplace violence” and not “terrorism.”

LEFT WING-MUSLIM ALLIANCE: In terms of gaining acceptance in the U.S., the Muslim campaign against “Islamophobia” is deliberately modeled after the successful homosexual campaign to promote gay rights by railing against homophobia. Muslims reject homosexuality but have entered into an alliance with homosexual and left-wing groups for political reasons under the guise of ‘civil rights.’ Their attitude is, once we seize power, we will deal with them [the homosexuals.

Muslim leaders here and abroad have studied and copied communist methods of infiltrating and penetrating America and other Western nations. They have studied the tactics of the far left, and are using them for their own agenda.

HAMAS-LINKED CAIR’S TERRORIST CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN WHITEWASHED: CAIR’s terrorist connections have been whitewashed by such news organizations as the taxpayer-subsidized Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), and Hollywood films are now screened and edited to eliminate negative depictions of Arabs and Muslims.

The film, near the end, shows Muslim Student Association supporter Amir Abdel Malik Ali having a student audience repeat a Muslim Brotherhood pledge of allegiance. The FBI officially cut its ties to CAIR in 2009, after the organization was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator and a Hamas front in the Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing court case.  CAIR has advised Muslims in America not to cooperate with the FBI.

From Bare naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

An Angry Obama – Will He Stir Civil Unrest Just To Win? This SOB Will Do Anything.

October 30, 2012   

Would Obama Incite Civil Unrest to Win?

By Daren Jonescu

 

Is President Obama willing to incite civil unrest to win re-election?  As we have all been encouraged to wear our dog-whistle decoders these days, one can hardly be blamed for wondering.  Worse yet, we know the answer.  He is already doing it.

Please bear with me, as this topic requires considerable delicacy. 

According to Rolling Stone, Barack Obama has now called Mitt Romney “a bull*****er,” on the record.  His anger at the challenger was palpable — that is, carefully staged — during each of the last two presidential debates.  And he has made a central theme of his campaign the warning that a Romney presidency would erase all of the “equality” victories of the 1960s and ’70s.

Consider these typical words from his October 25 rally in Las Vegas:

You can choose to turn the clock back 50 years for women and immigrants and gays.  Or in this election you can stand up for the principle that America includes everybody. We’re all created equal — black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, abled, disabled — no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from or who you love, in America you can make it if you try.

This, to restate, is his message down the stretch: before the revolutionary uprisings of the 1960s, America only “included” white men.  Romney is a white man who wants to return to that time.  So if you are a woman, an immigrant, gay, black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or disabled, then you should not merely oppose Romney as a candidate who does not represent your interests; rather, you should fear him, as a man who wishes to eliminate you from the American portrait.

If Romney wins, and you are not an “abled” white male, America will no longer “include” you, according to Obama.  In less than two weeks, you are going to be reduced to second-class citizenship, your fortunes cast back to the bad old days of 1962, before radical feminism, the Nation of Islam, gay rights, the Black Panthers, free love, flag-burning, the “drug culture” — and of course, before the days of America’s first “gay,” black, America-hating, drug-damaged, contraceptive-dispensing, progressive feminist Islamic-Christian president.

And now, after scowling at him through two debates, after his vice-president spent ninety minutes calling Paul Ryan a liar, and in the context of all this fear-mongering about the threat of a return to White Male America, Obama has branded his opponent a “bull*****er.”

From Lyndon Johnson or Harry Truman, this kind of remark might have been regarded as innocuous, albeit unpresidential.  From Obama, the Harvard genius with the well-creased pant leg, the bestselling author and master of political oration, it is an expression of bitter rage and supreme disdain.  And in an era when representatives of Obama’s base are flooding Twitter with threats to assassinate his opponent, such heated rhetoric could be dangerous.

Anyone who wonders whether perhaps Obama just does not want to be president anymore should think again.  He wants to be president.  What he does not want is to have to exert so much effort to retain the presidency.  What he does not want is what Hugo Chávez does not want, what Vladimir Putin does not want, what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad does not want: a fair fight, an unobstructed challenger, an unintimidated electorate. 

It was so easy in the past.  Swept along on a wave of adulation and enthusiasm, protected by leftist media and academia, and helped out when necessary by an Axelrod-arranged scandal or two, Obama has barely had to lift a finger to gain political office and to climb the ladder.  Authoritarians do not understand why one should have to do so.

So he is angry.  And this anger has become central to his campaign strategy.  The fear he is seeking to inculcate among his base has an even uglier flip-side.  The Obama campaign is attempting to cast Romney and his supporters not as people with the wrong ideas, but as The Enemy.  In this circumstance, fear can easily give way to extreme outrage — and perhaps to violence and intimidation.  This is particularly true when the target audience of this fear-inducing invective is ignorant, emotion-driven, and dominated in its thinking by entitlement greed, rather than by considerations of right and wrong.  Consider Sandra Fluke, Snoop Dogg, Occupy Wall Street, and student leftists (see examples).

When Harry Truman’s daughter, a singer, was panned by critic Paul Hume, the sitting president wrote a letter threatening to bust Hume’s nose if they ever met.  In 1950, however, none of Truman’s supporters would have been inclined to do the dirty work for him, or even to take the whole thing seriously.  Needless to say, Obama’s supporters are quite different from Truman’s. 

Could Obama really be reduced to attempting to win re-election through mob protests and intimidation — i.e., through a climate of fear?

Let us examine the broad facts.  According to the recent polls, most of which have been conducted by organizations sympathetic to Obama, Romney appears to be on his way to victory.  Obama’s policy record is insupportable on the basis of its results, and his campaign knows it.  His one ace in the hole, his alleged effectiveness in the Middle East, has been exposed once and for all as a disastrous lie.  And his opponent’s past seems to be scandal-free, thus eliminating the one major comeback technique his inner circle has shown any past skill in executing.

All appears lost for Obama according to normal campaign channels.  It is time for the Hail Mary pass.  But do we have any grounds for imagining that he and his team would stoop so low as to seek to incite mass incivility, on or before Election Day?

Let us examine a few more facts.  Barack Obama’s primary occupation before electoral politics was as a community organizer in Chicago.  He was an adviser to ACORN, the election fraud racket and socialist activism organization founded by former SDS radical Wade Rathke.  His mentors in Chicago included Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, the Weather Underground leaders who staged the Days of Rage in 1969; Rashid Khalidi, apologist for and promoter of anti-Israeli violence; and Jeremiah Wright, whose most famous words are “God damn America!”  In his youth, of course, Obama’s primary male role model was Frank Marshall Davis, a communist and, naturally, a community organizer. 

Would any of the people I just named stop short of using intimidation or civil unrest to achieve their political ends, if they believed it would be effective — or that it was their only hope? 

Too speculative, you say?  What does any of this have to do with Obama himself, you ask?

A few more facts.  On Election Day 2008, New Black Panther militants, one carrying a billy club, stood threateningly in front of a polling station in Philadelphia.  (See here.)  They were charged with voter intimidation.  Obama’s Justice Department dismissed the charges.  In March 2012, when Florida was on pins and needles over the Zimmerman-Martin case, and the Al Sharpton types were trying to escalate the tensions and incite racial unrest, Obama spiked his presidential message of national “soul-searching” with the race-baiting Sharptonesque observation that “[i]f I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

Obama has spoken sympathetically of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and, more importantly, embraces its leftist class warfare rhetoric.  His stock line about Romney’s economic plan is, “it turns out that it’s just a one-point plan — a sketchy deal that says folks at the very top get to play by a different set of rules than you do.”  Pure “99 percent” stuff.  Ayers and Dohrn, who hosted his first ever political campaign event, have given presentations to OWS groups. 

The Obama administration funded a study redefining domestic terror threats to exclude radical Islamists, while including people who are “reverent of individual liberty” and “suspicious of centralized federal authority.”

In short, the Obama presidency has been consistent in its lack of scruples when it comes to demonizing wealthy people, conservatives, and now Mitt Romney — not opposing them, but painting them as racist, greedy, dangerous potential terrorists hell-bent on doing harm to women, blacks, gays, and immigrants.

But now, most remarkably, we have Obama’s Benghazi gambit.  The focus of the story, of course, has been on the administration’s deliberate concoction and dissemination of a fairy-tale about a video protest to obscure the damaging facts concerning the murder of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans.  That story gets uglier, and more damning, by the day.  (See American Thinker.)

There is, however, another side to Obama’s Benghazi lie — a side most instructive on the present question.

Administration officials knew, on September 11, that the attack was in no way related to the airing of the obscure YouTube video, and that in fact there was no protest in Libya on that day.  In spite of this knowledge, they systematically cited the video as the primary source of the (nonexistent) protest in Benghazi and implied that the murderous attack grew spontaneously out of that protest.

The political fallout of that lie is devastating.  But we must not neglect its practical results for the world beyond the Obama campaign. 

By making the video the centerpiece of its various public statements over the days following the Benghazi attack — including of Obama’s September 25 address to the U.N. — the administration itself publicized and aggrandized it.  They repeatedly branded it a “disgusting” and “intolerant” offense against Islam, thereby giving credence to the mock outrage being stoked by a television host on the Egyptian Islamist station al-Nas and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government.  In other words, their repeated apology for the video’s offense against Islam, couched as a (feeble) defense of Western values — “we protect free speech, but we hate religious intolerance” — helped to justify, heighten, and prolong the Arab outrage over a video almost no one had seen. 

Rather than responding to the Ansar al-Sharia attack with force in real time, labeling it accurately at once, and promising with credibility to crush any copycat incidents — a response which might have defused or defanged any further uprising from the “Arab street” — Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others in the administration told a story that justified and empathized with Islamic anger, while weakly pleading for non-violent protests.  In addition to inviting a bounty on the filmmaker’s head; the administration’s rhetoric helped to swell the protests, to increase the intensity of subsequent violence at U.S. diplomatic missions, potentially to endanger the lives of Coptic Christians in Egypt; and to legitimize the sharia advocacy of the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Deaths have been reported at post-September 12 “video protests” in various countries.  At the peak of this Obama-fed furor, even al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri jumped on the bandwagon, calling for more anti-U.S. “protests” against the video. 

In short, the administration’s Benghazi cover story, by repeatedly citing and publicizing a supposedly grave insult against Islam, endangered many lives, and risked igniting a much larger outbreak of anti-Western violence in a region of the world Obama claims to admire and respect. 

And it must not be forgotten that the inflammatory words with which Obama and his team carelessly stoked Muslim outrage, thereby needlessly endangering so many Arab and Western lives, were a calculated, bald-faced lie, and Obama knew it. 

This lie, with all its resulting risk to human safety, was apparently judged to be worth it simply in order to shield Obama’s re-election campaign from harm.

Think about that.  Think about Obama’s attempts to brand Romney a threat to every leftist cause of the last fifty years.  Think of his supporters among the New Black Panthers, the SEIU, and the Communist Party USA.  Think of his condemnation of Romney at this final, desperate hour, as a “bull*****er” from the one percent who wishes to revoke the equal rights of blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, gays, women, and immigrants. 

Benghazi teaches us that Obama is willing to risk inciting civil unrest abroad for the sake of protecting his re-election hopes.  Is he willing to take the same risk at home?

One must hope that the harsh realities of life in Obama’s America have dulled the enthusiasm of even his most ardent supporters, and his “new era of civility” — Chicago-style civility — will come to nothing.

From American Thinker: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/would_obama_incite_civil_unrest_to_win.html

 

One and The Same…

October 30, 2012   

Mussolini and Obama strike a pose

From 1389 Blog: http://1389blog.com/

Mohammed Was A Filthy Pervert and Con Man

October 30, 2012   

Muhammad: The Greatest Con Man Who Ever Lived

by PatriotUSA on October 29, 2012

in PatriotUSA, Qur’an, sex offenses

Jesus was the son of God. Yet in Islam he is just a ‘Prophet’. Son of God works very well for me.

Muhammad (MHBIH) was the perfect man, the messenger of Allah, the final prophet.

Read how perfect Mohammad was not.

From Christopher Logan of Logan’s Warning:

Mohammad: The Greatest con man who Ever Lived 

Unfortunately the Koran instructs Muslims to believe that Mohammad was the Messenger of Allah, and the final prophet.

Koran verse 033.040

YUSUFALI: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.

But if we take a close look at the Islamic scriptures we can see that
it was a con right off the bat! The scriptures state that Mohammad was a
great man, and an example for all to follow.

Koran Verse 068.004

YUSUFALI: And thou (standest) on an exalted standard of character.

Koran verse 021.107

YUSUFALI: We sent thee not, but as a Mercy for all creatures.

Koran verse 033.021

YUSUFALI: Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful
pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final
Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.

Bukhari Volume 9, Book 89, Number 251: (Judgments)

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “Whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah, and whoever obeys the ruler I appoint, obeys me, and whoever disobeys him, disobeys me.”

Supposedly the Koran was revealed to Mohammad by the angel Gabriel.

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 3:(Revelation)

Narrated ‘Aisha:

(the mother of the faithful believers) The commencement of the Divine
Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in the form of good dreams which
came true like bright day light, and then the love of seclusion was
bestowed upon him. He used to go in seclusion in the cave of Hira where
he used to worship (Allah alone) continuously for many days before his
desire to see his family. He used to take with him the journey food for
the stay and then come back to (his wife) Khadija to take his food
like-wise again till suddenly the Truth descended upon him while he was
in the cave of Hira. The angel came to him and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, “I do not know how to read.

The Prophet added, “The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read and I replied, ‘I do not know how to read.’ Thereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read but again I replied, ‘I do not know how to read (or what shall I read)?’ Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me, and then released me and said, ‘Read in the name of your Lord,
who has created (all that exists) has created man from a clot. Read!
And your Lord is the Most Generous.” (96.1, 96.2, 96.3) Then Allah’s
Apostle returned with the Inspiration and with his heart beating
severely. Then he went to Khadija bint Khuwailid and said, “Cover me!
Cover me!” They covered him till his fear was over and after that he
told her everything that had happened and said, “I fear that something
may happen to me.” Khadija replied, “Never! By Allah, Allah will never
disgrace you. You keep good relations with your Kith and kin, help the
poor and the destitute, serve your guests generously and assist the
deserving calamity-afflicted ones.”

Well, if Mohammad really was Allah’s chose one, I would think that the angel would have known he could not read!

Besides that slip up by the greatest conman the world has ever seen, we will also see that “miraculously” Mohammad was allowed a special set of rules which always benefited him.

The Koran states that a Muslim man is allowed to take up to four wives.

Koran verse 004.003

YUSUFALI: If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four;
but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them),
then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will
be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice.

I stand against all forms of polygamy, whether it be two wives or four. Prophet Pervert was not even satisfied with four!

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:(Bathing)

Narrated Qatada:

Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.”
I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We
used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven).

If Mohammad was a great example for all to emulate, why didn’t he follow the rules?

Besides being a pervert, Mo was also a thief, as he was not happy
enough with just winning a battle. So he had to take the belongs of
those he defeated.

Koran verse 008.001 

YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning (things taken as) spoils of war. Say: “(such) spoils are at the disposal of Allah and the Messenger: So fear Allah, and keep straight the relations between yourselves: Obey Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe.”

Of course they are! Because Mohammad said so….

Rubbing hands and feet with dust (Tayammum)

Bukhari :: Book 1 :: Volume 7 :: Hadith 331

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.

 

1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.

 

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

 

3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

 

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).

 

5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Conveniently for Mo and his marauding men, the war booty consisted of captives of war (right hands possess), that Muslim men can lawfully rape.

Besides lusting over little girls
and sex slaves, Mohammad had a thing for his adopted son’s wife! So of
course Allah allowed him to take her from his son and marry her. Once
again, how convenient!

Koran verse 33:37

{ وَإِذْ تَقُولُ لِلَّذِيۤ أَنعَمَ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَنْعَمْتَ
عَلَيْهِ أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَٱتَّقِ ٱللَّهَ وَتُخْفِي فِي
نَفْسِكَ مَا ٱللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى ٱلنَّاسَ وَٱللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَن
تَخْشَاهُ فَلَمَّا قَضَىٰ زَيْدٌ مِّنْهَا وَطَراً زَوَّجْنَاكَهَا لِكَيْ
لاَ يَكُونَ عَلَى ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِيۤ أَزْوَاجِ أَدْعِيَآئِهِمْ
إِذَا قَضَوْاْ مِنْهُنَّ وَطَراً وَكَانَ أَمْرُ ٱللَّهِ مَفْعُولاً }

 

And when (idh is dependent because of [an implied preceding] udhkur,
‘mention [when]’) you said to him to whom God had shown favour, by
[guiding him to] Islam, and to whom you [too] had shown favour: by
manumitting him — this was Zayd b. Hāritha, who had been a prisoner of
war before [the coming of] Islam (in the period of al-jāhiliyya). The
Messenger of God (s) purchased him before his call to prophethood, and
then manumitted him and adopted him as his son — ‘Retain your wife for
yourself and fear God’, before divorcing her. But you had hidden in your
heart what God was to disclose, [what] He was to manifest of your love
for her and of [the fact] that should Zayd part with her you would marry
her, and you feared people, would say, ‘He has married his son’s
wife!’, though God is worthier that you should fear Him, in all things,
so take her in marriage and do not be concerned with what people say.
Zayd subsequently divorced her and her [obligatory] waiting period was
completed. God, exalted be He, says: So when Zayd had fulfilled whatever
need he had of her, We joined her in marriage to you — the Prophet
consummated his marriage with her without [the customary] permission
[from her legal guardian]
and gratified the Muslims with [a
feast of] bread and meat — so that there may not be any restriction for
the believers in respect of the wives of their adopted sons, when the
latter have fulfilled whatever wish they have of them. And God’s
commandment, that which He has decreed, is bound to be realised.

The bottom line with Islam is that Mohammad was NO prophet, he was a
con man who said whatever he had to in order to justify his actions at
the time. All con men do some harm, but none has come close to the damage Mohammad has done to this world. The Koran states Muslims are the best of mankind:

Koran verse 3:110

{ كُنْتُمْ خَيْرَ أُمَّةٍ أُخْرِجَتْ لِلنَّاسِ تَأْمُرُونَ
بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ وَتَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ ٱلْمُنْكَرِ وَتُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ
وَلَوْ آمَنَ أَهْلُ ٱلْكِتَابِ لَكَانَ خَيْراً لَّهُمْ مِّنْهُمُ
ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ وَأَكْثَرُهُمُ ٱلْفَاسِقُونَ }

 

You, O community of Muhammad (s), are the best community
brought forth, manifested, to men, according to God’s knowledge,
enjoining decency, and forbidding indecency, and believing in God.

Had the People of the Scripture believed, it, their belief, would have
been better for them; some of them are believers, such as ‘Abd Allāh b.
Salām, may God be pleased with him and his companions; but most of them,
the disbelievers, are wicked.

But the truth is that Mohammad was one of the worst men of all time, and unfortunately his hate-filled, perverted legacy still lives on today….

Source from Logan’s Warning is here.

To share or post to your site, please mention / link to the Patriot’s Corner. Thanks!

From 1389 Blog: http://1389blog.com/

In Britain, Tommy Robinson Being Denied Basic Rights in Prison

October 30, 2012   

Urgent: Tommy Robinson’s Legal Fund

Many of you have responded to my article “Darkness Descending in England” by asking how to help. Legal funds are badly needed. Tommy’s situation in prison is terrible, and they urgently need to raise funds to pay lawyers to address this situation and provide him with the best possible legal defense.

Donations to Tommy’s legal fund can be made online via the EDL website here. Please, do it. SION as well as AFDI are contributing, in addition to all of the other work we are doing, This is a priority. Robinson and Kevin Carroll are part of our international team, members of SION’s President’s council, key players in the worldwide struggle for freedom.

Tommy Robinson Denied Basic Rights in Prison British Freedom
Tommy Robinson Denied Basic Rights in Prison

Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon), leader of the anti-sharia English Defence League (EDL), is the UK’s most high profile prisoner of conscience. It seems that he is being treated differently as a result of his political profile. This does not just refer to his imprisonment but also to the way the British state is treating him now it has him in its power.

Following an international outcry he was moved from a dangerous part of Wandsworth Prison. However, it now appears that he is being denied his basic rights for politically motivated reasons.

We have received the following information from a reliable source concerning Tommy’s present circumstances:

1. He is still in the same clothes he went to prison in.

2. They are refusing to allow him clean/ fresh clothes — family members took clothing in but they would not allow it to be handed over.

3. He has received no mail or money from anyone and he knows his wife gave in a postal order for a large amount whilst visiting.

4. He is being refused all privileges.

5. With no money he cannot purchase razors, food etc. and is having to eat the slops provided.

6. He was arrested with £90 but at the prison when asking for his money he was told he didn’t have any. Where has this £90 gone?

We urge all concerned party members and supporters to write to their MPs seeking assurances that Tommy is being allowed his basic entitlements, especially mail which allows him to keep in contact with the outside and to know that he has support around the world (see Berlin video below).

You can contact your MP quickly and easily online at www.writetothem.com.

It is important that international lovers of freedom keep up the pressure on the British state to treat Tommy with fairness and respect. People should not be treated unfairly just because they stand up to the inequalities of sharia.

Demand equal treatment for Tommy Robinson rather than sharia inspired victimisation!

Atlas Shrugs_1344203162557Anders Gravers, Pamela Geller, Tommy Robinson, Robert Spencer and Kevin Carroll (Debbie Robinson not pictured)

From Atlas Shrugs: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

Are The mooslim Terrorists Ok?

October 30, 2012   

Found at Knuckledraggin: http://ogdaa.blogspot.com/

Pat Caddell Outraged At The Lies Surrounding Benghazi and The Lack of Media Concern

October 30, 2012   

Found at The Daley Gator

If You Are An Insane Moron – You’re In Luck! The Justice Department Wants to Hire YOU!

October 30, 2012   

Justice Department Gives Hiring Priority to the Clinically Insane and Intellectually Disabled

You don’t have to be black, Muslim, or homosexual to get ahead through government employment. You can also be a dwarf, clinically insane, or just really, really dumb. A piece that came out in PJ Tatler last August sheds some light on the quality of personnel in the Injustice Department.

The PJ Tatler has obtained documents from the Justice Department detailing efforts to recruit attorneys and staff who are dwarfs or who have “psychiatric disabilities” or “severe intellectual disabilities.” On May 31, 2012, Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez issued a directive to affirmatively recruit people with these “targeted disabilities.”

This DOJ policy does not merely involve prohibitions against discrimination, but rather the documents reveal deliberate recruitment efforts to hire as attorneys and staff for the Department of Justice people suffering from psychiatric disorders and intellectual disabilities. Moreover, applicants can “self-identify” their disability by means of the “Standard Form 256, Self Identification Disability.”

That is, if you put “I am crazy and stupid” on your resume, you will be given hiring priority. Yet government workers are paid 40% more than their presumably intellectually superior private sector counterparts.

On a tip from Ummah Gummah.

 From moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

General Ham Decided to Place Country and American Lives Before His Career and This Pathetic Pussy President

October 30, 2012   

Did General Disobey Obama’s Orders to Stand Down to Muslim Terrorists?

The indescribably shameful ascension to power of Barack Hussein Obama has confronted some military personnel with an agonizing choice: do they serve their country, or do they serve the sick joke in the White House? From a careerist’s point of view, General Carter Ham appears to have chosen incorrectly, according to this piece of RUMINT relayed by the Washington Times:

General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack [on our consulate in Benghazi] was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty also disobeyed the unconscionable order to allow terrorists to kill our ambassador. Instead of losing their careers, they lost their lives when their repeated requests for assistance were denied by the Obama Administration. But they certainly did not lose anyone’s respect.

Due to the Obamunist media’s Benghazi blackout, don’t hold your breath waiting for it to investigate this story.

If the massive voter fraud the Obama Regime has encouraged its supporters to engage in results in a contested election, we may find more weak links in the chain of command that connects the slimy left-wing politicians at the top to the patriotic heroes down below.

general-carter-ham
General Ham may have put country before career.

On tips from Joe B and Curtis F. Hat tips: Before It’s News, American Thinker.

 From Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

Men of Honor

October 30, 2012   

tomb-of-unknown-soldier-sandy

Pic found at Moonbattery: http://moonbattery.com/

So True…

October 29, 2012   

funny pictures

So True…

October 29, 2012   

funny pictures

Not a Prius Person…

October 29, 2012   

From The Feral Irishman: http://theferalirishman.blogspot.com/

Obama Didn’t Help Them…

October 29, 2012   

From The Feral Irishman: http://theferalirishman.blogspot.com/

Benghazi – Request for Help Denied – CIA and Military told to “Stand Down”

October 29, 2012   

Did Barack Hussein Obama fire General Ham of Africom for trying to disobey his order NOT to rescue Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi?

Pat Dollard is reporting a still unconfirmed rumor that bears further investigation. The story is about General Ham mentioned by Leon Panetta in the quote below.

“(The) basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place,” Panetta told Pentagon reporters. “And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

Pat Dollard The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had the unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command. The story continues that now General Rodiguez would take General Ham’s place as the head of Africon.

“President Barack Obama will nominate Army Gen. David Rodriguez to succeed Gen. Carter Ham as commander of U.S. Africa Command.”

Lt. Col Tony Shaffer: “My sources tell me Obama was in the room watching the Benghazi attack in real time.”

RightScoop  Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said his sources tell him that Obama was in the room watching the Benghazi attack go down and both he and Col. David Hunt agree it would have taken an order by the president to intervene. Further, Col. Hunt said that we were only 20 min away by jet and a couple of hours away by AC-130 gunships and special forces, and the decision not to intervene had to be political. 

 

 

From Bare Naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Britain Terrorizing a British Citizen – Tommy Robinson Being Held in Prison for Speaking Truth

October 29, 2012   

British Gestapo has decided to keep Tommy Robinson incarcerated until at least after Christmas

Please send well-wishes and letters of support to Tommy Robinson, especially around Christmas time.

CDL (H/T Don L)  Tommy Robinson (using Stephen Lennon – his legal name): EDL founder and patriot fighter will be incarcerated in Her Majesty’s prison until January 2o13 !!. Should you wish to send a message of support to him, here are the details:

Stephen Lennon
A2084CG
HM Prison Wandsworth
Heathfield Road
Wandsworth
London United Kingdom.
SW18 3HS

If you wish to make a donation toward Tommy’s legal fees:

DONATE HERE

We are all Tommy Robinson

RELATED STORIES:

update-re-incarceration-of-edl-and-british-freedom-members

breaking-uk-police-have-incarcerated-edls-tommy-robinson-together-with-savage-muslims

english-defence-leagues-tommy-robinson-remanded-to-prison-for-allegedly-entering-the-u-s-illegally-making-extradition-a-strong-possibility

From Bare naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

The Tommy Robinson Saga Continues in Britain – Blatant Abuse of His Human Rights

October 29, 2012   

TOMMY ROBINSON being denied basic human rights by British prison Nazis

Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon), leader of the anti-sharia English Defence League (EDL), is the UK’s most high profile prisoner of conscience. It seems that he is being treated differently as a result of his political profile. This does not just refer to his imprisonment but also to the way the British state is treating him now it has him in its power.

British Freedom (H/T bains)  Following an international outcry he was moved from a dangerous part of Wandsworth Prison. However, it now appears that he is being denied his basic rights for politically motivated reasons. We have received the following information from a reliable source concerning Tommy’s present circumstances:

1. He is still in the same clothes he went to prison in.

2. They are refusing to allow him clean/ fresh clothes — family members took clothing in but they would not allow it to be handed over.

3. He has received no mail or money from anyone and he knows his wife gave in a postal order for a large amount whilst visiting.

4. He is being refused all privileges.

5. With no money he cannot purchase razors, food etc. and is having to eat the slops provided.

6. He was arrested with £90 but at the prison when asking for his money he was told he didn’t have any. Where has this £90 gone?

We urge all concerned party members and supporters to write to their MPs seeking assurances that Tommy is being allowed his basic entitlements, especially mail which allows him to keep in contact with the outside and to know that he has support around the world (see Berlin video below).

You can contact your MP quickly and easily online at www.writetothem.com.

It is important that international lovers of freedom keep up the pressure on the British state to treat Tommy with fairness and respect. People should not be treated unfairly just because they stand up to the inequalities of sharia.

Demand equal treatment for Tommy Robinson rather than sharia inspired victimisation!

RELATED STORIES:

update-re-incarceration-of-edl-and-british-freedom-members

breaking-uk-police-have-incarcerated-edls-tommy-robinson-together-with-savage-muslims

english-defence-leagues-tommy-robinson-remanded-to-prison-for-allegedly-entering-the-u-s-illegally-making-extradition-a-strong-possibility

From Bare Naked Islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

Bumps in The Road…

October 29, 2012   

From Bare Naked islam: http://www.barenakedislam.com/

 

Not Surprising from The Religion of Hate and Intolerance…

October 29, 2012   

 

Wahhabi King Demands UN Adopt Resolution Condemning Blasphemy Against Islam…

Via JPost:

Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz on Saturday called on the UN to adopt a resolution condemning blasphemy, AFP reported.

“I demand a UN resolution that condemns any country or group that insults religions and prophets,” he reportedly said. “It is our duty and that of every Muslim to protect Islam and defend the prophets.”

The Saudi King is the latest Islamic leader to call for a ban on blasphemy following the release last month of the US-made Innocence of Muslims film, which triggered a wave of deadly anti-American violence across the Islamic world.

Abdullah also stressed the important of the “unity of the Islamic nation…to face the nation’s enemies.”

From Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Mooch’s 4 Year Vacation Paid for By The American Taxpayer

October 29, 2012   

Found at The Political Commentator

Obama Abandoned Our Ambassador to Die – Coward!

October 29, 2012   

From Theo: http://www.theospark.net/

Impeach Obama Over Benghazi…It is Criminal

October 28, 2012   

If Reelected, Obama Should Be Impeached over Benghazi

 

“The scandal thus far has at least tarnished and quite possibly implicated everyone from the CIA director, to the secretaries of State and Defense, to the UN ambassador and, of course, the president himself — with no end in sight, because Obama, normally loath to expose himself and even less so in an election season, refuses to answer questions on the subject.”
***

The game changer

Des Moines Register Endorses Romney - 1st Republican endorsement in 40 years   from Blazing Cat Fur: http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.com/

Sure He Lied…Obama Lies About Everything

October 28, 2012   

Obama Lied: White House Emails Show Administration Deeply Involved In Now Bankrupt Abound Solar…

Shocker.

Via Daily Caller:

Just one day after President Obama went on television saying that politics had nothing to do with the now bankrupt Abound Solar receiving a taxpayer-backed loan guarantee from the Energy Department, emails have surfaced that contradict these claims and suggest White House involvement in the company receiving the loan.

“And these are decisions, by the way, that are made by the Department of Energy, they have nothing to do with politics,” President Obama told KUSA’s Kyle Clark.

However, emails obtained by COMPLETECOLORADO.COM suggest that the White House was involved in the Energy Department awarding Abound Solar a $400 million loan gurantee, contradicting the President’s claim.

The emails also suggest that the loan guarantee was political payback to Democratic benefactor Pat Stryker.

In one email, DOE loan executive Jonathan Silver tells DOE credit advisor Jim McCrea that, “You better [let] him know the [White House] wants to move Abound forward,” referring to Treasury Advisor Ian Samuels who wasn’t moving fast enough on scheduling calls regarding Abound.

Keep reading… From Weasel ZIppers: http://weaselzippers.us/

 

New Picture of mohammed (mo ham for ed) is Found…With Seven of His Child Brides

October 28, 2012   

From Theo: http://www.theospark.net/

We Will All be in Fantasy Land if these Bastards Win…

October 28, 2012   

From It Ain’t Holy Water: http://itaintholywater.blogspot.com/

American Voters are Stupid Alright…

October 28, 2012   

From It Ain’t Holy Water: http://itaintholywater.blogspot.com/