ZION'S TRUMPET
1Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand; Joel 2:1
Show MenuHide Menu

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Before The Nanny State Took Over…

February 23, 2012   

From The Daley Gator at: http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/

 

The Prez and Mooch Hate All Things American

February 23, 2012   

Pics of the Day: Mooch Not Looking So Thrilled During The National Anthem…

U.S. President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama attend the ground breaking ceremony for the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture on the National Mall in Washington February 22, 2012. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Lest anyone think I’m just cherry picking a bad shot here’s an AFP photo.

US President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama stand for the National Anthem during the groundbreaking ceremony for the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture on the National Mall in Washington, DC, February 22, 2012. Scheduled to open in 2015, the museum will be the only national museum to be entirely devoted to African American life, art, history and culture. (AFP PHOTO/Saul LOEB)

And a different Reuters photographer.

U.S. President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama are joined by Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution Wayne Clough (L) as they place their hands over their hearts while the American flag is honored at the groundbreaking ceremony at the construction site of the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington February 22, 2012. The museum is scheduled to open on the National Mall in 2015. (REUTERS/Larry Downing)

ZIP at Weasel Zippers: http://weaselzippers.us/

Whitney Houston’s Funeral – What Was Said

February 22, 2012   

Whitney Houston Funeral: Celebrities Speak

Offline

Robert Fine

2/20/2012, 12:58 pm
User avatar
Stevie Wonder: I never saw her look so beautiful.

Jay Z: Be sure you buy my ‘Whitney’s Dead’ t-shirt.

Bobby Brown: Even in death, I still felt like beating her up.

Puff Daddy: See? She didn’t vote — and now she’s dead.

Bill Maher: Drug addict, lousy mother – but she was still cool, just like Barack Obama.

Jon Stewart: It honestly wouldn’t surprise me if conservatives did this to her.

Barack Obama, tweeting: Whitney, I will avenge the unspeakable crime by Mitt Romney which lead directly to your death.

Al Sharpton: Barack is wrong. The damn Jews killed Whitney. Hey, anybody seen my car?

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Does this mean the money’s dried up?

Rep. John Conyers: I hope she read her will before she signed it.

Speaker John Bohener, press statement: Henceforth, theretofore heretherof, let it be said and known, hencewiththeretoforeergotowittherof, to wit thereofheretoforehencewith.

Andrea Mitchell, NBC: I wonder if Republicans even care.

Samuel L. Jackson: The damn bitch just laid there.

Scarlett Johanson: At least they didn’t put her in a sweater vest.

Chris Mathews: It sent a tingle down my leg. Or was that…. Oh, not again! Now my pants are soaking wet!

Bill Clinton: Very moving. The first time I was ever moved to put my hand down the front of a dead woman’s dress.

Orlando Jones: Too bad it ain’t Sarah Palin lyin’ there dead like that.

Jimmy Falon: I wish the band was here, we could have struck up “Lying’ Ass Bitch,” as they carried her body out.

Will Smith: The biggest pity is she’ll never see my new place in Malibu.

Brad Pitt: Seeing a dead body… Now I’m really depressed.

Jesse Jackson: Racism is what killed her.

Michael Moore: Is there food somewhere?

Michelle Obama: Is there free food somewhere?

Her pharmacist: I will miss her.

From The People’s Cube at: http://thepeoplescube.com/

Sad But True

February 22, 2012   

 

Things Christians Like To Say In The American Church That Probably Don’t Mean Much…

Saying “I’m praying for you”

 
 
 
 

This is one of Christian culture’s very favorite things to say. Whether they actually will pray or not is anyone’s guess, but it seems important somehow that you believe they will. Versatile and efficient, “I’m praying for you” can be used in absolutely any situation to cover several evangelical bases and tend to egos all at once. With just four words it’s possible to establish yourself as spiritual alpha dog and signal an end to the conversation under the guise of bestowing blessing. Delicious and nutritious!

You may not find a less relational phrase in all of Christianese than “I’m praying for you.” When said in response to an expression of pain or heartbreak it often shuts the conversation down. The person sharing can feel as if they’ve been stiff-armed and kept at a distance by the person they were confiding in so they can be passed off to God Almighty. The confidant can easily say this and remain detached, and if you’ve said it before yourself, it’s that much more painful to hear.

People who are capable of casually informing people they’re praying for them can’t fathom that anyone could possibly have a problem with it. To their ears it’s the most wonderful thing to say and anyone taking issue must be a jaded miscreant who’s mad at God. (Anger at God is something else Christian culture does not endorse and does not deem permissible, but that’s a whole other blog post.) This is a prominent characteristic of Christian culture: they have no idea how they come off. If anyone feels marginalized or dismissed by the allegation of impending prayer, the pray-er will likely interpret this as disdain for the whole of Christianity and take it as a cue to write that person off.

Saying “I’m praying for you” may be as relational as someone in Christian culture knows how to be. They’re so busy Doing Things they may not know how to care and be cared for. All they may know is how to do is say things and remain detached, which definitely has its advantages. Actual relationship is a lot of work. Simpler to hold them at arm’s length and avoid holding people’s hurt than do the counter-intuitive work of bearing their burdens. When someone carries your struggle with you, the most healing form of relationship is taking place, and relationships are how we will all be healed. But they can be messy. It would be nice to keep this spirituality stuff within tidy boundaries. Which brings us to the hallmark of Christian culture: Doing Things and Avoiding Relationship. Keep this commandment and you will keep all the rest.

 
From Stuff Christian Culture Likes at: http://www.stuffchristianculturelikes.com/

Animals…Gotta Love ‘Em

February 22, 2012   

 

 

 

 

Obama Zombies

February 22, 2012   

A Quote Worth Quoting

February 21, 2012   

“Governments are not always overthrown by direct and open assaults. They are not always battered down by the arms of conquerors, or the successful daring of usurpers. There is often concealed the dry rot, which eats into the vitals, when all is fair and stately on the outside. And to republics this has been the more common fatal disease. The continual drippings of corruption may wear away the solid rock, when the tempest has failed to overturn it…”

Joseph Story – Supreme Court Justice – 1829

Found in the intro of the book – Ameritopia – by Mark Levin

Dads – Don’t Neglect Your Sons – They Will Grow Up To Be Just Like You

February 21, 2012   

Found at Saberpoint

Word of Warning for America

February 21, 2012   

Poem~ “The Wedding Apocalypse”

The Wedding day of doom
A Storm of fire, and blackened plumes
Smoke in the billows of clouds.
 
-
A morning in white turned into a day of fright.
-
A Scripture came to mind;
The days of Lot
People….eating, drinking, making merry
The day came upon us, it did not tarry.
-
 
We didn’t believe it would come to an end, not on a wedding, where there is feasting and friend.
-
 
We coddled the enemy
Built their cities
They laughed in our face
Without any pity.
 
-
 
Profiles happy on a sunny day
Turned to devastation, from the battle array.
-
 
Fire, smoke and gas, all over our land
It went according to their devices and plan.
-
 
Babies gone, women in turmoil, the men have gone
Taken their spoil.
-
 
A dove of peace..
Will it settle the mind?
Has God forsaken
While America is left behind?
 
-
God has turned his back on the slaughter, we rejected his love, our children, we have martyr’d.
-
 
Waiting for rapture to unveil, yet God looked away, his word will prevail.
-
Apocalypse now, on a wedding day.
 
-
Repent America,
Or…The enemy will have his way.
-
Apocalyptic

Poem & Mixed Media Collage by; P. AsheDina, The Mad Jewess~02/18/12

From The Mad Jewess at: http://themadjewess.com/

OMG! If You Drink Soft Drinks…You Are A Racist Bastard! Here a Racist, There a Racist, Everywhere a Racist…

February 21, 2012   

Bad News: Food Police To Label Soft Drinks Racist…

Have a Coke and a smile . . . you racist bastard!

Via Daily Caller:

“Spread of soda tax fizzles,” read a headline last week on authoritative state politics website Stateline. We shouldn’t pop the champagne cork just yet, though. Anti-sugar activists are still gunning for soft drinks.

Apparently, sugary beverages like soda, juice, and sports drinks are so nefarious that they warrant a two-day conference this summer. In June, the food-police Center for Science in the Public (or, really, their own fringe) Interest is rallying the troops in Washington, D.C. for another push to put the government in a wide swath of beverages.  This follows on CSPI’s recent lead balloon of last fall’s “Food Day,” which generated noise but little else — similar to the prospects of this conference. [...]

But perhaps the most nauseating session will examine the “impact of sugary drinks in communities of color.” We can already guess what the conclusion will be: Soft drinks disproportionately “harm” urban minorities.

From Weasel Zippers at: http://weaselzippers.us/

The Missing Worker and The True Unemployment Rate

February 21, 2012   

From American Power Blog at: http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/

The Mainstream Communist – Islamist Media Trying to Destroy The Effectiveness of The NYPD

February 21, 2012   

There’s a reason New York City has not been hit by radical Muslim terrorists since Sept. 11, 2001, and its name is the New York City Police Department (NYPD)

Posted: February 20, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Islam in America | 23 Comments »

But try to tell that to the Associated Press, which for months now has been waging a journalistic jihad against the NYPD and its counterterrorism tactics in the name of “civil rights.” Is the AP in cahoots with Muslim Brotherhood-linked terror front group CAIR who is all over the media demanding resignations of top NYPD officials because of their Muslim surveillance programs? And who keeps leaking secret NYPD documents to the AP – classified documents which  reveal covert operations that monitor potential Muslim terrorists?

In case no one has noticed, all the averted terrorist plots against this country since 9/11 have involved Muslims.

NY POST  Closely watching wannabe jihadis not only at home but across the country and around the world, the NYPD has foiled countless terror operations, including plots to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge, the subway system, the Stock Exchange, the trans-Hudson tunnels and JFK Airport, among others.

The latest salvo, “NYPD Monitored Muslim Students All Over Northeast,” discloses that undercover officers kept tabs on various Muslim student organizations — often viewed as breeding grounds for freelance jihadism — across New York state and New England and patrolled their Web sites.

The NYPD “monitored Muslim college students far more broadly than previously known, at schools far beyond the city limits, including the Ivy League colleges of Yale and the University of Pennsylvania,” writes Chris Hawley. “Police . . . recorded students’ names and noted in police intelligence files how many times they prayed . . . names were recorded in reports prepared for Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly.”

The AP story also breathlessly notes that “the latest documents mention no wrongdoing by any students,” even though “Kelly and Mayor Bloomberg repeatedly have said that the police only follow legitimate leads about suspected criminal activity.”

Was the AP born yesterday?

There’s always a gap between what public officials say to the “gotcha” media and what they actually must do — especially when it comes to terrorism. If officials could candidly talk about the daily reports they get about possible lethal jihadist activity, the country would be in a state of permanent panic.

So — like the Pentagon calling Major Nidal Malik Hasan’s murder of 13 defenseless service members at Fort Hood, Tex., in 2009 “workplace violence” — they publicly downplay localized, spontaneous jihad, even as they seek to combat it behind the scenes.

But in some quarters, the “civil rights” meme trumps everything, including self-preservation. It’s hardly “racist” to prudently note that Islamic religiosity characterized the 9/11 hijackers, Maj. Hasan and others and is used as a motivational tool by jihadis.

Nor is it “racist” to note that, too often across the Islamic world, believers pour out of mosques on Friday nights whipped into a frenzy by their imams and shouting “Death to America.”

What the NYPD is doing is simply good — and entirely legal — police work. The events of 9/11 obliged the department to transform itself from a municipal police force into a combination cop shop, intelligence service and paramilitary organization that can and does operate globally, not just locally. But the modern left is dubious at best about the moral legitimacy of pro-active self-defense — thus the smugly selfrighteous AP series.

Most Americans — including Muslim Americans — get it. The AP reports one monitored student saying of the cops: “I can’t blame them for doing their job. There’s lots of Muslims doing some bad things and it gives a bad name to all of us.”

That’s a voice of common sense and good will. There should be more like it.

Thanks to Muslims our police have to look like this now

On 9/11, America was shot in the back by 19 devout, praying Muslims, some of whom had infiltrated our nation posing as “students.” What the politically correct AP apparently sees as an “oppressed minority” is correctly viewed by the NYPD as a possible “suspect pool” for the next attempted terrorist attack.

Attempt they will. Al Qaeda may be operationally damaged, but the failed Times Square bombing serves as a potent reminder that eternal vigilance in the war against radical Islam is a price that even pacifist New Yorkers must pay for the right not to get blown up at Macy’s.

And if that offends the AP, tough.

From Bare Nake Islam at: http://barenakedislam.com/

Liberal Bastion of Harvard Complicent on Plan To Destroy Israel

February 21, 2012   

HARVARD UNIVERSITY to host conference calling for the destruction of the Jewish State

 

Harvard University is going to be hosting a conference entitled “One State Conference: Israel/Palestine and the One State Solution,” scheduled to take place March 3-4.

 INN According to the “Vision and Goals” of the conference, as outlined by its website:

“To date, the only Israel/Palestine solution that has received a fair rehearsal in mainstream forums has been the two-state solution. Our conference will help to expand the range of academic debate on this issue. Thus, our main goal is to educate ourselves and others about the possible contours of a one-state solution and the challenges that stand in the way of its realization.”

The conference was organized by a number of student groups including, Students for Justice in Palestine, the Palestine Caucus, the Arab Caucus, the Progressive Caucus, and the Association for Justice in the Middle East, all of which perpetrate an ideology based on the belief that Israel is an “apartheid state,” responsible for the “ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population.”

Speakers include, Ali Abunimah, the Executive Director of the Electronic Intifada; Dalit Baum, of the BDS organization Coalition of Women for Peace; Ilan Pappe, radical left Israeli academic and fervent supporter of the BDS movement; Marc Ellis, Director of the Center for Jewish Studies at Baylor University, who compares Zionism to colonialism and Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians to the Nazi treatment of Jews; as well as a number of other academics and scholars who advocate similar beliefs. 

“Most of the speakers are heavily involved in anti-Israel advocacy. The conference program features an activist workshop, in contrast to an academic or research framework in which different perspectives are presented… Such events represent the antithesis of constructive academic dialogue and peaceful coexistence,” the NGO Monitor claimed.

“Those who promote a one-state ‘solution’ advocate creating an entity which would, through its merger with the Palestinian Arab population of the West Bank and Gaza and an influx of Palestinians from neighboring states, lose its Jewish majority and its Jewish character. In effect, Jewish self-determination would be nullified,” the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) reported. The forum is clearly focused, therefore, on “dismantling the Jewish State of Israel.”

“According to the working definition of anti-Semitism developed by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), and recognized by the United States Department of State, the One State Conference, in implicitly ‘denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination,’ is an exercise in anti-Semitism,” CAMERA explained.

Anti-Semitism and Sham Scholarship

CAMERA  Another element in the State Department-recognized working definition of anti-Semitism is “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.” That is also likely to occur at the conference. Scheduled speaker Ali Abunimah has previously compared Israel to Nazis, and similar statements have been made by others. Conference organizer Ahmed Moor also accuses Jews of racism asserting, “Many Israelis and Jewish people are weaned on the idea of Jewish exceptionalism.” Marc Ellis likens Jews to Nazis and to the Egyptians of the Passover tale.

This sort of anti-Israel, anti-Semitic invective, masquerading as education, has become commonplace at these conferences. Far from being scholarly, however, many of the scheduled speakers are of dubious academic integrity and frequently disseminate misinformation and false narratives about Israel and Jews. For example:

  • Ali Abunimah has intentionally understated Hamas violence and disseminated false quotations to make Israeli leaders appear cruel.
  • Diana Buttu has repeatedly and falsely understated the extent of Palestinian terrorist violence and mischaracterized international law. She has even gone so far as to claim that Hamas rockets have no explosive head. This is an obvious falsehood.
  • Marc Ellis wrote a column describing how a Palestinian friend of his was murdered because Jewish settlers coveted her family’s land, falsely implying she was killed by Jews when, in fact, her murderer was an Arab. Ellis is currently defending himself against charges by Baylor University that could lead to his dismissal.
  • Leila Farsakh falsely asserted in a French newspaper that the PLO had agreed to share land with Israel in 1974. The truth is that in 1974, the PLO reaffirmed its rejection of a land-for-peace deal in what is known as the “Phased Plan” for the destruction of Israel.
  • Ilan Pappé repeatedly published a fabricated quotation to make David Ben-Gurion appear to endorse ethnic cleansing. Pappé has so little regard for historical facts, he freely admits “I am not as interested in what happened as in how people see what’s happened.”
  • Nadim Rouhana was denied tenure at Boston College due to the insufficient quality of his scholarship.
  • Stephen Walt is best known for his book, written with John Mearsheimer, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The book, which claims American Jews are a fifth column that controls American policy for the benefit of Israel, is little more than a rehash of classic anti-Semitic tropes which is also rife with falsehoods

Denying the Jewish People Their Right to Self-Determination

The “One State Conference” seeks to promote the destruction of Israel’s Jewish character. Conference organizer Ahmed Moor says as much in a piece he wrote for the Huffington Post entitled, “Israel’s Jewish Character Is Subject for Debate.”

The conference will feature a number of panels. Panel 7 deals with cultural identity, asking “What role should the state play in the maintenance of the national groups’ identities? Will it be necessary to forge a new, shared identity in the new state?” It is interesting that this question should be addressed without a single pro-Israel panelist participating.

In addition, this is how the third panel is described on the website:
Many people with an intimate understanding of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict insist that the one-state solution is wholly impossible to implement. Worse, it is a recipe for protracted ethnic bloodshed. Could that be true?

Could it? Let’s examine this issue. With a Jewish minority in Israel, Jews would face the same fate as ethnic and religious minorities in other Arab countries. For example:

  • According to human rights activist and former Dutch parliamentarian Ayaan Hirsi Ali, The Sudanese government’s sustained persecution of religious minorities culminated in the genocide in Darfur that began in 2003. Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir, has been indicted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, which charged him with three counts of genocide, and still the violence rages on.
  • Saudi Arabia bars all public expressions of religion other than Wahhabi Islam and prohibits all non-Muslim houses of worship. Saudi police recently raided a private home and arrested 35 Christians who had gathered simply to pray.
  • For decades, Coptic Christians have been second class citizens in Egypt where the building or even routine maintenance of a church was illegal, but since the fall of Hosni Mubarak violence against Christians has surged. Recently thousands of Muslims went on a rampage, attacking Copts, burning and looting Coptic homes and shops.
  • In Iraq, church bombings are increasingly common. Since June of 2004, 70 churches have been bombed.Thousands have been killed and nearly one half of Iraqi Christians have fled the country.
  • In Tunisia, the dominant political party, Ennahda, plans to institute Shariah law.
  • In Libya, the head of the Tripoli Military Council once led an Islamic militia with links to al-Qaida. He intends to run for office in upcoming elections which makes Christians uneasy.
  • Christians in Yemen are subject to abuse when they openly embrace their Christianity, with men being beaten and women harassed. They are not allowed even to bury their dead in the capital of Sana’a where all cemeteries are strictly Muslim.
  • Since Hamas took over Gaza in 2007, the Christian community has been facing severe persecution, afraid to practice their religion publicly. In November of that year, a Christian bookstore was bombed and the store’s manager tortured and murdered.

In a conversation recorded on February 9, 2012 at Imperial College in London, infamous Judenrat Norman Finkelstein, who describes himself as having devoted his life to the “Palestinian cause” told his interviewer, “You know and I know exactly what we’re talking about because if we end the occupation, and we bring back 6 million Palestinians, and we have equal rights for Arabs and Jews, there’s no Israel. That’s what it’s really about.”

Israel was declared a state on May 14, 1948 and is a full fledged member of the United Nations. Its Declaration of Independence clearly states: “On the 29th November, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a Jewish State in Eretz-Israel; the General Assembly required the inhabitants of Eretz-Israel to take such steps as were necessary on their part for the implementation of that resolution. This recognition by the United Nations of the right of the Jewish people to establish their State is irrevocable. This right is the natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate, like all other nations, in their own sovereign State.”

 Perhaps little should be expected from Harvard when it comes to the subject of the Middle East. Harvard’s Middle East Outreach Center, charged with providing curriculum materials to middle and high schools, has distinguished itself mostly by disseminating propaganda instead of scholarship. In addition, Harvard accepts millions in funding from Saudi Arabian princes and other wealthy Arab donors.
 

The assault against Israel involves a war of words and concepts which are just as deadly as the vicious  episodes of terrorist violence that punctuate daily life in the Jewish State.  A propaganda narrative casting Israelis as “Nazis” who are perpetrating a Jewish version of the Final Solution against hapless Palestinians has spread from the Middle East into the capitals of Europe, and is echoed in the “boycott and divestment” movement and “Anti-Israel Apartheid Weeks” on prestigious American college campuses.

One of the most wrenching facts of this war against the Jews is the central role played by Jewish enablers of anti-Semitism.  These individuals, mostly in the universities (American and Israeli alike), have given protective cover to the revival of Jew-hatred, which gains momentum with each passing day.  The fact that these enablers are Jewish gives legitimacy to the hateful rhetoric about Jews and the Jewish State, and allows such ideology to flourish with utter impunity.

“Jewish Enablers of the War Against the Jews” by University of Haifa Professor Stephen Plaut exposes these Jewish Jew-haters—this is the only label for them—for what they really are.  Plaut has written 20 searing portraits based on the words and deeds of these enablers, including figures such as the notorious Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein; the pseudo-rabbi Michael Lerner; and Harvard’s Sara Roy, an apologist for the terror group Hamas. This collection is comprised of Israelis as well, including Oren Yiftachel, who composes tracts purporting to show that his own country is a racist, apartheid state.

As Plaut’s work shows, these are not “self-hating” Jews; they hate both Israel and America.

From Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.com/

Birth Control is Just The First Step for Government Control

February 20, 2012   

Guns, Butter, Jobs and Birth Control

By Sultan Knish (Daniel Greenfield)

Excerpt of the article. To read the entire article go to Sultan Knish: http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

The left’s goal is to transform society, not to empower individuals to make their own choices. That is why an arena like birth control is its natural territory. A society with state subsidized birth control has a low birth rate, low marriage rate, high demand for social subsidies and a high demand for immigrants to compensate for the low birth rate and pay for the social subsidies. Now whether or not you think such a society is a good thing, it is the kind of society that the left wants.

Given a choice between universal birth control and universal free market jobs, the former is a priority and the latter a threat. It’s not just birth control, there are any number of elements, which may be benign in and of themselves, but which fit into a larger picture of the kind of society it wants.

The Communist era left thought big. If there was hunger, they would grow more wheat. If there weren’t enough jobs, they would create more factories. It was a grandiose insanity that eventually brought down Communism, but it was healthier than the post-human left which is declinist. If there is hunger, then their solution is to raise the price of food with a tax that will subsidize meals for the poor. If there aren’t enough jobs, the solution is for more people to go on the dole and for everyone to make do with less.

From a distance this looks like wealth redistribution, but it’s actually a program for teaching everyone to make do with less. That is why Obama has done everything possible to hike energy prices, by making it harder to get to oil, coal and natural gas, while promoting expensive “clean energy” and “energy efficiency”.

Faced with a challenge, the new left’s solution is always make do with less. Less heat, less food and less children. The old left still had some faith in human aspirations. The new left only sees humanity as foolish children who have to be regimented and taught self-discipline. To sacrifice not for a better world, but for a more sustainable existence. There is less of Marx to it and more of Gandhi in that.

There is a mystical strain to this incarnation of the left. It does not see economic problems as arising from natural causes, but spiritual causes. It assigns blame primarily to “greed”, a venial sin and a spiritual problem. Its solutions all involve remaking society in ways that have little to do with creating jobs or even regulating the banks, but address their secular notion of spiritual ills that are responsible for the malaise.

 

Teaching everyone to make do with less of everything is just step one. Step two is to break down the structures of attachment. Break down the family, religion and the nation. Teach people to stop being possessive of the old structures. Wipe out the tribal and national bonds so that there is no longer any war or jealousy. Eliminate marriage and stable parenthood to end possessiveness. Leave people as isolates, individual units, citizens of the state.

It’s an old program. The Nazis made some slight progress on it. Various leftist movements and regimes have flirted with communal arrangements, but no one has made an entire society work that way. Yet.

To people who think that way subsidized birth control is very important. So is tolerance, international travel, centralized schooling, learning to appreciate nature, disruptive immigration, extended adolescence, higher education, state subsidies, free love, multilingual training, world citizenship, social safety nets and a thousand other things. None of which involve creating jobs.

The left believes strongly in social solutions. It believes that all our ills are social in nature and that social justice can only be practiced by a healthy society. Their idea of a healthy society is totalitarian but they have that in common with most ideologues who want a perfect state, rather than a free state.

From Sultan Knish at: http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

Paul Weston of The British Freedom Party Speaks About The Islamic Scourge Taking Over Europe

February 20, 2012   

From Bare Naked Islam

No One Can Handle The Truth About The Evil Islamic Scourge

February 20, 2012   

MUST SEE: Leader of the new British Freedom Party has harsh words for the Islamic plague currently engulfing the West

Posted: February 18, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Islamic Britain, Islamization of the West | 16 Comments »

In the video below, Paul Weston gave an impassioned yet highly controversial speech in Amsterdam about the rapidly growing danger of Islamization. Had he given it in Britain, he probably would have been arrested.

CANADIAN BNIers can see Weston speak in Toronto, Monday, Feb. 20th: PAUL WESTON in TORONTO

BRITISH FREEDOM PARTY 25-POINT PLAN:

• Introduce a US style First Amendment guaranteeing Free Speech.

• Leave the profoundly undemocratic European Union.

• Abolish the Human Rights Act, which benefits only foreign criminals/terrorists.

• Halt any further immigration for a period of five years.

* Repair the damage wreaked by the progressive educational establishment.

• Drastically reduce crime – criminals should fear the consequences of their behaviour.

• Abolish all multicultural and equality quangos.

•Halt and turn back all aspects of the Islamisation of Britain, including Sharia finance.

• Promote British values and assimilation, rather than multiculturalism and division.

• Deport all foreign criminals and illegal immigrants.

•Diminish the public sector and government interference in the private sector.

• Provide affordable housing for young married families.

• Apply Super Tax on second and any further homes.

• Promote and enlarge apprenticeship schemes.

• Provide tax-breaks and financial assistance for new manufacturing companies.

• Promote Christianity, marriage, the family, the community and the Nation State.

• Rebuild Britain’s Armed Forces to 1980 levels.

• Withdraw troops from all areas where we are not directly threatened.

• Cancel foreign aid to countries which do not deserve or need it.

• Allow pubs (not restaurants) to operate as smoking or non-smoking establishments.

• Tighten regulations on the sexual/violent content of TV, films and games.

• Build independent energy resources. Reliance on mid-east oil is dangerous.

• Ensure no elderly person lives in fear, and can afford both heat and food in the winter.

• Ensure that a no-drugs policy means literally No Drugs.

• Live by Christianity’s Golden Rule: “Do unto others as thou wouldst be done by.”

A WARNING FROM BRITAIN

American Thinker  Recently, the Chairman of the newly formed British Freedom Party, Paul Weston, spoke to a group of New Yorkers at an meeting sponsored by Brigitte Gabriel’s ACT! for America organization. Weston also said he came to warn America that what is happening in Britain today could happen in America in the not too distant future.

Five years ago, Mr. Weston was in private business (real estate) with no interest in politics, but seeing the decline in quality of life and cultural institutions in Britain caused him to start writing about these subjects. Weston then came to the conclusion that he could no longer sit on the sidelines as his country faced a “dystopian” future of mass immigration and riots in the street. 

Mr. Weston spoke of how Tony Blair and his British Labor Party set out to destroy traditional Britain by encouraging mass immigration to ensure a majority that would vote for the Welfare State in perpetuity. Millions of people from around the world were invited to move to Britain. Pamphlets were distributed in Pakistan, for example, urging locals to move to England and go on welfare. And both of these actions were facilitated and were, fed, in part, by post-colonial British guilt. Today, although a native British citizen cannot marry more than one spouse, the United Kingdom pays welfare costs for immigrants with up to four wives and their children.

Seeing this problem in terms that the British Labor Party did not then anticipate and even now doesn’t comprehend, Muammar Gaddafi plainly spoke his mind years ago when he said, “We have fifty million Muslims in Europe. Allah will grant us victory without guns.”

The native British white population is having children at a rate of 1.4 per couple — and considerably fewer of them are forming couples these days. The immigrant Muslim population is having children at ten times that rate, Mr. Weston told the audience. 

“Many British (whites) are emigrating and the Left doesn’t care,” Weston said, as well as one hundred thousand of them have converted to Islam, most surprisingly women. He then posed the question: what if British Muslims could be able to impose a monoculture on the remaining whites? Answering himself, Weston stated that forty percent of British Muslims want sharia law and there was widespread rejoicing in British city streets by Muslims on September 11th, 2001. Today there are 3-4 Islamic terrorist attacks per week in Britain and constant calls by Islamists “for the murder of British Jews and homosexuals.”

Paul Weston then addressed solutions to the problem(s) by asking, “what can we do about it?” Prefacing his next remarks by saying he could be jailed in Britain for what he was about to say (the charge would be inciting racial unrest or being anti-Muslim), he then advocated a stop to any more mass immigration to Britain. He would deport foreign born criminals and also outlaw mosques “who preach terrorism.” If these things aren’t done, Weston added, “we could be in a worse situation than the breakup of Yugoslavia,” a situation that happened with surprising speed. He also advocated leaving the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union itself (one has to add assuming the EU still exists at the time of the next British election).

“We didn’t make all these sacrifices between 1939 and 1945 to give up now without firing a shot,” Weston emphatically stated, before commenting that the lack of Brits actually practicing Christianity has greatly hurt his country. He ended his speech by saying, “I implore America to not make the same mistakes that we have made in England.”

Finally, the question of Geert Wilders came up. Mr. Weston said that Wilders is “the most important politician in Europe right now. If he gets a majority in three years (becomes the Prime Minister), it could cause a cascade (across Europe). 

Finally, the question of Geert Wilders came up. Mr. Weston said that Wilders is “the most important politician in Europe right now. If he gets a majority in three years (becomes the Prime Minister), it could cause a cascade (across Europe). 

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE BFP HERE:

great-britain-introducing-an-exciting-new-conservative-party

british-freedom-party-a-real-conservative-party-that-will-raise-up-the-greatness-that-britain-has-been-missing-lately

canadas-michael-coren-interviews-paul-weston-of-the-new-anti-islamization-british-freedom-party

From Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.com/

Christians Are Being Persecuted and Killed All Over The World – Not a Peep From Obummer or The State Dept.

February 20, 2012   

IRAQ MAKES THE TOP TEN LIST!

 

A magazine that documents Christian persecution around the world. On the front cover is a Christian who was hunted down and mutilated by Islamic fanatics

The Top Ten List for countries trying to eradicate Christianity. Disgracefully, the mainstream media rarely, if ever, cover this kind of ethnic cleansing. One possible reason: anti-Christian bias among Western elites and stealth Muslims like Barack Hussein Obama who never mention a word about the violent persecution of Christians in Muslim countries.

Washington Times   It is more than a conspiracy of silence. It is a conspiracy of political and media apathy. There is no political or journalistic will to continually publicize and condemn religious persecution by extremist Muslims or Islamic dictatorships. Members of the Western media are overwhelmingly secular, so they often have a hard time even perceiving the religious root of persecution.

This silence and apathy create an implied consent for religious persecution. 

Over the past year there have been several reports of Christians being violently persecuted in the Middle East, Africa, and other Muslim nations. Most were wire service stories, or reports from religious media outlets like Catholic News Service. 

Churches being burned down by Muslims in Zanzibar

There was little follow-up or editorial outrage over what is now being called religious genocide, religious cleansing, or the next holocaust by human rights and religious groups alarmed at the fast spreading persecution. 

The persecution, in some regions genocide, of Christians and other religious groups is the most important international human rights issue willfully ignored by the American media and our government. 

Our self-proclaimed Christian President has not publicly addressed this issue, nor have the supposed Christians in our legislature. Our Christian Secretary of State has been mute.

But, they continue to dole out foreign, military, and humanitarian aid to countries that practice or allow inhumane persecution. With the exception of Newt Gingrich, the supposed Christian presidential candidates, who blather about their faith, are silent on this issue. 

Some examples: 

  • In Egypt Coptic Christians are being persecuted and murdered. 100 thousand Christians fled Egypt since the Mubarek regime collapsed in what the Egyptian Union of Human Rights is calling a “mass exodus.” Our president helped depose Hosni Mubarek in the cause of freedom.  
  • In Iraq, where we shed our blood treasure allegedly for the cause of freedom, Christians are being violently persecuted, murdered, and churches are being bombed, as seen in the above photo.
  • In the West Bank and Gaza, where Palestinians are in control, Christians are being persecuted. Justus Reid Weiner of Hebrew University claims 1,000 Palestinian Christians left the West Bank city of Bethlehem, the historic birthplace of Jesus. Our government wants to negotiate with people who persecute religion to supposedly bring peace, and that freedom thing, to the region.
  • In Pakistan it is illegal to convert to any religion but Islam. They have a blasphemy law with the death penalty. We give foreign aid and military assistance to Pakistan. Pakistan is a tenuous ally in the region.
  • CNN reported in Nigeria, 12,000 Christians and animists were killed over the past decade in a religious purge.

From Bare Naked Islam at: http://barenakedislam.com/

We Are No Longer American Citizens – We are Subjects of A Despotic Regime

February 18, 2012   

Rationing our Rights

By Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison

They said it would never lead to rationing.  But rationing is already here.  Under the latest assault by the Obama administration, they are rationing our rights.  Tens of millions of Catholics — and tens of millions of the rest of us — are having our religious liberty crushed by the latest health care mandate from HHS.

The legislation that President Obama signed with a flourish in 2010 was supported by not a single Republican.  The election of 2010 resulted in a massive electoral “shellacking” — the president’s own word — that cost the Democrats their majority in the House and serious losses in thousands of state legislative contests.  Ignoring all that, they advance.

The National Archives saluted the Fourth of July in 2010 with a breathless announcement.  Just four months after Vice President Joe Biden hailed the signing of historic health care legislation as a “big [expletive deleted] deal,” the folks at the Archives told us that they had discovered a previously unnoticed correction in an early Thomas Jefferson draft of the Declaration of Independence.  Young Mr. Jefferson had written the word “Subjects.”  Then he struck that word and penned the word “Citizens.”

The National Archives informed us meaningfully that this was the first time in American history that we were so called — Citizens.  Will future archivists be able to pinpoint the signing of ObamaCare as that moment in time when we became Subjects once again?

What else can we be but Subjects if we have to go hat in hand to HHS Sec. Kathleen Sebelius for a waiver from ObamaCare?  Thousands of waivers have been granted.  But not to the Catholic bishops.  Not to Southern Baptists, Evangelicals, Orthodox Jews, or Missouri Synod Lutherans.  We don’t qualify for waivers.  You have to be a big union or a crony capitalist to qualify for waivers from this administration.

Do you recall: “If you like your current health care coverage, you can keep it”?  President Obama cooed soothingly.  Eighty-five percent of us did like the health care we had before ObamaCare was thrust upon us.  Now, if we keep our current plans, they will be unrecognizable.  It’s like Henry Ford said: you can have any color Model T you want so long as it’s black.

This HHS health care mandate is the gravest assault on religious liberty in American history.  We must legislate against it.  We must sue in federal court.  We must line up behind the twenty-six states that are already challenging ObamaCare in federal court.

Those states — and literally hundreds of “friends of the court” who have submitted briefs against this unconstitutional and unconscionable bill — make the powerful point that when King George III and the British Parliament laid a tax on tea, even they would not have presumed to make us buy the tea.

With this latest Sebelius diktat, we are being forced to drink the tea.  The HHS mandate will force us to violate our consciences and provide drugs that can cause abortions.  To us, killing unborn children at any stage is never health care.  It is a grave sin.

So we must strenuously oppose this HHS mandate.  But we cannot ignore the storm warnings.  This mandate does not include RU-486, the lethal drug that causes later abortions than those that can be caused by ella and Plan B.  These are included.  Why does this administration exempt RU-486 and all surgical abortions?

The logic of their position is this: abortion is a fundamental right; abortion is a legitimate means of family planning; abortion should be spread around the world by UNFPA and Planned Parenthood and funded by American taxpayers.

But they have not included such later lethal drugs and such killing procedures in their entering bid.  Why not?

Abraham Lincoln spoke out most eloquently, and not just about the terrible 1857 Dred Scott ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court.  He also showed where it would lead.  In his justly famous “House Divided” speech of 1858, Lincoln said:

If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could then better judge what to do, and how to do it.

He showed with relentless logic that the principle that underlay that infamous court ruling was that slaves were property, that their owners could take them into the territories, and Congress had no power to prevent that.  But if slaves are property and only property, then how can an owner be prevented from taking his “property” — his slaves — into the free states?  Lincoln showed that we were just one court ruling away from abolishing all the free states.  Logically, we would become all slave or all free.  We could not “tend” toward both eventualities.

The Obama administration today tells us we must provide drugs that can cause abortions.

Tomorrow, they will tell us we must provide the abortions.  The logic is inescapable.

Against what they do today, we must resist.  Against what they threaten to do to us tomorrow, we must resist, as well.  If they do these things in the green wood, what will they do in the dry?

Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison are senior fellows at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C.

From American Thinker:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/rationing_our_rights.html

“He (Obama) has started the war against our liberties…That is Tyranny.” How True.

February 18, 2012   

The Rising Fever of Despotism

By Lee DeCovnick

Andrew McCarthy commands a well-deserved respect for his insightful and thought provoking discourse on American conservatism. And Saturday’s' NRO column clearly delineates what many conservatives think about the despotic nature of this Administration. The sharply focused conclusion, that tyranny’s deadly embrace has ensnared our nation, should set painfully on the shoulders of all Americans.

Here are the opening and ending paragraphs:

The thing to understand about the Department of Health and Human Services’ birth-control mandate, and the last, is that it is an assault on both faithful Christians and the Constitution by leftists who consider themselves at “war” — their word — with bourgeois America. It has nothing to do with guaranteeing access to contraceptives, sterilization, and abortifacients. [...]

There would not be a United States without the Bill of Rights — absent the understanding that a Bill of Rights would soon be added, the states would not have ratified the Constitution. There would not be a Bill of Rights without the guarantees of free speech and religious liberty enshrined in the very first amendment. This is the irreducible core of the social contract: Government may not compel an American to parrot the policy preferences of the executive branch, nor may it force an American to engage in or directly abet practices that are repellent to Christian doctrine.

The Obama Left is well aware of these things, for these things are basic. The president does not care. His doctrine, hard-Left doctrine, is government promotion of contraception and abortion on demand. On these tenets, he brooks no dissent. Regardless of what the Constitution says, you are commanded to obey. He has started the war against our liberties not because of any crisis, but because he can. That is tyranny. It is a rupturing of the American conception of sovereignty, in which the president is our servant, not our ruler. It cannot stand.

To read the the rest of this article go to American Thinker: http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2012/02/the_rising_fever_of_despotism.html

The Real Unemployment Picture

February 17, 2012   
Feb 17 2012

CBO Paints the Real Unemployment Picture

As the “mainstream” media predictably tells us that the economy is charging back and unemployment is all better now in the run-up to Obama’s reelection, let’s check in with reality to see what unemployment is like there. From the Congressional Budget Office (PDF):

The rate of unemployment in the United States has exceeded 8 percent since February 2009, making the past three years the longest stretch of high unemployment in this country since the Great Depression. Moreover, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the unemployment rate will remain above 8 percent until 2014. The official unemployment rate excludes those individuals who would like to work but have not searched for a job in the past four weeks as well as those who are working part-time but would prefer full-time work; if those people were counted among the unemployed, the unemployment rate in January 2012 would have been about 15 percent. Compounding the problem of high unemployment, the share of unemployed people looking for work for more than six months — referred to as the long-term unemployed — topped 40 percent in December 2009 for the first time since 1948, when such data began to be collected; it has remained above that level ever since.

The formula is simple: more government = less of everything else, including employment. Obama’s class war rhetoric and monstrous power grabs have terrified employers into battening down the hatches, and his grotesquely extravagant spending spree has sucked all the money out of the free market economy. What other effect on employment could anyone expect from putting an authoritarian statist weaned on Marxism into the White House?

where-are-the-jobs
The real employment picture, via Instapundit.

On tips from J, Curtis, and Bob Roberts

From Moonbattery at: http://moonbattery.com/

The Last Days of Western Civilization – Takuan Seiyo Speaks Truth to Those Who Will Hear It.

February 17, 2012   

The essay below is the fourth chapter in a series by Takuan Seiyo. The author was unable to publish it in the same venue that hosted the first three chapters, so Gates of Vienna is privileged to offer him a slot for it, and possibly also for the final installment.

Author’s Introduction

The text that follows is the fourth chapter of a long five-part essay that’s my answer to Oswald Spengler’s Der Untergang des Abendlandes. What I lack in comparison to the brilliant German, I tried to compensate for by offering not only an analysis of our decline, but also a suggestion of a peaceful ascent road out of what appears (except to progressing Progressives) as a bottomless pit.

The genesis of this essay lies in my continuous puzzlement why the particular post-modern, post-Christian virus decimates only the Western West, but not the Eastern West of Iron Curtain scars, or the Far East. I was born behind the Iron Curtain but have lived in the West since I was ten, and in the East for the past six years. This is therefore insider’s praxis rather than outsider’s musings.

The subject is so wide that its treatment must be equally eclectic. One who ventures here must be ready to travel with me to Washington and Mount Vernon, Estonia, Saxony, Judea, Rome, Greece, Babylon and China, with a commensurate range of subjects and periods. For that reason, it’s not fair either to the reader or to the writer to start with the text below, but rather one must go to the previous three, as well as have patience for the publication of the fifth one in the near future.

The reader is going to wonder why the fourth chapter is at Gates of Vienna and the previous three are at New English Review.

Different publications have different risk tolerances. NER was brave enough to publish the first three parts, but found the fourth one too hot. No one should condemn it who hasn’t published the kind of “Islamophobic” and other taboo-busting content as NER has. Especially after what happened to Giordano Bruno and Fjordman.

— Takuan Seiyo

 

Yin-Yang

The Bee and the Lamb
Part 4

By Takuan Seiyo


On the edge

The only way to restore vitality to Western Civilization is to recalibrate its yin-yang balance. Just as in Oriental medicine a patient suffering from acidosis (yin) is treated with alkali (yang) foods, so American and European societies must regress to nullify much of the Progressive “progress” that the Long March of the last 100 years has wrought. Not to erase it altogether, for the “progress” itself has been a correcting mechanism to the yang eruptions of two world wars and centuries of harsh religious fanaticism, but to rewind the reel 50 years back, just before excess yin started overflowing.

Jim Crow was wrong, and the WASP ruling elite committed various errors of direction and also of degeneration into a caste of Bertie Wooster sybarites, light on the brain content, or brooding Nick Carraways (of The Great Gatsby). But the antithesis, Black Run America[1], is much worse: a dystopian disaster, a banana republic without the bananas, a Detroit writ large, a Philadelphia turned Killadelphia.

The WASPs at least had a code of honor and a spirit of noblesse oblige inherited from Roman patricians. The people who rule us now are a multiracial collection of plebeian Looters, Loons and Fools, with the WASPs and Jews there either doing penance for past “unearned privilege” or further repairing the world by carrying water for the loudest looters in the black and brown communities.

Strict meritocracy and race-blind equal rights are just and great, and America did not have them even 60 years ago. But it did, at last, 45 years ago. Very briefly, for it continued hurtling toward the opposite pole. Now it is mired in the suicidal insanity of quotas for minorities and women, engineered equal outcomes, and the disparate impact doctrine proclaiming, essentially, that proper societal measures to promote lawful conduct, civic culture, work ethic, competent workforce etc. are “racism” requiring the federal government’s intervention, if racial minorities fall short of such standards. Showing that a yin-poisoned culture will use any available tool with which to self-eviscerate, in Scandinavia, where there are no indigenous People of Color, the ruling elite has been importing them to fill that vital need. Meanwhile, they mandate 40%-50% quotas for women in politics and corporate governance.

The bipolar amplitude currently in the far zone of yin may be observed in every area of postmodern, post-Reality Western society, with only superficial differences between countries.

The past ostracism of homosexuals and criminalization of homosexuality were wrong. But the current courting of “gays,” “gay” marriage, “gay” Marines, pedophile politicians, deviant promiscuity flaunted before a disgusted but cowed population — they are a cesspool of dissolution. Prudery and sexual repression were a terrible drag too, but seeing 13-year-old girls dressed like whores and Tweeting tales of their latest hookups from a perch at Jamba Juice is a civilizational tragedy.

Back-alley abortions were horrible, but the sanctioned and taxpayer-financed annual murder of 1.2 million fetuses in each of the United States and Europe[2] must inevitably unleash God’s wrath — even if God is just a homeostatic cosmic loop of information sub-particles, not at all like the Bible’s booming Jhvh or Michelangelo’s hirsute old man. If the sheeple just looked away from their brain-macerating LED screens, they could see that God’s wrath is already manifesting as the mathematically verifiable demographic atrophy of Euro-origin peoples.

The restrictive-oppressive educational systems in Europe’s and America’s schools a hundred years ago were stultifying. But the current educational regime of self-esteem, dumbed-down curriculum, non-competitiveness, “inclusiveness,” constant guilt inculcation for the sins of whitey, and the horrors of (White only) testosterone — they all form a path to the trash can of history. We have gone much too far, expanding sixfold what was before contracted twofold.

The same heedless yin expansion is evident in America’s geopolitics. Amazon.com’s editorial review of Robert Kaplan’s Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power states: “The Indian Ocean area will be the true nexus of world power [snip]. It is here that the fight for democracy, energy independence, and religious freedom will be lost or won, and it is here that American foreign policy must concentrate.”

This leaves me puzzled. Is there a shortage of democracy or religious freedom in the United States? There is an egregious surfeit of both, and both ought to be trimmed for the American people’s own good. Voting rights should be constricted and tied to a positive net worth, proof of English literacy, clean criminal record, and maturity defined as the age of 21. Religious freedom too ought to be curtailed to exclude Islam and voodoo — the one, a blueprint for subjugation of the host population by fanatical practitioners of a hostile ideology; the other, a barbarian cult unfit for a modern country firmly planted in the Christian civilization.

But it’s likely that the reviewer of Kaplan’s book expressed the Neocon — Christian Lamb creed that it’s America’s divine mission to fight for democracy and religious freedom the world over. After all, that’s the standard opiate of America’s ruling Republicrat Party. One might ask with whose taxpayers’ gold ducats and soldiers’ lives such a global fight will be waged, America’s dollar and sovereign debt now forged into manacles of penury due to this kind of madness, and her flyover people tired of the bleeding.

These observations seem outrageous to people relentlessly indoctrinated in the age of gushing yin that has “progressed” to the point of drowning every area of life in the West. However, the age of blowback yang contraction will come, either eased gently by enlightened leaders or slammed painfully on the countries of progressive lemmings by the intractable force of cosmic homeostasis.

The current travails of the West already spell the end of yin madness. Democracy as a governing system is self-terminating, having devolved into kakistocracy: a scorpion catching a river ride on the back of Aesop’s gullible frog.

“Quantitatively eased” fiat paper money and the welfare state are self-terminating, having run out of our peoples’ trust and other people’s money. Financial capitalism is self terminating, having degenerated into the larceny of global leveraged three-card Monte. Ten thousand bright and eloquent Naomi Kleins are waiting in the wings, flogging their competing brand of malignant idiocy, ruinous but tight and coercive for a change, at a dazed populace.

America’s overreaching Empire is ending, the dollar too hollow to support it and the American-built Beijing Frankenstein eager and able to step into the breach. The global troops of jihad are surging, thanking Allah for the fool giant’s last gigantic works on behalf of “democracy” that paved the way for Muhammad pbuh.

Christianity, having taken a radical but wrong turn from its past errors, is wading in pools of irrelevance or deep weirdness, its mainstream just a holding pen for Eloi lambs. The Jews, having forgotten their cosmic destiny as canaries in the coalmine, are self-terminating by supporting and even leading “progressive” ideologies that will blow back at them first, devastatingly[3].

The sexual revolution and the GLBT foolishness are ending, for the West’s young are ending and their Afghan and Somali replacements have different plans in this matter.

Culture is ending, the polite, old white crowd that savors Bach at the Frauenkirche or Velasquez at the Prado having neither the courage nor the vigor to stop the barbarization of its former domains. The future is writ as the torture of the children of Grieg with the barbarians’ Dika Down Booboo! or their mega-decibel Adhan; the Booboo-Muslim-Morlock crowd multiplying and living off white Eloi’s taxes under Leviathan’s special care[4].

Education in the West has already ended. It had evolved into a progressive indoctrination Kumbaya Socialist Youth Camp for unemployable Occupiers of Wall Street: their noses full of cow jewelry, egos full of self-esteem, and brains stuffed with Rosa Luxemburg and Rosa Parks, Howard Zinn and Malcolm X, Mumia and Che, Obama and OutKast — but not the multiplication tables.

Nature is slowly being devoured, turning into concrete and particle board beehives built with zero-interest loans from Ponzi socialist rulers to no-risk banksters; its displaced animal kingdom now in zoos, or eating from suburban garbage bins, or being eaten in China’s better restaurants.

All this should give rise to leaders who would ask Lenin’s question, What is to be done? — though answer differently. But there are no such leaders. The leaders the West does have only know how to pour more yin onto flooding yin. More credit expansion to cure the ills of credit expansion. More loans to nations and banksters who can’t repay existing loans. More technological capacity transferred to China. More subsidized college for imbeciles who can’t calculate 24% of 87 or pinpoint Moscow on the map. More retreat before advancing Islam. More appeasement of the barbarians within. More “minorities” in privileged positions in the ruling apparatus of Leviathan. More police facing Mecca. More women in combat, and toy soldiers confiscated from little boys. More gayness in gay Paree. More persecution of the flyover serfs who notice all that.

The question therefore is not what is to be done, but what will be rebuilt on the ruins, some day. For future archeologists will sift through the rubble, and some will rise strong enough to rebuild with the found pieces.

To Read the rest of this great essay go to Gates of Vienna at: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/02/bee-and-lamb-part-4.html#more

Another Western Civilization Lover of Freedom Says “F#*k You” To Islam

February 17, 2012   

 

Flemish politician uses picture of teenage daughter dressed in burka and bikini for campaign against Islam

A Belgian politician has risked causing uproar among Muslims after starting a ‘Women Against Islamization’ campaign featuring his 19-year-old daughter wearing a burka and a bikini. Filip Dewinter, leader of the far-right Vlaams Belang party, uses a shot of his daughter An-Sofie Dewinter in the dark blue bikini for the political campaign.

The glamorous teenager dons a burka that covers her head and face, while the rest of the Muslim garment is draped over her back.

The provocative image is likely to inflame tensions among Islamic groups and nationalists in the racially-divided country.

The poster shows the words ‘Freedom or Islam?’ written on a red bar across Ms Dewinter’s breasts. Further down the poster a black panel with the words ‘You choose!’ is seen covering the teenager’s crotch.

The extremist Vlaams Belang party claims that it wants to convince women to take a stand against Islam. Ms Dewinter told the Belgian press she does not feel used by the party. She said: ‘I’ve suggested (the poster) myself, I have learned to live with it but I have had everything up to death threats made at me.’

She said that she ‘wanted to make this statement.’ She added: ‘What is the greatest contrast with a niqab? Nude. ‘The campaign fits in perfectly with how I feel about the whole issue. As women, we must choose: freedom or Islam.’

The teenager claimed that she had been threatened by Muslim groups. She added: ‘Death threats and criticism no longer scare me off.’

Her father, the party’s leader, said: ‘Women are always the first victims of Islam. We want to make clear that they have a choice.’

The potentially incendiary poster comes after The Islamic fundamentalist group Shariah4Belgium was slammed for its aggressive stance. The group opened the country’s first Sharia court, a putting it on a collision course with the country’s nationalists.

Vlaams Belang spoke out against the Muslim courts and said that all legal disputes should be settled in the country’s civil judicial system.

Mr Dewinter claims Shariah4Belgium’s leadership said he should be killed for expressing his views. Sharia4Belguim was fined 550 Euros in January for inciting hatred towards non-Muslims.

From A Western Heart at: http://awesternheart.blogspot.com/2012/02/flemish-politician-uses-picture-of.html

Via The Jawa Report at: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/

So True…

February 17, 2012   

From Theo at: http://www.theospark.net/

 

An Upside Down World

February 17, 2012   

You know you live in Upside-down Land if…

 

• A Muslim officer crying “Allah Akbar” while shooting up an army base is considered to have committed “Workplace Violence” while an American citizen boasting a Ron Paul bumper sticker is classified as a “Domestic Terrorist”.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Your government believes that the best way to eradicate trillions of dollars of debt is to spend more money.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• A seven year old boy can be thrown out of school for calling his teacher “cute” but hosting a sexual exploration class on a college campus is perfectly acceptable.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• The Supreme Court of the United States can rule that lower courts cannot display the 10 Commandments in their courtroom, while sitting in front of a display of the 10 Commandments.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if..
• Children are forcibly removed from parents who appropriately discipline them while children of “underprivileged” drug addicts are left to rot in filth infested cesspools.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Working class Americans pay for their own health care (and the health care of everyone else) while unmarried women are free to have child after child on the “State’s” dime while never being held responsible for their own choices.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Hard work and success are rewarded with higher taxes and government intrusion, while slothful, lazy behavior is rewarded with EBT cards, WIC checks, Medicaid and subsidized housing.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• The government’s plan for getting people back to work is to provide 99 weeks of unemployment checks (to not work).
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Being self-sufficient is considered a threat to the government.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Politicians think that stripping away the amendments to the constitution is really protecting the rights of the people.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if..
• The rights of the State come before the rights of the individual.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Parents believe the State is responsible for providing for their children.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• You can write a post like this just by reading the news headlines.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• You pay your mortgage faithfully, denying yourself the newest big screen TV while your neighbor defaults on his mortgage (while buying iphones, TV’s and new cars) and the government forgives his debt and reduces his mortgage (with your tax dollars).
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Your government can add anything they want to your kid’s water (fluoride, chlorine, etc.) but you are not allowed to give them raw milk.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Being stripped of the ability to defend yourself makes you “safe”.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• You have to have your parents signature to go on a field trip but not to get an abortion.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• You can get arrested for expired tags on your car but not for being in the country illegally.
You know you live in Upside-down Land if…
• Using the “N” word is considered “hate speech” but writing and signing songs about raping women and killing cops is considered “art”.
Unfortunately, this list could go on and on. Our world has been turned upside-down. We are in distress. Where do we go from here?

 
From The Feral Irishman at: http://theferalirishman.blogspot.com/

Zion’s Trumpet Welcomes The Feral Irishman To The Blog Roll

February 17, 2012   

Zion’s Trumpet welcomes The Feral Irishman to our list of friends. He has an excellent blog and we have been reading it and following it for quite some time. He never fails to bring insight and humor into our day. Go read it for yourself. Damn fine tacos and a damn fine blog! ZTW

“Racism is about many things but it isn’t about Race” says the Sultan

February 17, 2012   
 

The Liberal Uses of Race

 Excerpts of an article by Daniel Greenfield
To read the entire article go to Sultan Knish at: http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/
Racism is about many things but it isn’t about race. To understand the uses of race in American liberalism requires understanding its place in the political culture. When American liberals speak of race they aren’t speaking in the genetic sense, what they are doing is clumsily piggybacking class onto race and adding one dubious construct to another.
 

The placement of racial politics at the center of liberal advocacy coincided with a growing national prosperity that seemed to be on the way to making class warfare of the old kind irrelevant. Previous liberal civil rights activity had been a subset of class, but class now became a subset of race. And both were a means of liberal self-definition as the people concerned with the plight of the downtrodden.

Class warfare was not really about the poor, it was about using a permanent social problem as a means of recreating the social order and gaining permanent political power. Race is just class dressed up in the same old class warfare clothes so that there is nearly no distinction between the two. Reformers gain power by attacking the failures of the system and positioning a social problem as an open sore that must be healed. But it isn’t healing that they have in mind.
 
Race hasn’t simply been politicized, the practical meaning of the word has been so thoroughly transformed that it does not refer to what most people think that it does. In the liberal lexicon race like class is an outcast term. It is a catchall term meaning those who are oppressed by the powerful majority. It is why the left will use accusations of racism in completely inappropriate ways that make no sense in relation to the dictionary definition.
Muslims are not a race, but they have been classified as an oppressed group. Socialism is not a race, but they are the official representatives of all oppressed peoples. To insult either one is to be “racist” because racism refers to majority oppression and nothing else. To be a racist is to oppose or denigrate the moral worldview of the reformers without reference to the skin color of any of the parties. Therefore African-American opponents of President Clinton were racists because the terminology of race had nothing to do with the preexisting racial construct. The idea of race as it had existed in theUnited Statesno longer applied. Words like racism were part of the Newspeak grammar which insisted on appropriating the moral force of the old meanings, but without actually employing those meanings.
 
Ideology is a vehicle for political power and all the Machiavellian outfits draped around the naked emperor of power do not change that. Western political parties in America, Europe and around the world have traded in the “Labor” ideology that banked on the dissatisfaction of the native working class for a “Diversity” ideology banking on the dissatisfaction of minorities.

Looks Just Like Hitler.

February 17, 2012   

Obama is On The Side of The Islamic Terrorists – Obama is a Traitor – A Traitor is One Who Betrays Their Country, One who Commits Treason – Yes, That’s Him.

February 17, 2012   

Obama Disarms FBI Counter Terror Training Programs, Purges Truth about Jihad

Perhaps Obama can order the exhumation of hundreds of millions of victims of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilations and enslavements in an effort to purge the truth, the reality, from history.

Over 18,000 Islamic attacks since 911, and Obama has caved to Islamic supremacists and their apologists. He ordered the purge of jihadic threat documentation. Spencer Ackerman is proud of his hand in this. History will not be kind to this tool. And his grandchildren will spit when his name is uttered.

This is a good day for jihad in America.

FBI Purges Hundreds of Terrorism Documents in Islamophobia Probe Spencer Ackerman, Wired

An internal FBI investigation into its counterterrorism training has purged hundreds of bureau documents of instructional material about Muslims, some of which characterized them as prone to violence or terrorism.

The bureau disclosed initial findings from its months-long review during a meeting at FBI headquarters on Wednesday with several Arab and Muslim advocacy groups, attended by Director Robert Mueller. So far, the inquiry has uncovered and purged over 700 pages of documentation from approximately 300 presentations given to agents since 9/11 — some of which were similar to briefings published by Danger Room last year describing “mainstream” Muslims as “violent.” And more disclosures may be forthcoming, as the FBI continues its inquiry and responds to Freedom of Information Act requests for the documents themselves.

FBI spokesman Christopher Allen confirms to Danger Room that the bureau found some of the documents to be objectionable because they were inaccurate or over-broad, others because they were offensive. Allen explains that the documents represent “less than 1 percent” of over 160,000 documents reviewed by the inquiry, which was prompted by a Danger Room investigation in September. The FBI purged documents according to four criteria: “factual errors”; “poor taste”; employment of “stereotypes” about Arabs or Muslims; or presenting information that “lacked precision.”

Danger Room uncovered several such documents in the fall, including some instructing FBI counterterrorism agents that “mainstream” Muslims sympathized with terrorists; that the Prophet Mohammed was a “cult” leader; and that the more “devout” a Muslim was, the more likely he would be to commit a violent act. Some documents even purported to graph the correlation. The FBI initially said the instruction occurred “one time only.” But when Danger Room uncovered additional anti-Islam materials — in briefings that compared Islam to the Death Star; in books on the shelves of the FBI training library at Quantico; and in pages hosted on internal FBI websites — the bureau began an extensive internal review.

Salam al-Marayati, the executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, attended the FBI meeting. He came away worried that the volume of anti-Muslim training documents hands al-Qaida an unnecessary win.

Read the rest. More on MPAC’s lies here.

Militant Islam Monitor:  Muslim Public Affairs Council tries to reroute HLF terrorist funding back to militant Islamic ‘Palestine Children’s Relief Fund’

From Pamela Geller at: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

Murdering Islamic Terrorist Groups Now In Charge of Instructing The FBI on Terrorism?

February 17, 2012   

FBI open to US Muslim Brotherhood groups “establishing a committee to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training”

And you thought it was bad that the FBI submited to demands to purge counter terrorism materials of jihadic doctrine documentation: Obama disarms FBI counter terror training programs, purges truth about jihad

You ain’t seen nothing yet. The Muslim Brotherhood and their jihadist brothers are on the march, emboldened by a pro-jihadist Obama adminstration.

“FBI officials say they are willing to consider a proposal from a coalition of Muslim and interfaith groups to establish a committee of experts to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training.”

Maybe the Taliban and Al Qaeda can review it as well. Hamas-CAIR is already all over it. Is there any rational man who believes that this makes us safer? Our government is clearly no longer a government by the people and for the people. It is now a government against the people.

The Washington Post is reporting:

“FBI officials say they are willing to consider a proposal from a coalition of Muslim and interfaith groups to establish a committee of experts to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training.”

FBI officials say they are willing to consider a proposal from a coalition of Muslim and interfaith groups to establish a committee of experts to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training.

“We’re open to the idea, but they need to submit a proposal first,” said Christopher Allen, an FBI spokesman who was in the meeting.

Groups at the meeting included the Islamic Society of North America, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the Interfaith Alliance, and the Shoulder-to-Shoulder campaign.

The FBI is satisfied with the job that its own experts had done in reviewing and purging “problematic” materials, Allen said, and the agency is also “developing guidelines so it won’t happen again in the future.”

Mueller told representatives of the groups that FBI experts had reviewed almost all of the agency’s training materials, including 160,000 pages of documents. More than 700 documents and 300 presentations were subsequently pulled from the agency’s training materials.

Materials that were pulled contained incorrect or imprecise information, were stereotypical, or “in poor taste,” the FBI said.

While the groups praised Mueller for the review and for listening to their concerns, they also say trust between Muslims, Sikhs and the FBI had been damaged by the episode.

“It is a travesty that the Muslim-American community has lost trust with an agency that is here to protect us,” said Salam Al-Marayati, director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, a Los Angeles-based advocacy group.

In a statement, the groups urged the FBI to acknowledge “the negative impact of these training materials on the Muslim-American community.”

The coalition raised the idea during a Feb 8 meeting with FBI Director Robert Mueller, who met with the groups to discuss pamphlets, videos and other anti-terrorism training materials that critics say are either Islamophobic or factually incorrect.

From Pamela Geller at: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

Et Tu Fox? Fox News No Longer Objective Regarding Islam – They Have Sold Out

February 17, 2012   

Did Saudi prince buy Fox’s silence?

By Diana West

The sections below are excerpts of the article. To read the entire article go to Jewish World Review at: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0212/west021712.php3

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Have you heard about the 23-year-old Saudi journalist who tweeted an imaginary conversation with Muhammad? It went something like this: He loved Muhammad, he hated Muhammad, he couldn’t understand Muhammad, he wasn’t going to pray for Muhammad. If this isn’t exactly a disquisition on faith and doubt a la “The Brothers Karamazov,” remember, we’re just talking Twitter.

The journalist received so many mostly white-hot angry tweets from co-religionists condemning his Islamic law-breaking “blasphemy” (30,000 in 24 hours!) that he apologized and fled the country. He hoped to seek asylum in New Zealand but was captured in Malaysia by Saudi agents who returned him to “the Kingdom.” There, according to Shariah (Islamic law), he now faces the death penalty for “blasphemy.”

If you haven’t heard of this young man, whose name is Hamza Kashgari, it could be because you’re watching too much Fox News. As of this writing, almost a week after the Kashgari story broke, I haven’t found a single story about it at the Fox News website. (You try: www.foxnews.com.) Meanwhile, CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC and CNN have all reported the Kashgari story, clueing in their viewers on how far totalitarian Islam, Saudi style, will go to exert its control over the human spirit. But not Fox.

Say — you don’t suppose the fact that Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns the second-largest block of stock (7 percent) in News Corp., Fox News’ parent company, not to mention a new $300 million stake in Twitter (almost 4 percent), has anything to do with Fox’s silence on this Saudi black eye of a story? After all, it was Saudi dictator King Abdullah — Alwaleed’s uncle — whom press accounts credit with ordering the tweeting journalist’s hot pursuit and imprisonment. And it is Saudi Arabia’s adherence to Islamic limits on free speech that is driving Kashgari’s ordeal.

This same issue is part of a much larger story, a terrifying point of parley between the Islamic world, as represented by the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and the Free World, as led, still, by the USA. Why terrifying? Any accommodation of Islamic so-called blasphemy law is an unconstitutional erosion of American free speech.

I’m mortified to report that the USA, as represented by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is working itself into sync with the Saudi, OIC and, apparently, Fox position that silence on Islam is golden. Last summer, Clinton, while meeting with the OIC in Turkey (where they throw journalists who cross the state in jail) to discuss “defamation” of Islam, promoted a de facto censorship of Islam’s critics by calling for “some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.”

Funny, but I don’t think Fox covered the secretary of state’s menacing comments about free speech. Not even a tweet’s worth.

To read the entire article go to: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0212/west021712.php3